logo
Serbian anti-graft protest misrepresented as anti-West demonstration in Burkina Faso

Serbian anti-graft protest misrepresented as anti-West demonstration in Burkina Faso

AFP08-05-2025

'Africans are protesting, demanding that the USA and France stop interfering in Burkina Faso and leave Africa to determine its own future,' reads the caption of the TikTok post published on May 1, 2025.
It continues: 'Thousands of citizens across Burkina Faso and other African nations have taken to the streets, calling on the United States and France to withdraw from African affairs. The demonstrators demand that foreign powers respect Africa's sovereignty and allow the continent to determine its own future without external influence.'
Image
Screenshot showing the false post, taken May 5, 2025
Shared more than 700 times, the 13-second video shows a large crowd protesting in a built-up area.
The same video was shared elsewhere on Facebook, Instagram (here and here), TikTok (here and here) and X.
On April 30, 2025, thousands of people in Burkina Faso's capital Ouagadougou staged a demonstration in support of Ibrahim Traore, the country's transitional president and head of the military regime. This came after authorities said they had foiled a coup attempt (archived here and here).
However, the video in the TikTok post does not show the scenes in Ouagadougou.
Serbian protest
Using Google Lens to conduct reverse image searches on keyframes from the video, AFP Fact Check found an X video published on March 15, 2025, captioned 'anti-corruption protests in Belgrade' (archived here).
Belgrade is the capital of the Balkan country Serbia.
Using keywords from the caption to conduct an internet search, AFP Fact Check found news reports describing protesters converging in Belgrade on the same date as the X video was published to protest the death of 15 people killed last year when a railway station roof collapsed in the northern city of Novi Sad (archived here).
Protesters believed the deaths were the result of alleged corruption and lax oversight related to construction projects
AFP reported that the protesters stretched for nearly two kilometres, with people filling the streets in and around the parliament and Belgrade's main pedestrian square.
We were able to match elements from the TikTok video with the X video, notably the streets and a large church.
Image
Graphic showing similarities between the X video (left) and the TikTok clip
Using Google Earth, AFP Fact Check identified St. Mark's Church (Crkva Svetog Marka) in Tasmajdan Park in Belgrade where the crowds had gathered.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inaccurate claims about Philippine juvenile justice law surface online
Inaccurate claims about Philippine juvenile justice law surface online

AFP

timean hour ago

  • AFP

Inaccurate claims about Philippine juvenile justice law surface online

"Go Kiko! Thanks to RA 9344, all 18 years old and below are protected against criminal liabilities only discernment (sic), they can kill, use drugs and they won't be held accountable by the LAW," reads a Facebook post published May 22, 2025. "You could be stabbed by a child in Tondo or Mandaluyong, and they can't be jailed. THANK YOU, Senator KIKO! Because of you, all minors are protected from prosecution." The post refers to Senator Francis Pangilinan and the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 (RA 9344), which he authored (archived link). It also references the 2021 murder of the Maguad siblings in Cotabato, where 18-year-old Gwynn and 16-year-old Louis were stabbed to death by their 17-year-old adopted sister (archived link). The suspect initially posed as a survivor before later admitting she committed the crime with a friend, also a minor. The post appears to suggest the suspects were not fully held accountable due to their age, framing the law as overly lenient toward youth offenders. "The suspects should be imprisoned for life. The justice system in the Philippines really is something," reads the caption. Image Screenshot of false post taken June 7, 2025 After his failed 2022 vice presidential bid, Pangilinan made a political comeback as an independent senatorial candidate in the May 12 midterm elections, which saw disappointing results for President Ferdinand Marcos's party (archived link). If Vice President Sara impeachment trial extends into the next Congress, Pangilinan will join in the case against his former opponent and Marcos's former ally turned political rival, who could be permanently barred from public office if convicted. The claim spread widely across social media, triggering reactions from users who believed the law grants blanket immunity to juvenile offenders. "I will never vote for him," one user said. Another commented: "Hopefully this law gets repealed. Because of this law minors can easily commit crimes." But legal experts told AFP the claims misrepresent the scope of the . 'Not automatically exempt' The Juvenile Justice and Welfare System, established under a 2006 law sponsored by Pangilinan and amended in 2013, outlines specific provisions for holding minors accountable depending on their age and whether they acted with (archived link). "The law clearly establishes that minors are not automatically exempt from criminal liability," , told AFP on May 30 (archived link). Citing section 3, Villarin explained that children 15 and below are exempt from criminal liability under all circumstances but remain civilly liable and subject to intervention programs depending on the offence. Meanwhile, "children above 15 but below 18 may be held criminally liable if they are proven to have acted with discernment, especially when the crime is punishable by more than 12 years of imprisonment, or if diversion is not appropriate or unsuccessful," she said. , also told AFP on June 5 that the post "misrepresents both the intent and actual provisions of the law" (archived link). He said the law had improved the juvenile justice system by creating ways to handle repeat and serious offences, including placing children who commit heinous crimes in intensive rehabilitation, while ensuring accountability matches their age and capacity for reform. "It's important to note that this was never about excusing wrongdoing -- it's about making sure children are held accountable in a way that reflects their age, capacity and potential for reform," he said, noting that before the law was passed, children as young as nine were jailed as adults, exposing them to abuse, criminal influence and trauma. Abitria said the Maguad siblings' case is a "powerful and painful example that accountability is very much possible" under the law. "Two minors were found to have acted with discernment -- that is, the court was convinced they understood the nature and consequences of their actions. As a result, they were tried, found guilty and sentenced to 30 years of imprisonment," he said. Philippine news outlet reported in May 2022 that the court denied parole for both minors and that they were placed in the custody of the social welfare and development agency upon conviction (archived link). The law mandates that children be placed in youth care facilities offering intensive intervention programs for serious or repeat offenders before being transferred to an adult correctional facility after turning . AFP has debunked more misinformation on the Philippine midterm elections here.

Clip from Florida misrepresented as 'woman caught in Los Angeles protests'
Clip from Florida misrepresented as 'woman caught in Los Angeles protests'

AFP

time2 hours ago

  • AFP

Clip from Florida misrepresented as 'woman caught in Los Angeles protests'

"The situation in America is bad right now. This video is from Los Angeles, America," reads part of a Hindi-language Facebook post published on June 10, 2025. "A mother with young children in her car was stuck -- and she was screaming, pleading to be released..." the caption continues. The woman can be heard screaming, "there's a baby in the car!" as the surrounding crowd howls. Image Screenshot of the false post, taken on June 12, 2025 Protests in Los Angeles broke out on June 6 following dozens of arrests of what authorities said were illegal migrants and gang members. Demonstrators took over streets in downtown LA, torching cars and looting stores, while law enforcement responded with tear gas and rubber bullets (archived link). US President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard and active-duty Marines into the city in response to the unrest, drawing criticism from state leaders (archived link). The clip also spread on Facebook, X and Instagram with the false claim. But a reverse image search using keyframes found a clip showing a similar scene was posted on Instagram on December 10, 2024 (archived link). Its caption contains hashtags that indicate it shows a street takeover -- impromptu events where drivers take turns doing doughnuts in intersections (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared video (L) and the Instagram clip Further searches reveal the Orange County Sheriff's Office in Florida published a video showing the same scene on its Facebook page on December 13, 2024 (archived link). The post appealed for information on a group of drivers who shut down a highway intersection to do doughnuts in their cars. "The situation escalated as participants harassed innocent drivers, blocked them from passing, and in some cases, climbed on and damaged vehicles," it goes on to say. Media outlets, including The Mirror US and Fox News, also used the clip in their reports about the incident (archived here and here). In another post on X, the Orange County Sheriff's Office said that the incident occurred at an intersection in South John Young Parkway and Central Florida Parkway (archived link). Google Street View imagery of the intersection shows that the false video was filmed in the area (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared video (L) and Google Street View imagery of the area with similarity highlighted by AFP Read more of AFP's reporting on misinformation related to the LA protests here.

Despite law, US TikTok ban likely to remain on hold
Despite law, US TikTok ban likely to remain on hold

France 24

time7 hours ago

  • France 24

Despite law, US TikTok ban likely to remain on hold

It would be the third time Trump put off enforcing a federal law requiring its sale or ban, which was to take effect the day before his January inauguration. "I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." Trump said a group of purchasers is ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations. Trump has repeatedly downplayed risks that TikTok is in danger, saying he remains confident of finding a buyer for the app's US business. The president is "just not motivated to do anything about TikTok," said independent analyst Rob Enderle. "Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape." Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. "Trump's not really doing great on his election promises," Enderle maintained. "This could be one that he can actually deliver on." Digital Cold War? Motivated by national security fears and belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having made no attempt to find a suitor. TikTok "has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control," said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain. "National security, economic policy, and digital governance are colliding," Singh added. The Republican president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19. As of Monday, there was no word of a TikTok sale in the works. Tariff turmoil Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over tariffs imposed by Washington on Beijing. ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law". Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company. Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok. Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman, Larry Ellison, is a longtime Trump ally. Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm. "TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand -- it's simply not as powerful," said Forrester Principal Analyst Kelsey Chickering. Meanwhile, it appears TikTok is continuing with business as usual. TikTok on Monday introduced a new "Symphony" suite of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools for advertisers to turn words or photos into video snippets for the platform. "With TikTok Symphony, we're empowering a global community of marketers, brands, and creators to tell stories that resonate, scale, and drive impact on TikTok," global head of creative and brand products Andy Yang said in a release.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store