Tokyo's Core Inflation Stays above BOJ Target in July
The data will be among factors the Bank of Japan will scrutinize at its next rate review on July 30-31, when the board is expected to revise up this fiscal year's inflation forecast in a quarterly review of its projections.
The Tokyo consumer price index (CPI), which excludes volatile fresh food costs, rose 2.9% in July from a year earlier, government data showed, slightly below a median market forecast for a 3.0% increase. It followed a 3.1% rise in June.
A separate index for Tokyo that strips away both fresh food and fuel costs — closely watched by the BOJ as a measure of domestic demand-driven prices — rose 3.1% in July from a year earlier after a 3.1% gain in June, the data showed.
The BOJ exited a decade-long, radical stimulus program last year and raised short-term interest rates to 0.5% in January on the view Japan was on the cusp of sustainably hitting its 2% inflation target.
While the central bank has signaled readiness to raise rates further, the economic impact of higher U.S. tariffs forced it to cut its growth forecasts in May and complicated decisions around the timing of the next rate increase.
But U.S. President Donald Trump's surprise announcement on Wednesday of a trade deal with Japan has diminished uncertainty over the country's economic outlook, prodding some investors to renew their bets on another rate hike by the end of this year.
Hours after the announcement, BOJ Deputy Governor Shinichi Uchida said the deal would reduce uncertainty and heighten the chance of Japan durably hitting the bank's inflation target.
A Reuters poll, taken before the trade deal announcement, showed a majority of economists expect the BOJ to raise its key interest rate again by year-end, though most expect the bank to stand pat at this month's meeting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
With federal funds frozen, wealthy U.S. universities capitulate to Washington
As a growing number of the wealthiest U.S. colleges capitulate in their battles with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, the strain from lost and frozen federal funding is putting pressure on the remaining holdouts to cut a deal. Universities targeted by Trump's crackdown on diversity programs and other policies he says show a liberal bias are essentially bleeding at the negotiating table after taking on debt, laying off hundreds of staff and slashing spending. As the fall semester approaches, they may be increasingly eager to ink accords that will stanch the flow. Cornell and Northwestern, both of which announced steps to address major budget shortfalls this year after the federal government suspended research funds, are now close to agreements with the White House. Brown, Columbia and the University of Pennsylvania reached accords over the past month. But amid those settlements, new universities are being targeted. Most recently, the University of California at Los Angeles and Duke joined Harvard, Northwestern, Princeton and others in losing access to federal grants that are the financial lifeblood of large research institutions. It all adds up to an unprecedented pressure campaign that's roiling the world of higher education, reverberating through faculty, student and alumni groups and clouding the outlook for the type of medical and scientific research that takes place at the colleges. The multitrillion-dollar tax law signed last month also hikes the tax on income from endowments for some of the wealthiest private schools. As the Trump administration gains leverage, colleges' bruised budgets could drive them toward making agreements quicker. "It seems like they want to get deals done now,' said Brendan Cantwell, a professor at Michigan State University who focuses on the political economy of higher education. "It's almost like a dam is broken. I would not be at all surprised if we saw a cascading set of agreements.' The Harvard University campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on July 2 | Sophie Park / The New York Times Federal funding has been used as a cudgel by the Trump administration, which has criticized what it says is a failure by academic institutions to crack down on antisemitism during campus protests over Israel's war in Gaza. The moves also come amid a broader campaign against diversity efforts and accusations of political bias. The fallout has already started. Northwestern said it would cut more than 400 jobs to save 5% on labor costs, with university officials calling the past few months some of the most difficult in its 174-year history. The Trump administration in April paused $790 million in research funding for the Evanston, Illinois-based school because of claimed potential civil rights violations. At Cornell, leaders in June warned that drastic financial austerity measures were on the table after hundreds of millions of dollars in federal research contracts were terminated or frozen. "The spring semester was unlike anything ever seen in higher education,' they wrote in a letter to students and staff. "We have been using institutional resources to try to plug these funding holes in the short term, but these interim measures are not sustainable.' Late last month, the government froze $108 million in research funding to Duke University, or about 20% of its federal revenue, three Trump administration officials said. Duke is in talks with government officials on a settlement, according to an administration official. Duke's press office didn't provide a comment on the funding loss or the status of government talks. A Duke official, who asked not to be identified discussing internal deliberations, said the school is reconsidering its budget amid the funding loss, but that it hopes an end to the freeze will come soon. Cornell and Northwestern have declined to comment on any settlement talks. On July 23, Columbia University agreed to pay $221 million in a deal that was promptly criticized for infringing on academic freedom at the school. Brown announced a deal on July 30, agreeing to give $50 million over 10 years to workforce development organizations in its home state of Rhode Island in exchange for the reimbursement of at least $50 million in unpaid federal grants. Shortly before reaching the deal, Brown took out a $500 million loan — a sign of how strained the school's finances had become. Brown, the least wealthy of the Ivy League schools with an endowment of $7.2 billion, had previously warned in June of "significant' cost-cutting measures to offset the federal funding. U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington on July 30 | REUTERS The Trump administration's higher-education crackdown has exposed just how dependent some of the elite, research-focused universities are on the government. They're essentially "major federal contractors' and stopping the stream would be catastrophic for many of them, according to Cantwell. "Think about Booz Allen or Raytheon,' Cantwell said. "If they said, 'All your federal funding will be frozen for 9 months,' you can imagine how those firms might react.' The Trump administration has dealt a harsher financial blow to Harvard than any other university in its crosshairs, freezing billions of multiyear research grants and contracts. The school estimates that the moves by the administration, as well as the endowment tax increase, will cost about $1 billion annually. Harvard's Kennedy School already cut staff. "The unprecedented challenges we face have led to disruptive changes, painful layoffs, and ongoing uncertainty about the future,' Harvard President Alan M. Garber said in a letter to the campus. Garber has told faculty that a settlement with the government isn't imminent and the university is considering resolving its dispute through the courts, the Harvard Crimson reported Monday. Larry Ladd, who served as Harvard's budget director and now advises schools at the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, said he can't criticize any college for coming to a deal with the Trump administration given what's at stake for their campuses. "Schools are likely facing pressure to use endowment and tuition revenue, which are typically used to support students, to support some of their research enterprise instead,' Ladd said. "They don't want to do that because they want to continue to support students. There's that pressure as well.' Lynn Pasquerella, president of the American Association of Colleges and Universities, said campus leaders are being put in an "untenable position' and worries that federal funds will continue to be weaponized by the Trump administration, even if schools make deals. "The concern is the more we capitulate through making these agreements, the more the administration will be empowered to continue along these lines,' she said.
The Diplomat
3 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Malaysia Agreed to $150B in Purchases as Part of US Tariff Deal: Minister
Despite the White House's release of updated tariff figures last week, there is much still to be negotiated between Washington and its trade partners. Late last week, U.S. President Donald Trump announced updated tariff rates for 67 nations, including nine from Southeast Asia, which are set to come into effect on August 7. However, given the unpredictability of the Trump administration and the speed of the negotiations that preceded last week's announcement, there is a lot that we don't know about these figures, and how they will affect each nation's trade with the U.S. For instance, while most Southeast Asian nations succeeded in negotiating a reduction in the tariff rate to around 19-20 percent, it still remains unclear specifically what each agreed to. It is also unclear what exemptions might apply to their major exports to the U.S. and whether other geopolitical conditions may have been slipped into the trade discussions. As James Guild wrote recently for The Diplomat regarding the deals with Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, which were announced prior to last week's announcement, 'many important details are missing. In fact, many of the countries on the other side of these deals quickly made it known they viewed things a bit differently than President Trump.' Yet, as the days go by, further details are emerging about what each nation put on the table during the rapid trade negotiations with the Trump team. Speaking to parliament yesterday, Malaysia's trade minister offered some details about how his nation managed to secure a reduction in its tariff, from 25 percent to 19 percent. In comments to parliament, Reuters reported that Tengku Zafrul Aziz said that Malaysian negotiators have agreed to spend up to $150 billion over the next five years to buy equipment from U.S. multinationals, in order to address the trade imbalance between the two countries. This includes agreements for state energy firm Petroliam Nasional Berhad to buy liquefied natural gas worth $3.4 billion a year. As Reuters reported, Malaysia 'will also commit to $70 billion in cross-border investments in the United States over the next five years.' He confirmed that Malaysia had also agreed to remove its tariffs on more than 98 percent of U.S. goods. Last year, Malaysia had a trade surplus of around $24.9 billion with the U.S., according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Tengku Zafrul said that the two countries were finalizing a joint statement covering the commitments that had been made, which also included tariff exemptions that Malaysia managed to secure on its pharmaceutical products and semiconductor exports to the U.S. In his address to parliament, the minister warned that semiconductor chips may still be subject to additional tariffs under U.S. tariffs on the grounds of national security. 'Therefore, we need to continue to be prepared for any possible additional tariffs imposed on the semiconductor industry,' he said. He added that the country was seeking similar exemptions for important raw materials, including cocoa, rubber, and palm oil, but that these had not yet been finalized. While Tengku Zafrul's comments bring some clarity to Malaysia's situation, it also highlights the challenge of negotiating trade agreements, which often take years of negotiations, on such a short time scale. Another area of considerable uncertainty that has been kicked down the road involves transshipped goods. Trump's tariff announcement included a blanket 40 percent tariff on any goods deemed to have originated in China. Like much else, it is still unclear how (and by whom) the provenance of goods will be established and verified. Lurking behind the uncertainty about the specifics of the deal, there is the larger uncertainty about whether the tariffs will even be in place in a month, a year, or a decade's time. One writer in Free Malaysia Today argued today that Malaysian policymakers should not panic, assuming that the tariffs are 'an assertive, yet unstable, use of executive power' that might not last. 'The current tariff wave is not a permanent reordering of trade architecture,' the op-ed argued, 'it is a phase of legal and political experimentation.' As such, the article argued that Malaysia should avoid making knee-jerk concessions to Trump. However long the tariffs are in effect, the short-term 'wins' that Trump has secured through the brute leveraging of U.S. economic power will likely be outweighed by the long-term drain of U.S. influence, as Southeast Asian governments seek out more predictable and 'like-minded' trade partners.
Japan Times
4 hours ago
- Japan Times
A year after Japan's stock meltdown, markets show resilience and promise
A year after an epic rebound in the yen upended currency trading and sent shares tumbling from Tokyo to New York, Japan's stock market has found firmer footing. It's taken two major routs and a significant unwinding of the carry-trade strategy, used by global investors to borrow heavily in the relatively low-yielding yen to buy other currencies offering higher returns. But twelve months on from Aug. 5, 2024, when Japan's stock benchmarks plummeted 12% and the market lost over $670 billion in value following an unexpected rate hike by the Bank of Japan, the broader Topix index is once again hovering near record highs. And while this summer's share climb bears some technical similarities to last July's ill-fated rise, a combination of clearer BOJ messaging, steady corporate reforms and a better-than-feared U.S. tariff deal has market participants betting against a repeat of the 2024 crash. "It looks like a lot more stable of an environment for the market to go higher,' said analyst Pelham Smithers, who runs an eponymous Japan equity research firm in the U.K. "I think there's room for further rate hikes, which it hasn't felt like before.' The yen is still keeping investors on their toes — the currency gained 2% against the dollar on Friday following disappointing U.S. employment data. The Topix and Nikkei 225 lost over 1% Monday after those statistics stoked recession fears. The yen was trading at around ¥146.75 to the dollar in Tokyo on Tuesday. But the yen's choppiness over the past four weeks is tame compared to its 10% surge over the same period in 2024. And stocks' Monday decline was mild in contrast to their August 2024 collapse, which was also accelerated by weak U.S. jobs data. The relative calm is evidence that investors are finally settling into the new reality of higher Japanese interest rates, said Anna Wu, a cross-asset strategist at investment management firm VanEck in Sydney. "The market has come to a realization that yes, the BOJ will be hiking, but the differentials between the yen and trading pairs, as well as Japan interest rates versus the Fed's rates, are still meaningfully high,' Wu said. That makes another sharp carry-trade unwind unlikely, she added. The newfound acceptance is largely thanks to an improvement in communication by the BOJ, Wu said. Its 15 basis point hike last July caught markets off-guard, sending the yen soaring and global investors rushing to offload carry trade positions. The central bank has since updated its messaging style, ensuring at least one of its board members delivers a scheduled speech and holds a news conference ahead of each policy meeting. For instance, 10 days ahead of its most recent hike in January, BOJ Deputy Gov. Ryozo Himino gave an unusually explicit hint of a raise, with Gov. Kazuo Ueda later backing up the message. The result was telling. Although the quarter percentage point hike to 0.5% was the bank's largest in 18 years, markets were well prepared, and stocks gained in the following week, helped by a rally in banking shares. "The BOJ's decision to raise rates again in January, despite last summer's turmoil, made it clear that the rate hike path will continue,' said Masayuki Koguchi, executive chief fund manager at Mitsubishi UFJ Asset Management. "It's become easier to envision future rate hike scenarios,' he said. Plus, having bounced back from last summer's meltdown and a tariff-fueled rout in April, Japan's equities now look more resilient against potential shocks, analyst Smithers said. "We got out a bit of hot money with the two flash crashes,' he said. "The people in the market right now are the ones who believe in Japan.' A large chunk of those "believers' are foreign investors, drawn to Japan's shares by a record level of corporate share buybacks and hopes that governance reforms will unlock long-term value for shareholders. "Governance reforms and shareholder returns, far from peaking, are scaling new heights,' said Sunny Romo, an investment director of Japanese equities at M&G Investments. That signals room for Japan's stocks to climb higher, especially as global investors look to diversify outside the U.S., she added. Domestic market watchers see potential for more upside, too. Expectations that Japan's ruling parties may give in to opposition calls for consumption tax cuts after a recent election setback are fueling hopes of a boost for retail and other domestic-oriented sectors. "The market is in a different place now than it was a year ago,' said Kazuhiro Sasaki, head of research at Phillip Securities Japan. "Investors have things to look forward to, especially in domestic demand-driven stocks, if the government pursues fiscal expansion.' Optimism is shared by strategists at Goldman Sachs Japan and Bank of America Securities who have hiked their forecasts for the Topix and Nikkei in recent weeks, citing hopes that U.S. tariffs won't derail Japan's economy as much as feared due to a truce limiting levies to 15%. However, the trajectory of Japanese equities still hinges on the yen's stability, and in a world of tariff-driven market swings that's no small caveat. Lingering trade worries and uncertainty around Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's fate could still boost safe-haven demand for the yen, stoking volatility, said Klaus Wobbe, CEO of Intalcon Asset Management. "I think the yen could strengthen again to below ¥140, especially if the Fed cuts in the fourth quarter and the BOJ tightens,' said Wobbe. "That would be an indicator that the true unwind is underway. ¥140 is the last line of defense.'
