Iran's uranium stocks said to be intact, UK media says
The newspaper, citing two people briefed on preliminary intelligence assessments, said European capitals believe Iran's stockpile of 408 kilograms of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels was not being held in Fordow and may have been moved prior to US strikes on Sunday.
Claims that uranium was moved from any of Iran's nuclear sites were dismissed by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday.
"We were watching closely and there was no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved," she said.
The initial European intelligence assessment is unlikely to go down well with US President Donald Trump who is currently engaged with a fight with his own spy agencies about the impact of the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites.
On Thursday, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the strikes had caused "severe damage" to Iran's nuclear facilities after a leaked report downplayed the extent of the operation.
According to Ratcliffe, key sites had been destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the "course of years."
But he stopped short of supporting Trump's claims that the operation on Iran's nuclear programme had been a "spectacular military success" that had "obliterated" the facilities.
Trump's claims were supported by Israel's Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) which said on Wednesday that US and Israeli strikes had rendered the Fordow underground enrichment site "inoperable."
In a handout, the IAEC claimed the "devastating" strikes "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure."
The new US intelligence assessment comes a day after a leaked early report from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) played down the extent of the destruction and concluded that key components of Iran's nuclear programme could be restarted in months.
Speaking at the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday, Trump rejected that assessment, insisting that his country's spies did not have the full picture and defended his own conclusion that American bombs and missiles delivered a crushing blow.
"This was a devastating attack and it knocked them for a loop," Trump said as his administration scrambled to support claims he made only hours after the attack.
The impact of the US strikes was also downplayed by Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
In his first public remarks since Iran and Israel agreed to a ceasefire which brought an end to the 12-day conflict, Khamenei said Trump's assessment had been "exaggerated."
"They could not achieve anything significant," Khamenei said in a video message broadcast on state television.
US military operation
The US launched strikes on Sunday on three of Iran's nuclear facilities; Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
At Fordow, which is buried deep under a mountain north of the city of Qom, US stealth bombers dropped several 14,000-kilogram bunker-buster bombs, collapsing the entrance and damaging infrastructure.
But the facility itself was not destroyed, US intelligence found.
Iran's ongoing nuclear programme was at the heart of the recent conflict with Israel, which Israeli officials see as an existential threat to their country.
Iran was previously subject to an international nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which saw the country receive sanctions relief in exchange for strict limits on its nuclear activities.
During his first term in office, President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the pact in 2018, slamming it as "the worst deal ever negotiated" and slapping new sanctions on Iran.
Since then, the other signatories to the deal have scrambled to keep Iran in compliance, but Tehran considers the deal void and has continued with uranium enrichment, which at current levels sits at 60%.
That's still technically below the weapons-grade levels of 90%, but still far above the 3.67% permitted under the JCPOA.
Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is peaceful and purely for civilian purposes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
11 minutes ago
- Euronews
Global plastics treaty talks stall as deadline approaches
Negotiators working on a treaty to address global plastic pollution discussed a new draft of the text on Wednesday that wouldn't limit plastic production or address chemicals used in plastic products. Talks stalled just one day before they are due to end after countries with very divergent views expressed disappointment with the draft. It could change significantly, and a new version is expected on Thursday, the last scheduled day of the negotiations. 'Unbalanced' or a 'good enough' starting point? When they convened on Wednesday night, Colombia's delegation said that the text was entirely unacceptable because it was unbalanced and lacked the ambition and global obligations needed to end plastic pollution. The delegation said that it wouldn't accept the wording as the basis for negotiations. The head of Panama's delegation to the talks, Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez, stood up and cheered. Many delegations made statements to agree, including Mexico, Chile, Ghana, Canada, Norway, the United Kingdom, the European Union and the group of small island developing states. "We have made clear that the text on the table is not acceptable for the EU," European Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience, and a Competitive Circular Economy, Jessika Roswall, said. EU representative Magnus Heunicke said in a post on social media that the text "doesn't meet the minimum needed to respond to the huge plastic challenge". 'Let me be clear, this is not acceptable for future generations,' said Erin Silsbe, representing Canada. Oil- and gas-producing nations raised other concerns, with Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and others saying that the draft doesn't have the scope they want to set the parameters of the treaty or precise definitions. The United States said that six articles crossed red lines, but didn't say how. India's delegation, on the other hand, said that the draft is a 'good enough starting point.' What was included in the treaty draft? The draft contains one mention of plastic production in the preamble, reaffirming the importance of promoting sustainable production and consumption of plastics. It doesn't contain an article on production from a previous draft. There is no mention of chemicals. The new provisions seek to reduce the number of problematic plastic products that often enter the environment and are difficult to recycle, and promote the redesign of plastic products so that they can be recycled and reused. Parties to the treaty would improve their waste management. Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, drafted the document based on the views expressed by nations throughout the negotiations. He told them that he did it to move them closer to a legally-binding instrument, and they can shape and improve it, as well as add and delete wording. With little time left, he said, it's time to build bridges, not dig in over red lines. David Azoulay, Head of the delegation for the Centre for International Environmental Law, said the text makes "a mockery of a three-year-long consultative process" - one that included board support for a treaty addressing the full lifecycle of plastics. "This is a treaty that all but ensures that nothing will change. It gives in to petrostate and industry demands with weak, voluntary measures that guarantee we continue to produce plastic at increasing levels indefinitely, fail to safeguard human health, endanger the environment, and damn future generations," he adds. "It will be very difficult to come back from this, and we encourage Member States to reject the text." What is blocking progress on the plastics treaty? The biggest issue of the talks has been whether the treaty should impose caps on producing new plastic or focus instead on things like better design, recycling and reuse. Around 100 countries want to limit production as well as tackle cleanup and recycling. Many have said it's essential to address toxic chemicals. Powerful oil and gas-producing nations and the plastics industry oppose production limits. They want a treaty focused on better waste management and reuse.
Euronews
13 minutes ago
- Euronews
Iran's president criticises Netanyahu's pledge to help in water crisis
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday criticised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's offer to help the country deal with its water crisis, saying he should first address the situation in Gaza. Pezeshkian's response came as Netanyahu addressed Iranians in a video message on Tuesday, pledging that Israel would help solve the country's severe water shortages once Iran is 'free' from the current government, according to Israeli media. 'A regime that deprives people of Gaza of water and food says it will bring water to Iran? A mirage, nothing more,' Pezeshkian said on X. The Iranian president also doubled down on the comments during a cabinet meeting in Tehran, saying that 'those with a deceptive appearance are falsely claiming compassion for the people of Iran." 'First, look at the difficult situation of Gaza and defenceless people, especially children who are struggling ... because of hunger, lack of access to potable water and medicine, and because of a siege by the brutal regime.' The remarks mark a return to political spats that follow Israel's waves of airstrikes on Iran in June, targeting nuclear facilities, top military commanders and nuclear scientists. Water and power issues persist On Wednesday, authorities in Iran ordered government offices and banks across much of the country to close as surging summer temperatures and the worsening water crisis strain the power grid. The closure is the second this summer announced by state television, according to media reports. As temperatures across the capital Tehran have exceeded 40 degrees Celsius, authorities urged residents to avoid outdoor activities during peak heat hours and conserve water and energy. Iran produces some 62,000 megawatts of electric energy per hour at its peak, but needs about 80,000 megawatts to meet its needs. Experts warn that the two-hour electrical outages that Tehran and other cities currently face every other day could soon extend to four hours. On Sunday, reports say Pezeshkian told a group of officials that 'we do not have water; we do not have water under our feet and we do not have water behind our dams, so you tell me, what do we do? Someone comes and tells me, 'What do I have to do?' Pezeshkian said that Iran is in 'a serious and unimaginable crisis' and added that his administration is in touch with experts who are trying to find a solution to the problem.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump to offer Putin economic incentives to end the war in Ukraine
US President Donald Trump is preparing to meet his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. He is reportedly ready to present Putin with a proposal that includes several economic concessions to Russia in exchange for peace, according to The Telegraph. Among the incentives would be access to Alaska's natural resources, as well as Ukrainian rare earth minerals and the lifting of some sanctions on Russia's aircraft industry. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other senior administration officials are reportedly working closely with Trump to finalise the proposals ahead of the summit. In April, Kyiv and Washington signed a deal that gives the US access to Ukraine's minerals. According to the Kyiv School of Economics, Ukraine holds one third of Europe's and 3% of global lithium reserves. Two of Ukraine's largest lithium deposits lie in Russian-held territory and Putin has laid claim to the valuable minerals extracted there. Ukrainians are sceptical Ukrainians in Kyiv on Wednesday voiced scepticism that the planned summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will bring the war on Ukraine to an end. Trump has threatened 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to stop his war in Ukraine the summit, to be held in Alaska on Friday, though he did not say what those consequences might be. Kyiv residents weren't optimistic of a breakthrough. "In my opinion, nothing is likely to change in the coming days," said a woman who gave her name only as Natalya. "We have already seen numerous times how negotiations have been postponed, failed, and other changes have occurred." Oleksandra Kozlova, 39, head of department in digital agency, echoed her sentiment. "People have already lost hope. Personally, I don't think this round will be decisive," she said. Many Moscow residents were more hopeful. 'This (conflict with Ukraine) must end someday, so I hope that some kind of compromise can certainly be found,' one resident said. 'It's a huge deal, that the first step has already been taken,' another commented. 'There will definitely be an advantage.' Conflicting terms for peace Trump consulted with European leaders earlier on Wednesday, who said the president assured them he would make a priority of trying to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine when he speaks with Putin on Friday in Anchorage. Prior to Trump announcing the meeting with Putin, his efforts to pressure Russia into stopping the fighting had delivered no progress. The Kremlin's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armour. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace. Moscow presented ceasefire conditions that are nonstarters for Zelenskyy, such as withdrawing troops from the four regions Russia illegally annexed in 2022, halting mobilisation efforts, or freezing Western arms deliveries. For a broader peace, Putin demands Kyiv cede the annexed regions, even though Russia doesn't fully control them, and Crimea, renounce a bid to join NATO, limit the size of its armed forces and recognise Russian as an official language along with Ukrainian. Zelenskyy insists any peace deals must include robust security guarantees for Ukraine to protect it from future Russian aggression.
