
Moment bus hurtles off road & crashes into river when ‘breaks failed' as terrified students scream ‘we're going to die'
Shocking footage shows the double decker narrowly avoiding cars before flying off the road near Eastleigh, Hampshire yesterday morning.
7
7
7
7
The speeding bus squeezes between an oncoming car and a learner driver before crashing through a fence into the River Itchen, on Bishopstoke Road.
19 people were left injured following the disturbing ordeal, which was over in a matter of seconds.
Video from inside the vehicle, filmed by one horrified passenger, also shows the double decker barrelling down the Hampshire road.
Terrified screams can be heard from the students, who shout, "we're going to die", before the video cuts off.
The youngster behind the camera says: "Oh my god, the bus has just had a major crash and now he's speeding off."
Someone else yells in panic: "Get away from the windshield."
"We're going to die, we're actually going to die, what's he doing?", says the concerned boy filming.
"Oh my god, oh my god, we're actually going to die," he repeats, his voice growing more shaky.
Pictures from the scene also showed the large blue bus sitting upright in the shallow river with broken railings left behind.
Three passengers were rushed to hospital while fourteen were treated for minor injuries.
It comes as the driver earlier blamed faulty brakes and a "jammed accelerator".
Speaking to the BBC, resident Kelly West said: "We ran outside, we ran around the front of the bus and spoke to the driver."
She was told by the driver that the "brakes were not working" and the accelerator "jammed".
He explained to her that he was "doing the best he could" to avoid oncoming traffic coming down the road.
The Bluestar double-decker was College Bus 607 for Barton Peveril students, according to Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary.
Multiple emergency services swooped down after the crash.
At least five ambulances were spotted on the residential road and two helicopters were scrambled to the scene, which has been cordoned off by police.
Fire crews were also seen carrying ladders and working with stretchers to bring any remaining passengers off the bus.
All passengers have since been removed from the bus which is sitting upright in the River Itchen, said the ambulance service.
Bluestar have confirmed there were 19 passengers on-board at the time.
Scott Agass said that his 17-year-old son was onboard but is thankfully okay.
He told the Echo: "We are just waiting for our son who was onboard. They are not in the bus at the moment, I think they are all out.
7
7
"He said he was sitting there with a blanket and a monitor on his finger. He doesn't really know what happened or what caused it.
"I suppose it just happened so quick. All he saw was that it crashed and gone in the river."
It is understood that other families of the youngsters are gathered at the Eastleigh Rugby Club awaiting more information from police.
Barton Peveril Sixth Form College has said its staff are working closely with police.
Bluestar, which operates the double-decker, has said "early reports suggest the bus left the highway and came to rest in a shallow river".
Richard Tyldsley, Bluestar general manager, said: "There were 19 passengers on-board at the time.
"Our driver and at least two of the passengers have confirmed injuries, and we are awaiting further updates on the status of others on-board.
'We do not currently have full details of their injuries and are following their progress closely.
'Our thoughts are with everybody involved, and we wish those who were injured a full and speedy recovery.
'At this time, we do not know the circumstances behind this incident and are carrying out an immediate investigation. We are also assisting the police as they carry out their own enquiries."
7

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sally Rooney vows to use royalties to support Palestine Action despite terror ban
Novelist Sally Rooney has vowed to continue supporting Palestine Action 'in whatever way I can' using royalties from BBC adaptations of her books. The Normal People author, 34, publicly reaffirmed her support for the direct-action group, which was designated a proscribed terrorist organisation by the Home Office last month. It means showing support for the group is illegal under the Terrorism Act in the UK, punishable by a maximum of 14 years in prison. In an impassioned piece published in the Irish Times, the writer hit out at the arrest of more than 500 'brave individuals' holding placards declaring 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' in London's Parliament Square last weekend. 'In this context I feel obliged to state once more that – like the hundreds of protesters arrested last weekend – I too support Palestine Action,' she wrote. 'If this makes me a 'supporter of terror' under UK law, so be it. My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets. 'In recent years the UK's state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees. 'I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can.' She said she would happily publish the same statement in a UK paper, but noted that would now be illegal. Ms Rooney accused the British government stripping its citizens of basic rights and freedoms 'in order to protect its relationship with Israel'. 'The ramifications for cultural and intellectual life in the UK – where the eminent poet Alice Oswald has already been arrested, and an increasing number of artists and writers can no longer safely travel to Britain to speak in public – are and will be profound,' she added. Ms Oswald, 58, who won the TS Eliot prize in 2002 and was professor of poetry at the University of Oxford, was among those detained in central London last week. Afterwards, she said her motivation for taking part included the very personal experience of giving online poetry classes regularly to young people and children in Gaza. Half of the protesters arrested and now facing potentially life-changing terror convictions were over 60, Metropolitan Police figures show. Home secretary Yvette Cooper this weekend defended the decision to ban Palestine Action, insisting it is more than 'a regular protest group'. Ms Cooper said counterterrorism intelligence showed the organisation passed the tests to be proscribed under the 2000 Terrorism Act with 'disturbing information' about future attacks. 'Protecting public safety and national security are at the very heart of the job I do,' she wrote in The Observer. 'Were there to be further serious attacks or injuries, the government would rightly be condemned for not acting sooner to keep people safe.' Protesters have vowed to continue defying the ban as Huda Ammori, the group's founder, brings a legal challenge to the High Court in November.


Daily Record
11 minutes ago
- Daily Record
BBC Strictly Come Dancing 'police called in' after drug allegations probe
The BBC has reportedly called in the Metropolitan Police over allegations surrounding Strictly Come Dancing, with the force said to be investigating a number of claims The BBC has reportedly called in assistance of the police to investigate allegations surrounding Strictly Come Dancing. The corporation is said to have contacted the police following an inquiry into the popular dance show by lawyers. An investigation had already been launched into the programme following alleged accusations that two of its stars had used cocaine. Detectives are thought to be looking into other claims related to the show, as reported by the Mirror. Strictly is due to return to our screens in just a few weeks as the 23rd series kicks off. It has been under the spotlight as of late, after being wrapped up in a number of controversies with the future of it's airing at one point in doubt. "It's a significant new development in the BBC 's recent string of crises that they have now got the police involved in investigating allegations surrounding Strictly," an insider revealed. The TV insider continued: "This is a very dramatic turn of events. Despite all the show and its team have been through over recent months, it's hugely controversial that you've now got Scotland Yard detectives probing Strictly." "This is their biggest prime-time family entertainment show, so it's not a good look for the BBC," they told The Sun. Strictly has made headlines following allegations of bullying and inappropriate behaviour. It is believed to be the first time the BBC has contacted the police over allegations connected to the show. When approached by the Mirror, the BBC declined to comment on any police investigation. A BBC spokesperson said earlier this month: "We have clear protocols and policies in place for dealing with any serious complaint raised with us. "We would always encourage people to speak to us if they have concerns. It would not be appropriate for us to comment further." Earlier this month, the BBC reportedly brought in a leading law firm to probe allegations of cocaine use by two stars, with reports suggesting their drug taking was common knowledge behind the scenes. Former contestants, professional dancers, and production staff are being asked to speak with lawyers at Pinsent Masons to raise any concerns they might have, according to reports. It comes after drug use allegations were submitted to the BBC in March by Russells Solicitors representing a celebrity participant. In a statement shared with the Mirror, a BBC representative said: "We have clear protocols and policies in place for dealing with any serious complaint raised with us. We would always encourage people to speak to us if they have concerns. It would not be appropriate for us to comment further." Since then, it was reported that executives have offered those performers the opportunity of rehab. It was also claimed there could be random drug testing introduced for the upcoming tours, which are famous for their after-show parties. A source told the Sun: "The BBC is taking the allegations really seriously. Bosses are aware of the two stars in question and have a duty of care to make sure they're OK." They further stated: "As per BBC policy, the option of specialised professional support is on the table and will be offered. While drug testing won't happen on the main show, bosses are considering bringing in random checks for the tour next year."


Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Judge who let knife-wielding migrant stay in UK was on asylum seeker charity board
A judge who allowed a migrant convicted for drug dealing and sexual assault to stay in the UK is a former executive of a pro-asylum charity, it has been revealed. Judge Fiona Beach ruled that Christian Quadjovie was not a threat to the British public at a hearing last year. French-born Quadjovie has spent a total of 963 days behind bars in UK prisons since arriving in Britain at the age of 10. Quadjovie, who was set to be deported, was granted a reprieve by Judge Beach, an ex-director at Asylum Aid who represented migrants for free on behalf of the Bail for Immigration Detainees charity. The decision has since been overturned after government lawyers claimed her judgment was 'made against the weight of evidence'. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said Judge Beach's apparent conflict of interest 'undermines confidence' in the courts. 'Judges must be independent' He added: 'This is the latest example of an immigration judge with open borders views. 'The similarity between her decisions and the political views she has broadcast totally undermines confidence in the system. Judges must be independent.' Records show Judge Beach was a director of Asylum Aid between September 2004 and February 2007. She is understood to have stepped back from the group in December 2006 when appointed as a part-time judge. Quadjovie's case was first brought before her in April 2024. He was first convicted as a boy of 12 for sexually assaulting a girl under 13. In 2016, he was given a nine-month referral order for carrying a knife in public. Later that year, he was convicted of drug offences. He was detained for 30 months and caught with more drugs after his release. The Home Office tried to deport him, but he argued that he would not be able to reintegrate in France. Judge Beach's stated in the tribunal decision: 'The appellant had some support in the UK in the form of family support, potential access to education and public funds and access to housing assistance, yet found himself involved with gangs and drug dealing. 'The concern would be whether the appellant would slip back into the same way of earning money which he did in the UK, i.e. drug dealing. 'There is a real risk that this would occur again as a young man in France with few ties, no accommodation, no qualifications other than a GCSE in French and no employment experience on which to rely.' 'Not a serious threat to public security' The decision concluded: 'Taking account of all the evidence, I find that the evidence does not show that the appellant is a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat to public policy or public security.' However, in October, Home Office lawyers said Ms Beach's judgment was made 'against the weight of evidence' and has since been overturned. A spokesman for the judiciary said: 'In each case, judges make decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented, and apply the law as it stands.' In a letter, seen by the Sun on Sunday, Mr Jenrick made a formal request to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office to probe whether Judge Beach had declared her previous roles. In an interview with The Telegraph last week, Mr Jenrick said it was time to sack what he called 'activist' judges. He said: 'If judges want to enter the political sphere themselves, then they should stop being judges and go into politics. 'We have to have a situation where judges who act politically and bring their own personal politics into their job as a judge are held to account and frankly, can be removed.'