
SpaceX allows Chinese investors to buy stakes in company
In December, Kahlon testified that SpaceX prefers to avoid investors from China because it is a defense contractor. There is a major exception though, he said: SpaceX finds it 'acceptable' for Chinese investors to buy into the company through offshore vehicles.
'The primary mechanism is that those investors would come through intermediate entities that they would create or others would create,' Kahlon said. 'Typically they would set up BVI structures or Cayman structures or Hong Kong structures and various other ones,' he added, using the acronym for the British Virgin Islands. Offshore vehicles are often used to keep investors anonymous.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Experts called SpaceX's approach unusual, saying they were troubled by the possibility that a defense contractor would take active steps to conceal foreign ownership interests.
Related
:
Advertisement
Kahlon, who has long been close to the company's leadership, has said he owns billions of dollars of SpaceX stock. His investment firm also acts as a middleman, raising money from investors to buy highly sought SpaceX shares. He has routed money from China through the Caribbean to buy stakes in SpaceX multiple times, according to the court filings.
The legal dispute centers on an aborted 2021 deal, when SpaceX executives grew angry after news broke that a Chinese firm was going to buy $50 million of the company's stock. SpaceX then had the purchase canceled. In separate testimony, the rocket company's CFO explained that the media coverage was 'not helpful for our company as a government contractor.' SpaceX's business is built on those contracts, with the U.S. government paying the company billions to handle sensitive work like building a classified spy satellite network.
Company executives were concerned that coverage of the deal could lead to problems with national security regulators in the U.S., according to Kahlon's testimony and a filing from his attorneys.
Advertisement
SpaceX, which also launches rockets for NASA and sells satellite internet service, is perhaps the most important pillar of Musk's fortune. His
Federal law gives regulators broad power to oversee foreign investments in tech companies and defense contractors. Companies only have to proactively report Chinese investments in limited circumstances, and there aren't hard and fast rules for how much is too much. However, the government can initiate investigations and then block or reverse transactions they deem a national security threat. That authority typically does not apply to purely passive investments in which a foreign investor is buying only a small slice of a company. But experts said that federal officials regularly ask companies to add up Chinese investments into an aggregate total.
The
The new materials do not contain allegations that the Chinese investments in SpaceX would violate the law or were directed by the Chinese government. The company did not respond to detailed questions from ProPublica. Kahlon declined to comment on the reasons for SpaceX's approach.
It's not uncommon for foreigners to buy U.S. stock through a vehicle in the Cayman Islands, often to save money on taxes. But experts said it was strange for the party on the other side of a deal — the U.S. company — to prefer such an arrangement.
Advertisement
ProPublica spoke to 13 national security lawyers, corporate attorneys and experts in Chinese finance about the SpaceX testimony. Twelve said they had never heard of a U.S. company with such a requirement and could not think of a purpose for it besides concealing Chinese ownership in SpaceX. The 13th said they had heard of companies adopting the practice as a way to hide foreign investment.
'It is certainly a policy of obfuscation,' Andrew Verstein, a UCLA law professor who has studied defense contractors, said of the SpaceX testimony. 'It hints at potentially serious problems. We count on companies to be forthright with the government about whether they've taken money from America's rivals.'
The new material adds to the questions surrounding Musk's extensive ties with China, which have taken a new urgency since the world's richest man joined the Trump White House. Musk has regularly met with Communist Party officials in China to discuss his business interests in the country, which is where
Last week,
The Delaware court records reveal SpaceX insiders' intense preoccupation with secrecy when it comes to China and detail a network of independent middlemen peddling SpaceX shares to eager Chinese investors. (Unlike a public company, SpaceX exercises significant control over who can buy into the company, with the ability to block sales even between outside parties.)
Advertisement
But the case leaves unanswered the question of exactly what percentage of SpaceX is owned by Chinese investors.
Related
:
The
The experts said the court testimony is puzzling enough that it raises the possibility that SpaceX has more substantial ties to China than are publicly known and is working to mask them from U.S. regulators. A more innocent explanation, they said, is that SpaceX is seeking to avoid scrutiny of perfectly legal investments by the media or Congress.
Once a welcome source of cash,
Bret Johnsen, the SpaceX CFO, testified in the Delaware dispute that the company does not have a formal policy about accepting investments from countries deemed adversaries by the U.S. government. Rather, he said, SpaceX has 'preferences that kind of feel like a policy.' Sensitive to how such financial ties could make it 'more challenging to win government contracts,' Johnsen said that he asks fund managers to 'stay away from Russian, Chinese, Iranian, North Korean ownership interest.'
Advertisement
In the public portion of his deposition, Johnsen wasn't asked whether routing Chinese money offshore made such investments acceptable to SpaceX. But he lent credibility to Kahlon, the investor who said that was enough to get the green light. Johnsen said that he has a long-standing personal relationship with Kahlon and that he's discussed the company's approach to Chinese ownership with him. The CFO added that he trusts Kahlon to bring in only investors that the company approves of.
Over the years, Kahlon has personally helped Chinese investors buy stakes in SpaceX on 'a number of occasions' through 'proxies such as British Virgin Islands- or Cayman Islands-based entities,' according to a filing from his lawyers. He also knows of 'many' other Chinese investors who own SpaceX shares, the filing said. He learned about them through conversations with investors and brokers, as well 'from having viewed investor lists.'
Kahlon is a consummate SpaceX insider. He 'has been with the company in one form or fashion longer than I have,' said Johnsen, who's worked at SpaceX for 14 years. Early in his career, Kahlon worked for Peter Thiel at the same venture capital firm that once employed JD Vance, and he first met with SpaceX around 2007 a few years after it was founded.
Kahlon eventually opened his own firm called Tomales Bay Capital, becoming a major player among the middlemen who cater to would-be investors in SpaceX. He's helped people like former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos buy pieces of the rocket company. He also said he has served as a 'back channel' between SpaceX and international regulators as the company sought to bring its satellite internet products to countries like India.
Kahlon and Johnsen were forced to testify after the deal with a Chinese firm fell apart in late 2021, sparking years of litigation. That year, Kahlon had the opportunity to buy more than half a billion dollars of SpaceX stock from a West Palm Beach private equity firm. Kahlon had already brought Chinese money into SpaceX before, he testified, and he again turned to China as he gathered funds to purchase the stake.
Kahlon soon connected with a Shanghai-based company called Leo Group, short for 'Love Each Other.' As Kahlon made his pitch during their first call, Leo was told that 'it would be best not to disclose the name of SpaceX,' an executive at the Chinese company later testified. 'They deemed that information to be quite sensitive.'
Leo quickly sent Kahlon $50 million. He then messaged another business associate in China: 'Have any folks interested in spcex still?'
Kahlon testified that he was planning to tell Johnsen about the Leo investment and expected the CFO to sign off on it. But the deal blew up after Leo mentioned SpaceX in a regulatory filing that generated widespread coverage in the Chinese business press. (Whether Leo had Kahlon's permission to make the disclosure is a matter of dispute.) In a panic, Kahlon enlisted a Leo vice president to try to get the articles taken down. But when Johnsen and Tim Hughes, SpaceX's top in-house lobbyist, spotted the stories, they grew alarmed.
'This is not helpful for our company as a government contractor,' the SpaceX CFO later testified regarding the press attention. 'It, in essence, arms our competitors with something to use as a narrative against us.'
'In my entire professional career, this was literally the worst situation that I've been in,' Kahlon said. 'I failed at what I thought was a core responsibility in the relationship we had.'
SpaceX ultimately decided to let Kahlon buy only a smaller portion of the stake, purchasing much of the half-billion dollar investment itself. According to contemporaneous messages and testimony from Kahlon, he was told that decision was made by Musk. However, Kahlon continued to have a strong relationship with SpaceX after the mishap, court records say, with the company allowing his firm to keep buying a large quantity of shares.
Musk's business interests in China extend far beyond SpaceX's ownership structure — a fact that has drawn criticism from Republican lawmakers over the years. In 2022, after Tesla opened a showroom in the Chinese region where the government runs Uyghur internment camps, then-Sen. Marco Rubio tweeted, 'Nationless corporations are helping the Chinese Communist Party cover up genocide.'
In addition to Tesla's sprawling factory in Shanghai, last year, almost 40% of Tesla's sales were to Chinese customers. The company has also secured major tax breaks and regulatory victories in the country. In 2019, the Chinese premier offered Musk the country's equivalent of a green card.
In recent years, the billionaire has offered sympathetic remarks about China's desire to reclaim Taiwan and lavished praise on the government. 'My experience with the government of China is that they actually are very responsive to the people,' Musk said toward the end of Trump's first term. 'In fact, possibly more responsive to the happiness of people than in the U.S.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the Trump-Musk Feud Means for SpaceX and NASA
The U.S. government relies on SpaceX to support NASA and other agencies, and the company has received more $20 billion in federal contracts for it. As Musk and Trump threaten to cut ties, here's what that would mean for the U.S.'s space ambitions.


Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump Ready to Ditch His Tesla Car amid Musk Fallout: 'I Might Just Get Rid of It'
WASHINGTON — June 7, 2025 President Donald Trump is distancing himself from Elon Musk—publicly and materially. According to The Washington Post, Trump has told aides in recent days that he is considering selling or giving away the red Tesla (TSLA) Model S he purchased in March, a gesture that once symbolized his support for Musk. Confident Investing Starts Here: 'I might just get rid of it,' Trump told aides, according to a senior White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The car, still parked near the White House as of this week, has become a visible casualty of the rapidly souring relationship between Trump and Musk. The split followed Musk's harsh criticism of the administration's latest domestic policy bill, which he publicly called a 'disgusting abomination.' That comment triggered a sharp response from the president, both publicly and privately. On Air Force One, when asked by a reporter about Musk's alleged drug use, Trump replied: 'I don't want to comment on his drug use. I don't know what his status is.' 'I read an article in The New York Times. I thought it was, frankly, it sounded very unfair to me.' But privately, Trump has reportedly told associates that Musk is 'crazy' and blamed his behavior on drug use, according to The New York Times. Musk Gave No Public Comment on the Car—But a Hint at Peace? As of Saturday afternoon, Elon Musk has not issued any public statement specifically addressing Trump's decision to unload the Tesla. However, he did respond to a suggestion from investor Bill Ackman on X that the two men should reconcile for the good of the country. 'You're not wrong,' Musk replied—his only recent public comment that could be interpreted as a gesture toward de-escalation. Beyond that, Musk has been active on X in recent days, directing criticisms at others, including Steve Bannon and critics of Tesla, but has avoided commenting directly on Trump's actions regarding the car or federal contracts. Trump Weighs Tesla Breakup The sale—or symbolic disposal—of the Tesla would mark a final, visual severing of a political and personal alliance that once had significant policy weight. Musk had been one of Trump's most prominent business backers, and the March purchase of the Model S was, at the time, framed by aides as a nod of approval to the entrepreneur's role in the administration. Now, according to officials, the car is being referred to inside the West Wing as a political relic. And while no final decision has been made, staff say it's become a quiet but pointed symbol of Trump's intent to distance himself from Musk for good. Trump himself, speaking about Musk during a press gaggle on June 6, said: 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Whether the car is sold, donated, or simply removed from view, it now stands as a monument to one of the most dramatic falling-outs in recent political history. Is Tesla Stock Still a Buy? Meanwhile, Wall Street isn't exactly bullish on Musk's flagship automaker. According to TipRanks, Tesla currently holds a 'Hold' rating based on 37 analyst reviews over the past three months. It's a split camp: 16 analysts rate it a Buy, 10 say Hold, and 11 recommend Sell — a clear reflection of the uncertainty swirling around the company. The market seems just as cautious. The average 12-month price target for TSLA is $284.37, suggesting a 3.7% downside from its current level.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 top FTSE 250 investment trusts to consider for a SIPP
There are dozens of investment trusts across the FTSE 250, offering exposure to all sorts of sectors and geographies. Here are two that I think are worth considering for a SIPP. In this account, they would have time to compound and — ideally — generate solid long-term returns. First up is Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust (LSE: USA), which pretty much does what it says on the tin. However, what separates this from similar trusts is the ability to invest up to 50% of assets in private growth companies. Today, unlisted firms make up 37% of the portfolio. Admittedly, this adds extra risk because these can be harder to value. Also, by definition, they tend to be less mature enterprises, meaning there's greater risk of some going bust. However, the trust only needs to back a small handful of generational private companies to do well long term. One is SpaceX, the rocket and satellite internet pioneer that is today the largest holding. It's up tenfold in value since 2018! Beyond this, the trust is invested in loads of top-tier public companies that I expect to be larger in future. These range from internet payments firm Stripe to streaming juggernaut Netflix and language learning leader Duolingo. Other tech names include Amazon and Meta. Just as the US led the way during the rise of the internet, it is doing so again with generative AI. We think this new technology is consequential and will usher in a period of change on a scale that we haven't seen since the industrial revolution. The trust's shares are currently trading at an 8% discount to net asset value, which I think looks attractive. It continues to buy back shares in an attempt to control the discount. The second trust is another from Baillie Gifford, namely Pacific Horizon Investment Trust (LSE: PHI). The managers aim to invest in the top 20% of the fastest-growing companies in Asia. Now, words like 'Pacific' and 'Asia' might immediately ring alarm bells because of all the uncertainty around global trade. The trust has 31% invested in China, the world's second-largest economy, and another 9% in Vietnam. Both could be hit hard by US tariffs, assuming they stay punishingly high. That said, now is arguably a great time to consider investing for the long run. Asian companies and economies are still likely to become much more influential in future, despite President Trump's best efforts. Just look at China's BYD (not a holding), which is overtaking Tesla in selling EVs. Or Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the world's leading maker of advanced chips. It is Pacific Horizon's largest holding. I doubt such firms' upwards trajectory will be permanently impaired by US tariffs. Combining Asia's favourable macroeconomic position with its structurally faster growth rates and valuations at multi-year lows relative to developed markets, Asia ex Japan appears to be in a sweet spot. Pacific Horizon also offers exposure to India (16.8%) and Korea (10.6%), as well as strategically important firms like Zijin Mining (one of China's largest producers of gold and copper). Again, the shares trade at a discount to NAV (9.2%). I think they're worth a look for a SIPP. The post 2 top FTSE 250 investment trusts to consider for a SIPP appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Ben McPoland has positions in Duolingo and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Amazon, Duolingo, Meta Platforms, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, and Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio