Germany invites Trump, Zelenskyy, NATO, EU leaders to virtual meeting before Trump-Putin summit
Neither Zelenskyy nor European leaders have been invited to Friday's summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals
By Vaibhav Sisinity
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
The German chancellery said in a statement that the virtual talks will focus on "further options for action to put pressure on Russia" as well as "preparations for possible peace negotiations and related issues of territorial claims and security".
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
He is our only child, we cannot see him suffer. Help us!
Donate For Health
Donate Now
Undo
The European Commission confirmed that President Ursula von der Leyen will take part "in the calls organised by Chancellor Merz" ahead of the summit.
The leaders of Britain, Finland, France, Italy and Poland are also set to join the "various discussion groups", the chancellery in Berlin said.
Live Events
Ukraine and its backers in Europe insist that Trump and Putin cannot decide on land swaps behind their backs at the summit, but the Europeans concede that Moscow is unlikely to give up control of Ukrainian land it holds.
Trump has suggested that a peace deal could include "some swapping of territories," but the Europeans see no sign that Russia will offer anything to exchange.
European Union foreign ministers met on Monday following talks on Ukraine among US and European security advisers over the weekend. They are concerned that Putin will try to claim a political victory by portraying Ukraine as inflexible.
Concerns have mounted in Europe and Ukraine that Kyiv may be pressed to give up land or accept other curbs on its sovereignty. Ukraine and its European allies reject the notion that Putin should lay claim to any territory even before agreeing to a ceasefire.
"As we work towards a sustainable and just peace, international law is clear: All temporarily occupied territories belong to Ukraine," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said ahead of the ministerial meeting.
"A sustainable peace also means that aggression cannot be rewarded," Kallas said.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said "it must be obvious to Poland and our European partners - and I hope to all of NATO - that state borders cannot be changed by force". Any land swaps or peace terms "must be agreed upon with Ukraine's participation," he said, according to Polish news agency PAP.
Still, it's hard to ignore the reality on the ground.
Russia in 2022 illegally annexed the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in Ukraine's east, and Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in the south, even though it doesn't fully control them. It also occupies the Crimean Peninsula, which it seized in 2014.
On the 1,000-km front line, Russia's bigger army has made slow but costly progress with its summer offensive. The relentless pounding of urban areas has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to UN estimates.
"In the end, the issue of the fact that the Russians are controlling at this moment, factually, a part of Ukraine has to be on the table" in any peace talks after the Alaska summit, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said on CBS on Sunday.
Rutte said Ukraine's Western backers "can never accept that in a legal sense," but he suggested that they might tacitly acknowledge Russian control.
He compared it to the way that the US hosted the diplomatic missions of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania from 1940 to 1991, "acknowledging that the Soviet Union was controlling those territories, but never accepting (it) in a legal sense".
Giving up any territory, especially without a ceasefire agreement first, would be almost impossible for Zelenskyy to sell at home after thousands of troops have died defending their land.
Ultimately, Putin is seen by some analysts as being not so much interested in land itself, but rather in a more "Russia-friendly" Ukraine with a malleable government unlikely to try to join NATO, just as pro-Russian breakaway regions in Georgia have complicated that country's quest to become a member.
Zelenskyy insists that a halt to fighting on the front line should be the starting point for negotiations, and the Europeans back him. They say that any future land swaps should be for Ukraine to decide and not be a precondition for a ceasefire.
Claims on land could also be part of negotiations on the kind of security guarantees that Ukraine might receive to ensure another war does not break out.
The Europeans believe Kyiv's best defence is strong armed forces to deter Russia from striking again. They insist there should be no restrictions on the size of Ukraine's army and the equipment, arms and ammunition it can possess or sell.
Beyond that, they say Ukraine should not be constrained in its choice of joining the EU or being forced to become a neutral country.
The Trump administration has already taken Ukraine's membership of NATO off the table for the foreseeable future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India holds firm in US trade talks, eyes EU pact amid tariff tensions
In a key meeting of the Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Foreign Secretary and the Commerce Secretary briefed members on India-US relations and ongoing trade negotiations, sources said on Monday Regarding the upcoming US delegation visit for trade negotiations, the government indicated there is no change in schedule.(REUTERS) The government outlined three categories under which the US has been imposing tariffs. The issues included Global Tariffs - measures applied to all countries, not just India, sector-specific tariffs - designed to attract certain industries to the US, such as automobiles, leather, and textiles and revenue-oriented tariffs - targeting sectors like agriculture and oil for revenue generation. Officials stressed that negotiations with the US are continuing, but India will not compromise in the agriculture and dairy sectors. The government is actively assessing the impact of tariffs in consultation with stakeholders, including exporters, and is exploring alternative trade partnerships. Talks on trade agreements with the EU are being expedited, and new agreements with other countries are also under consideration. On broader ties, the government noted that India-US relations remain strong beyond trade. Recent developments include resolutions passed at the UN Security Council and the QUAD on the Pahalgam attacks, the extradition of Tahawwur Rana from the US, and the designation of TRF as a terrorist organisation. There has been no India-US dialogue regarding Pakistan in the current trade discussions. Committee Chairperson Shashi Tharoor confirmed that around 50 questions were raised in the meeting. He reiterated that trade is only one dimension of the India-US partnership. On Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir's nuclear threat remark, the government stated that such statements are unacceptable, especially when made from the soil of a friendly country. Regarding the upcoming US delegation visit for trade negotiations, the government indicated there is no change in schedule. On whether the nuclear threat issue would be raised with Washington, officials deferred to the Foreign Secretary but affirmed that such rhetoric is unwelcome. Commenting on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy following his conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the government noted that if the war ends, 25 per cent of existing tariffs--imposed due to India's purchase of Russian oil--would be lifted. However, India remains focused on addressing the remaining 25 per cent tariff impact.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Respecting voice of farmers': Punjab govt scraps land pooling policy; decision comes after HC interim stay on Aug 7
Chandigarh: The Bhagwant Mann-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) govt in Punjab has withdrawn its contentious Land Pooling Policy, 2025, in the face of significant criticism from farmer groups and opposition parties. The decision, which came on Monday evening, follows the Aug 7 interim stay issued by the Punjab and Haryana high court on the policy that aimed to acquire around 65,500 acres of land and was touted a "farmer-friendly" initiative vital for "planned urban development". The formal decision to scrap the policy, which was notified on May 14 and amended on July 25, was made following internal concerns within the AAP leadership, according to sources. The party was worried that the policy could be politically damaging and undermine the govt's other achievements. Till now, CM Mann and the entire AAP leadership had been vociferously defending the policy. In a statement, the principal secretary, housing and urban development, said, "The govt hereby withdraws the land pooling policy dated May 14, 2025, and its subsequent amendments. Consequently, all actions, like LOIs issued, registration done, or any other action taken thereunder shall be reversed henceforth." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Confirming the decision, AAP spokesperson Neel Garg posted on X, "The Land Pooling Policy was introduced in the interest of farmers. The Aam Aadmi Party always stands with farmers. If farmers do not like this policy, why should we impose it? Therefore, respecting the voice of the farmers—we are withdrawing this policy." The policy's objective was to acquire land in 164 villages for urban development near 27 cities and towns. The govt aimed to acquire around 45,000 acres in the Ludhiana district alone through a phased approach. Despite repeated assurances from CM Mann that no land would be "forcefully acquired," farmers remained sceptical. This opposition was rooted in a deep-seated fear that the policy would lead to the permanent loss of their lands and livelihoods. The protests also led to significant dissent, with farmers in districts like Ludhiana, Hoshiarpur, and Jalandhar putting up "no entry" banners for AAP leaders. While MP Malvinder Kang publicly called for a "meaningful dialogue" with the farming community, the internal disagreement also saw some AAP functionaries resign in protest. Those who stepped down in protest included Harmanjit Singh Brar, chairman of the Moga District Planning Committee, and Gurjeet Singh Kanjhla, the block president of the AAP's unit in CM Mann's own constituency of Dhuri. Under the policy, owners who opted for pooling were to receive a 1,000 sq yd residential plot and a 200 sq yd commercial plot in fully developed land in lieu of one acre. To address farmer concerns, CM Mann announced several amendments to the policy on July 22. These changes included raising the annual livelihood allowance for landowners to Rs 1 lakh per acre until developed plots were handed over, a fivefold increase from the previous Rs 20,000. Farmers who owned as little as one kanal of land were also made eligible to receive a residential plot. Furthermore, landowners could opt for a larger residential plot in place of a commercial one, and a letter of intent (LOI) would be issued within 21 days, which could be used to secure bank loans. In its order staying the Land Pooling Policy, 2025, the high court highlighted several key flaws, stating that the policy appeared to have been notified "in haste". The court criticised the lack of mandatory social impact assessment (SIA) and environmental impact assessment (EIA) studies for the large-scale acquisition of fertile agricultural land. It also noted the absence of a rehabilitation plan for landless labourers and artisans, who would be severely affected, and pointed out the lack of specified timelines for the project and a proper grievance redressal mechanism for those impacted. In its detailed order, released on Saturday, the court noted that the Land Acquisition Act 2013 bars the acquisition of multi-cropped land unless there are exceptional circumstances. "The land which is sought to be acquired is amongst the most fertile land in the state of Punjab, and it is possible that it may impact the social milieu," said the HC division bench. Earlier, the policy received formal cabinet approval on July 2. When announcing the policy, the Punjab govt highlighted its dual objectives: to curb illegal colonies and the land mafia while also ensuring direct profits for farmers. GONE IN LESS THAN 3 MONTHS May 14 & June 6 |The Bhagwant Mann-led AAP govt officially notified the Land Pooling Policy, 2025. July 25 | The policy was subsequently amended. Early Aug | The policy began to face criticism from farmer groups, opposition parties, and even some members of the AAP. Protests, including tractor marches, were held across the state. Aug 7 | The Punjab and Haryana high court issued an interim stay on the policy. The court's decision was in response to a petition that challenged the legality and constitutionality of the policy, citing a lack of mandatory social and environmental impact assessments. Aug 11 | The Punjab govt decided to officially withdraw the contentious policy MSID:: 123239957 413 | Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Print
27 minutes ago
- The Print
Will convey displeasure to US over Munir's nuclear threat from American soil—Centre tells House panel
MPs who attended the meeting said Misri told the Lok Sabha Committee on External Affairs headed by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor that New Delhi's position remains that BRICS was not an anti-Western grouping but should be seen instead as a 'non-Western grouping'. The committee, it is learnt, was told by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri that US President Donald Trump's imposition of steep tariff on Indian exports was not just a response to New Delhi's purchase of Russian crude oil but could also be connected to its presence in BRICS. New Delhi: The Centre told a parliamentary committee Monday that New Delhi will convey to Washington DC its displeasure over Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, delivering nuclear threats from the soil of the United States, sources told ThePrint. Sources said Misri told the MPs that India would not tolerate such nuclear blackmail. ThePrint exclusively reported on 10 August that Munir, speaking at an event in the US, said, 'we are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' 'India's position will be conveyed to the US,' sources quoted Misri as having said. Misri is also learnt to have told the panel that the US's trade deficit with India may also have been a trigger for Trump, who first announced the imposition of 25 percent tariff on Indian exports to the US and later raised it to 50 percent citing the 'direct or indirect import of Russian oil'. The foreign secretary is learnt to have added that India will not cross certain 'red lines'—a reference to US's demand for India to open up its agriculture and dairy sectors—in its trade negotiations with Washington. 'The three issues that India believes could have acted as a trigger for Trump are purchase of Russian crude oil, trade deficit and India's presence in the BRICS multilateral grouping. India's position is very clear. Misri said New Delhi never considered BRICS to be an anti-Western bloc but believes it can be categorised, if at all, as a non-Western bloc,' an MP who was part of the meeting told ThePrint. Sources in the Indian establishment have previously argued that New Delhi's sale of processed Russian crude oil was necessitated by various European countries, who stopped importing from Moscow, becoming dependent on supplies from India. Apart from Misri, Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal was also present in the meeting that lasted over three hours. The officials told the MPs that the latest developments would not have any impact on India's 'friendship' with the US. 'Trade is just one aspect of India-US relations. There are many positives also,' one official is learnt to have told the committee. The officials added that India's trade relations, including defence purchases, would not be affected by Trump's announcements. In response to questions from MPs, they underlined that India is not trying to 'enhance' or recalibrate its relations with China or Russia in light of the US President's remarks and announcements. (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: Proxy pushback: After Rajnath, now Gadkari & Venkaiah; BJP is running out of patience with Trump
