South Korea's Lee names Koo Yun-cheol finance minister, makes other picks
SEOUL: South Korea President Lee Jae Myung has chosen a former vice finance minister, Koo Yun-cheol, to be his finance minister, his office said on Sunday (June 29).
Koo is widely known as a policy expert, serving different positions across the government and authoring books on South Korea's innovation and growth, most recently on artificial intelligence, Lee's chief of staff, Kang Hoon-sik, told a briefing.
Among other ministerial positions, Lee named Kim Jung-kwan, president of power plant builder Doosan Enerbility and a veteran bureaucrat in economics, energy and public policy, to be industry minister.
Kim fits the role to realise President Lee's "energy mix philosophy", Kang said, referring the new leader's aim to balance nuclear power and renewable energy.
The former head of South Korea's disease control agency, Jeong Eun-kyeong, was nominated for health minister. She was highly praised for her response to the Covid-19 pandemic, becoming one of the Time Magazine's 100 most influential people of 2020.
Cabinet nominations in South Korea must be vetted by hearings in parliament. But presidents may appoint their nominees even without parliament approval, and Lee's Democratic Party has a majority in parliament. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
42 minutes ago
- The Star
Banking sector oversold amid tariff issue
Kenanga Research opined that the headwinds on net interest margins are less pronounced than before as funding costs ease. PETALING JAYA: The banking sector is oversold amid lingering uncertainties over tariffs, according to Kenanga Research. 'Based on past performances, we believe banks are adopting a conservative guidance on loan growth (where concerns may lie on more regionally exposed banks), while asset quality remains a minimal concern,' it said. The research house, which maintained its 'overweight' call on the sector, opined that the headwinds on net interest margins (NIMs), while still persistent, are less pronounced than before as funding costs ease. It kept its expectation for the overnight policy rate to remain steady at 3% throughout the year. For the third quarter of the year, Kenanga Research's top pick for the sector continued to be AMMB Holdings Bhd for its optimisation efforts, and emphasis on earnings sustainability to lift return on equity (ROE), with higher dividend yield prospects (6%) being a bonus. Its second pick is CIMB Group Holdings Bhd as recent share price weakness is offering a more palatable entry with 6% dividend returns to mitigate concerns over its more challenging regional operations. It also favours Malayan Banking Bhd , which continues to take market share among the big caps and is poised to lead in terms of earnings growth and dividend yield in the longer term. As for non-bank financial institutions, Kenanga Research liked general insurer LPI Capital Bhd , which is slated for special dividend yields of up to 13% on top of its core 6% to 7% yields. 'LPI will benefit from synergistic gains from its acquisition by Public Bank Bhd with industry-leading net margins offering leeway to compete more aggressively in the market,' it explained. The research house is also expecting a turnaround in valuations. Benchmarking against the KL Finance index, the sector price-to-book value (PBV) declined to a one-year low of 1.08 times in May. 'The currently depressed valuations pushed sector ROE/PBV multiple to 9.8 times. 'This marks only the second time this level has been breached outside of crisis periods (such as the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic), the first being during the collapse of several US banks in the first quarter of 2023,' it said. The research house opined that the sector is now likely at trough valuations, driven by concerns over sluggish loan growth and stubborn industry NIMs. However, Kenanga Research highlighted that the industry is in a period of unprecedented asset quality with industry gross impaired loans hovering persistently below 1.5%. This is guarded by the average bank loan loss coverage (including regulatory reserves) of 140%, which will hopefully lighten the need for hefty pre-emptive provisions as seen during the pandemic.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Iranian nuclear program degraded by up to two years, Pentagon says
A graphic showing Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant is seen in this phtograph released by the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 26, 2025. U.S. Department of Defense/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Pentagon said on Wednesday that U.S. strikes 10 days ago had degraded Iran's nuclear program by up to two years, suggesting the U.S. military operation likely achieved its goals despite a far more cautious initial assessment that leaked to the public. Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, offered the figure at a briefing to reporters, adding that the official estimate was "probably closer to two years." Parnell did not provide evidence to back up his assessment. "We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the Department (of Defense) assess that," Parnell told a news briefing. U.S. military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22 using more than a dozen 30,000-pound (13,600-kg) bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles. The evolving U.S. intelligence about the impact of the strikes is being closely watched, after President Donald Trump said almost immediately after they took place that Iran's program had been obliterated, language echoed by Parnell at Wednesday's briefing. Such conclusions often take the U.S. intelligence community weeks or more to determine. "All of the intelligence that we've seen (has) led us to believe that Iran's -- those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated," Parnell said. Over the weekend, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said that Iran could be producing enriched uranium in a few months, raising doubts about how effective U.S. strikes to destroy Tehran's nuclear program have been. Several experts have also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes and could be hiding it. But U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said last week he was unaware of intelligence suggesting Iran had moved its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes. A preliminary assessment last week from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggested that the strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by months. But Trump administration officials said that assessment was low confidence and had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged. According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, the strikes on the Fordow nuclear site caused severe damage. "No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged," Araqchi said in the interview broadcast by CBS News on Tuesday. (Reporting by Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
CIA review finds flaws but does not dispute finding Putin sought to sway 2016 vote to Trump
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A CIA review released on Wednesday found flaws in the production of a U.S. intelligence assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to sway the 2016 U.S. presidential vote to Donald Trump, but it did not contest that conclusion. The review "does not dispute the quality and credibility" of a highly classified CIA report that the assessment's authors relied on to reach that conclusion, it said. But the review questioned the "high confidence" level that the CIA and FBI assigned the conclusion. It should have instead been given the "moderate confidence" rating reached by the communications-monitoring U.S. National Security Agency, the review said. Trump, who has a history of quarreling with U.S. intelligence analyses, has previously rejected that intelligence assessment, which was made public in an unclassified version in January 2017. After a November 2017 meeting with Putin, he said that he believed the Russian leader's election meddling denials. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, a former congressman who served as director of national intelligence in Trump's first term, ordered the review and its "lessons learned" section "to promote analytic objectivity and transparency," said a CIA statement. The CIA's Directorate of Analysis, which conducted the review, "identified multiple procedural anomalies" in how the December 2016 classified assessment of Russian election interference was prepared. They included "a highly compressed timeline ... and excessive involvement of agency heads" and "led to departures from standard practices in the drafting, coordination, and reviewing" of the report, it said. "These departures impeded efforts to apply rigorous tradecraft, particularly to the assessment's most contentious judgment," it continued. The review, however, did not overturn the judgment that Putin employed a disinformation and cyber campaign to sway the 2016 vote to Trump over his Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton. A 2018 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report reached the same conclusion. (Reporting by Jonathan Landay; Editing by Don Durfee and Chizu Nomiyama)
