
Tariff Tracker, June 2: Renewed US-China spat brings fears of rare earth shortage to the fore
Dear reader,
Last week, US President Donald Trump's tariffs were held invalid by a US trade court, and this order was then stayed by an appeals court, allowing things to persist as they are.
We are now entering the third month since his 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements, which allowed the US to charge a 10% baseline tariff on all trading partners, and country-specific rates on those countries with which the US has maintained trade deficits. He subsequently announced a pause on the latter for 90 days.
Trump's goal all along has been to bring the countries of the world to the bargaining table to seek trade deals with the US. His claims of 90 trade deals within 90 days, however, may have been far more ambitious than originally imagined. Thus far, the US has finalised a trade agreement with the UK, has engaged in talks with India with a view towards a staggered trade agreement, and will meet the EU over the coming weeks to finalise a trade agreement.
Since his return to the White House, Trump has repeatedly singled out China for refusing to play ball. He slapped a 10% fentanyl tariff on China (currently at 20%) and increased US tariffs on Chinese goods to an eye-watering 145% by early April. China has responded at every turn, restricting rare earths exports through an elaborate licensing system, citing a national security risk, and taxing US exports of coal and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG).
So, when the two countries announced on May 12 that they had found a common ground, investors and markets worldwide heaved a sigh of relief. The truce had reduced mutual tariffs by 115% and was set to last 90 days.
However, the waters are choppy again, and this weekend, both countries have accused each other of not honouring the truce. China's Commerce Ministry on Monday (June 2) accused the US of 'seriously violating' the truce the two nations had concluded in Geneva last month. This follows Trump's claim on Friday (May 30) that China had 'totally violated' the agreement, over American concerns over the sluggishness in clearing rare earth exports from China.
Rare earth metals, or rare earth elements (REEs), are a group of 17 chemical elements on the periodic table, with similar chemical properties and silver-coloured in appearance. Despite their name, REEs are not as rare. However, it is unusual to find concentrated and economically mineable deposits of REEs, despite their relative abundance compared to silver, gold or platinum. And crucially, China holds unparalleled expertise in refining REEs compared to other nations.
The rare earths sought by the US are vital in the manufacture of high-value goods, ranging from everyday items like smartphones and electronic displays, to those in the fields of defence and clean energy. China has held indisputable dominance over rare earths since the 1990s, supplying 85-95% of global demand.
China has weaponised rare earths exports in the past, restricting these exports to Japan in 2010 over a fishing trawler dispute, and more recently to the US between 2023 and 2025. And on April 4 this year, China announced another set of rare earth restrictions following Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements.
While the presence of smuggling and alternate suppliers helped to arrest the threat in the past, such a move may not be viable now. On May 22, economist Alan Beattie wrote in The Financial Times that the April 4 restrictions by China involve finished items, specifically magnets, which are currently made only by a few Chinese companies. Alternatives to China do not currently exist, which has increased the prices of rare earths in the interim. This round of export controls relies on end-user licensing requirements for materials that can be used for both civilian and military purposes, potentially affecting electric vehicles and F-35 fighter jets.
He noted that the US was especially vulnerable, given its limited attempts to increase rare earth manufacturing and processing, and retaining minimal stockpiles of critical minerals. 'Trump has risked a geoeconomic war with China without any discernible attempt to prepare or even assess the dangers,' Beattie warned.
Supply chain shortages are already being reported worldwide. Since April, rare earth exports from China have halved, according to a Reuters report, even as companies contend with the vague and tedious application process for permits.
American automakers have been the hardest hit, The New York Times reported on Monday. Rare earths are an important component of the magnets for the electric motors that run brakes, steering and fuel injectors. Magnets are also used in the motors in luxury car seats, as well as factory robots. The report cited executives warning of rollbacks in automobile production in the midwestern and southern states over the coming weeks.
In India too, automakers have expressed fears of having to shut production within days if the Indian government does not intervene, The Indian Express reported last month.
China has now alleged that the US imposed several restrictions against it, including AI chip export control guidance, limiting sales of chip design software – electronic design automation (EDA) – to China, and announcing the revocation of visas for Chinese students, the ministry said.
'The US has continuously provoked new trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations,' the Commerce Ministry said. 'Instead of reflecting on its own actions, it unjustly shifts blame, baselessly accusing China of violating the consensus, which gravely deviates from the facts. China firmly rejects these unwarranted accusations.'
On Sunday, China also accused the US of trying to 'sow division', following comments by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth at a defence conference in Singapore. Hegseth described China as an 'imminent' threat, and said China was 'credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific', even preparing for 'the real deal' of invading Taiwan.
'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the cold war mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a 'threat',' the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said.
Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in connecting with Chinese President Xi Jinping over a call to iron out the differences, something which has thus far not materialised.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
Pakistan cuts PoK development budget, raises money for Chinese projects
The Pakistani government has slashed the budget for the PoK by 16 per cent, from 75 billion Pakistani rupees to 63 billion ($222 million), which would leave the region 'handicapped' read more The Pakistani federal government has significantly reduced the developmental budget for Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK), which includes Gilgit-Baltistan; and raised money for Chinese projects in the country in its national development programme worth a record Rs 4.083 trillion ($14.4 billion). Islamabad cited 'tight control of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)' for its controversial move. Minister for Planning and Development Ahsan Iqbal admitted the country faced 'some limitations with the IMF programme and thus the challenge ahead was to leverage the limited resources to achieve maximum returns from each project.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD PoK budget slashed by 16% The Pakistani government has slashed the budget for the PoK by 16 per cent, from 75 billion Pakistani rupees to 63 billion ($222 million). Pakistani newspaper Dawn reported that the region would be 'handicapped by lower allocations'. Ahsan Iqbal said that 'the majority [of allocation] is for water, power and highway sector,' with most of the projects being operated by the Chinese. Budget raised for Chinese projects Islamabad has raised allocation for Diamer-Bhasha Dam as well as the Hyderabad–Sukkur Motorway, both are being developed by the Chinese. In May 2020, the Pakistani government had signed a 442 billion PKR contract with a joint venture of China Power and Frontier Works Organisation (FWO), an engineering arm of the Pakistani Army, for the construction of the Diamer-Bhasha dam. Meanwhile, The M-6 Motorway or the Karachi port-Sukkur–Hyderabad Motorway is being built as a part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Interestingly, Islamabad has allocated Rs1 trillion development budget for the upgradation of the N-25 Highway in Balochistan, which runs from Chaman to Karachi through Quetta. 'Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has directed that Rs120 billion ($426.7 million) be allocated for N25 Chaman-Quetta-Karachi Expressway,' Iqbal said at a press conference in Islamabad. This upgradation too is happening under the ambit of the CPEC. However, the Pakistani government earlier claimed its upgradation was being financed by savings from reduced global oil prices. The 2025–26 budget is expected to be presented by Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb in Pakistan's lower house of parliament on June 10, following the Eid Al-Adha holidays. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
RBI likely to cut rates for third time as inflation stays below forecast
India's central bank is widely expected to deliver a third consecutive rate cut on Friday as muted inflation provides ample space to focus on boosting economic growth further. A strong majority of economists, 53 of 61, in a Reuters poll expect the Reserve Bank of India's monetary policy committee (MPC) to cut the repo rate to 5.75 per cent. Two respondents see a cut of 50 basis points and the remaining six expect no change. "Despite no pressing need for a third successive rate cut on June 6, we expect the MPC to cut - an opportunistic move amid the lower-than-expected inflation outcome and outlook, and retain the stance as 'accommodative'," Barclays economists wrote in a note. "The RBI may be tempted to lower inflation forecasts, but it may be prudent not to," they added. Retail inflation has slowed faster than expected and dropped to a near 6-year low of 3.16 per cent in April. The RBI expects it to average around 4 per cent during the year but many economists expect it to be lower. On the growth front, India's GDP surged 7.4 per cent in the March quarter, much faster than forecasts and driven by construction and manufacturing. Full year growth for 2025 financial year that ended in March is estimated at 6.5 per cent and the RBI expects the pace to be retained in fiscal 2026, though the outlook faces challenges given a global slowdown and US President Donald Trump's tariff uncertainties. "RBI's estimate of neutral real rates is between 1.4 per cent and 1.9 per cent. In an environment of softer global growth, the neutral real rate is likely to be closer to 1.4 per cent," IDFC First Bank chief economist Gaura Sen Gupta wrote. "The risk of overheating of the economy remains low with persistence of a negative output gap as indicated by persistently low core inflation and low current account deficit," she added. Since January, the RBI has infused nearly $100 billion into the banking system. "Apart from 25 bps cut in repo rate, there could be some probability of widening of the corridor to 50-basis between repo and SDF (standing deposit facility) rate," said Gopal Tripathi, head of treasury and capital markets at Jana Small Finance Bank. A sharp fall in India's treasury bill yields indicates that the central bank could widen the policy rate corridor at its meeting, five bond traders said last week. Indian lenders have also urged the central bank to revert to overnight liquidity management operations and sought easier cash reserve requirements, four sources familiar with the matter said.


News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
F-21 Takes The Spotlight As India Explores Its Next Big Fighter Jet Buy
Last Updated: Lockheed Martin is ready to produce the F-21 in India, tailored for India's needs, and can be made locally with Tata Group under the Make in India initiative, boosting industries The Indian Air Force (IAF) is exploring options to enhance its fighter jet fleet, with several global contenders in the fray. India is considering proposals from Russia, France, and the United States. Russia has offered its fifth-generation Sukhoi-57, while the US has pitched the F-35. India has already procured two squadrons of Rafale fighter jets from France and has the option to purchase more. However, no deal has been finalised yet. The Rafale is a 4.5-generation aircraft and comes at a high cost. Additionally, there are limitations on India's control over the aircraft's technology, including potential issues with source codes and future upgrades. While Russia has offered the fifth-generation Sukhoi-57, questions have been raised about its performance. Similarly, the American F-35, while advanced, is extremely expensive, and concerns have also been noted regarding its operational effectiveness. Amid ongoing evaluations of global fighter jet options, American aerospace giant Lockheed Martin has proposed the F-21 to India as a potential solution. Known for producing the F-35, Lockheed Martin is one of the world's leading fighter jet manufacturers, with its F-series jets in service across several countries—including the F-16s operated by Pakistan. The F-21 is a specially designed variant based on the F-16 platform. Lockheed Martin CEO Jim Taiclet has stated that India can consider purchasing the F-21 instead of the F-35. The F-21 has been specifically designed to meet India's defence requirements. Difference Between F-21 and F-35 According to a report in The Indian Express, it features modern AESA radar, an upgraded cockpit, and an improved mission computer. The aircraft is suitable for both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. Its price is around $100 million (approximately Rs 850 crore) per jet, though costs may rise with additional customisations based on India's requirements. On the other hand, the F-35 is a fifth-generation stealth jet with radar-evading capability, advanced sensors and cutting-edge data-sharing technology. According to Hindustan Times, its price ranges from $110 to $150 million per jet. Change In US Strategy The US was previously hesitant to offer the F-35 to tier-2 allies like India and Saudi Arabia. According to a report in The Times of India, this reluctance stemmed from concerns that its sensitive technology could potentially fall into the hands of countries like China or Russia. Additionally, there is an agreement with Israel ensuring it receives the most advanced weapons in the Middle East to maintain its military edge. However, America's strategy is now shifting, as stealth jets like Russia's Su-57 and China's J-20 are being offered to other countries. Opportunity For India Lockheed Martin's CEO reportedly said that India is not fully ready for the F-35 yet, so it can opt to buy the F-21. A report in The Hindu stated that Lockheed Martin is ready to produce the F-21 in India, which will benefit Indian industries. The F-21 may be an economical option to replace the Indian Air Force's ageing MiG-21 and MiG-27 jets. Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: June 04, 2025, 13:14 IST