Pakistani stars Mahira, Fawad, Hania slam Indian attacks that martyred six
Listen to article
Leading Pakistani actors Mahira Khan, Hania Aamir, and Fawad Khan have strongly condemned India's recent military aggression, which resulted in the martyrdom of 26 civiliansm, including children, and injuries to at least 46 others in overnight airstrikes targeting multiple civilian areas across Pakistan.
Mahira Khan reposted a tweet by writer Fatima Bhutto criticising the Indian attack.
Adding her voice on Instagram, Mahira called the strikes 'seriously cowardly' and prayed, 'May Allah protect our country, may better sense prevail. Ameen.'
Actress Hania Aamir also spoke out, stating, 'You don't bomb innocent people and call it strategy,' in a sharp rebuke of the Indian strikes.
Fawad Khan also condemned the attack, calling it 'shameful' in an Instagram story. He added, 'May better sense prevail. Inshallah. Pakistan Zindabad.'
The backlash from Pakistan's entertainment industry comes as India attempts to justify the attack in the wake of the April 22 incident in Pahalgam in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), despite offering no concrete evidence linking Pakistan to the attack.
Previously, several prominent Pakistani celebrity accounts, including those of Mahira Khan, Fawad Khan, and Ali Zafar, were banned in India.
Meanwhile, the DG ISPR said that India carried out 24 airstrikes on six different locations inside Pakistani territory.
He said that 13 people were martyred in Bahawalpur's Ahmedpur East area. The deceased included two three-year-old girls, seven women, and four men. In addition, 37 individuals were injured, including nine women and 28 men.
In a separate incident near Muzaffarabad, a strike on Bilal Mosque resulted in three fatalities, while two children — a girl and a boy — sustained injuries, he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The fall of Bollywood's conscience
In the great theatre of the subcontinent, many roles are played. The diplomat with his pocket square, ever so cautious, so vary of his words; the journalist with his war drum baritone and breaking news ticker; the general adorned in ranks, with his maps, military insights and strategically placed metaphors. But perhaps the most watched performers, the ones that garner the most eyeballs, are the stars, the celebrities, the legends of celluloid — those silken, sculpted, social-media-verified wonders of Indian cinema, who, in times of tension, often hold more sway over the hearts of their fans than even actual heads of state. So, when the most recent diplomatic domino between Pakistan and India began to fall, sparked by a tragic incident in Kashmir and snowballing into a full-blown chest-thumping war mongering chaos, eyes obviously turned to the borders. For the latest updates and bulletins, eyes turned to the news. And for everything in between, they turned to mobile screens. While the news cycle monopolised missile updates and water cooler conversations stoked further trepidation, it was on social media, Facebook and Instagram pages, and Threads of the world that we witnessed, some with a shrug and others with resignation, a curtain fall. The fanfare of nationalist fervour is nothing new. We have seen it before — during surgical strikes, border standoffs, even high-stake cricket matches. But this time, it felt different. The air itself had a simmering quality to it. This time, it was the power corridors of Bollywood that stood in a staunch and ignoble salute. Fan favourite stars from the lauded Bollywood pantheon, like Akshay Kumar, whose recent filmography reads like a defence ministry-sponsored resume, wasted no time. His message was swift: unwavering support for the Indian response, patriotic hashtags, and a pixel-perfect picture of the tri-coloured flag. Quick on his heels was the ever-so-predictable Kangana Ranaut, Bollywood's resident Rottweiler of righteousness. Never known for subtlety, Ms Ranaut deemed it appropriate to post that Pakistan was a 'terrorist nation' and called for the 'cleansing' of traitors. 'These [insert PC term for insects known for their signature infestations and filth] should be nuked' she said. And in doing so India will actually be doing the entire world a huge favour. Even the usually discreet monoliths — Hrithik Roshan, Ajay Devgan, and Shahid Kapoor chimed in with near-identical messages support for the armed forces, for the government, for decisive action. A methodical barrage of copy-paste nationalism. Who would have thought that the modern face of digital diplomacy could be achieved in 280 characters or less? Citizens of a proud nation simply supporting their sovereign nation? That wasn't jarring really. Why would anyone assume otherwise? Why wouldn't the slumbering nationalism be kindled by the horns of war? But what truly unsettled fans, particularly across this side of the border, was how quickly this nuance petered out. And in that silence, there seemed to be no room for peace, no space for reflection. The world's biggest democracy was suddenly rendered to be nothing more than an echo chamber. Perhaps the most painful silence was from those who once told stories that made these very borders blur. Alia Bhatt, beloved on both sides of the Wagah gate, posted a vaguely-worded graphic: 'Strength. Solidarity. Resilience.' It was the PR version of nodding solemnly and exiting stage left. And then there was the illustrious Karan Johar whose popularity spikes are the bread and butter of the expat South Asian demographic (in its gargantuan entirety) posted an Indian flag. No caption, no context. Just 'vibes'. A hard one to reconcile was the bard of Bollywood, Javed Akhtar, also known as the poet of peace and author of anthems. The same man whose verses once melted hostility into harmony, proclaimed 'I'd rather go to jahannum (hell) than go to Pakistan'. Not a great commendation for his own nation in which he currently was, observed one keen eyed netizen. For Pakistani fans, this was nothing short of watching your favourite uncle suddenly flip the dining table during Eid lunch. Praise be, all was not lost. Amidst this morbid uniformity, a few voices of dissent also joined in on the chorus; one such unexpectedly (but most welcomingly) from Sonakshi Sinha. While others laced up their patriotic boots, she dared to 'run amok' on Instagram. 'The Indian media has lost the plot. This isn't journalism, it's dangerous fiction.' No flags. No warmongering. Not a battle cry. Just a slice of honesty. A whisper in fact. Of course, Ms Sinha was swiftly trolled, memed, accused of being 'anti-national,' and told to go to Pakistan (a favourite insult, it seems, for anyone who suggested peace in that time). But she reminded us of something crucial: bravery isn't always about standing tall. Sometimes, it can just be about not sitting down when everyone else has. While India's celebrity class was actively engaged in staging their synchronised salute, the world also had the pleasure (read titillation) of tuning into a very different performance, one that took place on Piers Morgan Uncensored. There, sat across from each other, were Barkha Dutt and Hina Rabbani Khar. One Indian. One Pakistani. One a journalist. One a former foreign minister. Both articulate, accomplished women; razor-sharp, and blessedly allergic to nonsense. Khar, with her characteristic calm and poise, spoke of nuance, context, and the inherent dangers of nationalist hysteria. Barkha, no stranger to war reporting, put on a grand show, pushing back at every notch she possibly could. For a brief moment outside the 'theatricality', the screens became a classroom. One where nobody yelled 'Jai ABC' or 'Death to XYZ', and everyone simply listened. What a contrast to Instagram's red carpets of conformity it truly was. For Pakistanis, Indian cinema has been primarily for entertainment, but additionally, it has also been a companion. A cultural mirror that everyone in the south Asian region can glom onto seeking valid representation and actually 'be seen' by the rest of the world. Bollywood to Pakistanis has been a secret rebellion against political bitterness. From DDLJ and Devdas posters adorning every other inner-city salon in major urban locales to Arijit Singh, Shreya Ghoshal and Diljit Dosanjh being played at almost every wedding function and celebration, Bollywood has always held an intimate and fortified place in our hearts. It is reasonable then that this moment in history did not go over too well with the Pakistani audience. It felt much like, to perhaps the uninitiated, being ghosted by someone who you had once loved unconditionally. To see your once revered icons tweet in unison about severe military action against your homeland with such brazen callousness was unmistakably heartbreaking. Especially when you factor in how the majority of it all actually appeared performative — as opposed to genuine patriotism. And what of the audiences who always consumed Indian cinema with rose-tinted nostalgia? Many now found themselves confused, disappointed, and quietly (but profoundly) wounded. It wasn't just that stars didn't advocate for peace, it was that they didn't seem to care really. No acknowledgement of the mutual love they received across the border. No reminder that their music was the soundtrack of Pakistani childhoods, their dialogues recited in college hallways. Instead, silence. And silence, when given a platform, can be very, very loud. Why did this happen? Why didn't more stars speak out for peace? Well, it's not just about courage. It is also about contracts. Since 2014, Indian cinema has become increasingly aligned with the political establishment du jour. Films like The Kashmir Files are tax-exempt. Directors with the 'right' politics get easier approvals, cheaper insurance, state PR. Meanwhile, those with inconvenient opinions get labelled 'urban naxals' or 'tukde tukde gang.' Ask Deepika Padukone, who showed up at a student protest in 2020. She said nothing, just stood there. But that silence cost her millions in brand deals and led to calls for a boycott of her film. The writing on the wall was quite clear: dare to speak against the tide, and you shall be made to disappear. Even the once mighty and untouchable Khans, Shah Rukh, Salman, Aamir, have faced the wrath of their fanatical home-grown audience, and have been left with no choice but to play it safe and stay 'mum'. Not long ago, SRK's son was jailed under suspicious circumstances with King Khan jolting from lawyers' chambers to police stations as an inconsequential and lowly civilian. Aamir was attacked for his wife's comments on rising intolerance and his movie 'Laal Singh Chadda' was massacred in the box office for his alleged (and somewhat imagined) anti-state rhetoric. Even Salman who has always kept his alliances clear has become a prisoner of the gallows, living in anguish under the ever-looming threat of the Bishnoi gang. We know, we understand and feel empathy for these stars. But not all was lost. Anurag Kashyap, never one to bow, tweeted cryptically about how 'conformity is not the same as unity.' Another personality, often chastised for her exceptionally 'woke' stances, Swara Bhasker shared an article on the need for empathy, adding: 'Peace isn't weakness. Hate isn't strength.' These voices were barely audible, drowned out by hashtags and hyperbole. But they mattered. Because resistance doesn't always come with fireworks. Sometimes, it just comes with a spine. This could have been a moment. A cinematic plot twist. Imagine if Shah Rukh had posted a throwback clip from Main Hoon Na. Or if Madhuri had tweeted 'Peace is patriotic.' If Priety Zinta had only quoted a line from her famous Veer Zaara song 'Aisa Des Hai Mera'. If Ranveer Singh had just... danced it out? But no. All we got brand-safe statements, media-managed mentions, and a whole lot of silence. What a story it could have been. What a script we missed. There was a time when Indian films imagined a better world. When screenwriters flirted with forbidden love across borders, when a song could soften suspicion, and when a poem could become protest. Today, those scripts are shelved, their authors quiet, their protagonists, for all intents and purposes, neutered by eagle-eyed publicists and spectres of political correctness. So here we are, popcorn in one hand, a tear stained handkerchief in the other, looking at the silver screen, waiting for someone, anyone, in this great theatre of the subcontinent, to play the role of the artist again. To remind us that before they were influencers, stars were simply storytellers. That their job was not just to reflect power, but to sometimes question it. And perhaps one day, they will. When it's safer. When the script changes. When bravery is back in vogue. Until then, we are left with silence. Polished. PR-approved. Politically correct. But silence nonetheless. Shahzad Abdullah is a PR and communications strategist, cultural curator and director of communications at Media Matters All facts are information are the sole responsibility of the
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bilawal urges India to end ‘excuses', resume dialogue with Pakistan
Former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Saturday urged India to move beyond what he termed 'repetitive excuses' and engage in meaningful dialogue with Pakistan to address long-standing bilateral issues. Speaking at a press conference in Washington following a series of meetings with US lawmakers, policy experts and think tanks, the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) chairman criticized New Delhi's reluctance to resume talks, saying it was counterproductive to regional peace. 'India continues to evade efforts for dialogue and investigations. The excuses vary, be it civil-military dynamics, geopolitics, or blanket narratives linking Muslims with terrorism, but they all serve the same purpose: avoidance,' Bilawal said. Bilawal Bhutto warns of escalating water disputes with India, calls for diplomatic engagement 'It's not sustainable for two nuclear-armed neighbours with such low conflict thresholds to lack any structured dispute resolution mechanism.' The former foreign minister is part of a high-level Pakistani delegation currently visiting key Western capitals as part of a diplomatic outreach initiative aimed at presenting Islamabad's stance on recent tensions with India. The delegation, which includes senior political figures and former diplomats, will also visit London and Brussels in the coming days. Alongside Bilawal, the group includes former foreign ministers Hina Rabbani Khar and Khurram Dastgir Khan, Senators Sherry Rehman, Musadik Malik, Faisal Sabzwari and Bushra Anjum Butt, as well as seasoned diplomats Jalil Abbas Jilani and Tehmina Janjua. Bilawal emphasized that Pakistan's civil and military leadership are united in their stance against terrorism, and that dialogue with India is essential for regional stability. He reiterated Islamabad's openness to talks at both political and military levels. 'If India truly seeks peace, it must be willing to engage, whether through direct talks or through mediation by international stakeholders,' he said. 'Unfortunately, New Delhi has rejected all options, be it engagement through the UN, third-party mediation, or bilateral diplomacy.' He further stressed that reversing decisions that have escalated tensions would be a constructive step forward. 'It is in everyone's interest, including India's, to revisit policies that have only led to a diplomatic freeze and increased hostility.' The Pakistani delegation's engagement in Washington is seen as part of a broader attempt to counter India's expanding diplomatic footprint and narrative, particularly in Western capitals.
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Ceasefire but no peace: Bilawal warns of ‘less safe' South Asia despite Trump-led de-escalation
Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, former Foreign Minister of Pakistan and current head of the Pakistan People's Party, leads a delegation to Washington, which played a key mediatory role in a ceasefire after Pakistan's conflict with India in May. Photo: AFP Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has warned that South Asia remains at risk of a full-scale war despite a US-brokered ceasefire between India and Pakistan, calling for sustained diplomatic efforts and international engagement to avoid further escalation. Speaking to US news network Newsmax, Bilawal said a ceasefire between the two nuclear-armed neighbours had been achieved in May with the help of former US president Donald Trump and his team, but cautioned that peace remained fragile. 'At the moment we have achieved ceasefire between India and Pakistan, thanks to the role played by President Trump, his team, Secretary Rubio, and that's a big achievement. The US deserves credit for that,' he said. 'But... we have achieved ceasefire, we haven't achieved peace and we are actually in a situation in South Asia right now where we [are] less safe than we were before this conflict.' Bilawal, who also chairs Pakistan's Parliamentary Diplomatic Committee, warned that the threshold for war between the two rivals had dangerously decreased, particularly in the event of a cross-border terrorist attack. 'If there [is] any terrorist attack in India or anywhere in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), it means war between India and Pakistan and that's not sustainable,' he said. Tensions between the two countries escalated last month following a deadly attack in Pahalgam, IIOJK, in which 26 Indian tourists were killed. On May 7, India launched airstrikes on Pakistani soil, prompting Islamabad to respond with Operation Bunyanum Marsoos. A US-brokered ceasefire was reached on May 10, halting further military action. Bilawal said Pakistan's agreement to the ceasefire had come after consultations with Washington and should be seen as the beginning of a broader peace process. 'We did so while communicating with the United States and we will communicate that this would just be the start,' he said, calling for dialogue at a neutral venue.'We work towards permanent peace through dialogue and diplomacy... we should discuss all friction points with India.' While expressing confidence in the current US leadership's willingness to support regional stability, Bilawal also voiced concern that the Indian government could sabotage mediation efforts. 'I also suspect that Indian government will try and sabotage the President's efforts,' he said. 'Just like President Trump played a role in achieving this ceasefire, we will be looking to the US to encourage their friend and ally India to have a dialogue with Pakistan.' Praising Trump's influence, Bilawal said the former president had the trust of both countries and could help bring them back to the negotiating table. 'I think President Trump is the one man at the moment who can bring about peace between India and Pakistan,' he said. 'I think his stature, his leadership qualities and his vision supports peace... he is friends with Pakistan, he is friends with India so he can talk to both of us as friends and try and convince [us] to get along.' He reiterated that Kashmir remained a core issue in any future dialogue. 'We have to discuss Kashmir as a root issue... because if [we] keep ignoring Kashmir, they will keep producing the cannon forger for terrorists to use in such events.' He said Pakistan was willing to engage on counterterrorism and recalled previous US-Pakistan cooperation in that domain. 'We had done a great job while working with them. The one country that US President thank[ed]... after he was elected President was Pakistan for our cooperation.' Bilawal also accused India of 'weaponising water' by threatening to cut off water supplies to Pakistan — an action he said violated international norms. 'We are really looking to the international community to add their voice to ours in condemning India's decision to cut off our water,' he said. On trade, Bilawal said talks with US officials had shifted from traditional security concerns to economic cooperation. 'We are actually sitting with Americans talking about trade rather than terrorism, war and other things,' he said, noting particular interest in agriculture and mineral investment. However, he cautioned that peace was a prerequisite for foreign investment. 'If we have peace in the region then business is gonna progress,' he said. 'If the aggression [is] gonna continue, if they [are] gonna continue [to] support terrorist proxies in Balochistan... then it's not gonna create an environment that's conducive even if our trade talks go well,' he added.
