logo
Rs55b windfall expected from gas tariff hike

Rs55b windfall expected from gas tariff hike

Express Tribune29-01-2025

Listen to article
In line with International Monetary Fund (IMF) commitments, the government is projected to collect over Rs55 billion in prior year adjustments (PYA) during FY25, following an increase in gas tariffs for captive power plants (CPPs).
The tariff was raised from Rs3,000/mmbtu to Rs3,500/mmbtu for CPPs, pushing the weighted average gas tariff to Rs1,722/mmbtu, with an expected annual average of Rs1,689/mmbtu, said Hamdan Ahmed, an analyst at Optimus Capital Management. Additionally, the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority's (OGRA) oil price assumption of $81.8/bbl, compared to FYTD25 prices of $76.5/bbl, suggests an upside potential to revenue estimates.
The power sector stands to benefit from this shift. If CPPs transition to the national grid, a net tariff reduction of Rs0.2-0.5/KWh could be achieved across all consumer segments.
"A net tariff reduction of Rs0.2-0.5/KWh for all consumers is achievable if CPPs shift to the grid," said Ahmed.
Additionally, capacity charges may decrease by Rs0.6/KWh, particularly as the majority of CPPs — around 3,676 GWh — are concentrated in the South. Increased reliance on low-cost nuclear and Thar coal plants would further aid in lowering electricity tariffs, he wrote in a research report.
On the other hand, the gas sector faces limited direct impact, though a complete shift of CPPs to the grid could lead to a Rs35 billion under-collection, necessitating a modest 5% gas tariff hike to meet revenue requirements. However, short-term challenges remain, including excess RLNG in the system, potential disruptions to domestic gas supply, and risks of exploration and production (E&P) curtailments. Despite this, the weighted average cost of gas remains below imported RLNG, favouring its reallocation to productive industrial use.
In line with IMF commitments, the government is expected to accelerate the grid transition of CPPs through levies, which could weigh on energy-intensive industries such as chemicals, textiles, and cement. However, Ahmed anticipated that electricity tariff reductions may offset some of the financial strain on these industries. Additionally, exploration and production companies (E&Ps) and the PSO could benefit from a gradual recovery in circular debt stock, which is around Rs2.8 trillion.
It is pertinent to mention that OGRA had notified an increase of Rs500/MMBtu in gas tariffs, effective February 1, 2025, for CPPs, with the primary beneficiary being the textile sector. Gas prices remained unchanged for all other consumer categories. Contrary to the Petroleum Division's proposal of a Rs100/MMBtu hike in unprotected residential consumer tariffs, the government opted to maintain the current rate. The Economic Coordination Committee also clarified its plans to gradually bring gas tariffs for CPPs at par with RLNG rates and instructed the Petroleum Ministry to take measures to impose a grid transition levy on CPPs.
The revision in gas prices for CPPs would reduce the gap between CPP tariffs and RLNG prices to a minimum of $0.12/MMBtu, compared to an average of over $6.5/MMBtu over the past three years, thus meeting IMF guidelines for tariff alignment, wrote JS Global.
However, contrary to common belief that companies using CPPs would shift to the national grid after the hike, they may choose to maintain CPP utilisation despite the increased price. The transition to the grid is estimated to take six months, and fluctuations in power supply could prove costly, said Ahmed.
"The supply, even at the increased price, is a sigh of relief for CPPs," wrote Shagufta Irshad of JS Global in her report. A 17% or Rs500/MMBtu hike in gas tariffs, compared to a potential complete cut in gas supply, would still provide relief for CPPs, especially in the textile sector.
Although the industry has arranged for alternative fuel and power sources — including multi-fuel-fired plants, increased solar power capacities, direct RLNG purchases from private companies, and power supply arrangements with respective power utilities—a complete disconnection remains a threat. This is particularly concerning as an uninterrupted power supply from the grid throughout the year remains uncertain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

K-P to unveil Rs2tr tax-free budget
K-P to unveil Rs2tr tax-free budget

Express Tribune

time25 minutes ago

  • Express Tribune

K-P to unveil Rs2tr tax-free budget

The Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government is set to present a Rs2,000 billion budget tomorrow, with over Rs1,800 billion allocated for current expenditures. The budget will show a surplus of Rs180 billion and will not introduce any new taxes. However, the scope and rate of existing taxes will be expanded. A total of Rs433 billion has been earmarked for development projects, including funds for the development of the newly merged tribal districts. The government will also announce the imposition of an "education emergency" in the new fiscal year. Under this initiative, furniture will be provided to 100 per cent of public schools. To boost its own revenues, the province has set a 40 per cent higher target for provincial tax collection compared to the current fiscal year. The new budget includes the establishment of four additional cardiac centers in addition to the existing ones, as well as special funds for the merged districts. Measures to support the province's vulnerable, marginalized, and low-income populations are also part of the budget. Funding has been allocated for key infrastructure and welfare projects including the Peshawar-DI Khan Motorway, a new electricity transmission line, the establishment of an insurance company, and the Chashma Right Bank Canal. Safe City projects in Peshawar, Bannu, and DI Khan will receive financial support, and the education budget is being increased by 13 per cent. The monthly honorarium for artists will also be raised from Rs100,000 to Rs150,000. A significant portion of the development budget will focus on completing ongoing projects. Priority will be given to projects that are 80 per cent or more complete, followed by those with 60 per cent completion. The number of new development projects has been capped at 500, with Rs195 billion to be immediately released, and up to Rs250 billion allocated as needed. For the first time, a special committee will be formed to approve projects based on priority and necessity. The budget will continue to prioritize the education, health, and social welfare sectors. Additionally, the 13-year throw-forward period for the Annual Development Program (ADP) will be reduced to seven years. A safari park is also planned for Misri Banda in Nowshera as part of the new fiscal year's initiatives. The federal government is set to allocate a total of Rs1,342.78 billion to K-P from the divisible pool for the upcoming fiscal year 2025-26, which will raise the province's overall budget to approximately Rs2,000 billion. For the ongoing fiscal year 2024-25, the federal government was expected to provide Rs1,221.53 billion. However, according to revised estimates, the actual amount transferred to the province stood at Rs1,135.66 billion by the end of the fiscal year. In the upcoming fiscal year, the merged tribal districts will receive a Rs40 billion subsidy in the energy sector. This is a reduction from Rs65 billion allocated during the current fiscal year. Additionally, the federal government will provide Rs80 billion in special grants to these merged districts — an increase from Rs66 billion allocated in the current year. Under the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP), the merged tribal areas will be allocated Rs65.44 billion, compared to Rs70 billion in the current fiscal year.

Twilight of the Empire
Twilight of the Empire

Express Tribune

time4 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Twilight of the Empire

US President Donald Trump gestures, as he departs for Pennsylvania, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, U.S., May 30, 2025. Photo: Reuters Listen to article As a series of trends and shocks cumulatively strain the old order, US President Donald Trump, even his critics must admit, possesses the fatal gift of locating the aching pulse of the nation, only to inflame it further with self-destructive measures while eroding Washington's global credibility. He sees the symptoms of American decline clearly: deindustrialisation, a brittle middle class, bloated trade deficits, and the political cost of endless wars. But he metabolises crisis into spectacle, grievance into doctrine, and interdependence into betrayal. For decades, the US has functioned as the imperial core of a global capital-recycling apparatus. The system has depended on the continuous inflow of surplus capital from export-heavy economies, including China and Germany, to America's debt-saturated financial architecture. The US trade deficit reached an eye-watering $1.1 trillion in 2023, a figure that dwarfs those of other peripheral or semi-peripheral economies like India. In this light, Trump's populist howl against the 'indignity' of the American people, dispossessed in the very belly of global wealth, is not entirely misplaced. His instinct that endless wars serve as spectacles to obscure the real mechanism of American hegemony – the global dollar-debt regime – is accurate in a crude, pre-theoretical sense. Since the late 1960s, when America ceased being a surplus nation, its geopolitical muscle has rested not on production but on its control of the dollar as the global reserve currency. The military-industrial complex is merely the theatrical wing of a deeper financial imperialism. However, Trump is radically mistaken in his belief that punitive tariffs and protectionist swagger will resurrect 'Middle America.' Tariffs, in the late neoliberal stage, cannot revive industrial capacity gutted by decades of offshoring and rentier capitalism. Instead, they risk destabilising the very mechanism whereby America's status as a debtor empire is transformed into an asset: the recycling of dollar-denominated debt into US capital markets. If that circuit is broken, the paper wealth of Wall Street and the speculative empires of Trump's own class will collapse. To materially uplift the working and lower-middle classes that fuelled his electoral resurgence, Trump would have to declare war not on China or Brussels, but on Manhattan and Malibu, hedge funds, private equity, and speculative real estate. 'Asymmetric interdependence' For much of the post-World War II period, what was marketed as 'globalisation' was, in fact, an imperial project cloaked in liberal universals. It was the projection of American state-capitalist hegemony through a scaffold of multilateral institutions – the IMF, World Bank, WTO, NATO – and the sacrosanct status of the dollar as the planetary currency-signifier. These were not neutral frameworks but instruments of asymmetric interdependence: the United States exported capital, debt, and ideology, while importing dependence, discipline, and surplus labour from the periphery and semi-periphery. The so-called "Washington Consensus" was never a consensus but a diktat. The system also functioned through a deeper ideological fantasy that free markets and global rule-based order were apolitical, universal, and benign. However, even most liberal-internationalist critiques warn the fantasy is fraying. The very interdependence that sustained US primacy is in retreat. Firms and governments worldwide need American consumers, capital markets, and alliances, giving Washington soft coercive power. Trump's tactics have upended that balance. By 'assailing interdependence,' the administration is chipping away at the very basis of American advantage. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye argue that order depends on stable power balances, shared norms, and sustaining institutions. Trump has shaken all three. What follows is a deeper drift into disorder, one that won't resolve until Washington either reorients itself or is overtaken by a new dispensation. The plunge may already be underway. 'In his erratic and misguided effort to make the United States even more powerful, Trump may bring its period of dominance—what the American publisher Henry Luce first called 'the American century'—to an unceremonious end,' they write in a Foreign Affairs essay. The weaponisation of the global economy hollows out the very symbolic order the US once used to legitimate its rule. By shrinking its adversaries' strategic space, Washington also corrodes the interconnected lattice that once lent credibility and allure to its empire. A tariff here, a blacklist there, and the freezing of foreign bank reserves – each may win tactical advantage, but at the cost of eroding the trust that underpinned the liberal international order. After all, what merchant or government would dare anchor long-term plans to a system where every node can be severed by a presidential signature? Trump's disruption is risky for the US precisely because new economic blocs are emerging from the wreckage of Western hegemony. Many leaders of the Global South remember colonialism and feel the 21st century liberates them from Western diktats. Where the US once posed as the sole path to progress, China's tech power and Russia's security reach now appear less like threats and more like counterweights. On soft power's front, when natural disasters strike or epidemics spread, Western-style NGOs and media have lost some of their framing power, as Chinese and Russian aid convoys now appear on television alongside those from the Red Cross. The velvet-glove diplomacy of the Cold War years – teddy bears over bombers – has been largely replaced by quarantine diplomacy, vaccine pledges, and once-dominant American development agencies playing second fiddle to Belt-and-Road contracts. In May, a major Democracy Perception Index reported that majorities of people worldwide now see the US negatively. The pollster noted that after Trump's return to the White House, America's reputation 'took a particularly massive hit in EU countries' and fell sharply everywhere. Even NATO founder Anders Fogh Rasmussen sighed that the US' standing was 'unloved' across most of the world. By contrast, China's image is improving globally, even overtaking the US in overall favourability in most regions. At home, the US is cannibalising its future. Budget cuts to core research agencies like the NSF and NIH are hollowing out the very ecosystem that once drove American innovation. Labs shrink, fellowships vanish, and global talent turns to Beijing, Singapore, or the UAE – where funding flows and visas follow. Meanwhile, China invests aggressively in semiconductors, AI, and green tech, eroding the US edge. As Oxford's Carl Benedikt Frey puts it, Trump's agenda risks dismantling the pillars of US innovation. Technological leadership is not a birthright but is built. And Washington is letting it rot. Trump's move to turn tariff-penalties and export bans into blunt instruments has worried many that he was abandoning existing rules and undermining the soft power that Washington has spent decades building. Analysts argue that American power rests on a blend of hard force and attraction, even though this very soft power has enabled hard power interventions. Interdependence with trading partners and multilateral institutions generates US leverage, while global admiration for 'American culture and ideals' makes allies pliant, they argue. Trump's assault on trade pacts and international agencies undercuts the foundation of American power and accelerates the erosion of the postwar order. In principle, if American power were absolute, it could force partners into line indefinitely. In practice, aggressive trade measures are sowing resentments. Many countries have been party to US-led trade deals expecting mutual benefit – now they wonder if Washington will simply upend their exports to punish political stances. The WTO and other legal venues, for a long time arenas where small states could begrudge larger ones, are being largely sidelined. Without clear enforcement, the most vulnerable economies will look for alternative blocs or simply bribe each other to stay out of the US orbit. The cruellest irony is that by inflicting pain on others – or threatening to – the US is undermining the very goodwill and partnerships that underpinned its postwar hegemony. The writer is a Lahore-based senior journalist

Minimum wage to remain unchanged at Rs37,000 in FY26, says Aurangzeb
Minimum wage to remain unchanged at Rs37,000 in FY26, says Aurangzeb

Business Recorder

time8 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Minimum wage to remain unchanged at Rs37,000 in FY26, says Aurangzeb

Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb on Wednesday said the government hadn't increased the minimum wage in the budget for the financial year 2025-26 and it would remain at Rs37,000 per month. The finance minister didn't mention about the minimum wage in his budget speech on Tuesday, as he announced Pakistan's federal budget 2025-26 'for a competitive economy' on Tuesday, targeting a modest 4.2% growth for the coming fiscal year, compared to 2.7% expected in the outgoing FY25. The budget was announced with a total outlay of Rs17.6 trillion, down 7% or Rs1.3 trillion as compared to the Rs18.9 trillion budgeted outlay of FY25. Key highlights of Pakistan budget for 2025-26 Last year, the government increased the minimum per month wage to Rs37,000 from previously Rs32,000. However, the government has kept it unchanged this year. This comes despite a demand from a key ally of Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) led government, Pakistan People's Party (PPP) to increase the minimum wage to Rs50,000.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store