
Citigroup Sells Swiggy Shares Worth INR 12.2 Crore
You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
Citigroup Global Markets has offloaded its stake in Swiggy to BNP Paribas Financial Markets in a block deal worth INR 12.2 crore, according to stock exchange data. The transaction involved the sale of 3.2 lakh shares at INR 381 apiece and was executed through bulk deal mechanisms.
Citigroup Global Markets, the brokerage and investment banking arm of US-based Citigroup Inc., sold the shares to the investment unit of French banking major BNP Paribas. The move marks a notable shift in foreign institutional interest in the Indian foodtech company, coming at a time when Swiggy is undergoing internal restructuring.
The share sale comes shortly after Swiggy announced the impending shutdown of its digital storefront platform, Minis, by August 10. Minis, which once offered home-cooked meals, handmade products, and baking supplies, has not been visible on the main Swiggy app for over a year—indicating the company had already begun winding it down in phases.
While Swiggy continues to be a major player in India's food delivery and quick commerce space, recent financials suggest mounting pressure on profitability. In the quarter ending March 31, 2025, the company reported revenue of INR 4,410 crore but posted a loss of INR 1,081 crore during the same period. Food delivery accounted for 37 per cent of its total revenue, with quick commerce contributing the rest.
Neither Citigroup nor BNP Paribas issued public statements on the rationale behind the transaction. However, such secondary market trades often reflect broader investor sentiment and strategic rebalancing, especially in the run-up to Swiggy's anticipated public offering.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear
How Pakistan shot down India's cutting-edge fighter using Chinese gear By Saeed Shah and Shivam Patel ISLAMABAD/NEW DELHI, August 2 (Reuters) -Just after midnight on May 7, the screen in the Pakistan Air Force's operations room lit up in red with the positions of dozens of active enemy planes across the border in India. Air Chief Mshl. Zaheer Sidhu had been sleeping on a mattress just off that room for days in anticipation of an Indian assault. New Delhi had blamed Islamabad for backing militants who carried out an attack the previous month in Indian Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians. Despite Islamabad denying any involvement, India had vowed a response, which came in the early hours of May 7 with air strikes on Pakistan. Sidhu ordered Pakistan's prized Chinese-made J-10C jets to scramble. A senior Pakistani Air Force (PAF) official, who was present in the operations room, said Sidhu instructed his staff to target Rafales, a French-made fighter that is the jewel of India's fleet and had never been downed in battle. "He wanted Rafales," said the official. The hour-long fight, which took place in darkness, involved some 110 aircraft, experts estimate, making it the world's largest air battle in decades. The J-10s shot down at least one Rafale, Reuters reported in May, citing U.S. officials. Its downing surprised many in the military community and raised questions about the effectiveness of Western military hardware against untested Chinese alternatives. Shares of Dassault, which makes the Rafale, dipped after reports the fighter had been shot down. Indonesia, which has outstanding Rafale orders, has said it is now considering purchasing J-10s – a major boost to China's efforts to sell the aircraft overseas. But Reuters interviews with two Indian officials and three of their Pakistani counterparts found that the performance of the Rafale wasn't the key problem: Central to its downing was an Indian intelligence failure concerning the range of the China-made PL-15 missile fired by the J-10 fighter. China and Pakistan are the only countries to operate both J-10s, known as Vigorous Dragons, and PL-15s. The faulty intelligence gave the Rafale pilots a false sense of confidence they were out of Pakistani firing distance, which they believed was only around 150 km, the Indian officials said, referring to the widely cited range of PL-15's export variant. "We ambushed them," the PAF official said, adding that Islamabad conducted an electronic warfare assault on Delhi's systems in an attempt to confuse Indian pilots. Indian officials dispute the effectiveness of those efforts. "The Indians were not expecting to be shot at," said Justin Bronk, air warfare expert at London's Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think-tank. "And the PL-15 is clearly very capable at long range." The PL-15 that hit the Rafale was fired from around 200km (124.27 mi) away, according to Pakistani officials, and even farther according to Indian officials. That would make it among the longest-range air-to-air strikes recorded. India's defense and foreign ministries did not return requests for comment about the intelligence mistakes. Delhi hasn't acknowledged a Rafale being shot down, but France's air chief told reporters in June that he had seen evidence of the loss of that fighter and two other aircraft flown by India, including a Russian-made Sukhoi. A top Dassault executive also told French lawmakers that month that India had lost a Rafale in operations, though he didn't have specific details. Pakistan's military referred to past comments by a spokesperson who said that its professional preparedness and resolve was more important than the weaponry it had deployed. China's defense ministry did not respond to Reuters' questions. Dassault and UAC, the manufacturer of the Sukhoi, also did not return requests for comment. "SITUATIONAL AWARENESS" Reuters spoke to eight Pakistani and two Indian officials to piece together an account of the aerial battle, which marked the start of four days of fighting between the two nuclear-armed neighbors that caused alarm in Washington. The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss national security matters. Not only did Islamabad have the element of surprise with its missiles' range, the Pakistani and Indian officials said, but it managed to more efficiently connect its military hardware to surveillance on the ground and in the air, providing it with a clearer picture of the battlefield. Such networks, known as "kill chains," have become a crucial element of modern warfare. Four Pakistani officials said they created a "kill chain," or a multi-domain operation, by linking air, land and space sensors. The network included a Pakistani-developed system, Data Link 17, which connected Chinese military hardware with other equipment, including a Swedish-made surveillance plane, two Pakistani officials said. The system allowed the J-10s flying closer to India to obtain radar feeds from the surveillance plane cruising further away, meaning the Chinese-made fighters could turn their radars off and fly undetected, according to experts. Pakistan's military did not respond to requests for comment on this point. Delhi is trying to set up a similar network, the Indian officials said, adding that their process was more complicated because the country sourced aircraft from a wide range of exporters. Retired U.K. Air Mshl. Greg Bagwell, now a fellow at RUSI, said the episode didn't conclusively prove the superiority of either Chinese or Western air assets but it showed the importance of having the right information and using it. 'The winner in this was the side that had the best situational awareness,' said Bagwell. CHANGE IN TACTICS After India in the early hours of May 7 struck targets in Pakistan that it called terrorist infrastructure, Sidhu ordered his squadrons to switch from defense to attack. Five PAF officials said India had deployed some 70 planes, which was more than they had expected and provided Islamabad's PL-15s with a target-rich environment. India has not said how many planes were used. The May 7 battle marked the first big air contest of the modern era in which weaponry is used to strike targets beyond visual range, said Bagwell, noting both India and Pakistan's planes remained well within their airspaces across the duration of the fight. Five Pakistani officials said an electronic assault on Indian sensors and communications systems reduced the situational awareness of the Rafale's pilots. The two Indian officials said the Rafales were not blinded during the skirmishes and that Indian satellites were not jammed. But they acknowledged that Pakistan appeared to have disrupted the Sukhoi, whose systems Delhi is now upgrading. Other Indian security officials have deflected questions away from the Rafale, a centerpiece of India's military modernization, to the orders given to the air force. India's defense attaché in Jakarta told a university seminar that Delhi had lost some aircraft "only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack (Pakistan's) military establishments and their air defenses." India's chief of defense staff Gen. Anil Chauhan previously told Reuters that Delhi quickly "rectified tactics" after the initial losses. After the May 7 air battle, India began targeting Pakistani military infrastructure and asserting its strength in the skies. Its Indian-made BrahMos supersonic cruise missile repeatedly sliced through Pakistan's air defenses, according to officials on both sides. On May 10, India said it struck at least nine air bases and radar sites in Pakistan. It also hit a surveillance plane parked in a hangar in southern Pakistan, according to Indian and Pakistani officials. A ceasefire was agreed later that day, after U.S. officials held talks with both sides. 'LIVE INPUTS' In the aftermath of the episode, India's deputy army chief Lt. Gen. Rahul Singh accused Pakistan of receiving 'live inputs' from China during the battles, implying radar and satellite feeds. He did not provide evidence and Islamabad denies the allegation. When asked at a July briefing about Beijing's military partnership with Pakistan, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told reporters the work was "part of the normal cooperation between the two countries and does not target any third party." Beijing's air chief Lt. Gen. Wang Gang visited Pakistan in July to discuss how Islamabad had used Chinese equipment to put together the "kill chain' for the Rafale, two PAF officials said. China did not respond when asked about that interaction. The Pakistani military said in a statement in July that Wang had expressed "keen interest in learning from PAF's battle-proven experience in Multi Domain Operations." (Additional reporting by John Irish in Paris, Idrees Ali in Washington, Nur-Azna Sanusi in Singapore and the Beijing newsroom; Editing by Katerina Ang)
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
India's NCC acquires orders from state government
Indian construction company NCC has secured two new orders worth Rs7.91bn ($90m) from state government agencies, as per the company's stock exchange filing. The breakdown of the orders reveals that the buildings division of NCC has been allocated a project worth Rs4.61bn while the electrical division is set to undertake work amounting to Rs3.3bn. The specifics of the contracts were not disclosed. The company has stated that these contracts have been secured as part of its regular business dealings and that there is no involvement of the company's promoters with the awarding entities. Furthermore, NCC has been selected for a major infrastructure project by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority, involving the development of Metro Line 6, with the contract valued at Rs22.69bn. The acceptance letter for the Metro Line 6 project was recently issued to NCC. The project involves the design, production, provision, installation, integration, testing, and commissioning of rolling stock, communication-based signalling, and train control systems. It also includes telecommunication systems, platform screen doors, and depot machinery and equipment for Line 6, which runs from Swami Samarth Nagar to Vikhroli (Eastern Express Highway) as part of the Mumbai Metro Rail Project. The timeline for the completion of the construction of the metro is 24 months, with a defect liability maintenance period of two years. Following this, the company will provide comprehensive maintenance services for a duration of five years. This June, NCC reported securing new orders worth Rs16.9bn, which were directed to the company's building division from various state government bodies and a private entity. The financial performance of NCC for the quarter ending 31 March 2025 saw a net profit of Rs2.53bn, marking a 6% increase from the same period in the previous year. At the end of fiscal year 2025, NCC had accumulated orders worth Rs328.88bn, including changes in scope. The consolidated order book was reported at Rs715.68bn, with a standalone order book value of Rs624.71bn as of 31 March. "India's NCC acquires orders from state government " was originally created and published by World Construction Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wells Fargo gives CEO Scharf a $30M award, names him chair
This story was originally published on Banking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Banking Dive newsletter. Wells Fargo intends to give CEO Charlie Scharf a $30 million one-time equity award and install him as chair of its board, in addition to serving as chief executive, the bank announced Thursday. The move is meant to lock Scharf into leading Wells for the next six years and recognize his role in restoring the bank's reputation, boosting its risk and control infrastructure, and identifying and investing in 'core' business areas. Regulators have terminated 13 consent orders against Wells since Scharf became CEO in 2019, including a $1.95 trillion asset cap the Federal Reserve lifted in June – a remnant of the bank's 2016 fake-accounts scandal. Wells did not give a timeline for handing the chair role to Scharf – nor did it detail a future role for the bank's current chair, Steven Black. The bank did, however, note that it intends to appoint a lead independent director. Scharf and Black have served together before; Black was a director on BNY's board when Scharf served as chair and CEO of the bank in 2018 and 2019. 'We are thrilled to recognize Charlie's significant contributions to Wells Fargo,' Black said in a statement. 'We look forward to Charlie's continued guidance and strategic direction as we navigate the future." Depending on the timing, Wells could become the third U.S.-based systemically important financial institution to combine its chair and CEO roles this year. BNY in June named CEO Robin Vince to concurrently serve as its chair, starting Sept. 1. Morgan Stanley CEO Ted Pick assumed chair responsibilities Jan. 1. That leaves Citi as the only U.S. SIFI (there are eight) to maintain separate chair and CEO roles. Scharf would also become at least the third CEO of a top-10 U.S. bank this year to receive an eight-figure equity award. Goldman Sachs disclosed in January that it would give CEO David Solomon an $80 million retention bonus. The bank gave the same deal to President John Waldron, drawing criticism from proxy advisers this spring. Capital One, meanwhile, granted CEO Richard Fairbank a $30 million one-time award in June after the bank closed its long-running acquisition of Discover. Scharf's award is not limited to $30 million in restricted share rights. He also is set to receive 1,046,000 stock options. The award will vest on a pro rata basis following the fourth, fifth and sixth anniversaries of the grant date. Unvested portions of the award will be forfeited if Scharf resigns or retires earlier, the bank said. Also, Scharf must keep at least 50% of the vested shares throughout his time at Wells and a year after he leaves, according to the bank. Scharf, in a statement Thursday, largely deferred to his team. 'Over the last several years, our Operating Committee and our 213,000 employees have executed a multi-faceted transformation under extremely difficult circumstances,' he said. 'It is a privilege to lead Wells Fargo and our talented and dedicated team, and I look forward to building on our significant momentum to continue improving our performance and market position in everything we do.' The award further stabilizes leadership at Wells and removes any incentive Scharf might have to explore options outside of the bank. Observers have casually speculated that Scharf could have been a dark-horse candidate to succeed mentor Jamie Dimon as CEO of JPMorgan Chase. Dimon has hinted that the clock is ticking on his tenure atop the bank, and a series of personnel moves – first in 2021, then last year and again this year (twice) – has alternately raised the profiles of various potential internal successors. The value of Scharf's award will fluctuate along with Wells' stock price, the bank said. The options, for their part, will only have value insofar as the bank's stock price appreciates throughout the vesting period. Scharf wasn't the only Wells executive whose compensation came under the microscope. Wells' human resources committee decided not to keep a target total compensation structure for its named executive officers, the bank said Thursday in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The panel, rather, will 'determine incentive compensation for each NEO, including the CEO, using a holistic performance assessment that evaluates NEO performance based on individual and Company performance, as well as line of business performance, where applicable, relative to established financial and non-financial performance criteria,' the bank said. Scharf will be Wells' first CEO-chair hybrid in nearly a decade. The bank changed its bylaws after former Chair and CEO John Stumpf resigned in October 2016, to require an independent chair. Wells amended those bylaws this week to allow Scharf to serve in a dual capacity. Another new amendment requires the bank to maintain an independent lead director. Recommended Reading BNY names CEO Robin Vince as its next chair