SASSA beneficiaries just 80 days' away from NEW nightmare
However, not even Postbank staff were able to handle the number of affected SASSA beneficiaries. And even after several deadline extensions, with millions still unassisted countrywide, the department pulled the plug on the Postbank card-swap debacle. POSTBANK SASSA BENEFICIARIES HAVE 80 DAYS Changing your SASSA grant provider is relatively easy, if you haven't done so already. Image: File
Nevertheless, while the card swap is no longer necessary for SASSA beneficiaries, there's a new payment nightmare looming on the horizon. Now the Public Protector has flagged serious failures by the South African Social Security Agency and Postbank.
Unending delays and irregular staff appointments, there is now no payment alternative in place when SASSA's arrangement with the government entity ends on Tuesday 30 September 2025. As such, the Democratic Alliance's (DA's) Alexandra Abrahams is urging any SASSA beneficiaries still with Postbank to switch to another reputable bank as soon as possible. Postbank's master agreement with SASSA runs out at the end of September. Image: File
If the Public Protector's warning rings true, as many as two-million SASSA beneficiaries may not be paid from October 2025 onwards. Investigations into Postbank include allegations of mismanagement of social grants and ineffective implementation of the grant payment systems. Likewise, it is looking into the irregular appointment of former SASSA CEO, Busisiwe Memela-Khambula.
In its report, the Public Prosecutor mentioned something that all SASSA beneficiaries still with Postbank should note. 'The Master Service Agreement with Postbank is expiring at the end of September 2025. And an extension of the contract seems implausible, in light of the fundamental compliance issues experienced between SASSA and Postbank. Therefore, affected SASSA beneficiaries should find a new credible service provider,' says the report. Soon the SASSA/Postbank Gold card really will be a thing of the past. Image: File
Furthermore, the DA's Alexandra Abrahams has requested that SASSA, Postbank, and the South African Reserve Bank be held to account in Parliament as a matter of urgency. 'SASSA's inability to appoint a credible grant payment service provider has jeopardised the SASSA grant payments of 2 169 371 beneficiaries, including those of Child, Disability and Older Person grants. SASSA beneficiaries require urgent clarity on how their grants will be paid from October 2025 onwards,' concludes Abrahams. ARE YOU WITH POSTBANK AND HAVE YOU CHANGED PROVIDERS YET?
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Bye bye MultiChoice: R53 billion takeover by French media giant Canal+ approved
French media giant Canal+ has received regulatory approval from South Africa's Competition Tribunal to proceed with its multibillion-rand takeover of MultiChoice, paving the way for one of the most significant media mergers on the African continent. The deal, valued at around R53 billion, will see Canal+ acquire full control of MultiChoice, best known for its DStv and Showmax platforms. While the approval from the Competition Tribunal is a major milestone, the merger still needs clearance from other regulatory bodies, including Icasa, the JSE, the Takeover Regulation Panel, and the Financial Surveillance Department. 'It is a hugely positive step forward in our journey to bring together two iconic media and entertainment companies,' said Canal+ in a statement. As part of the approval, the Tribunal imposed conditions designed to protect South African interests: Ongoing investment in local sports and general entertainment content. Measures to support Historically Disadvantaged Persons (HDPs) and SMEs in the local broadcasting sector. Guarantees to maintain South Africa's influence over content and access decisions through the continued independence of MultiChoice (Pty) Ltd, which services local subscribers. 'We look forward to executing the remaining processes and to building something extraordinary – a global media and entertainment company with Africa at its heart,' said Calvo Mawela, CEO of MultiChoice Group. Despite the approval, Canal+ and MultiChoice must still navigate legal and policy hurdles, including South Africa's laws on foreign ownership of broadcasters. As part of the transaction structure, MultiChoice's South African business will be carved out and maintained independently to comply with these restrictions. Customers and viewers are not expected to be affected during the ongoing approval process, and both companies have committed to maintaining current services. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Beyond the balance sheet: Costs and benefits of broad-based BEE
Any discussion about black economic empowerment must weigh up its benefits, addressing historical injustices and the costs of not transforming the economy. Photo: File The current media debate around broad-based black economic empowerment (broad-based BEE) has brought fresh attention to the policy's effect on the economy — raising important questions about its effectiveness, costs and outcomes. As this conversation grows louder, it's worth taking a closer look at some of the arguments being made. An example from the debate is a recent study released by Solidarity and the Free Market Foundation (FMF), which arguably overlooks certain key economic implications of B-BBEE. Titled The Costs of B-BBEE Compliance, the report estimates that broad-based BEE may reduce South Africa's GDP growth by as much as 1.5 to 3% annually, potentially resulting in 96,000 to 192,000 fewer jobs each year. It further contends that the policy disproportionately benefits a narrow elite while imposing undue compliance costs on the broader economy. While such figures demand scrutiny, they also warrant a critical examination of the underlying assumptions, methodology and, crucially, the broader socio-economic context in which broad-based BEE operates. One of the most significant concerns with the report is its presentation of correlation as causation. The paper attributes specific percentages of GDP loss and job losses directly to broad-based BEE but does not demonstrate how these effects were isolated from South Africa's myriad economic problems. South Africa's macroeconomic environment remains deeply constrained by structural impediments such as: Chronic electricity and water shortages, including load shedding; Global economic headwinds; Endemic corruption; and Policy uncertainty and governance deficits. Attributing complex macroeconomic trends solely to broad-based BEE risks simplifies a nuanced reality and underestimates the multifactorial nature of South Africa's growth constraints. Equally important is the report's limited treatment of the potential benefits of broad-based BEE. Many of which manifest over the medium to long term and are difficult to quantify through conventional compliance cost frameworks alone. Equity equivalent programmes (EEPs) enable multinational corporations, constrained by global ownership structures, to achieve ownership points through local investments in enterprise development, skills transfer and innovation. Far from being passive mechanisms, EEPs represent substantial, targeted injections into the domestic economy. IBM, for example, committed R700 million over 10 years to enterprise development, research and education. This included support for 74 black-owned businesses and fully funded bursaries for dozens of students from disadvantaged backgrounds in critical fields of information and communication technology. Samsung also made a substantial commitment, launching a R280 million equity equivalent investment programme (EEIP) in May 2019, projected to contribute nearly R1 billion to the South African economy over its 10-year duration. This programme aimed for a measurable effect on job creation, specifically targeting the creation of 262 direct jobs and supporting 13 black-owned and women-owned businesses. A notable focus of Samsung's investment is on industrialisation by black people through e-Waste recycling and beneficiation research and development, including the establishment of the first black-owned and operated e-waste beneficiation plant in Africa. These company-specific statistics, alongside broader programmes such as JP Morgan's Abadali EEIP, which aims for an additional 1,000 permanent jobs and R2 billion in financing transactions, underscore the crucial role of EEPs in boosting small and medium enterprises (SMEs), particularly black-owned businesses, by providing essential funding, business support and mentorship. Furthermore, these programmes significantly advance skills development, with more than 2,500 beneficiaries receiving critical skills training, and facilitating technology transfer, aligning with South Africa's national development goals and fostering a more inclusive and skilled workforce. The YES programme directly targets South Africa's intractable youth unemployment crisis. Since its inception in 2018, YES has facilitated more than 186,000 quality work experiences for young people, injecting nearly R11 billion in salaries into the economy. About 45% of participants secure permanent employment after placement, and 17% establish their own businesses, multiplying the long-term economic benefit. The initiative also encourages private sector participation by offering measurable broad-based BEE recognition for companies that create these opportunities. Enterprise and supplier development (ESD) remains a cornerstone of the broad-based BEE framework, driving significant investment into the SMME sector. South African corporates reportedly channel R20 billion to R30 billion annually into ESD programmes, helping integrate black-owned businesses into supply chains and enabling sustainable growth. For instance, the Shoprite Group's CredX programme has provided R10 billion in working capital to suppliers, while its Next Capital initiative has invested R20 million to support new black-owned enterprises. Collectively, such interventions empower black entrepreneurs, expand the tax base and generate employment in communities historically excluded from meaningful economic participation. Why broad-based BEE still matters Perhaps the most profound omission in the Solidarity and FMF report is its decontextualised approach to broad-based BEE's rationale. Apartheid was not merely a political system; it was an economic design that systematically dispossessed black South Africans of land, capital, skills and opportunities. This entrenched economic disenfranchisement cannot be dismantled simply by repealing discriminatory laws. Broad-based BEE emerged as a policy instrument to facilitate redress, promote equitable economic participation and mitigate the persistent structural inequality that threatens social cohesion and long-term stability. Any analysis that fails to account for this historical imperative and the potential socio-economic cost of neglecting it, is incomplete. There is little doubt that broad-based BEE can and should be improved. Calls for greater transparency, genuine empowerment outcomes, and tighter controls to prevent fronting and inefficiency are well-founded. But presenting a one-sided narrative that focuses exclusively on compliance costs while disregarding significant economic and social returns undermines the opportunity for a more balanced, evidence-based debate. As South Africa grapples with the problems of inclusive growth, any meaningful conversation about the future of broad-based BEE must extend beyond a narrow cost-benefit calculus. It must weigh the policy's role in addressing historical injustices, its measurable and often intangible benefits, and the opportunity costs of not transforming the economy. A policy of this nature should not be romanticised or demonised without context. Instead, it demands honest, nuanced discussion, one that prioritises national development, social cohesion and sustainable, broad-based participation in the economy. The question should not be whether broad-based BEE has costs but rather whether we are collectively doing enough to ensure that its benefits are fully realised and that it continues to evolve to serve the South Africa we aspire to build. Safiyya Patel is a managing partner at Webber Wentzel.
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Farmer loses SCA battle after harmful Facebook posts about lawyer following R3 million debt
SCA dismissed an appeal by farmer who posted inflammatory messages against an attorney over a debt. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has dismissed an appeal from an aggrieved farmer, Francois Harman, who had taken to Facebook to post disparaging and inflammatory remarks against Pretoria attorney Pieter Strydom. Strydom, who acts as an insolvency practitioner, was representing the Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa (Land Bank) in its legal proceedings against Harman for outstanding debts. The Land Bank and Unigro Financial Services advance loans to farmers and whenever a farmer falls in default of payment, the organisations would instruct Strydom to initiate legal proceedings to recover the debt. The legal dispute began when Harman and his company, Redlex, secured a loan from the Land Bank but fell into arrears, ultimately leading to a lawsuit for over R4.3 million. After Redlex was liquidated in July 2019, the Land Bank, represented by Strydom, secured a judgment against Harman in May 2020 for more than R3 million plus interest. Frustrated by the judgment and the financial toll it had taken on him, Harman resorted to social media to express his anger. His Facebook posts targeted Strydom and other officials at the Land Bank, accusing them of unethical behaviour and acting impartially. In response to his alarming online conduct, Strydom sought a protection order against Harman, which prohibited him from further harassment or verbal abuse through electronic communication. The order was obtained in Harman's absence.
