Saudi Arabia's latest rules: Strict new regulations for private food laboratories in 2025
TL;DR:
Saudi Arabia
's Ministry of Municipalities and Housing has issued new regulations for food laboratory operations, introducing strict spatial, technical, and visual standards to improve food safety, urban compliance, and investment conditions.
The rules apply to private and conformity-assessment food labs, setting requirements for lab size, parking, appearance, and location while exempting government labs.
Measures include banning visible wiring/air-conditioning units on facades, mandating at least 100sqm for labs, and locating labs within urban boundaries, all to raise quality and safety standards.
In a significant regulatory shift, Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Municipalities and Housing has introduced stringent new rules for private food laboratories, marking a proactive step to elevate food safety and urban standards across the Kingdom.
In a statement on Sunday, the ministry said the new rules apply to laboratories that conduct food testing and measurements under defined standard conditions, whether operating independently or as part of a conformity assessment body.
Key features of the new regulations
Scope and Applicability:
The updated rules govern all laboratories engaged in food testing and measurements carried out under standardized conditions. This applies whether labs are operating independently or as part of a conformity assessment body. However, facilities managed by Saudi government bodies such as the Saudi Standards, Metrology, and Quality Organization are explicitly exempt from these requirements
.
Spatial and Technical Requirements:
Food laboratories must now operate only within officially recognized urban areas, directly supporting urban planning objectives and reducing potential negative impacts like noise or visual pollution. There is a strict prohibition against any external environmental or visual nuisances
.
Key technical and spatial standards:
The minimum space for any laboratory facility, whether inside an existing building or as an independent site is set at 100 square meters.
Standalone labs must provide a minimum of one dedicated parking space for every 25 square meters of total space, making client and staff access easier and managing urban congestion
.
Aesthetic and Safety Standards:
The Ministry's rules extend to the visible appearance of laboratories. New criteria strictly forbid any visible electrical wiring or external air-conditioning equipment on building facades or rooftops, reinforcing high safety, quality, and aesthetic standards for all lab buildings
.
Objectives
These reforms are part of broader efforts to:
Harness urban policy to raise overall quality of life;
Foster a more compliant and attractive investment climate for food-related industries;
Ensure that consumer food safety and laboratory testing standards align with the Kingdom's health and urban development strategies
The reforms aim to align with broader goals of improving the urban environment and raising Saudi Arabia's profile as an attractive, investment-friendly destination for food and health-related enterprises.
The Ministry emphasized that these standards are designed to promote both public health and better quality of urban life.
With these robust new regulations, Saudi Arabia is strengthening its food safety framework and urban quality of life, ensuring private food labs meet the highest operational and aesthetic standards. Exemptions for government-controlled laboratories support efficient national oversight, while the private sector is positioned to grow in a more strictly regulated, investor-friendly environment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Alkem Laboratories partners with Abdulaziz Alsheikh to incorporate subsidiary in KSA
Alkem Laboratories has, pursuant to a shareholders' agreement dated 12 August, 2025, agreed to incorporate a subsidiary company in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Pursuant to incorporation of such subsidiary, the Company will hold 51% of the total share capital. The balance stake of 49% will be held by Abdulaziz Alsheikh (Saudi Partner). The subsidiary is proposed to be incorporated as a limited liability company and will be involved in the manufacture, import, marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical and/or nutraceutical products within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Trump 2.0 and the end of strategic trust: Why Bharat must prepare for a long separation from America
Donald Trump's foreign policy, defined by personal deal-making rather than institutional continuity, has tilted sharply toward Pakistan—driven less by geopolitical considerations and necessities than by the overlapping business interests of his family, friends, and close associates read more For decades, the Bharat-United States relationship—built painstakingly across several administrations, especially in the last 25 years—operated on a certain baseline of strategic trust. Even when disagreements arose, a bipartisan consensus in Washington recognised Delhi as an indispensable partner in not just balancing China but also stabilising the Indo-Pacific. But in Donald Trump's second term, this consensus seems to have been shattered. His foreign policy, defined by personal deal-making rather than institutional continuity, has tilted sharply toward Pakistan—driven less by geopolitical considerations and necessities than by the overlapping business interests of his family, friends, and close associates. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The clearest sign of Pakistan's growing closeness to the United States has come with two high-profile visits to Washington by Field Marshal Asim Munir in as many months. Such access is rare for an Asian military leader, rarer still for one from a country the US has long viewed through the prism of counterterrorism and aid dependency. But in Trump's presidency, Munir's military credentials are only part of the attraction; his economic utility is far more significant. This shift has produced one disquieting outcome—an unambiguous American tilt toward Pakistan. And this preference, rooted in personal financial networks rather than traditional diplomacy, makes it unlikely that Trump will seek to normalise relations with Bharat anytime soon. Worse, the repercussions may very well extend beyond his presidency. In just six months, Trump has rewritten the rules of American statecraft. Allies and adversaries are no longer defined by shared values or strategic need but by whether they can offer him, his family, or those around him a lucrative offer—and a headline-grabbing deal for the state. If the offer/deal is worthwhile, a country is a friend. If not, it risks being treated as a pariah/rival. A banana republic like Pakistan fits in well in this game of loot and scoot. An eminent democracy like Bharat doesn't. Trump's Dubious Pakistani Links Jared Kushner was among the first in the Donald Trump orbit to cultivate influence in West Asia, working closely with Saudi Arabia during Trump's first term. After leaving the White House, his private equity firm secured a $2 billion 'investment' from the Saudi sovereign wealth fund. A New York Times article, 'The Wooing of Jared Kushner: How the Saudis Got a Friend in the White House' (December 8, 2018), details how Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman courted Kushner to advance his 'hawkish regional agenda and consolidate his own power'. Based on documents, emails, and texts, the report shows that a Saudi delegation—visiting the US the very month Trump was first elected—identified Kushner 'as a crucial focal point in the courtship of the new administration'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump secured his second tenure on November 5, 2024. The very next day, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman met Field Marshal Asim Munir, then Pakistan's army chief, in Riyadh. Many analysts link this meeting directly to the Trump-Munir rapport, viewing it as the starting point of their relationship. The connection deepened in April 2025, when Pakistan's newly formed Pakistan Crypto Council (PCC) signed a landmark agreement with World Liberty Financial (WLF)—a cryptocurrency firm majority-owned by Donald Trump Jr, Eric Trump, and Jared Kushner. The deal came just days after a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22. The timing was conspicuous, and the links unmistakable. WLF's flagship product, the USD1 stablecoin, operates on Binance's blockchain. Binance was founded by Changpeng Zhao, who, as per Forbes, was ranked the 24th-richest person in the world and second-richest Canadian, with a net worth of $64.8 billion in May 2025. Interestingly, on April 7, 2025, Zhao—who was once convicted in the US for money laundering—was appointed by Pakistan's Finance Ministry as a strategic adviser to the Pakistan Crypto Council (PCC), a regulatory body to oversee and promote blockchain technology in that country. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's Pakistan connection is further bolstered by his long-time real estate partner, Steven Charles Witkoff, and his sons—Zach and Alexander. The Witcoffs co-founded WLF in 2024, of which the Trump family owns 60 per cent of the shares. Steven Witkoff is Trump's main adviser in West Asia. He has developed deep connections in the ruling and business classes of the region, which were further strengthened by his close association with the US President. The presence of the Witcoffs has helped the Trumps spread their business deals across West Asia. A Reuters article, 'Trump's stablecoin chosen for $2 billion Abu Dhabi investment in Binance, co-founder says' (May 2, 2025), reports how a stablecoin launched by Trump's WLF 'is being used by an Abu Dhabi investment firm for its $2 billion investment in crypto exchange Binance', run by Changpeng Zhao. The report adds, 'The use of USD1 in the deal highlights World Liberty's growing clout in the global crypto industry, and its ties to Binance.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD WLF may be less than 20 months old, but it has already courted controversies. A New York Times investigation has found the company offering endorsements to cryptocurrency firms in exchange for payments of $10–30 million, while pocketing most of the funds. The Trump saga doesn't just end with WLF. Texas investor Gentry Beach, a close friend of Trump Jr, too, has deep Pakistan connections, though he has also courted Bangladesh and Turkey for his ventures. As per media reports, Beach visited Pakistan on January 30, 2025, within a fortnight of Trump taking office for the second time. He went there as chairman of a firm called White Bridge Global. The visit was organised by Pakistan's Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC). Interestingly, top military officials, including Field Marshal Asim Munir, are on the SIFC. White Bridge has reportedly signed a deal in Pakistan to explore placer gold deposits near the Indus River. It has also signed luxury real estate deals in the country. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD During his meeting with Prime Minister Sharif, Beach reportedly said, 'America cares about Pakistan… You are our front face in the entire region.' How prophetic were his words! Then, there is Omeed Malik, born to a Pakistani father and Iranian mother. Malik is the co-founder of 1789 Capital with Trump Jr. In an article, 'Meet Don Jr's New Boss', published in the New York Post on November 22, 2024, Malik is showcased as the brain behind the 'idea for a 'parallel economy'—a kind of Brexit for conservatives from corporate America, which he saw tilting inexorably into wokeness'. Those who know Malik say that he has created a sort of conservative deep state within the United States that now supports Trump against the traditional deep state, which distrusts the Donald. Donald Trump has used his time between the first and the second presidencies to create new connections globally to set up his own deep state ecosystem, with his Rockbridge Network as the nerve centre. This conservative deep state may be opposed to the traditional deep state of America, but it continues to carry forward the distrust for Bharat. Thus, this new deep state—just like the Leftist deep state—has deep links with Pakistan, Bangladesh, and West Asia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD An Alternative World Order Bharat, in Trump 2.0, thus had no chance, given the personalised objectives and expectations the new president came to power with. This aspect becomes glaring in comparison to autocratic countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, and the countries of West Asia. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharat, being a responsible and responsive democracy, insists on transparent processes and guards its strategic autonomy. It cannot offer such depredatory concessions, making it a bad fit for Trump's loot-and-scoot policies. Trump's public derision of Bharat, his punitive tariffs, and his warm embrace of Pakistan's military leadership have left a deep scar in New Delhi. Even if relations improve on the surface, the trust that took decades to build has taken a massive beating. This mistrust won't vanish when Trump leaves office. To make matters worse, America now has two deep states, which stand opposed to each other, but on Bharat they have a common worldview: It's inimical to Delhi and seeks alliance with Islamabad. This foreign policy would ultimately backfire on America, but when the country is led by those obsessed with forwarding personal wellbeing and family businesses, the nation becomes the casualty. The US President, with his Trump-first policy, has signed the death pact for Pax Americana. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For Bharat, the strategic lesson is clear: First, the United States is not a dependable partner. Second, New Delhi must start looking for an alternative world order, as the US-led Western order remains innately biased towards the white world. This Western doublespeak was evident at the start of the Ukraine war when a large section of the Western world was abhorred to see the Ukrainian plight, while far more cataclysmic events in Afghanistan, Sudan, and elsewhere in the Global South went largely unheeded. Historically, it's not coincidental that the only case of nuclear catastrophe was seen in an Asian country even when World War II was largely the creation of one European nation. One can just imagine the reaction in the Western world had the US dropped a nuclear bomb on a White Christian state! Bharat must use the occasion to create a coalition of dharmic states—countries across East and Southeast Asia with deep historical and cultural ties with Bharat. From China, Japan, and Mongolia to Myanmar, Thailand, and Cambodia, these connections provide a foundation for a civilisational alliance that can complement, not replace, India's other partnerships. This, however, doesn't mean Bharat can become oblivious to Chinese perfidy. The Trumpian emergency has forced Bharat and China to come closer and look beyond obvious differences, but this doesn't mean Delhi can—and should—let its guard down, for that would come at great national cost. Beyond this civilisational bloc, outreach to Brics partners like Russia, South Africa, and Brazil can reinforce Bharat's multipolar strategy. This approach is not driven by sentiment alone. The global balance of power is shifting. Brics now surpasses the G7 in purchasing power parity. The world's 'unipolar moment' is over; Pax Americana is in decline. Trump's foreign policy accelerates this decline by eroding American credibility. For India, that volatility is a reason to engage more deeply with Asia, Africa, and Latin America, to invest in strategic infrastructure abroad, and to expand trade with economies that share an interest in a balanced world order. Bharat's challenge is to turn the Trumpian turbulence into an opportunity—to globalise Delhi's partnerships, deepen its civilisational connections, and act as a confident pole in an increasingly disrupted multipolar world. The path to success is often tough, treacherous, and lonely. Trump has just shown that to Bharat. And the country should be grateful to him for imparting this timely lesson. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
China cuts Saudi orders for Russian crude while Trump punishes India with steep tariffs
Chinese refiners are reducing Saudi oil orders, hinting at a shift towards Russian crude due to its competitive pricing. While China defends its Russian oil imports as legitimate, the US has pressured India with tariffs over similar purchases. India, in turn, criticizes the West's double standards, highlighting their continued trade with Russia. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump targets India with steep tariff hike Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Chinese refiners are cutting back on orders for Saudi oil, with the decline hinting at a shift in global crude flows as more Russian barrels enter the market, according to Energy Aspects London-based consultant said in an 11 August note that the drop in so-called nominations for September-loading term cargoes from Saudi Aramco showed refineries were holding back purchases due to greater availability of Russia's Urals crude and comfortable stockpiles. The note did not cite any global oil market is closely watching the potential reordering of flows after the United States and European Union increased pressure on India over its imports of Russian energy. With no comparable action taken against China, there is growing speculation that more of Moscow's oil will be bought by mainland refiners, including Urals crude shipped from Russia's western citing traders informed by the producer, reported that Saudi Aramco will sell 43 million barrels of September-loading crude under contractual supplies to China. This is down from 51 million barrels in the previous month and below the year-to-date monthly average of about 45 million barrels. China had earlier defended its Russian oil imports as legitimate, responding to US pressure after Washington imposed secondary tariffs on India over its energy purchases from Aspects said Chinese interest in Urals crude is increasing as it remains the 'most competitive' compared with similar Middle Eastern grades. However, the consultancy added that China's intake has a limit, as Russian imports already account for 17% of its overseas supplies, with 20% viewed as the ceiling for a single President Donald Trump had this month cited India's imports of Russian crude when announcing an additional 25% tariff on imports from India. The measure, set to take effect on August 28, could push tariff rates on some Indian goods to as much as 50% — high enough to effectively hit U.S. imports from India, which reached nearly $87 billion in move appears aimed at increasing Trump's leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, with India being used as a bargaining tool in the a White House official said on Monday that Trump has extended a tariff truce with China by another 90 days , preventing the imposition of triple-digit duties on Chinese new decision stops U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from jumping to 145%, and Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods from rising to 125%. For now, it keeps U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports at 30%, while China's tariffs on U.S. imports stay at 10%.Indian refiners have become the world's biggest buyers of Russian oil after turning to discounted supplies in the wake of Western sanctions on Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Russia's share of India's total oil imports jumped from just 1.7% in 2019–20 (FY20) to 35.1% in FY25, making it India's largest oil has sharply criticised the United States and European Union, accusing them of unfairly singling it out over Russian oil purchases while both continue to trade extensively with Moscow despite the a statement issued earlier this month, India's Foreign Ministry said: 'It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia.' The ministry added: 'It is unjustified to single out India.'Former Reserve Bank of India Governor Raghuram Rajan told Valor International that stopping purchases of Russian oil would not be a disaster for India, as current prices are not much higher than those for Russian crude. If Russian oil supplies were cut off completely, prices would go up, but India could cope, he said the bigger problem is political. A decision to stop buying from Russia would be seen at home as giving in to U.S. pressure, which is unpopular in any democracy, Rajan said. If Washington had quietly asked India to phase out Russian oil, it might have been acceptable. Making it public and linking it to a tariff threat makes it much harder politically, he added.
