Iran's uranium stocks said to be intact, UK media says
Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium is believed to be largely intact following US strikes on the country's main nuclear sites, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing European officials.
The newspaper, citing two people briefed on preliminary intelligence assessments, said European capitals believe Iran's stockpile of 408 kilograms of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels was not being held in Fordow and may have been moved prior to US strikes on Sunday.
Claims that uranium was moved from any of Iran's nuclear sites were dismissed by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday.
"We were watching closely and there was no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved," she said.
The initial European intelligence assessment is unlikely to go down well with US President Donald Trump who is currently engaged with a fight with his own spy agencies about the impact of the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites.
On Thursday, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the strikes had caused "severe damage" to Iran's nuclear facilities after a leaked report downplayed the extent of the operation.
According to Ratcliffe, key sites had been destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the "course of years."
But he stopped short of supporting Trump's claims that the operation on Iran's nuclear programme had been a "spectacular military success" that had "obliterated" the facilities.
Trump's claims were supported by Israel's Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) which said on Wednesday that US and Israeli strikes had rendered the Fordow underground enrichment site "inoperable."
In a handout, the IAEC claimed the "devastating" strikes "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure."
The new US intelligence assessment comes a day after a leaked early report from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) played down the extent of the destruction and concluded that key components of Iran's nuclear programme could be restarted in months.
Speaking at the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday, Trump rejected that assessment, insisting that his country's spies did not have the full picture and defended his own conclusion that American bombs and missiles delivered a crushing blow.
"This was a devastating attack and it knocked them for a loop," Trump said as his administration scrambled to support claims he made only hours after the attack.
The impact of the US strikes was also downplayed by Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
In his first public remarks since Iran and Israel agreed to a ceasefire which brought an end to the 12-day conflict, Khamenei said Trump's assessment had been "exaggerated."
"They could not achieve anything significant," Khamenei said in a video message broadcast on state television.
US military operation
The US launched strikes on Sunday on three of Iran's nuclear facilities; Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
At Fordow, which is buried deep under a mountain north of the city of Qom, US stealth bombers dropped several 14,000-kilogram bunker-buster bombs, collapsing the entrance and damaging infrastructure.
But the facility itself was not destroyed, US intelligence found.
Iran's ongoing nuclear programme was at the heart of the recent conflict with Israel, which Israeli officials see as an existential threat to their country.
Iran was previously subject to an international nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which saw the country receive sanctions relief in exchange for strict limits on its nuclear activities.
During his first term in office, President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the pact in 2018, slamming it as "the worst deal ever negotiated" and slapping new sanctions on Iran.
Since then, the other signatories to the deal have scrambled to keep Iran in compliance, but Tehran considers the deal void and has continued with uranium enrichment, which at current levels sits at 60%.
That's still technically below the weapons-grade levels of 90%, but still far above the 3.67% permitted under the JCPOA.
Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is peaceful and purely for civilian purposes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Tariffs: France and Germany pursue different tacks towards US deal
France and Germany exhibited diverging strategies in the trade dispute between the EU and the US ongoing since mid-March, following a Council summit in Brussels on Thursday. While Germany is eager to reach a swift agreement at all costs, France emphasised the important that bloc should not display weakness. In a press conference after the summit, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the Council encouraged the Commission to use the remaining two weeks to come to a swift agreement. But he said that the Council had encouraged von der Leyen to pursue the EU's own countermeasures if necessary. He said it was important to conclude something quickly and flagged the risks to the auto, chemicals and pharma sectors if 9 July arrives and the Trump tariffs take effect. 'My hope is that we can reach a swift conclusion,' French President Emmanuel Macron said after an EU summit on Thursday in Brussels, adding: 'However, this willingness should not be mistaken for weakness. We want to conclude quickly because it serves our collective interest, supports the stability of international trade, and benefits our businesses—but not at any price.' On Wednesday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz criticized the Commission's strategy as overly technical and called for accelerating the negotiations by focusing on strategic sectors such as automobiles, steel, and energy, chemicals and pharma. The US currently imposes 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and a 10% baseline on all EU imports. Negotiations between the US and the EU have gained momentum since President Donald Trump and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met at the G7 summit in Canada on 16 June, as the critical 9 July deadline approaches, after which Trump has threatened to impose 50% tariffs on all EU imports. On Thursday evening, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced to EU member states that she had received a US counter-proposal to the EU's offer, though she did not disclose any details. For several months, the EU has been offering the US a zero-for-zero tariff deal on all industrial products, along with commitments to purchase strategic goods such as liquid natural gas and soybeans. However, few believe that securing 0% tariffs from the US is still a realistic possibility. 'Since they decided to impose multiple tariffs on their trade partners across the globe, the US now has an appetite for the revenue that tariffs generate,' an EU official said, implying that the US rejected the EU offer. The Commission is now reconsidering its approach to a future tariff-based deal, though the specific terms have yet to be determined. 'The prevailing assumption is that a 10% tariff might be the benchmark,' an EU diplomat said. 'On some areas 10% is not so much, the EU imposes 10% on a lot of imports of cars, whether they are Chinese or Japanese,' another EU official told Euronews, adding that 'for other products, such as aircraft, it's much more complicated because the production line is very interdependent between the US and the EU. That's why, you need a granular analysis.' If the EU manages to reach an agreement by 9 July, it will not be a comprehensive agreement, two senior EU diplomats said. 'The most realistic outcome would likely be a general framework or a 'principled agreement', due to time constraints,' an EU diplomat commented.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Von der Leyen touts EU-led alternative to mired WTO
At Thursday's EU summit in Brussels, European leaders discussed the possibility of overhauling the WTO's institutional framework, including its stalled dispute resolution mechanisms, to better reflect the current global trade landscape. 'The WTO hasn't worked for years,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in a press conference following the summit, referencing persistent dysfunction under both the Trump and Biden administrations. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen presented leaders with different options of trade deals, labelling as the most attractive a closer cooperation between the EU and members of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), a regional trade pact of 11 Pacific Rim countries and the UK. She introduced the initiative as a potential first step toward reshaping the global trade order. 'I said that we can think about this as the beginning of redesigning the WTO—of course, understanding what should be reformed positively within it,' von der Leyen told reporters after the summit. She stressed the importance of learning from the WTO's shortcomings and showing the world that 'free trade based on rules' remains achievable with a wide group of willing partners. 'This is a project we should truly engage in. CPTPP and the European Union—that's my team,' she said, adding that the EU must take the lead in managing this initiative. Asked whether the United States should be involved, von der Leyen replied: 'As far as I understand, the Americans left the CPTPP at a certain point.' This is not the first attempt to circumvent the WTO's paralysis. As a stopgap measure, 57 WTO members, including the UK, Paraguay, and Malaysia, have joined the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a mechanism that replicates the WTO Appellate Body's functions for participating members. However, the MPIA covers only 57.6% of global trade and does not address the broader institutional crisis. The WTO has been effectively paralysed since December 2019, when the US began blocking appointments to the Appellate Body, rendering the two-tier dispute settlement system non-functional. Major trade negotiations—such as those on eliminating harmful fisheries subsidies and reforming agricultural rules—remain stalled due to entrenched positions from key members, including the US, China, Japan, and the EU itself. With few signs of resolution, the WTO's future relevance is increasingly being called into question.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
EU leaders kick Israel partnership down the road despite pressure
A majority of EU countries ordered the review of the bloc's deal with Israel over its war with Gaza, but they cannot agree on what to do with it. Over lunch on Thursday conducted in strict discretion, with mobile phones kept out of the room, the 27 EU leaders chewed over the eight-page review listing Israel's human rights violations including blockade of humanitarian assistance, military strikes against hospitals and forced displacement of the Palestinian population. But despite a majority of 17 countries calling for the review in May, leaders concluded only "to continue discussions on a follow-up... taking into account the evolution of the situation on the ground." It was a 'good sign" according to one diplomat that the EU "is responsive to Palestinian plight', since it will give Kaja Kallas, the EU's top diplomat, space to engage with Israel and work with the European Commission, to scope out further options for action if the situation on the ground doesn't improve. With Israel's recent ceasefire with Iran, some argue that severing political and trade ties with Tel Aviv would not make sense. For others, it's another sign of Europe's weak response to the ongoing crisis in the Middle-East. Divisions among member states over how to address Israel's war on Gaza and the humanitarian catastrophe are so deep that most countries prefer to let Kallas decide on what to do next. Some also warn that any trade measure with Israel will require a qualified majority that will be difficult to find in the European Commission's college of commissioners. 'I defended that the EU must suspend the association agreement between Europe and Israel, as a measure that is proportional to the humanitarian catastrophe (…) in Palestine,' Spain's prime minister Pedro Sanchez told reporters at a press conference following the Council summit. 'From a political and moral point of view, we have the obligation, the moral duty to saves lives in Gaza," he said. Thursday's conclusions on Israel came despite pressure from Spain but also Ireland and Slovenia whose leaders had called on the EU prior to the Council summit to take concrete steps to condemn Tel Aviv's violations in Gaza. Ireland's Taoiseach Micheál Martin said that the "degree of carnage and destruction" as well as "death and injury to children" in Gaza requires "strong" humanitarian and political responses from the EU. Martin said he found it "incomprehensible" that Europe cannot find a way "to pressure Israel to stop this war in Gaza". Following the Council, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that the Council had shared concerns about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, and had considered how – with the US – the EU could exert pressure on Israel to bring about a ceasefire. French President Emmanuel Macron also called for an immediate ceasefire. Israel has so far maintained its humanitarian blockade in Gaza to pressure Hamas to release its remaining hostages. On Wednesday, the Israeli military killed at least 45 Palestinians, including some who had sought aid, the Hamas-run health ministry said. At the same time, the Israeli military announced that seven soldiers had been killed in a bomb attack claimed by Hamas. The war has so far resulted in more than 56,000 Palestinians killed and more than 131,00 wounded, according to the Associated Press citing the Hamas-run health ministry. On Thursday, Israel's national security minister Itamar Bengvir called on X for a 'complete halt' of humanitarian aid in Gaza, as the current one is a 'true shame".
