3 dead, including bystander woman and infant, in shooting at Utah festival
Three people were killed, including an 8-month-old infant, in a shooting that occurred Sunday, June 15 after an altercation broke out between two groups of people at a festival in Utah, police say.
Five people were hit by gunshots, of which three were fatal, during the WestFest at Centennial Park in West Valley City, a city of about 145,000 people located 12 miles from Salt Lake City. WestFest is an annual four-day festival celebrating the city, according to the festival's website. This year the event ran from June 12 to 15, and featured a carnival, a parade, a talent showcase, rides and fireworks.
Those who died in the shooting include an 18-year-old male, who was part of one of the groups, and a 41-year-old female and an 8-month-old infant, who were bystanders, West Valley City police said in updates posted to X, formerly Twitter.
Two teens, a 17-year-old female and a 15-year-old male, were both hit in the arm during the incident, police said, adding it is not "clear if they were connected to the groups involved." An update on their conditions was not immediately available.
Police: 'Verbal altercation' turns deadly
Police said the incident occurred around 9:20 p.m. Sunday, June 15 as two groups of people got involved in a "verbal altercation." When officers working the carnival "approached to break up the altercation, a 16-year-old male from one of the groups pulled out a gun and fired."
An officer fired in response but did not hit the suspect, identified as a 16-year-old male. He was taken in custody for questioning. Police, in an update June 16, said the suspect's name will not be released given his juvenile status. The names of the 18-year-old and 41-year-old victims, meanwhile, will be released after the necessary protocols, such as notifying families, are followed.
An investigation into the incident is ongoing and police said witnesses were interviewed regarding the incident. Police have also requested witnesses to contact the department at 801-840-4000 to share more information on the incident.
'Must do better,' says mayor
Salt Lake County Mayor Jenny Wilson, in a statement, condemned the incident, saying: "We the people can, should, and must do better."
"The violence and deaths at the WestFest celebration in West Valley are tragic and seem to be the result of youth violence," Wilson said. "I am so deeply saddened by the loss of life, especially that of an innocent bystander and an infant."
"My thoughts are with all who were onsite and impacted by this tragedy and the families of those who lost their lives," she added.
Bystander killed amid 'No Kings' protest in Utah
The festival shooting took place on the final day of the event and came just a day after an "innocent bystander" was killed after being caught in the crossfire between a person who pulled out a rifle at demonstrators and members of a peacekeeping team for the "No Kings" protest in Salt Lake City.
Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at sshafiq@gannett.com and follow her on X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
8 hours ago
- NBC News
Andrew Tate sues Meta and TikTok for ‘deplatforming' him in 2022
Controversial influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate are suing Meta and TikTok for banning their social media accounts in 2022. Romanian authorities have charged the Tate brothers, who are dual U.S.-British citizens and former boxers, with human trafficking. Andrew Tate is also charged with rape. In Britain, both brothers were charged with rape and other crimes, prosecutors said in May. They both have denied any wrongdoing. The brothers are prominent figures in the 'manosphere,' a loose network of online communities known to elevate extreme interpretations of masculinity that are often hostile to women. Andrew Tate, in particular, gained notoriety on social media, where he was also widely criticized for spreading misogynistic rhetoric to his millions of followers. In two lawsuits filed last week in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the Tate brothers accuse TikTok and Meta of defaming and unlawfully 'deplatforming' them by removing their social media accounts. The two were banned in 2022 from Twitter, TikTok, YouTube and Meta-owned Instagram and Facebook for violating the platforms' community guidelines. They were reinstated on Twitter (now X) after Elon Musk took over ownership, but they appear not to have returned to other platforms. The lawsuits focus on TikTok, Instagram and Facebook. They do not mention YouTube or its parent company, Google. Attorneys for the Tates, as well as representatives for Meta and TikTok, did not respond to requests for further comment Monday. The lawsuits, which are largely identical, claim the removals of their accounts were 'not an isolated enforcement action grounded in neutral application of its Terms of Use, rather, it was the culmination of a coordinated campaign to suppress, silence, and destroy the reputations and livelihoods of two controversial but law-abiding men.' The brothers also allege that the 'deplatforming' was done without notice or explanation and that it violated contractual agreements and stripped them of their main sources of revenue. Their brand and business model relied heavily on their social media engagement, the lawsuits say, and their removals from the platforms led to 'substantial and irreplaceable financial loss and damage.' TikTok and Meta 'inflicted' 'substantial financial, reputational, and emotional harm,' according to the lawsuit. The brothers said they took legal action 'to ensure that even the most powerful technology companies remain accountable when they act as instruments of government censorship and suppress constitutionally protected speech in violation of federal and state law,' the lawsuits say. Andrew Tate, 38, and Tristan Tate, 37, reside in Romania and Dubai, according to the lawsuits. They briefly left Romania to go to the United States after a travel ban on them was lifted. They made an appearance at UFC 313 in Las Vegas in March after they touched down in Florida in February. In May, the U.K.'s Crown Prosecution Service charged both brothers with rape, human trafficking and other crimes, leading Romanian courts to issue an order to extradite them to the U.K. once their court case there ends. Florida also opened a criminal investigation against them this year after they visited the state. In 2023, they filed a defamation suit in Palm Beach County, Florida, Circuit Court against people they claim provided false evidence to Romanian authorities and conspired to deceive officials to have them wrongfully imprisoned. A woman countersued in February this year, claiming the brothers tried to lure her into a webcam sex trafficking ring. The Tates' lawsuits note that while they were 'arrested in Romania and placed under house arrest in connection with criminal investigations, neither was, or has been, convicted of human trafficking or sexual exploitation.' 'Despite this, TikTok and other actors repeatedly invoked these allegations to justify censorship and reputational damage, again with no opportunity for Plaintiffs to question or dispel such false and malicious accusations,' the lawsuits say. The platforms enabled defamation of the brothers by 'refusing to clarify or support' their reasons for banning their accounts, thus 'allow[ing] widespread media narratives to suggest criminality,' according to the lawsuits. Andrew Tate has previously pushed back against the criticisms of his online presence, telling NBC News in November 2022 that he is playing an 'online character.' He said at the time that he makes 'many videos praising women' and that his coaching involves teaching men 'to avoid toxic people as a whole.' Tate said he tells his audience to avoid 'low value people,' including 'toxic men.' Andrew Tate wrote Sunday on X that he is shelling out money (he says '400,000,000 of personal funds') to battle the platforms and those who tried to 'cancel' him, including 'mainstream media across Australia UK and USA,' as well as 'every single girl who lied about me.' 'It's good vs evil and I will lose my entire fortune in this fight,' he wrote to his nearly 11 million followers. 'I'm happy to go broke and live on the street trying to beat The Matrix.' The brothers seek more than $50 million in compensatory damages from each company, according to the respective lawsuits.
USA Today
15 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump sent the National Guard to LA in June. It was the busiest protest month in 5 years
President Donald Trump received widespread backlash for his decision to deploy the National Guard in Washington, D.C., but it isn't the first time the move has stoked controversy in this term. Following a high profile assault on a 19-year-old former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) employee known as "BigBalls," Trump announced his administration would take control of the Metropolitan Police Department and ordered 800 members of the guard to the nation's capital. In June, protests against widespread immigration arrests and raids prompted Trump to send the National Guard to Los Angeles, California. Trump said the guardsmen were sent to quell mostly peaceful protests, but he did so without the governor's consent or invitation. That was shortlybefore the "No Kings" protests that popped up on Trump's birthday all over the country, and organizers predicted Trump's militarized response in LA, which also included deploying marines in the city, would inspire more protesters. It ended up being the busiest protest month since 2020. Here is what to know: Why did Trump deploy the National Guard in DC? Trump said he was taking over Washington, D.C., to address crime and homelessness, despite the fact that violent crime is down 26% in 2025 compared with last year. He deployed hundreds of National Guard troops and also moved to put the Metropolitan Police Department under control of the Department of Justice. Trump does have special authority to deploy the National Guard in D.C., and he did so in 2020 as well. "We're not going to lose our cities over this. This will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C.," Trump said, adding that he may set his sights on other cities like Chicago in the future. The move drew harsh criticism from Democrats across the country. "Violent crime in D.C. is at its lowest level in 30 years. We had an unacceptable spike in 2023, so we changed our laws and strategies," Mayor Muriel Bowser said at a televised community meeting on Aug. 12. "Now, crime levels are not only down from 2023, but from before the pandemic. Our tactics are working, and we aren't taking our foot off the gas." On Aug. 15, the District of Columbia sued the administration in an attempt to halt Trump's police takeover. The DOJ previously declined to comment. June was the busiest month of protesting since 2020 Protests in the first half of the year were already trending higher than the first months of previous administrations before Trump sent the military in to largely peaceful protests in Los Angeles in early June. Dave Clark, a professor of political science at Binghamton University who collected global mass mobilization data, previously said the militarized response to protests could make a difference. "I would say that using the military for civil control is the wild card here," he said in June, explaining there is little relevant precedent for it in the U.S. "In many cases, the move to authoritarian kinds of tactics will actually bring out more protesters." Days later, people across the country participated in the "No Kings" protests that happened on Trump's 79th birthday and the day of the Army's 250th anniversary parade in D.C. Data from the Crowd Counting Consortium, a joint project between the Harvard Kennedy School and the University of Connecticut, show the first five months of this year have seen more protests than the first years of former President Joe Biden's term and Trump's first term. The consortium project collects publicly available information from political crowds in the U.S. at marches, protests, riots and more. The data also shows June 2025 saw more than 4,600 protests, the most in a calendar month since June 2020 when nearly 7,500 protests happened around the country following the police killing of George Floyd. Clark noted the data from protests after June 1 show a trend of objecting to "heavy handed" tactics, with the titles, notes and claims included in the data showing words like "militarized," "police state" and "sweep." Trump warned people who planned to protest against the district takeover that they, too, would be met with heavy force. "You spit and we hit," he said at his Aug. 11 press briefing. Are National Guard still in Los Angeles? Trump has pulled back all but a few hundred National Guard members it sent to Los Angeles. California sued the Trump administration after Trump deployed 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles amid the immigration arrest protests. Gov. Gavin Newsom has argued the deployment was an unlawful use of the military, according to Reuters. A multi-day trial took place ending Aug. 13, Reuters reported, and a ruling is expected in the coming weeks. Contributing: Bart Jansen, Joey Garrison, Trevor Hughes, Michael Loria, Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
CNBC
3 days ago
- CNBC
FBI Director Patel and foundation win defamation lawsuit against blogger, awarded $250,000
FBI Director Kash Patel and his foundation won a default judgment in their defamation lawsuit against a blogger who publicly accused Patel of being a "Kremlin asset," of trying to overthrow the U.S. government, and of planning the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump. Patel and the Kash Foundation were awarded a total of $250,000 in compensatory and punitive damages against the Substack blogger and podcaster Jim Stewartson in an order on Aug. 5 by Judge Andrew Gordon in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas. The order was first reported by the online news site Court Watch. Gordon issued the default judgment favor of the longtime Trump loyalist Patel after Stewartson did not respond in court filings to the lawsuit, which cited a series of social media posts and other comments by Stewartson. Patel had sought $10 million in damages on claims of defamation, injurious falsehood and business disparagement. The judge said punitive damages were warranted in the case "in part to deter Stewartson and others from engaging in defamation." "Factual criticism of, and opinions about, public figures are protected speech and must be tolerated," Gordon wrote. "But defamatory falsehoods made with actual malice are not protected, even if directed at public officials. "The complaint and the motion adequately demonstrate Stewartson acted with malice." Stewartson told CNBC in a text message on Friday, "I was never served with this lawsuit. I just found out about the judgement from trolls on Twitter last week." He said that Patel's lawsuit, and another pending defamation complaint against him by former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn in Florida state court, are "intended to intimidate me because I have been accurately and diligently reporting on Patel and Flynn's involvement in the QAnon movement and their participation on January 6th for five years." "It is a preposterous, frivolous lawsuit and neither of them will receive a dime," Stewartson said. "In fact, I intend to pursue my own case against them for their years-long campaign of abuse of me and the legal system." The FBI said that Patel would have no comment on the decision. CNBC has requested comment from his lawyers. Patel's attorneys said in a court filing in March that after filing the suit in June 2023, Stewartson for months "dodged" accepting service of the complaint, which, as a rule, is required for a civil case to proceed. The attorneys said they finally completed service of the lawsuit in late October 2023, when a person at Stewartson's home in California accepted a copy of the complaint. Gordon wrote in his order that he "found good cause to grant" a request for the default from Patel's lawyers. But Gordon also said that the motion by Patel's lawyers "offers scant evidence of harm or damages to either plaintiff." He noted that an expert's report "states that Mr. Patel's 'image has been deeply hurt by the defamation accusing him of working against the government, corruption, and crime. Apart from the business already lost, this impacts future opportunities and relationships.'" "But the report offers no examples of 'business already lost' and how Mr. Patel's image was hurt by the defamatory statements themselves, as opposed to the myriad non-defamatory attacks Mr. Patel has suffered as a result of being a public figure," Gordon wrote. "To the contrary, after the defamatory statements, Mr. Patel was confirmed by the United States Senate as Director of the F.B.I." the judge wrote. "Clearly his reputation was not significantly sullied by the defamatory statements." Gordon said there was "almost no concrete evidence of harm or damages suffered by" Patel's foundation. "All of the defamatory statements were directed at Mr. Patel individually," the judge noted. But Gordon said that both compensatory and punitive damages were warranted in the case. "Stewartson's statements were defamatory and caused presumed damages," the judge wrote. "Falsely stating as fact that a public figure 'attempted to overthrow the government,' planned the January 6 insurrection, was a 'Kremlin asset,' and paid people to 'lie to [C]ongress' ... inflicts real injuries, personally and professionally," the judge wrote. The judge awarded Patel $100,000 in compensatory damages and the same amount in punitive damages. He awarded the foundation $25,000 in compensatory damages, and the same amount in punitive damages after accepting as a reasonable estimate a claim that at least seven donors had stopped giving to the group.
