After Enquiry, SAU Expels Bangladeshi Scholar After Clash Over Serving Fish on Hindu Fasting Day: Report
South Asian University. Source: MEA website
The university expelled doctoral scholar Sudipto Das, finding him 'guilty of serious misconduct'.
'Following a detailed proctorial enquiry, the university has found doctoral candidate Sudipto Das guilty of serious misconduct due to multiple instances of indiscipline. The university has ordered his immediate expulsion, permanently disqualified him from applying to any future programmes at SAU, and instructed him to vacate the hostel premises within 24 hours,' Hindustan Times quoted a senior official as saying.
The university order also noted that Das had been suspended in 2022 for 'similar disruptions'.
The university also fined student mess secretary Yashada Sawant an amount of Rs. 5,000 for not maintaining order at the mess when the altercation occurred.
Das's expulsion comes after an altercation occurred on February 26 between members of the Students' Federation of India (SFI) in the university, and the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) following the serving of fish curry in the university mess on the day of Maha Shivratri, a day when some Hindu fast. According to TOI, members of the ABVP had requested that only vegetarian food be served on the day. However, on seeing fish curry being served on the day at the university mess, they attempted to take it off the counter. Members of the SFI intervened. According to TOI, a woman member of the mess committee was allegedly manhandled as well.
Arguments also broke out between members of the SFI and the ABVP, both accusing each other of instigating violence.
While the SFI accused ABVP members of trying to impose their dietary preferences on others and calling this an attack on secular values, the ABVP claimed that serving non-vegetarian food on a Hindu fasting day was 'insensitive' and disrupted religious harmony, Hindustan Times reported.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
As the economy grows, so would tax collection; hopeful of meeting FY26 target: CBDT Chairman Ravi Agrawal
The net direct tax collections may have slowed down, but the Income Tax Department is 'comfortable and hopeful' of meeting the target for the ongoing financial year 2025-26, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) Chairman Ravi Agrawal said. In an interview with Aanchal Magazine, the CBDT Chairman listed several measures including the various 'nudge' campaigns being taken by the Department to boost compliance that has already resulted in filing of over 1.1 crore updated returns and collections of over Rs 11,000 crore. However, there is scope for further increase in the number of returns filed by taxpayers. Edited excerpts: There is a moderation in direct tax collections. Till July 10, it was 1.3 per cent down year-on-year. Is it because of the income tax benefits given in the Budget? How are you assessing the trend vis-a-vis the target? When this overall net tax collection (budget estimate) was given to us, at that point, this element (income tax cut) was also factored in while arriving at the figure and while estimating the tax buoyancy, this was factored in. We are hopeful that it will be done. So far as the reduction is concerned, that was primarily attributable to higher refunds outgo. Also, the fact that if you compare July last year versus July this year, the difference is that the due date for filing the return was July 31, and self-assessment tax was also coming. Since the due date has been shifted, that collection to that extent has basically taken a hit to that extent. But then, going forward, we feel that as the economy grows, so would the tax collection because ultimately taxes are derivative of economic growth. So, economic growth, and then better tax administration, would definitely yield. We are comfortable and hopeful of meeting the target. How is the Income Tax Department making use of digital technologies to boost compliance? On an annual basis, the department captures around 650 crore transactions data from different sources. These transactions are collated, and for about 40 crore PANs, Annual Information Statements (AIS) are generated. This has the data of your TDS, tax payment, any transactions that have been done with different parties, maybe immobile property, or shares or mutual funds or any other. That is reflected on the portal online that is available to the taxpayers. And it's not only available to the taxpayers, they are seeing it, which is an interesting statistic, to me it was very interesting. If you see in FY 2024-25, about 7.42 crore taxpayers actually saw their AIS. And the number of times they actually visited, on an average, if we see, it's about three and a half times. That means the visits to the AIS module of ours was 24 crore times. The point I'm trying to make is that one, you collate this information, this information is corresponding to more than 40 crore taxpayers and more than 7.5 crore taxpayers actually see this multiple times. This becomes a reference point basically for the taxpayer to see their ledger, take a call, what are the taxes to be paid like advance tax and all, whether it has to be paid or not and the return that has to be filed, what is the income that has to be reflected, which means that there is a wide acceptability of the information and the ledger in the form of AIS that is being shown to the taxpayer. It also reflects their confidence in the information that is being shown. 9 crore people are filing the returns and you have more than about 40 crore people in whose case this AIS has been updated. So therefore we can say that yes, there is a scope for further increase in the number of returns that have been filed. What is the role of AI in such analysis? In that context, now we come to what is the role of AI? So, one is, who ought to file the return is not filing. You have this data. Based on that, you can come up with potential cases and then correspond with them electronically. So whatever coordinates you have, you can inform. The second component is whosoever is filing the return, whether a correct return has been filed or not. In case, there is an obvious gap or something which needs to be flagged and from the taxpayer nudge him towards better compliance, and right compliance. And the third component is: if you find that the taxpayer is repeatedly committing a mistake, can there be a case of a harder nudge? So these are components of tax administration that we are working on and where AI is helping. Because AI is then raising red flags in all these transactions and saying: okay, this maybe you would like to consider. And based on that we do a ABC sort of analysis, the numbers are huge…every year some 9 crore people would file returns and then you have to do that analysis. This is the extent and volume of e-governance in the tax department. The direct tax department is huge and if you see the profile of the taxpayer, that spectrum is also really very very wide wherein on one hand, you have a technologically-challenged taxpayer to a very, very matured taxpayer who is very, very technology savvy. So you have to build a system to make sure that the wide spectrum of people are able to see and find value with it. We have seen on the indirect tax side also, like for GST, a move towards capturing the unregistered persons. Is there a similar move from the direct tax side to expand the tax net to the ones who are not filing returns? Basically, what has to be seen is that the taxpayers' base is also increasing. And also the number of people who are filing the returns are also increasing. More and more awareness once it comes, naturally the compliance will go up. So I would not put this number that all these 40 crore people were supposed to file the return and they ought to be our taxpayer. No, not that. But, yes, there is a scope for improvement. And then how do we nudge the taxpayer? How do we prompt the taxpayer to come look at their transactions and then if there is a requirement of filing a return, the person would. I think the awareness is there all across, the communication is also fast, so, by and large, now the taxpayer is also aware about the obligations. It's not that the taxpayer is not aware about it. They are taking that call. And once more and more the data gets matured and it gets populated and you are able to reflect it online, people will take care. Especially, younger generation. How is the Tax Department flagging these gaps to the taxpayers? Our systems create a 360-degree profile of taxpayers' financial transactions and flag any inconsistencies between their declared income and their financial activities. The in-house 'Project INSIGHT', uses advanced data analytics to collate information from various sources, including bank reports, financial institutions, sub-registrars of properties etc. The Department proactively nudges taxpayers suspected of making wrong claims or omissions to update their returns and pay the correct tax. The success of this approach is visible in the outcome of the 'nudge' campaigns. In the Foreign Income and Assets Nudge Campaign, based on matching data received under automatic exchange of information, 19,501 taxpayers were nudged. This resulted in 62 per cent of them revising their returns, and a total of 30,161 taxpayers declared foreign assets worth Rs 29,208 crores and foreign income of Rs 1,089 crore during the campaign period. For false claims, data analytics identified over Rs 9,000 crore in excess deductions claimed under Section 80GGC. Nudging taxpayers through SMS and emails led to a reduction of Rs 963 crore in deductions and the payment of Rs 409.50 crore in additional taxes as of June 18, 2025. The Virtual Digital Assets Nudge Campaign is also ongoing, wherein the taxpayers are being nudged through SMS and e-mail to revisit claims made in ITRs related to TDS under Section 194S versus Schedule VDA filings. The updated return facility (ITR-U) has seen significant success. As of June 18, 2025, a total of 8,892,395 updated ITRs have been filed, generating Rs 9577.06 crore in additional taxes. Overall, over 1.1 crore updated returns have been filed, collecting more than Rs 11,000 crore. By proactively providing taxpayers with information about their financial transactions, we encourage voluntary compliance. How is the Department communicating with the taxpayers? We are communicating with non-filers…there is an ABC analysis that we do to find which people have entered into larger transactions, and who are not filing. Maybe a person had filed earlier in the earlier year, but has chosen not to file this year. So then you can identify those people and try to also see rational from our end through AI. What could be the reason that this guy has not filed now. For example, the person may have entered into an immovable property transaction in one year, and subsequently, it may not be so. It may be something like that the income does not fall above the threshold. You see all those cases, see the high-end cases and then correspond with them through emails in the database or from other data sources. Recently, there were search operations at 150 locations. Was it a similar exercise? This was basically an exercise in that direction. The taxpayer reports certain income, and while calculating their income, reports certain exemptions or deductions which are taken on face value and the system processes. But what we found through AI was that there were gaps, and they were really patterns that emerged, which reflected that the deductions and the exemptions that were claimed were not the correct deductions/exemptions. So, therefore, our pan-India exercise was undertaken to also flag and bring home the point that while we trust the taxpayer, but then at the same time, incorrect claims of deductions and exemptions are not acceptable, and we have not actually gone to the taxpayer per se. We have gone to the intermediary or the facilitator who is misguiding the taxpayer and identify those people. Those could be professionals or intermediaries. Through those, more than 1.5 lakh PANs have been identified. The exercise is still going on. At times, what happens is that the intermediaries give false promises of refunds, and potentially the taxpayer may not be aware of what is being filed. So one has to be cautious about it because it has implications. Since it is an end-to-end, e-enabled service that the tax department is providing, unless the taxpayer gives us the right coordinates of email and mobile, it becomes really very difficult for the tax department to correspond with the taxpayer. If an email of an intermediary is given, or a temporary email of an intermediary is given, then naturally the correspondence would go or the letter would go to that very email which is not being seen by anyone, and therefore, the taxpayer ultimately takes a hit. Like, we are committed to providing refunds as soon as possible. The average time for refunds is 17 days now (38 days in 2020-21) after returns are filed. But how do we give it unless, until the taxpayer actually gives the right coordinates. How is the Tax Department selecting cases for scrutiny? The Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS) is a technology-driven system used by the Income Tax Department to select income tax returns for scrutiny, aiming to ensure efficiency, transparency, and objectivity. The CASS risk rules and selection parameters are regularly reviewed and updated to adapt to evolving tax evasion patterns, compliance behaviors, and policy changes. This includes incorporating new data sources like enhanced TDS and SFT reporting for more precise risk assessments. Approximately 0.3 per cent of all income tax returns filed annually are selected for scrutiny, including cases chosen under CASS and other mechanisms like reopening. The proportion specifically selected under CASS typically ranges from 0.05-0.2 per cent of total annual returns filed. For FY 2024-25, about 2.5 lakh cases were selected for scrutiny, representing only about 0.29 per cent of total ITR filers. The Department operates on a 'Trust First and Scrutinise Later' philosophy, focusing on high-risk cases rather than random selection. You mentioned email addresses being incorrect or temporary. Apart from electronic communication, is there any other method of communication which the tax department is exploring since PAN is Aadhaar linked and you can go back to check addresses? No, we would prefer only an e-route. One, that is trackable also. There's an audit to it also. And, ultimately overall you see that it makes our service fast. Look at the volumes. What we would encourage is correspondence through e-mails. The Select Committee has submitted its report on the new Income Tax Bill. There were a lot of concerns raised by digital rights activists about privacy about the storage of data which the tax department would be accessing during an investigation. Say, there is personal or privileged communication between family members or doctors/lawyers. How will the income tax department ensure that that trust is not breached or misused during a probe? First, from a regulatory point of view, statutory permissions are there which mandate the tax department to actually not part with the data in an unauthorised manner. It's a legal obligation. Having said that, practically, in practice, how are we going to go about it? We have put in place a mechanism where this information or this data is scrutinised in a sanitised environment by authorised people. And also, the data which gets raised but which pertains to the privacy domain, is redacted and only the relevant data is investigated. We are also now coming up, we are in the process of defining procedures wherein these things could be made more tight to take care of a taxpayer. It is a genuine concern of the taxpayer. But, then you see, how do you investigate? There's a mobile, there is a personal chat also here, there's a financial transaction also. So, say, it's WhatsApp, it's both. You got to maintain the evidentiary value of this mobile also. It cannot be that at that point in time, you say I'll take this but I'll not take the other part. There would be continuity. So, therefore, to maintain the evidentiary value, you have got to capture the data in toto. But then once you have captured the data, it's the responsibility of the tax department to ensure that whatever investigation is done, only the relevant data is actually analysed, and the other data is redacted. So will there be specific rules for the new investigation process based on the new bill? If you see the manual that we have come out with, the search and seizure manual, we have put that also as one of the requirements. We are also coming up with the digital manual for analysis of digital evidence. There also we would be actually taking care of it. So, we will address it. What is the pendency of cases in direct taxes? And how are you going to address it? Yes, there is a pendency. About 5.5 lakh cases are pending. So we have taken certain steps. For example, last year we came up with this VSVS 2024 scheme (Vivad se Vishwas Scheme), and 40,000 people participated in that. To that extent, those were taken care of. Now, what we have done is that we have expanded the numbers of commissioner appeals. Officers who were doing appellate ones. We have also given appeal work to principal commissioners. We have tried to profile appeals with similar issues, Identify which can be low-hanging fruits for easy disposals. We have tried to give numbers, scores to the appeals, which actually prompt the officers to dispose of more appeals. So these are the steps that have been taken. In fact, if you see last year, we disposed of about 1.75 lakh appeals at the first appellate level in FY25, which was a substantial percentage increase of 55.18 per cent over 2023-24. And more so, the number of disposals were more than the number of new appeals instituted. So that in fact, for the first time, this came down but we are very conscious about it. The Select Committee was also insistent, and rightly so, that we should actually work on reducing the appellate pendency. Primarily this happened because at the time of Covid, the appeal disposal was not so high. So all those things were there. But we are taking all the steps. So this year, you are looking at reducing… Yes. In a big way, we are trying to reduce. We have already set for ourselves a target of more than 2 lakh for this year, but then we will not rest at that and we'll try to (reduce it) further. Aanchal Magazine is Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and reports on the macro economy and fiscal policy, with a special focus on economic science, labour trends, taxation and revenue metrics. With over 13 years of newsroom experience, she has also reported in detail on macroeconomic data such as trends and policy actions related to inflation, GDP growth and fiscal arithmetic. Interested in the history of her homeland, Kashmir, she likes to read about its culture and tradition in her spare time, along with trying to map the journeys of displacement from there. ... Read More
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anert's note contains blatant lies: Chennithala
T'puram: Senior Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala said the note released by Anert in response to his questions to the electricity minister regarding the multi-crore scam related to the PM KUSUM scheme, which provides free solar pumps to farmers in Kerala, contains blatant lies. "This explanation confirms all the corruption allegations I have raised. Anert's note, filled with falsehoods, is part of the electricity minister's attempt to evade answering the allegations," Chennithala said. He said the official has listed such blatant lies to cover up the corruption conducted on behalf of the electricity minister. "We all witnessed what happened to the former principal secretary to the chief minister, who justified a consultancy corruption deal I exposed during the previous govt's tenure. The same fate awaits this official," he added. "If attempts to protect this corrupt official continue, another major corruption involving him will soon be exposed. The govt has become one that charges commissions through consultancies," Chennithala said. When Anert called for a tender worth Rs 240cr, the CEO's authority was only Rs 5cr. Anert's claim that they did not call for a Rs 240-cr tender is a blatant lie. Kerala's e-tender portal clearly recorded the Rs 240-cr tender. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Similarly, the explanation given for amending the financial bid is strange. The most important aspect of a financial bid is the amount recorded. Amending a bid means changing the amount, he added. Another major falsehood is the claim that the CAG report approved this tender process. The CAG report examining the tender processing of this period has not yet been released, making this claim a blatant violation of service rules by the Anert official concerned, he said. The beneficiaries of the commission from the multi-crore transactions through Anert will soon be revealed. The electricity minister can no longer evade this issue. "I have all the evidence and documents of the corruption and irregularities. I challenge the minister for a detailed investigation. The minister should face the investigation with dignity instead of hiding behind officials. An investigation of Anert's transactions over the past five years should be conducted, and the legislative assembly committee should recommend an inquiry," demanded Ramesh Chennithala.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC directs govt officials to expedite drainage work in Cuttack
1 2 Cuttack: Orissa high court on Friday took stock of the chronic waterlogging issues in Cuttack and directed top govt officials to expedite drainage work while ordering a joint inspection of the Matru Bhawan site and submission of a report by Aug 4. While issuing the order, the division bench of Justices S K Sahoo and V Narasingh expressed concern over delay in executing key drainage infrastructure projects, especially a box-pushing culvert under railway tracks meant to ease stormwater discharge from Matru Bhawan to Matagajpur. A major hurdle cited was the non-construction of a 1.3km stretch of drain between Matru Bhawan and Khannagar. Watco had deposited Rs 15.45 crore with ECoR in 2016 for constructing the culvert, but work is yet to begin. The bench noted the delay was primarily due to the presence of an 11kV underground power cable. The court ordered a joint inspection involving representatives from Water Corporation of Odisha (Watco), Tata Power Central Odisha Distribution Limited (TPCODL), East Coast Railway, and members of the advocates' committee, to determine how the cable can be relocated to allow drainage work to proceed. Appearing in virtual mode, Usha Padhee, principal secretary of housing and urban development cited that over 400km of drainage work is required to be carried out in Cuttack. She informed the court about 24x7 emergency control rooms, rapid response teams, and the strategic placement of over 310 pump sets to combat flooding in low-lying areas. In a report, amicus curiae N K Mohanty apprised the court of delays in completing sewer connections across the city. He stated that only around 20,000 houses have been connected to the 362-km JICA-built sewer network, resulting in excessive discharge into open drains. Mohanty highlighted structural issues such as broken mesh and clogged drains due to debris and poor maintenance by the Cuttack Municipal Corporation (CMC). Additionally, five key drains are still awaiting administrative approval for construction. CMC also submitted that it has engaged a consultancy firm to prepare a comprehensive drainage master plan for the city. The final report is expected by Dec. Detailed project reports (DPRs) for five major stormwater drains are under technical vetting, and tenders will be floated after govt approval and fund allocation. The matter will be taken up for next hearing on Aug 7.
