logo
A mother's heartbreak: The unresolved mystery of missing Indian student

A mother's heartbreak: The unresolved mystery of missing Indian student

Saudi Gazette24-07-2025
DELHI — Nine years ago, an Indian student vanished into thin air.
Najeeb Ahmed was studying biotechnology at the prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) in Delhi, when he mysteriously went missing in October 2016.
The night before his disappearance, the then 27-year-old who lived in one of the university's residential hostels was involved in a scuffle with members of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), a right-wing student group. The students have denied any involvement in his disappearance.
For years, India's crime-fighting agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), has been trying to figure what may have happened to Ahmed — the agency took over the case from city police in 2017.
Now a court in Delhi has finally shut the investigation after the CBI said it had exhuasted all possible leads in the case.
"As a parting note, the court earnestly hopes that Najeeb Ahmed shall be traced soon," the court said in the order, which was announced last month.Ahmed's family, however, have alleged the inquiry was not conducted in a proper manner and said they would appeal the decision in a higher court."What message does it send, that India's premier investigating agency has not been able to find a missing student from one of India's best universities?" Ahmed's mother Fatima Nafees told BBC Hindi."We will not give up until we find our son."Born in a village in Uttar Pradesh, Ahmed, the son of a carpenter, was the eldest of four. His family made many sacrifices to support his JNU education."After completing his undergraduate degree, he was adamant that he wanted to study at JNU," Ms Nafees said."I told him you can take admission, but you won't stay in the hostel. You are too naive. But he didn't listen to me."On the night of 14 October, 2016, Ahmed reportedly got into a scuffle with a group of students affiliated to ABVP who were campaigning for hostel elections. JNU is known for its vibrant and intense student politics, with ideological groups often clashing over campus issues.In his testimonies to the CBI, his roommate Mohd Qasim said that Ahmed got injured in the altercation and had to be taken to a public hospital, where he was allegedly refused treatment.The doctors told him they could not treat his wounds without a formal crime complaint having been made to the police, his roommate alleged.According to the court order, Ahmed chose not to file a complaint and returned to campus. He went missing the next day, leaving behind his phone, wallet, and clothes in his hostel room.A CBI report says Ahmed last used his phone and laptop around 10am the day he disappeared. A hostel warden told the agency that he saw Ahmed getting into a tuk-tuk in the morning and leaving campus.Ms Nafees, who had been informed of the scuffle over phone by Ahmed's roommate, was on her way to Delhi to see her son. She arrived in the morning and upon finding him missing, filed a missing persons complaint on 15 October 2016.For days, there was no progress. Protests erupted on campus as students and activists accused authorities of inaction.In November 2016, Ms Nafees filed a petition in the Delhi High Court, accusing the police of being "slow, misdirected and subjective" and called for a court-monitored probe.A month later, Delhi Police conducted two extensive searches using sniffer dogs across JNU's sprawling campus — but again, nothing was found.In May 2017, the court handed over the investigation to the CBI.A year later, the CBI told the court it had exhausted all possible leads — and asked the bench to close the case.The agency said it had examined more than 500 witnesses, collected information from taxi, bus, train and flight operators, and searched hospitals and morgues, but had found nothing.A one million rupees [$11,600; £8,600] reward for information about Ahmed also failed to yield results, investigators argued.The case dragged on for two more years, when in 2020, Ms Nafees returned to court, this time to challenge the CBI's conclusions.She alleged the agency failed to properly probe the students involved in the scuffle with her son. She said they had a "clear motive", had threatened him, and should have been arrested. The CBI denied all allegations saying they had left "no stone unturned" in looking for Ahmed.The agency said it had tracked the phone locations of the nine students involved in the fight with Ahmed that night, but found no evidence linking them to his disappearance.Explaining its decision to finally shut the case, a court in Delhi said that the CBI has investigated "all plausible avenues" thoroughly but "no credible information" could be received about Ahmed's whereabouts.The judge dismissed Ms Nafees' plea, noting that while witnesses confirmed verbal threats, there was no "direct or circumstantial" evidence linking Ahmed's disappearance to the fight with ABVP members."Such scuffles and exchanges are not unheard of" in the charged atmosphere of JNU, the order added.The court, however, added that the CBI could reopen the case if new information comes to light.The order has been a huge blow for Ahmed's family and well-wishers.Colin Gonsalves, who represented Ms Nafees in the Delhi High Court in 2018, said he still questioned the investigation."The police routinely arrest people for minor crimes in India. It's shocking then, that none of the students were taken into custody for questioning," he said.Ms Nafees alleges that her son's religion had affected the seriousness of the investigation."If the victim had been a Hindu boy, would the police have responded the same way?" she asked."They would have demolished the houses of those suspected," she alleged, referring to the rising instances where homes of individuals accused of crimes are bulldozed by Indian authorities. The BBC has reached out to the CBI for comment.However, the agency has consistently maintained that they have carried out the probe impartially. In 2018, the Delhi High Court had said that they had found no evidence that CBI investigated the case unfairly or "under political compulsions".Ms Nafees says she's not done fighting. Every 15 October, the day her son vanished, she joins a candle march at JNU in his memory. The hope has dimmed, but the wait continues."Sometimes I wonder if I should put a nameplate outside our house," said Nafees Ahmed, his father."Our house has been renovated. What if he comes, but can't recognise it?" — BBC
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Putin to meet in coming days, Kremlin aide says
Trump and Putin to meet in coming days, Kremlin aide says

Saudi Gazette

time16 hours ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Trump and Putin to meet in coming days, Kremlin aide says

MOSCOW — US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have agreed to meet in the "coming days", a Kremlin aide has said. It follows Trump saying there was a "good chance" he could meet his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts together in person "very soon" to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. Trump's deadline for Russia to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine or face more sweeping sanctions is due to expire on Friday. A possible meeting between Trump and Putin would follow US envoy Steve Witkoff holding talks with the Russian president on Wednesday. Witkoff has travelled to Moscow four times previously, visits followed by optimism from Trump but ultimately no major breakthrough in peace talks. Trump was also asked at a White House briefing on Wednesday night whether Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Putin had agreed to a three-way summit, and he said there was a "very good prospect". Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov noted that the idea of a three-way summit was mentioned at talks in Moscow on Wednesday, but was quoted by Russian news agencies as saying the option was left by Russia "without comment". Zelensky indicated his support for a summit, acknowledging that various formats of meetings had been discussed - "two bilateral and one trilateral" - and added that Europe "must be a participant" in any talks. He wrote on X: "Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same brave approach from the Russian side." Ushakov said a location for a meeting between Trump and Putin had been agreed, with further details to be announced later. The official, who advises Putin on foreign affairs, said all parties have begun working on the details. Last month, Trump admitted to the BBC that after all four of Witkoff's previous visits, Putin had disappointed him after talks had initially led to optimism. The US President is now striking a more cautious tone, telling reporters on Wednesday: "I don't call it a have been working at this for a long time. There are thousands of young people dying... I'm here to get the thing over with." On Wednesday, the Kremlin released a vague statement about Witkoff's visit, calling the discussions "constructive" and noting that both sides had exchanged "signals". Zelensky meanwhile said he had spoken to Trump about Witkoff's visit, with European leaders also on the call. The Ukrainian president has been warning that Russia would only make serious moves towards peace if it began to run out of money. Expectations are muted for a settlement by Friday - when Trump's deadline expires - and Russia has continued its large-scale air attacks on Ukraine despite the US threat of sanctions. As pressure builds, Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order imposing a 25% tariff on Indian imports over its continued purchase of Russian oil. Before taking office in January, Trump said he would be able to end the war between Russia and Ukraine in a day. The conflict has raged on and his rhetoric towards Moscow has since hardened. Three rounds of talks between Ukraine and Russia in Istanbul have failed to bring the war closer to an end, three-and-a-half years after Moscow launched its full-invasion. Moscow's military and political preconditions for peace remain unacceptable to Kyiv and to its Western partners. Russian demands include Ukraine becoming a neutral state, dramatically reducing its military and abandoning its Nato aspirations. It also wants Ukrainian military withdrawal from its four partly occupied regions in the south-east, and the demobilisation of its soldiers. Russia also demands international recognition of Ukraine's Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, as well as the annexed Crimea. Other conditions include a ban on Ukraine's membership in any military alliances, a limit on the size of the Ukrainian army, Russian as an official language, and the lifting of international sanctions on Russia The Kremlin has also repeatedly turned down Kyiv's requests for a meeting between Zelensky and Putin. Meanwhile, the US approved $200m (£150m) in additional military aid to Ukraine on Tuesday, including support for drone production. — BBC

Trump orders India tariff hike to 50% for buying Russian oil
Trump orders India tariff hike to 50% for buying Russian oil

Saudi Gazette

time21 hours ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Trump orders India tariff hike to 50% for buying Russian oil

WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump has issued an executive order hitting India with an additional 25% tariff over its purchases of Russian oil. That will raise the total tariff on Indian imports to the United States to 50% — among the highest rates imposed by the US. The new rate will come into effect in 21 days, so on 27 August, according to the executive order. A response from India's foreign ministry on Wednesday said Delhi had already made clear its stance on imports from Russia, and reiterated that the tariff is "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". "It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest," the brief statement read. "India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests," it added. The US president had earlier warned he would raise levies, saying India doesn't "care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine". On Wednesday, the White House said in a statement that the "Russian Federation's actions in Ukraine pose an ongoing threat to US national security and foreign policy, necessitating stronger measures to address the national emergency". It said India's imports of Russian oil undermine US efforts to counter Russia's activities in Ukraine. It added that the US will determine which other countries import oil from Russia, and will "recommend further actions to the President as needed". Oil and gas are Russia's biggest exports, and Moscow's biggest customers include China, India and Turkey. Russia is now the biggest seller of oil to India, accounting for more than 35% of India's overall supplies, according to global commodities data platform Kpler. Trade data shared with the Reuters news agency showed that India bought about 1.75 million barrels a day of Russian oil in the first six month of this year. Speaking later at an event in the White House, Trump took a question from the BBC on the subject and said the tariff on India was just the start — "You're going to see a lot more, so much secondary sanctions," he said. The threatened tariff hike follows meetings on Wednesday by Trump's top envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow, aimed at securing peace between Russia and Ukraine. The additional tariff would mean a steep 50% duty on key Indian exports like textiles, gems and jewellery, auto parts, and seafood, hitting major job-creating sectors. Electronics, including iPhones, and pharma remain exempt for now. Delhi has previously called Trump's threat to raise tariffs over its purchase of oil from Russia "unjustified and unreasonable". In an earlier statement, a spokesperson for India's foreign ministry said the US had encouraged India to import Russian gas at the start of the conflict, "for strengthening global energy markets stability". He said India "began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict". The latest threatened tariff demonstrates Trump's willingness to impose sanctions related to the war in Ukraine even against nations that the US considers to be important allies or trading partners. This could be a warning that other countries could feel a real bite if Trump ramps up those kind of sanctions once Friday's deadline passes, when the US president has threatened new sanctions on Russia and to place 100% tariffs on countries that purchase its oil. This would not be the first time the Trump administration has imposed secondary tariffs, which are also in place to punish buyers of Venezuelan oil. India has previously criticised the US — its largest trading partner — for introducing the levies, when the US itself is still doing trade with Russia. Last year, the US traded goods worth an estimated $3.5bn (£2.6bn) with Russia, despite tough sanctions and tariffs. Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi have in the past referred to each other as friends and, during Trump's first term, attended political rallies in each others' countries. But that has not stopped Trump from hitting India with the levies, suggesting diverging interests between New Delhi and Washington. The Federation of India Exports Organisations has called the decision to impose additional tariffs "extremely shocking", adding that it will hit 55% of India's exports to America. The tariffs are expected to make Indian goods far costlier in the US, and could cut US-bound exports by 40–50%, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), a Delhi-based think tank. "India should remain calm, avoid retaliation for at least six months, and recognise that meaningful trade negotiations with the US cannot proceed under threats or mistrust," former Indian trade official and head of GTRI, Ajay Srivastava, said. — BBC

Trump Doubles Tariffs on India to 50% for Buying Russian Oil
Trump Doubles Tariffs on India to 50% for Buying Russian Oil

Leaders

timea day ago

  • Leaders

Trump Doubles Tariffs on India to 50% for Buying Russian Oil

The US President, Donald Trump, has signed an executive order doubling tariffs on India from 25% to 50% for purchasing oil from Russia. On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order imposing tariffs on India 'in response to its continued purchase of Russian Federation oil,' the White House said. This makes India's tariffs among the highest imposed by the US so far. 'India's importation of Russian Federation oil undermines US efforts to counter Russia's harmful activities,' the White House noted. The tariffs will come into effect on August 27, 2025, according to the White House fact sheet, which warned that other countries that directly or indirectly import Russian oil could be subject to similar tariffs. India and China are two of the largest Russian oil buyers. Trump has imposed 30% tariffs on imports from China. In response to Trump's announcement, the Indian Foreign Ministry reiterated in a statement that 'these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.' It said that New Delhi had made clear its position that its imports from Russia 'are based on market factors' and aim to ensure energy security for its people. 'It is therefore extremely unfortunate that the US should choose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest,' it noted, adding that New Delhi will 'take all actions necessary to protect its national interests.' The tariff hike announcement followed a meeting between the US Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, and the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, in Moscow, two days before Trump's deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine or face new economic sanctions. Short link : Post Views: 7

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store