Disrespecting Marathi ‘will not be tolerated': Amid rising tensions, Ajit Pawar urges respect for languages
Addressing the issue publicly in Mumbai, Pawar emphasised that while India is a diverse and multilingual country, every state has its own linguistic identity that must be honoured. 'In every state, the language of that particular region is important and should be respected and given priority,' Pawar said. 'At the same time, India is one nation. Outside our home states, Hindi is widely spoken, followed by English. This is the scenario across the country — from Jammu and Kashmir to Kanyakumari,' he added.
The statement was made against the backdrop of the state seeing several incidents of individuals being assaulted over speaking Marathi. This week itself, a student in Navi Mumbai and an attendant at the Nanded state transport bus stand were assaulted over the language issue.
On his part, Pawar reiterated that Marathi holds the status of a classical language, underscoring its historical and cultural significance. He stated that while newcomers to Maharashtra are not expected to be fluent in Marathi, they should at least make an effort to learn and show respect for it. 'If someone who cannot speak Marathi says, 'We live here but cannot speak Marathi well, and our mother tongue is Hindi—but we respect Marathi and we are trying to learn,' then that is acceptable. If only this much is said, there would be no problem at all,' Pawar said. 'But if someone adamantly says, 'We will not speak Marathi,' that cannot be tolerated or accepted,' he added.
Pawar clarified that his appeal is not about forcing anyone to abandon their native language, but about encouraging mutual respect and peaceful coexistence. 'You work here, live here—think about the local people, the Maharashtrians, and what they expect. This way, we can all live happily together,' he concluded.
Asked about the statement made by Maharashtra Governor C P Radhakrishnan over the Marathi issue, Pawar said that posts like those of the governor and President of India are senior positions, and it would not be appropriate for him to speak about it.
At a function on Tuesday, Radhakrishnan had stressed the need to stay away from spreading linguistic hatred, saying it would harm the state and affect industry and investments. 'If you come and beat me up, can I speak in Marathi immediately?' he had asked, saying, 'In the long run, we are doing harm to the state.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
With AI plan, Trump keeps chipping away at a foundational environmental law
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills When President Donald Trump rolled out a plan to boost artificial intelligence and data centers, a key goal was wiping away barriers to rapid that meant taking aim at the National Environmental Policy Act - a 55-year-old, bedrock law aimed at protecting the environment though a process that requires agencies to consider a project's possible impacts and allows the public to be heard before a project is approved. Data centers, demanding vast amounts of energy and water, have aroused strong opposition in some AI Action Plan Trump announced last week would seek to sweep aside NEPA, as it's commonly known, to streamline environmental reviews and permitting for data centers and related infrastructure. Republicans and business interests have long criticized NEPA for what they see as unreasonable slowing of development, and Trump's plan would give "categorical exclusions" to data centers for "maximum efficiency" in permitting.A spokeswoman for the White House Council on Environmental Quality said the administration is "focused on driving meaningful NEPA reform to reduce the delays in federal permitting, unleashing the ability for America to strengthen its AI and manufacturing leadership."Trump's administration has been weakening the law for months."It's par for the course for this administration. The attitude is to clear the way for projects that harm communities and the environment," said Erin Doran, senior staff attorney at environmental nonprofit Food & Water is a foundational environmental law in the United States, "essentially our Magna Carta for the environment," said Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, another environmental group, referring to the 13th century English legal text that formed the basis for constitutions into law by President Richard Nixon in 1970, NEPA requires federal agencies proposing actions such as building roads, bridges or energy projects to study how their project will affect the environment. Private companies are also frequently subject to NEPA standards when they apply for a permit from a federal recent years, the law has become increasingly important in requiring consideration of a project's possible contributions to climate change."That's a really important function because otherwise we're just operating with blinders just to get the project done, without considering whether there are alternative solutions that might accomplish the same objective, but in a more environmentally friendly way," Park business groups say NEPA routinely blocks important projects that often taken five years or more to complete."Our broken permitting system has long been a national embarrassment,'' said Marty Durbin, president of the US Chamber's Global Energy Institute. He called NEPA "a blunt and haphazard tool" that too often is used to block investment and economic White House proposal comes as Congress is working on a permitting reform plan that would overhaul NEPA, addressing long-standing concerns from both parties that development projects -- including some for clean energy -- take too long to be strength - and usefulness - can depend on how it's interpreted by different a Republican, sought to weaken NEPA in his first term by limiting when environmental reviews are required and limiting the time for evaluation and public comment. Former Democratic President Joe Biden restored more rigorous his second term, Trump has again targeted the executive order that touched on environmental statutes has many agencies scrapping the requirement for a draft environmental impact statement. And the CEQ in May withdrew Biden-era guidance that federal agencies should consider the effects of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions when conducting NEPA the US Supreme Court in May narrowed the scope of environmental reviews required for major infrastructure projects. In a ruling involving a Utah railway expansion project aimed at quadrupling oil production, the court said NEPA wasn't designed "for judges to hamstring new infrastructure and construction projects.""It's been a rough eight months for NEPA," said Dinah Bear, a former general counsel at the Council on Environmental Quality under both Democratic and Republican Ruple, a research professor of law at the University of Utah, said sidelining NEPA could actually slow things down. Federal agencies still have to comply with other environmental laws, like the Endangered Species Act or Clean Air Act. NEPA has an often overlooked benefit of forcing coordination with those other laws, he examples of cases where NEPA has played a role A botanist by training, Mary O'Brien was working with a small organization in Oregon in the 1980s to propose alternative techniques to successfully replant Douglas fir trees that had been clear-cut on federal lands. Aerially sprayed herbicides aimed at helping the conifers grow have not only been linked to health problems in humans but were also killing another species of tree, red alders, that were beneficial to the fir saplings, O'Brien US Forest Service had maintained that the herbicides' impact on humans and red alders wasn't a problem. But under NEPA, a court required the agency to redo their analysis and they ultimately had to write a new environmental impact statement."It's a fundamental concept: 'Don't just roar ahead.' Think about your options," O'Brien said.O'Brien, who later worked at the Grand Canyon Trust, also co-chaired a working group that weighed in on a 2018 Forest Service proposal, finalized in 2016, for aspen restoration on Monroe Mountain in Utah. Hunters, landowners, loggers and ranchers all had different opinions on how the restoration should be handled. She said NEPA's requirement to get the public involved made for better research and a better plan."I think it's one of the laws that's the most often used by the public without the public being aware," said Stephen Schima, senior legislative counsel at environmental law nonprofit Earthjustice. "NEPA has long been the one opportunity for communities and impacted stakeholders and local governments to weigh in."Schima said rolling back the power of NEPA threatens the scientific integrity of examining projects' full impacts."Decisions are going to be less informed by scientific studies, and that is one of the major concerns here,'' he said uncertainty from NEPA changes and competing opinions on how to comply with the law's requirements may invite even more litigation."And all of this will fall on the shoulder of agencies that are losing the staff needed to lead them through these changes," he said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Speak Tamil, Not Foreign Language Like English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey Slams DMK MPs
In a fiery language face-off in the Lok Sabha, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey stunned the House by rejecting DMK MPs' request to switch from Hindi to English due to a technical glitch in the translator system. Calling English a 'foreign language,' Dubey said he would have appreciated a request to speak in Tamil instead. He accused the DMK of harboring hatred for Hindi and North Indians, pointing out that Tamil Nadu MPs didn't object when a fellow MP spoke in Bengali for 30 minutes. 'Keep promoting English and we'll become England again, slaves,' Dubey warned. His defiant remarks ignited a storm in Parliament and online, exposing the deep fault lines in India's ongoing language politics. Watch the full debate, reactions from opposition parties, and what this clash means for India's federal identity, culture, and Constitution.#operationsindoor #operationmahadev #nishikantdubey #hindivsenglish #languagepolitics #dmkvsbjp #parliamentdebate #indianpolitics #parliament #loksabha #loksabhadebate #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews Read More
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi HC asks NTA to form grievance panel for candidates affected by tech issues
The Delhi high court has directed the National Testing Agency (NTA) to constitute a committee for redressing the grievances of candidates who lose time in competitive exams, due to technical issues. The Delhi high court. (File Photo) The direction was issued by justice Vikas Mahajan on Monday while dealing with a plea filed by a NEET UG candidate seeking compensatory marks in the medical entrance exam, asserting that he was subjected to interruptions and harassment mid examination for re-verification of his identity credentials. In his petition, the candidate claimed that the technical glitches in the biometric verification delayed his entry to the exam hall and was later asked to again step out for biometric verification mid-exam, submitting applications in English and Hindi. It went on to add that despite loss of time, the examination authorities did not give him compensatory time. The NTA, represented by advocate Sanjay Khanna, opposed the petition asserting that the candidate had reached 14 minutes after the commencement of the exam process and the glitch could not be attributed to it since the candidate had himself locked the biometric verification and the verification could not be completed despite three attempts. He further submitted that the examination authority's action of contacting the candidate mid exam was a part of the general procedure and he could thus not seek advantage of the same. Consequently, the court after viewing the CCTV footage to ascertain the time lost, directed the NTA to award him grace marks. It noted that the examination authorities could not justify interrupting the candidate during the exam, especially when he had already agreed to take responsibility for any biometric discrepancies. 'This court finds that the petitioner having evidently suffered a loss of time amounting to 03 minutes and 32 seconds, during the exam due to no fault of his own, deserves to be compensated,' the court noted. Noting multiple instances where candidates lost exam time through no fault of their own, Justice Mahajan, in a 23-page order, directed the NTA to set up a committee saying, 'This Court has come across a few individual cases where the candidates suffered loss of exam time for the reason not attributable to them. Constitutional courts cannot be expected to view CCTV footage, like in the present case, for each such candidate who has been prejudiced on account of loss of exam time for no fault of his. Such cases ought to be examined by a body of experts in a transparent and fair manner which would carry out the exercise undertaken by this court in the present case.' It added, 'Accordingly, the respondent no.1/NTA is directed to constitute a standing Grievance Redressal Committee for the said purpose, if not already in place, where aggrieved candidates may approach for redressal of their grievances. The standing committee shall also be at liberty to devise a formula more suitable/appropriate for the examination in question.'
