
A 3-pet limit? Who knew?
May 15—A Clarkston woman said she was shocked to learn she was breaking the law by having four dogs in her fenced yard.
Beverli Lounsbury, who lives on the 800 block of Third Street, received a $1,540 citation after city police received a complaint about the number of dogs at her house.
The city of Clarkston has a three-pet limit on the books, which includes cats and dogs and applies regardless of the combination of species the owner may have.
However, Lounsbury's ticket was issued because three of her dogs were not licensed and two were not up-to-date on their vaccinations. She was given several weeks to find a new home for the fourth dog, which she was fostering.
Ben, a large, fluffy Pyrenees, is now in "doggie jail" at Riverview Animal Clinic, said Lounsbury, who is employed at the veterinarian clinic, and the other three — Carmelita, Axel and Merx — remain at home.
"I went to City Hall and got them licensed that day," said the 37-year-old dog owner. "I had no idea about the city's dog-licensing laws and three-pet limit. I was fostering the fourth dog, and now he's at the clinic. Ben hates being in jail. Just like a person, he's bored and lonely behind bars."
Lounsbury recently attended a Clarkston City Council meeting to ask the city to reconsider its three-pet ordinance. It's making residents afraid to foster animals inside city limits, she said, and many dogs and cats desperately need temporary care until permanent homes can be found. Otherwise, they end up being dumped in rural areas or euthanized.
Councilor Skate Pierce recently reviewed the dog licensing and pet-limit laws and does not believe the city's ordinance should be updated at this time. Similar regulations are used in other jurisdictions, and citations are entirely complaint-driven, primarily for smell and barking issues, Pierce told the council.
Pets under the age of four months are not included in the three-per-household limit, so a new batch of kittens or puppies wouldn't trigger a ticket. A kennel-licensing option is only available in heavy, industrial zones, such as the port area.
The three-pet rule was established a decade or so ago because of hoarding issues, officials said.
Inside Clarkston city limits, it is unlawful to have any livestock, such as horses, mules, sheep, cattle, goats, rabbits, pigs, ducks or geese. Six backyard chickens are OK.
"I was fostering Ben because he was about to be euthanized for killing a chicken," Lounsbury said. "He got along well with our other dogs, and they are all healthy and well cared for. We are really hoping to find a good home for Ben with someone who will not give not up on him. We fell in love with him."
Abandoned pets are a human problem and not the fault of the animals, she said.
"People sign up for the responsibility, but when push comes to shove in a hard time, they surrender their pets or try to have them euthanized for behavior issues that could be fixed through proper training."
Daily headlines, straight to your inboxRead it online first and stay up-to-date, delivered daily at 7 AM
Lounsbury said animal lovers and potential foster families were alarmed to learn about the three-pet limit in Clarkston. Most would jump through any hoops to obtain a kennel license, if that were an option, she said.
"We're willing to pay a fee, but we feel like the city won't work with us," Lounsbury said. "Animals can't speak. We as people need to stand up and speak about this. We would pay more to do the right thing."
The number of pets allowed per household varies throughout the Lewiston-Clarkston Valley. The city of Lewiston, unincorporated Asotin County, and the city of Asotin don't have limits on cats, but all three have dog rules.
In Asotin County, each household can have as many as four dogs. People who have five or more dogs are required to get a hobby or kennel license, said Ed Holbert, code enforcement officer for the Asotin County Sheriff's Office. Breeders need a commercial kennel license, and those operations are subject to inspection.
Dogs in the unincorporated residential areas of the county are required to be licensed after the age of six months. A lifetime license for spayed or neutered canines is $25, and tags for dogs who are intact are $25 per year. All dogs need to have a collar with the Asotin County license attached, Holbert said.
"That way, if a dog gets out, we can return it to the owner by looking up the tag, instead of taking it to the Lewis-Clark Animal Shelter," Holbert said.
Dog licenses can be purchased at the sheriff's office in Asotin or the Clarkston Veterinary Clinic on Peaslee Avenue.
Inside Asotin's city limits, the number of dogs per household is also limited to four, said Police Chief Monte Renzelman. A kennel license, which is $50 per year, is required for five or more.
Neutered or spayed dogs in Asotin require an annual tag that costs $8, or a lifetime license for $25. Licenses, which are available at City Hall, run $25 a year for dogs that are not fixed.
Although there's no law specifying the number of household cats inside Asotin, residents are not allowed to drop off or feed strays, Renzelman said.
Across the Snake River in Idaho, there's a five-dog limit for folks who live in Lewiston, said Animal Control Officer Doug Willey. However, enforcement is rarely an issue.
If a resident exceeds the dog limit, it's usually because of an unexpected litter of puppies. Willey said he works with dog owners to help find homes for the pups.
More information about dog and cat rules can be found online on websites for each city and county in the region or by calling local officials.
"It can be hard to find the rules," Lounsbury said. "I didn't know about Clarkston's until the code enforcement officer showed up at our house."
Sandaine can be reached at kerris@lmtribune.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Missoula adopts Pride flag as official city flag
Missoula City Councilor Jennifer Savage sponsored a local ordinance to name the Pride flag as an official city flag, allowing it to fly on public property despite a new law. Savage stands here at a Missoula business flying the Pride flag near City Hall. (Keila Szpaller/The Daily Montanan) Adoption this week of a new official city flag in Missoula means the rest of the state can display Pride flags in public buildings — despite a new law meant to restrict such displays. On a 9-2 vote Monday night, Missoula City Council passed a resolution to adopt the Pride flag — as well 'as flags representing portions' of the Pride flag — as an official flag of the Garden City. The action by the city follows Gov. Greg Gianforte's signing of House Bill 819, which regulates which flags can be flown or displayed on government property. The law prohibits nongovernmental and 'politically charged' flags. But a stipulation in the law says any public building can display the flag of 'any county, municipality, special district, or other political subdivision within the state.' Since Missoula adopted the flag as its city flag, it opens up the possibility for other communities to also display the Pride flag. Rep. Braxton Mitchell, a Columbia Falls Republican who sponsored the bill, vowed in an email he would seek to change the law. He also said he believes it's likely the law will not be challenged in court. 'We will amend the law next session to make sure no city can make a political symbol their official flag,' Mitchell wrote. 'If they want to fly that flag, they can do it at home, not on the taxpayer's pole.' Council member Jennifer Savage, who sponsored the ordinance, said in an interview that Pride flags were starting to come down in schools as a result of HB 819. Missoula County Public Schools had previously said it would follow state law. For Savage, the mother of a queer daughter, the flag being displayed meant something else, too. 'When I see a Pride flag, I think that my kid is safe in that place,' Savage said. 'I think it symbolizes inclusion. I think when a public school teacher flies it in their classroom, it says to students, this is a safe place for you. And it also signals to other students that hate won't be tolerated there.' The law includes carveouts, such as for the Gadsden flag, law enforcement flags, school flags, and the flag of any nation recognized by the United States. Similar laws in Utah and Idaho prompted Salt Lake City and Boise to adopt Pride flags as city flags in response to state legislation. Savage said her inbox was flooded with Missoulians concerned over the law. Fellow council member Daniel Carlino said he hadn't seen Missoulians turn out to a city council meeting all year quite like they did on Monday night. The council took public comment for around an hour prior to voting to approve the change. 'I think it was important that Missoula did what we can to fight back when the state and federal government are trying to attack the LGBTQ+ community,' Carlino said on Tuesday. Missoula did not have a city flag prior to Monday night, Carlino said. There was some confusion about whether more than one city flag was allowed, though Savage said other flags could be brought before council for consideration. In a comment posted on Facebook, Gov. Greg Gianforte said Missoula City Council 'should be ashamed.' 'Last night, nine members of the Missoula City Council made clear their top priority is flying a divisive pride flag over government buildings and schools — all while ignoring the city's housing affordability crisis, raising taxes by 17% because of over spending, and refusing to take firm action to end encampments in the city,' Gianforte wrote. 'Missoulians deserve better, and fortunately, two council members voted against imposing this divisive, far-left agenda on their community.' Mitchell stated during his bill's Senate hearing that he'd seen Black Lives Matters and Pride flags in his classrooms growing up, and said he did not feel those issues should be pushed in schools. 'Leave it to Missoula to turn their city flag into a Pride flag. Nothing says 'unity' like politicizing public property,' Mitchell said in a statement. 'The ultra far left Missoula City Council and their mayor are completely out of touch with reality and the values of the vast majority of Montanans. Taxpayer owned property should represent everyone, not just the loudest political movements of the moment. The Pride flag, like any other political symbol, has no place replacing a city's identity.' He added situations like this are exactly why he pushed the law. 'We resoundingly passed HB 819 to stop governments from hijacking public property to push ideology,' Mitchell said. 'If this resolution passes, it only proves how necessary HB 819 is, and I'm sure it won't be good for Missoula's local economy either.' Missoula City council members Sandra Vasecka and Bob Campbell voted against the measure. Councilor Campbell said he had a request for the people who said the flag makes them feel safe. 'Stop and think for a minute whether or not that's true for everyone in the community, whether or not that the flag is the cure, the be all, the end, to feel safe,' Campbell said to council on Monday night. 'And I propose that's not always the case.'
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Freeport to replace non-compliant accessibility ramps over next decades
FREEPORT, Ill. (WTVO) — The City of Freeport is undertaking an expensive, multi-decade project to bring accessibility ramps for disabled people in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). About 75% of the ramps in Freeport are not compliant with the act's regulations, according to Acting Public Works Director Darin Stykel. Freeport has over 1,800 ADA ramps. Each ramp costs around $20,000 to replace. 'The city of Freeport started approximately a year ago with a plan to evaluate all the ramps and accessibility needs within the city of Freeport and the right of ways,' Darin said. The city collected data and put it in a '.' 'We wanted to create the living documents that could be updated, and they'll always be a resource on the City Hall site, along with the policy and plan that we put together that gives a grievance process for anybody that feels like a ramp in their neighborhood might be not compliant or it can be fixed,' Darin said. The city is replacing some of the noncompliant ramps with federal and state funding, along with local road project funding. 'In the last three years, the City of Freeport has replaced about 322 ADA ramps. We have another 50 scheduled for this year,' said Darin. Megan Ebert, Youth Services Director for RAMP, a nonprofit disability service, said the changes will benefit those with disabilities. 'I think that whenever we have an opportunity to make our community more inclusive, we should take that opportunity. And it's really exciting that we're going to give everyone access to the goods and services that they need,' she said. Darin said replacing all of the accessibility ramps in Freeport will take time and money. 'We're targeting 25 years, based on the finances that will be required for this project. Currently, in 2025, we have about $25 million in ramps to replace. If we extrapolate that for the cost of inflation over the 25 years, that will climb to nearly $38 million,' he said. A majority of the funding will come from Freeport's 1% sales tax. 'This project is able to be funded and move forward because of the 1% sales tax that the city of Freeport took on,' he added. 'We wouldn't have the funding currently to replace ramps or even fixed streets if we didn't have that funding.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'sanctuary jurisdictions' list that included Milwaukee disappears after outcry
The Trump administration removed a list of 'sanctuary' jurisdictions allegedly defying enforcement of federal immigration law after cricitism about its accuracy and blowback from a national law enforcement group. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security published the list May 29 and removed it from its website June 1, according to an internet archive. The Wisconsin jurisdictions accused of obstructing the law and in jeopardy of losing federal grants and contracts were the city of Milwaukee, city of Madison, Dane County and Shawano County. DHS officials did not respond to a request for comment June 3 on why the Wisconsin jurisdictions made the list, what prompted the list's removal and whether the jurisdictions' federal funding was no longer at risk of termination or suspension. More: Milwaukee, other Wisconsin 'sanctuary jurisdictions' listed as defying federal immigration law Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson blasted the administration's hasty approach, saying he had received no notification. A City Hall spokesperson said officials were meeting to evaluate options on whether to take issue with the designation. Milwaukee is not officially designated a sanctuary for immigrants, though some argue its policies and positions indirectly make it a sanctuary city. Shawano County Sheriff George Lenzner said on June 2 the county doesn't identify as a sanctuary jurisdiction and "remains committed to upholding federal immigration laws and policies." The County Board voted in 2021 to become a 'Second Amendment Sanctuary County' that opposed any attempts to enact "legislation unlawfully infringing on our rights under the Second Amendment," which may be where the misunderstanding stemmed. Nationally, other places pointed out that the list misspelled city names, misidentified counties as cities or vice versa, and included conservative communities with no sanctuary immigration policies. The National Sheriffs' Association released a statement saying sheriffs felt "betrayed" by the list. No political appointee for the administration could explain in a meeting with the association who compiled, proofed, and verified the list before publication. "DHS has done a terrible disservice to President Trump and the Sheriffs of this country," the statement said. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Sanctuary jurisdictions list by Trump's DHS vanishes after outcry