logo
#

Latest news with #ABVP

A mother's heartbreak: The unresolved mystery of missing Indian student
A mother's heartbreak: The unresolved mystery of missing Indian student

Saudi Gazette

time10 hours ago

  • Politics
  • Saudi Gazette

A mother's heartbreak: The unresolved mystery of missing Indian student

DELHI — Nine years ago, an Indian student vanished into thin air. Najeeb Ahmed was studying biotechnology at the prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) in Delhi, when he mysteriously went missing in October 2016. The night before his disappearance, the then 27-year-old who lived in one of the university's residential hostels was involved in a scuffle with members of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), a right-wing student group. The students have denied any involvement in his disappearance. For years, India's crime-fighting agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), has been trying to figure what may have happened to Ahmed — the agency took over the case from city police in 2017. Now a court in Delhi has finally shut the investigation after the CBI said it had exhuasted all possible leads in the case. "As a parting note, the court earnestly hopes that Najeeb Ahmed shall be traced soon," the court said in the order, which was announced last family, however, have alleged the inquiry was not conducted in a proper manner and said they would appeal the decision in a higher court."What message does it send, that India's premier investigating agency has not been able to find a missing student from one of India's best universities?" Ahmed's mother Fatima Nafees told BBC Hindi."We will not give up until we find our son."Born in a village in Uttar Pradesh, Ahmed, the son of a carpenter, was the eldest of four. His family made many sacrifices to support his JNU education."After completing his undergraduate degree, he was adamant that he wanted to study at JNU," Ms Nafees said."I told him you can take admission, but you won't stay in the hostel. You are too naive. But he didn't listen to me."On the night of 14 October, 2016, Ahmed reportedly got into a scuffle with a group of students affiliated to ABVP who were campaigning for hostel elections. JNU is known for its vibrant and intense student politics, with ideological groups often clashing over campus his testimonies to the CBI, his roommate Mohd Qasim said that Ahmed got injured in the altercation and had to be taken to a public hospital, where he was allegedly refused doctors told him they could not treat his wounds without a formal crime complaint having been made to the police, his roommate to the court order, Ahmed chose not to file a complaint and returned to campus. He went missing the next day, leaving behind his phone, wallet, and clothes in his hostel room.A CBI report says Ahmed last used his phone and laptop around 10am the day he disappeared. A hostel warden told the agency that he saw Ahmed getting into a tuk-tuk in the morning and leaving Nafees, who had been informed of the scuffle over phone by Ahmed's roommate, was on her way to Delhi to see her son. She arrived in the morning and upon finding him missing, filed a missing persons complaint on 15 October days, there was no progress. Protests erupted on campus as students and activists accused authorities of November 2016, Ms Nafees filed a petition in the Delhi High Court, accusing the police of being "slow, misdirected and subjective" and called for a court-monitored probe.A month later, Delhi Police conducted two extensive searches using sniffer dogs across JNU's sprawling campus — but again, nothing was May 2017, the court handed over the investigation to the CBI.A year later, the CBI told the court it had exhausted all possible leads — and asked the bench to close the agency said it had examined more than 500 witnesses, collected information from taxi, bus, train and flight operators, and searched hospitals and morgues, but had found nothing.A one million rupees [$11,600; £8,600] reward for information about Ahmed also failed to yield results, investigators case dragged on for two more years, when in 2020, Ms Nafees returned to court, this time to challenge the CBI's alleged the agency failed to properly probe the students involved in the scuffle with her son. She said they had a "clear motive", had threatened him, and should have been arrested. The CBI denied all allegations saying they had left "no stone unturned" in looking for agency said it had tracked the phone locations of the nine students involved in the fight with Ahmed that night, but found no evidence linking them to his its decision to finally shut the case, a court in Delhi said that the CBI has investigated "all plausible avenues" thoroughly but "no credible information" could be received about Ahmed's judge dismissed Ms Nafees' plea, noting that while witnesses confirmed verbal threats, there was no "direct or circumstantial" evidence linking Ahmed's disappearance to the fight with ABVP members."Such scuffles and exchanges are not unheard of" in the charged atmosphere of JNU, the order court, however, added that the CBI could reopen the case if new information comes to order has been a huge blow for Ahmed's family and Gonsalves, who represented Ms Nafees in the Delhi High Court in 2018, said he still questioned the investigation."The police routinely arrest people for minor crimes in India. It's shocking then, that none of the students were taken into custody for questioning," he Nafees alleges that her son's religion had affected the seriousness of the investigation."If the victim had been a Hindu boy, would the police have responded the same way?" she asked."They would have demolished the houses of those suspected," she alleged, referring to the rising instances where homes of individuals accused of crimes are bulldozed by Indian authorities. The BBC has reached out to the CBI for the agency has consistently maintained that they have carried out the probe impartially. In 2018, the Delhi High Court had said that they had found no evidence that CBI investigated the case unfairly or "under political compulsions".Ms Nafees says she's not done fighting. Every 15 October, the day her son vanished, she joins a candle march at JNU in his memory. The hope has dimmed, but the wait continues."Sometimes I wonder if I should put a nameplate outside our house," said Nafees Ahmed, his father."Our house has been renovated. What if he comes, but can't recognise it?" — BBC

Najeeb Ahmed: Delhi court closes investigation into JNU student's disappearance
Najeeb Ahmed: Delhi court closes investigation into JNU student's disappearance

BBC News

time16 hours ago

  • Politics
  • BBC News

Najeeb Ahmed: Delhi court closes investigation into JNU student's disappearance

Nine years ago, an Indian student vanished into thin air. Najeeb Ahmed was studying biotechnology at the prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) in Delhi, when he mysteriously went missing in October night before his disappearance, the then 27-year-old who lived in one of the university's residential hostels was involved in a scuffle with members of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), a right-wing student group. The students have denied any involvement in his disappearance. For years, India's crime-fighting agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), has been trying to figure what may have happened to Mr Ahmed - the agency took over the case from city police in 2017. Now a court in Delhi has finally shut the investigation after the CBI said it had exhuasted all possible leads in the case. "As a parting note, the court earnestly hopes that Najeeb Ahmed shall be traced soon," the court said in the order, which was announced last month. Mr Ahmed's family, however, have alleged the inquiry was not conducted in a proper manner and said they would appeal the decision in a higher court. "What message does it send, that India's premier investigating agency has not been able to find a missing student from one of India's best universities?" Mr Ahmed's mother Fatima Nafees told BBC Hindi. "We will not give up until we find our son."Born in a village in Uttar Pradesh, Mr Ahmed, the son of a carpenter, was the eldest of four. His family made many sacrifices to support his JNU education."After completing his undergraduate degree, he was adamant that he wanted to study at JNU," Ms Nafees said. "I told him you can take admission, but you won't stay in the hostel. You are too naive. But he didn't listen to me." On the night of 14 October, 2016, Mr Ahmed reportedly got into a scuffle with a group of students affiliated to ABVP who were campaigning for hostel elections. JNU is known for its vibrant and intense student politics, with ideological groups often clashing over campus his testimonies to the CBI, his roommate Mohd Qasim said that Mr Ahmed got injured in the altercation and had to be taken to a public hospital, where he was allegedly refused treatment. The doctors told him they could not treat his wounds without a formal crime complaint having been made to the police, his roommate to the court order, Mr Ahmed chose not to file a complaint and returned to campus. He went missing the next day, leaving behind his phone, wallet, and clothes in his hostel room.A CBI report says Mr Ahmed last used his phone and laptop around 10am the day he disappeared. A hostel warden told the agency that he saw Mr Ahmed getting into a tuk-tuk in the morning and leaving campus. Ms Nafees, who had been informed of the scuffle over phone by Mr Ahmed's roommate, was on her way to Delhi to see her son. She arrived in the morning and upon finding him missing, filed a missing persons complaint on 15 October 2016. For days, there was no progress. Protests erupted on campus as students and activists accused authorities of November 2016, Ms Nafees filed a petition in the Delhi High Court, accusing the police of being "slow, misdirected and subjective" and called for a court-monitored probe.A month later, Delhi Police conducted two extensive searches using sniffer dogs across JNU's sprawling campus - but again, nothing was found. In May 2017, the court handed over the investigation to the CBI. A year later, the CBI told the court it had exhausted all possible leads - and asked the bench to close the case. The agency said it had examined more than 500 witnesses, collected information from taxi, bus, train and flight operators, and searched hospitals and morgues, but had found nothing.A one million rupees [$11,600; £8,600] reward for information about Mr Ahmed also failed to yield results, investigators argued. The case dragged on for two more years, when in 2020, Ms Nafees returned to court, this time to challenge the CBI's conclusions. She alleged the agency failed to properly probe the students involved in the scuffle with her son. She said they had a "clear motive", had threatened him, and should have been arrested. The CBI denied all allegations saying they had left "no stone unturned" in looking for Mr agency said it had tracked the phone locations of the nine students involved in the fight with Mr Ahmed that night, but found no evidence linking them to his disappearance. Explaining its decision to finally shut the case, a court in Delhi said that the CBI has investigated "all plausible avenues" thoroughly but "no credible information" could be received about Mr Ahmed's judge dismissed Ms Nafees' plea, noting that while witnesses confirmed verbal threats, there was no "direct or circumstantial" evidence linking Mr Ahmed's disappearance to the fight with ABVP members."Such scuffles and exchanges are not unheard of" in the charged atmosphere of JNU, the order court, however, added that the CBI could reopen the case if new information comes to order has been a huge blow for Mr Ahmed's family and well-wishers. Colin Gonsalves, who represented Ms Nafees in the Delhi High Court in 2018, said he still questioned the investigation. "The police routinely arrest people for minor crimes in India. It's shocking then, that none of the students were taken into custody for questioning," he said. Ms Nafees alleges that her son's religion had affected the seriousness of the investigation."If the victim had been a Hindu boy, would the police have responded the same way?" she asked. "They would have demolished the houses of those suspected," she alleged, referring to the rising instances where homes of individuals accused of crimes are bulldozed by Indian authorities. The BBC has reached out to the CBI for comment. However, the agency has consistently maintained that they have carried out the probe impartially. In 2018, the Delhi High Court had said that they had found no evidence that CBI investigated the case unfairly or "under political compulsions". Ms Nafees says she's not done fighting. Every 15 October, the day her son vanished, she joins a candle march at JNU in his memory. The hope has dimmed, but the wait continues."Sometimes I wonder if I should put a nameplate outside our house," said Nafees Ahmed, his father. "Our house has been renovated. What if he comes, but can't recognise it?"Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

SP is disregardingconstitutional values: UP Deputy CM
SP is disregardingconstitutional values: UP Deputy CM

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Politics
  • Time of India

SP is disregardingconstitutional values: UP Deputy CM

Gorakhpur: Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister and health minister Brajesh Pathak launched a blistering attack on Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav during his visit to Gorakhpur on Wednesday. Addressing reporters after a review meeting at the Circuit House, Pathak accused the SP of disregarding constitutional values and indulging in divisive politics. Referring to a recent meeting of SP MPs held near Parliament in a mosque, Pathak said the incident reflects the party's 'appeasement mindset'. "The SP has no connection with the Constitution. Despite clear constitutional provisions against exploiting religion for political gain, they continue their communal politics and pose themselves as 'namazwadis' before the public," he said. Recalling the Ayodhya firing incident, Pathak added, "This is the same party that opened fire on innocent Ram bhakts, staining the Sarayu with blood. Their attempts to hurt Sanatan culture will never succeed. " He ruled out the SP's return to power, saying, "One who couldn't stand with Ram can never stand with Krishna. And if not Krishna, how can he be a Yaduvanshi?" On SP's alleged minority appeasement, Pathak countered, "Unlike SP, the BJP believes in 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas'." On the Chhangur Baba controversy, he assured stringent action against any wrongdoing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cat Keeps Hugging its Friend - Then the Owner Notices Something is Wrong Tips and Tricks Undo Earlier, over 2,000 meritorious class 10 and 12 students were felicitated at an ABVP-organised ceremony. Praising ABVP as a nationalist movement, Pathak said it prepared youth for societal service. ABVP national general secretary Virendra Singh Solanki added, "ABVP fosters character, patriotism and responsibility, not just academic brilliance."

After Enquiry, SAU Expels Bangladeshi Scholar After Clash Over Serving Fish on Hindu Fasting Day: Report
After Enquiry, SAU Expels Bangladeshi Scholar After Clash Over Serving Fish on Hindu Fasting Day: Report

The Wire

time5 days ago

  • Politics
  • The Wire

After Enquiry, SAU Expels Bangladeshi Scholar After Clash Over Serving Fish on Hindu Fasting Day: Report

The move comes after an altercation occurred on February 26 between members of the Students' Federation of India and the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad following the serving of fish curry on the day of Maha Shivratri South Asian University. Source: MEA website The university expelled doctoral scholar Sudipto Das, finding him 'guilty of serious misconduct'. 'Following a detailed proctorial enquiry, the university has found doctoral candidate Sudipto Das guilty of serious misconduct due to multiple instances of indiscipline. The university has ordered his immediate expulsion, permanently disqualified him from applying to any future programmes at SAU, and instructed him to vacate the hostel premises within 24 hours,' Hindustan Times quoted a senior official as saying. The university order also noted that Das had been suspended in 2022 for 'similar disruptions'. The university also fined student mess secretary Yashada Sawant an amount of Rs. 5,000 for not maintaining order at the mess when the altercation occurred. Das's expulsion comes after an altercation occurred on February 26 between members of the Students' Federation of India (SFI) in the university, and the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) following the serving of fish curry in the university mess on the day of Maha Shivratri, a day when some Hindu fast. According to TOI, members of the ABVP had requested that only vegetarian food be served on the day. However, on seeing fish curry being served on the day at the university mess, they attempted to take it off the counter. Members of the SFI intervened. According to TOI, a woman member of the mess committee was allegedly manhandled as well. Arguments also broke out between members of the SFI and the ABVP, both accusing each other of instigating violence. While the SFI accused ABVP members of trying to impose their dietary preferences on others and calling this an attack on secular values, the ABVP claimed that serving non-vegetarian food on a Hindu fasting day was 'insensitive' and disrupted religious harmony, Hindustan Times reported. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Opposition Fire First Salvo Before Parliament Monsoon Session Ahead Of Key INDI Alliance Meeting
Opposition Fire First Salvo Before Parliament Monsoon Session Ahead Of Key INDI Alliance Meeting

Time of India

time5 days ago

  • Politics
  • Time of India

Opposition Fire First Salvo Before Parliament Monsoon Session Ahead Of Key INDI Alliance Meeting

As the Monsoon Session of Parliament approaches, tensions are already flaring. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh calls the all-party meeting a 'meaningless formality,' criticising the Modi government for ignoring critical issues like the Pahalgam attack, Trump's 'five jets' claim, Operation Sindoor, and China's moves. Ramesh demands Parliament address Vote Bandi in Bihar, where lakhs allegedly lost voting rights, and pushes for the long-pending J&K statehood bill. BJD's Amar Patnaik slams the BJP-led Odisha government for failures across sectors, highlighting deaths during Rath Yatra, crimes against women, and the tragic self-immolation of an ABVP student. RJD's Manoj Jha attacks PM Modi, accusing him of ignoring lawlessness in Bihar and Manipur while selectively deploying fact-finding teams elsewhere. In contrast, BJP MPs Hema Malini and Gulam Ali Khatana call for 'constructive discussion' and hope for a disruption-free session.#monsoonsession #pahalgamattack #votebandi #congress #bjp #pmmodi #bjd #rjd #jairamramesh #odishanews #manojjha #operationsindoor #trumpjetclaim #jammustatehood #parliamentdebate #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store