logo
Poland's presidential election set for tight vote

Poland's presidential election set for tight vote

RTÉ News​a day ago

Tomorrow, Polish voters will cast their ballots in a decisive second-round vote to decide whether centrist Rafal Trzaskowski or conservative Karol Nawrocki will become their next president.
The past two weeks of campaigning have delivered a tight contest between two candidates from Poland's largest political camps: the centre-right Civic Platform and the nationalist-conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party.
But it was always likely to be that way. Both parties have dominated Polish politics for more than 20 years and there is no love lost between them.
Polls yesterday showed both candidates tied on 47% each, or a one percentage point advantage for either. The result will be very close.
At stake is whether the current pro-EU coalition government can pursue its reform agenda with a centrist ally in Warsaw's presidential palace, or face continued political gridlock until the next parliamentary election in 2027 with another conservative president in office.
Outgoing President Andrzej Duda, an ally of PiS, has vetoed or deferred some two dozen bills passed by Donald Tusk's coalition government in the past 18 months, blocking its efforts to reverse the changes made to the judiciary during PiS's time in power from 2015 to 2023.
The coalition has also held off on proposing the liberalisation of abortion laws knowing that Mr Duda would likely block it.
Left, liberal and centrist voters see a Nawrocki presidency as presenting more of the same, if not worse.
Poland's president holds a largely ceremonial role but can veto bills passed by parliament.
A 60% majority can overturn the veto but Mr Tusk's government is short of those numbers.
The president is also the commander-in-chief of Poland's armed forces and oversees security and defence policy so the office holder wields power.
The campaign, which began in January, has been "99% ideological and maybe 1% issue-based", Andrzej Bobinski, managing director of Polityka Insight, told RTÉ News.
Mr Trzaskowski, the centrist mayor of Warsaw who narrowly lost the previous presidential election in 2020 to Mr Duda, has been the frontrunner throughout.
But he saw his lead almost disappear in the first round.
Mr Trzaskowski and his team have since focused on mobilising more left and hard left voters, and particular young female voters, many of whom feel disappointed at the ruling coalition's lack of progress on liberalising Poland's strict abortion laws.
"Women hardly believe that even with the President from the same political spectrum, anything will change," said Magdalena Jakubowska, vice-president of think tank Res Publica Foundation in Warsaw.
At rallies in the past two weeks, Mr Trzaskowski's wife, Malgorzata Trzaskowska, has often taken centre stage to emphasise that her husband is the candidate who supports women's rights.
He supports the liberalisation of current abortion laws but he has not put the issue at the front of his campaign as he did in 2020.
Doing so would hamper his efforts to appeal to conservative voters from small town and rural Poland.
Mr Nawrocki, who has taken on the mantle of the challenger in this race, is a historian and social conservative. But he has no political experience.
He is currently the head of Poland's Institute of National Remembrance, a state body that oversees official Polish history, and was previously the director of the Museum of the Second World War in his native Gdansk.
Though officially running as an independent candidate, he has the full backing and support of PiS's political machine.
Mr Nawrocki's campaign has been dogged by scandals as much as anything else, namely accusations that he purchased a flat in the late 2000s from an elderly man in his home city of Gdansk for a small sum in return for a promise to look after the pensioner.
Polish media later reported that the elderly man now lives in a care facility and not in the apartment.
Mr Nawrocki repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and said he continued to help the elderly man financially.
He has also been linked to football ultras in his youth.
However, these allegations have not damaged his campaign as he has managed to secure the support of the PiS electorate.
"Karol Nawrocki basically has to work to the right and to the extreme right. He has to mobilise his voter base and to mobilise everybody who's to the right of Law and Justice," said Mr Bobinski.
Mr Trzaskowski, he added, "is trying to build a coalition of people who don't want Law and Justice to get back to power".
The big political development in this campaign has been the increase in support for far-right candidates.
In the first round vote, 21% of Polish voters cast their ballots for one of two far-right candidates.
Last week, the more popular of the two, Slawomir Mentzen, who won 15% of votes in the first round, invited both Mr Trzaskowski and Mr Nawrocki to discuss election issues on his YouTube channel.
Mr Mentzen presented eight demands that he wanted them to agree so that his 2.9 million voters could decide who to support in the second round.
The interviews made for interesting viewing but, by themselves, may not make a massive impact on the final result.
During his grilling, Mr Nawrocki came across as weak and fawned over the far-right leader's eight demands in a bid to win the support of his voters.
He signed all eight of Mr Mentzen's demands, one of which was a commitment to oppose Ukraine's membership of NATO in the future. It was a point that Mr Trzaskowski would not agree to.
Mr Trzaskowski fared better and may have won over the libertarians among Mr Mentzen's voters - they like his low tax agenda, rather than his ultra-nationalism.
Also, both men went for a beer together after their YouTube debate which did the rounds on Polish social media.
Videos of them having a pint in Mr Mentzen's craft beer pub, along with Polish foreign minister Radoslaw Sikorski, were the stuff of PR gold and could translate into a few more votes for Warsaw's mayor.
In the end, Mr Mentzen decided not to endorse either of the two candidates. The whole thing looked like an exercise in self-promotion for the far-right leader who wants to break Poland's long-standing political duopoly.
However, a sizeable number of far-right voters could just vote for the conservative candidate tomorrow knowing that he aligns more closely with their nationalist and socially conservative views.
A lively debate on the Polish public broadcaster and two mass rallies by both candidates in the capital last weekend did not result in a swing towards either candidate.
Those who are committed Trzaskowski or Nawrocki supporters are not going to change sides at this stage.
Instead, younger voters who opted for more radical, anti-establishment parties in the first round, are more likely to sway the result for one candidate or the other.
If far-right supporters turn out in large numbers for Mr Nawrocki, then he may win.
Whereas, if Mr Trzaskowski successfully mobilises more left and liberal voters, particularly women, the result could favour him.
Whatever the outcome, it looks set to be very close.
"I'm expecting that there will be very little difference between the two candidates. It will be really 50-50, and 200, 300,000 votes may really change the situation," said Ms Jakubowska.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Seven dead as two bridges in Russia collapse after explosions
Seven dead as two bridges in Russia collapse after explosions

Irish Examiner

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Seven dead as two bridges in Russia collapse after explosions

Explosions caused two bridges to collapse and derailed two trains in western Russia overnight, officials said on Sunday, without saying what had caused the blasts. In one of the incidents, seven people were killed and dozens were injured. The first bridge, in the Bryansk region on the border with Ukraine, collapsed on top of a passenger train on Saturday, causing the casualties. Hours later, officials said a second train was derailed when the bridge beneath it collapsed in the nearby Kursk region, which also borders Ukraine. Rescue workers at a damaged bridge in Russia's Bryansk region, which borders Ukraine (Moscow Interregional Transport Prosecutor's Office telegram channel/AP) In that collapse, a freight train was thrown off its rails on to the road below as the explosion collapsed the bridge, acting governor Alexander Khinshtein said on Sunday. The crash sparked a fire, but there were no casualties, he said. Russia's investigative committee, the country's top criminal investigation agency, said in a statement that explosions had caused the two bridges to collapse, but did not give further details. Photos posted by government agencies from the scene in the Bryansk region appeared to show train carriages ripped apart and lying amid fallen concrete from the collapsed bridge. Other footage on social media were apparently taken from inside vehicles on the road, which had managed to avoid driving on to the bridge before it collapsed. Seven people were killed when the bridge collapsed (Russian Emergency Ministry Press Service telegram channel/AP) In the past, some officials have accused pro-Ukrainian saboteurs of attacking Russia's railway infrastructure. The details surrounding such incidents, however, are limited and cannot be independently verified. In a statement on Sunday, Ukraine's military intelligence, known by the Ukrainian abbreviation GUR, said a Russian military freight train carrying food and fuel had been blown up on its way to Crimea. It did not claim the attack was carried out by GUR or mention the bridge collapses. The statement said Moscow's key 'artery' with the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia region and Crimea has been destroyed. Russian forces have been pushing into the region of Zaporizhzhia in eastern Ukraine since Moscow's invasion in February 2022. They took Crimea and annexed it in 2014.

Polls open in Poland for close-fought presidential election
Polls open in Poland for close-fought presidential election

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Polls open in Poland for close-fought presidential election

Polls have opened in Poland for the second round of the presidential election, with the two candidates offering radically different visions for the country locked in a dead heat. The race pits the pro-European Warsaw mayor, Rafał Trzaskowski, backed by Donald Tusk 's politically-diverse governing coalition, against the historian and former amateur boxer Karol Nawrocki, endorsed by the populist-right Law and Justice (PiS) party that governed the country between 2015 and 2023. While the role of the Polish president is largely ceremonial, it carries some influence over foreign and defence policy and a critical power to veto new legislation. This can only be overturned with a majority of three-fifths in parliament, which the current government does not have. At stake is whether Tusk's government will be able to make progress on its electoral promises on the rule of law and social issues, including abortion and LGBTQ rights, after 18 months of difficult cohabitation with the opposition president, Andrzej Duda. READ MORE A Nawrocki win would prolong the current deadlock, making it difficult for the government to pass any major reforms before the 2027 parliamentary election. Prof Aleks Szczerbiak, who teaches east and central European politics at the University of Sussex, said: 'Tusk knows the stakes and that if Nawrocki wins, he's got a lame-duck administration for the next couple of years. And it will be worse than with Duda as Nawrocki will come in fresh, with a new mandate from what effectively turned into a referendum on the government.' In the final days of the campaign, both candidates sought to court voters of candidates knocked out in the first round and mobilise their supporters, with analysts stressing that less than 200,000 votes could decide the outcome of the race. Polls showed the difference between the two candidates to be within the margin of error, making it the closest election in Poland's post-1989 history. On Friday night, the country went into electoral silence, which forbids further campaigning and new polls. This left voters with little more than 24 hours to reflect on a brutal and polarising campaign. Trzaskowski, the Oxford-educated Warsaw mayor since 2018 who previously held ministerial posts and served in the European parliament, sought to project himself as a safe pair of hands to work with the government on implementing progressive reforms. However, his campaign faced difficulties because of close links to the unpopular Tusk government. He also had to defend himself against suggestions he is out-of-touch and elitist, and against allegations about foreign funding for online advertising promoting his candidacy. In turn, Nawrocki is new to politics. Since 2021, he has led the Institute of National Remembrance, a state research institute with public prosecution powers investigating historical crimes against Poland. Formally an independent but endorsed by PiS, he offers a new face to the party which is burdened by the polarising legacy of its eight years in power. He received public support from the US president, Donald Trump, and members of his administration, as well as the Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán. But his campaign was beset with allegations of impropriety related to his past, including questions over his acquisition of an apartment from an older man and his admission that he took part in an organised fight between 140 football hooligans in his youth. A win for Nawrocki could also alter Poland's supportive position toward Ukraine. He repeatedly spoke about the difficult history between the two nations and declared his opposition to Ukrainian membership in Nato. The polls will close at 9pm local time (8pm in Ireland), with exit polls to follow. However, the race is expected to be too close to call, with the focus shifting to late polls and official results dripping in overnight. -Guardian

EU prepared to retaliate to Trump's steel and aluminum tariff hikes
EU prepared to retaliate to Trump's steel and aluminum tariff hikes

Irish Examiner

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

EU prepared to retaliate to Trump's steel and aluminum tariff hikes

Europe is prepared to retaliate against US president Donald Trump's plan to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, the European Commission, raising the prospect of an escalating trade fight between two of the world's largest economic powers. Mr Trump's announcement on Friday that he would increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%, intensifies his global trade war and came just hours after he accused China of violating an agreement with the U.S. to mutually roll back levies and trade restrictions for critical minerals. The European Commission said it "strongly" regrets Trump's plan to increase tariffs, adding it "undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution." "This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," a European Commission spokesperson said, adding that "the (European Union) is prepared to impose countermeasures." The spokesperson noted that the European Union had paused its countermeasures to create space for continued negotiations. "The European Commission is currently finalising consultations on expanded countermeasures. If no mutually acceptable solution is reached, both existing and additional EU measures will automatically take effect on 14 July — or earlier, if circumstances require," the spokesperson added. Trump announced the higher tariffs just outside Pittsburgh, where he was talking up an agreement between Nippon Steel and US Steel. Trump said the $14.9bn (€13.1bn) deal, like the tariff increase, will help keep jobs for steel workers in the US. He later posted on social media that the increased tariff would also apply to aluminum products and that it would take effect on Wednesday. The planned move ratchets up pressure on global steel producers, and has sparked protests from trading partners around the world. Canada's Chamber of Commerce quickly denounced the tariff hike as "antithetical to North American economic security." "Unwinding the efficient, competitive and reliable cross-border supply chains like we have in steel and aluminum comes at a great cost to both countries," Candace Laing, president of the chamber, said in a statement. Canada's United Steelworkers union called the move a direct attack on Canadian industries and workers. Australia's centre-left government also condemned the tariff increase, with Australia's trade minister Don Farrell calling it "unjustified and not the act of a friend." The US is the world's largest steel importer, excluding the European Union, with a total of 26.2m tons of imported steel in 2024, according to the US Department of Commerce. As a result, the new tariffs will likely increase steel prices across the board, hitting industry and consumers alike. Steel and aluminum tariffs were among the earliest put into effect by Mr Trump when he returned to office in January. The tariffs of 25% on most steel and aluminum imported to the US went into effect in March, and he had briefly threatened a 50% levy on Canadian steel but ultimately backed off. Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store