Plan to reintroduce banned pesticide in France overruled by constitutional council
The decision on Thursday night deals a blow to the government. It comes after weeks of opposition from the left, environmentalists and doctors, and a record-breaking 2m signatures on a petition against a bill that would have allowed a pesticide banned in France in 2020 to come back into use.
The 'Duplomb law' – named after the conservative lawmaker Laurent Duplomb who proposed it – had been presented in parliament as a bid to free up French farmers, who have repeatedly expressed frustration over bureaucratic constraints on the agricultural sector, unfair foreign competition, and what they called stringent regulations, including on pesticides.
But in a rebuke of the government on Thursday night, the constitutional council found that the law's provision to reintroduce acetamiprid – a chemical known to be toxic to pollinators such as bees – did not abide by France's environmental charter, which guarantees the 'right to live in a balanced and healthy environment'. The constitutional authority also raised questions over provisions for water reservoirs in the bill.
The president, Emmanuel Macron, had 'taken good note of the decision', his office said on Thursday night, and was expected to swiftly validate the bill without these contested sections.
The Green leader, Marine Tondelier, said she was 'very relieved' by the verdict. The Socialist party said the verdict was a rebuke to the 'irresponsibility of the prime minister, François Bayrou, and his government'.
The insecticide in question was particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who said they had no alternative against pests and faced unfair competition. Some growers also argued that acetamiprid, allowed in other EU countries, was vital to fight virus yellows, which cut yields by 30% in 2020 and slashed sugar output.
The petition on the website of France's lower-house National Assembly called the measure a 'frontal attack on public health'. Beekeepers have described the chemical as 'a bee killer', and its effects on humans are also a source of concern, though its risk remains unclear in the absence of large-scale studies.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
The student-led petition against the bill garnered more than 2m signatures after lawmakers adopted its reintroduction on 8 July, when it was rushed through a deeply divided lower house of parliament without a proper debate.
Agence France-Presse contributed to this report
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's first 200 days hailed as most consequential since Roosevelt
By It has been a first 200 days that experts say is the most consequential start to a presidential term for 92 years. That was when Franklin D, Roosevelt set out to save America from the Great Depression and get the country back to work. When President Donald Trump entered the White House on January 20, 2025 he faced a struggling economy, an immigration disaster, and brewing trouble in Europe and the Middle East. Trump dealt with it all by throwing the political rulebook out the window - he abandoned free trade, upended relations with America's allies, eviscerated his own government bureaucracy, and bombed Iran . All of those measures, according to the naysayers, should have led to disaster. Instead, Trump's supporters are doing victory laps and he is forging ahead at breakneck speed. 'You've not seen anything like this in almost anyone's lifetime. You have to go back to March 4, 1933 (the inauguration of Roosevelt) to have an administration so active and aggressive, and successful in promoting its agenda,' high-profile pollster Frank Luntz told the Daily Mail. ''John Kennedy getting elected in 1960 was a very big deal, but nothing compared to what Trump has done in his first 200 days. He really has remade the governing process. Trump has reset what is acceptable in American politics. It's not that he's played the game better, he's changed the game. He's changed the world. We've never had anyone like him.' For allies the tone was set by J.D. Vance's speech in Munich on February 14 during which the norms of the transatlantic alliance were, as one eminent European put it, 'smashed to smithereens.' Trump, through Vance, demanded America demanded the Europeans step up their own security and take responsibility for their own back yard. At home, Elon Musk frenziedly came and went from the White House, taking a chainsaw to government departments. After 200 days, USAID and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting are gone, and the Department of Education is on the way out. It happened so quickly that Musk himself is already out the door. Meanwhile, in Congress, despite small majorities, Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' incorporating his tax cuts, made it over the line into law by July 4. And, as high-profile deportation raids escalated, the number of migrants crossing the border into the U.S. plummeted to levels near zero, which not even Trump's biggest supporters had dared to predict. 'Honestly, I would give the guy A plus,' said Republican strategist David Urban. 'This Trump. 2.0 is incredibly efficient and incredibly efficacious. They're just knocking out of the park at so many different fronts. It seems like almost an entire presidency has occurred in this first 200 days. Amazing. The velocity at which things traveled in this second term is just unprecedented. 'Whether you like the President or not, there's one thing that's undeniable, that he is the most consequential president in our lifetime.' Urban added: 'He's basically reshaped NATO. He's basically reshaped trade. He's reshaped immigration. I mean huge, huge issues which impact so many people on a daily basis. The President's done what most people thought could not be done. 'There were so many prognosticators of doom on the other side who have been affected by TDS (Trump derangement Syndrome,) who said that if the President does X, then Y is going to happen and the sky will fall. The President has done X, and not only has Y not happened, there's been a positive outcome. However, as Trump hits the 200 day mark, he faces a new potential showdown with Vladimir Putin and uncertainty over his trade war with China. And another problem looms over everything - the specter of Jeffrey Epstein. Urban believes the brouhaha will pass, like similar frenzies over the JFK assassination and UFO sightings. 'I think there's no there, there,' he said. 'I don't believe there's some magical list that's people who drink children's blood that's going to satiate anybody.' But the issue threatens to cast a shadow over the next 200 days as Democrats look set to up their attacks on Trump for not releasing the full 'Epstein files,' leading to wild conspiracy theories relating to the late pedophile billionaire. "Well, the Democrats have to. What else are they going to have to propel them back to power?' Larry Sabato, Director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, told the Daily Mail. 'What else do they have unless the economy goes into recession, or has a significant measurable slowdown, or there's stagflation. They have to continue to criticize and they want to take a subject that people seem to care about, that they think this is dividing the MAGA base. 'And it is on that issue. But then Trump's base comes right back together for anything that Trump tells them they should be for. It doesn't change their votes, doesn't change their determination to see him succeed in everything he wants to do.' The Epstein issue is resonating with voters but not impacting Trump's support, he suggested. 'I've already had so many people write to me and say to me in a grocery store, "Look, I'm very upset that they're not releasing all that, shame on Trump for not doing it." But then the next sentence is "I just love this guy, he's been the greatest president of my lifetime." They don't care. So what?' Sabato said the solidity of Trump's base means he will usually poll above 40 percent and that is 'plenty good to run a presidency. You don't need to be over 50 percent.' 'In terms of energy and achievement I would rate the 200 days very highly compared to other presidencies. Now, the other scale would be very, very different, say, wisdom or attention to the Constitution and the customs and traditions that have made America work. And I would give it an F minus. 'Almost every day, we seem to be taking another step down the road to the most extreme polarization we've had since the Civil War.' Trump's success, while celebrated by his supporters, has also created a potential problem for Republicans down the road. according to Luntz, who conducts weekly focus groups with voters. It has resulted in two hugely divergent views of his presidency. Many Republicans are almost euphoric, but many Democrats are more alienated than ever. 'It has been a tale of two presidencies. Those that voted for Donald Trump are ecstatic. He's done everything he promised to do and more. He's done it in a bold and way, and they approved of just about everything,' said Luntz. 'For those who didn't vote for him, it's even worse than they were expecting. They've come to realize that everything he said, he meant.' Trump is a '49 percent president' because he has not added to his support in office, Luntz said. 'This is the difference between him and Ronald Reagan. Reagan was elected with 50 percent of the vote. Trump was elected with 50 percent of the vote. Reagan went out of his way to expand it, and he was successful in doing it. Trump is not seeking to expand his coalition.' That doesn't matter for a president who will not be seeking reelection, but it matters a lot for his successor, and also in the 2026 midterms. 'There is blowback, and that blowback is significant, and the pendulum, when it swings back, is going to swing back with velocity,' Luntz said. 'Eventually, when it's the other side that will win, because it will happen, there's going to be a level of retribution that we haven't seen, that I think is very dangerous for the political system.'
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Take Five: When Don meets Vlad
Aug 8 (Reuters) - Geopolitics is high on the agenda, with a potential meeting between the U.S. and Russian presidents, trade deadlines and talks, and markets bracing for United States' inflation data and rates decisions in Australia and Norway. Here is your week ahead from Alun John, Amanda Cooper and Karin Strohecker in London, Rae Wee in Singapore, and Lewis Krauskopf in New York. Shuttle diplomacy is in full swing with U.S. President Donald Trump set to meet Russia's Vladimir Putin in the coming days - the first face-to-face summit between a sitting U.S. president and his Russian counterpart since Joe Biden met Putin in June 2021. Trump - who has veered between admiration and sharp criticism of Putin - is looking for a breakthrough to end the 3-1/2 year war in Ukraine after voicing mounting frustration with his Russian counterpart and threatening new sanctions. Ramifications of the encounter are likely to ripple through global markets with secondary tariffs set to hurt Russia and other nations around the world. Trump has imposed an extra 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing continued imports of Russian oil, and warned that China could be next. Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is pushing for Europe to be involved in the peace process and talks. There has been further progress in the makings of a trade deal between Washington and Beijing, or so Trump and his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have said. But the August 12 deadline for a tariff truce between the world's two economic superpowers is closing in. Trump has yet to sign on the dotted line after both sides at talks in Stockholm agreed to seek an extension of a pause on tariffs. Still, things seem somewhat positive for now. Trump has said he would meet Chinese President Xi Jinping before the end of the year should a trade deal be struck. Investors, meanwhile, are craving more clarity, remaining largely on the sidelines and leaving Chinese markets range-bound for the most part, though stocks ended the week near a 10-month high. Firming bets that the U.S. Fed is primed to resume cutting interest rates will be tested by Tuesday's release of U.S. inflation data. The July consumer price index will also be watched for signs of the impact of Trump's tariffs deluge fuelling more price hikes. June data showed the biggest rise in five months, as higher costs for some goods were starting to bite. A hot number could shake the narrative that the Fed will cut rates at its next meeting in September, which has gathered steam after a surprisingly weak employment report earlier this month. The inflation report is also one of the most significant U.S. economic data releases since Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after the weak jobs report - a move that stoked fears about data integrity and credibility. Australia's and Norway's central banks have been the two most cautious in developed economies in this cycle of rate cuts, but markets think their next moves could see them diverge. The Reserve Bank of Australia only started easing this year, and has made just two 25 bps cuts from its 2024 peak, compared to a cumulative 100 bps for the Fed, and 200 bps for the ECB. Norway's central bank has made just one 25 bps cut. In Australia, where inflation grew at its slowest pace in four years in the three months to June, markets expect a 25 bps reduction on Tuesday with one or maybe two more such cuts to follow this year. The Norges Bank, in contrast, is set to stay on hold on Thursday, with another cut not fully priced until November. Be nervous with market pricing though, at their last meetings both central banks confounded market expectations with Norway making its one cut, and Australia staying on hold. The middle of August is generally viewed as one of the dullest periods in the year. Lawmakers and central bankers are on a break, there is no big data and traders use the lull to ditch their screens. There's just one small problem. August is when volatility has a habit of exploding - and last year was a case in point. A sharp appreciation of the Japanese yen, combined with a drop in U.S. tech stocks ignited one of the biggest one-day bursts in volatility on record. The average daily percentage move in the VIX volatility index (.VIX), opens new tab in August over the last 35 years is 0.55%, the highest for any month. The least volatile month is April - even with this year's meltdown after Trump's announcement of his "Liberation Day" tariffs - with an average daily move of 0.07%. With stocks at record highs, and positioning in things like the dollar stretched, there is no shortage of tripwires.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump tariffs on gold bars drive prices to record high
Gold futures have soared to record highs after Donald Trump escalated his trade war with Switzerland by imposing fresh levies on gold bars. Prices hit an all-time high of $3,534 (£2,632) overnight and were trading up 1.2pc on Friday morning amid reports that the US president is set to slap import duties on 1kg gold bars. The US Customs Border Protection agency said 1kg and 100g bars will be subject to levies on imports, according to a letter first reported by the Financial Times. Spot gold – the price of gold that can be bought and sold immediately – is currently trading at around $3,400, just shy of the all-time high recorded in April. It comes after Mr Trump slapped 39pc tariffs on imports from Switzerland earlier this month, landing it with one of the highest tariff rates of any country outside of Asia. Only countries such as Laos, Myanmar and China have higher tariffs. Mr Trump has also threatened to impose a 50pc tariff on goods from India in a row over its purchases of Russian oil. Representatives from Switzerland flew to the US earlier this week to hold crisis talks with US trade officials in a bid to ease the levies. Such stringent tariffs have been imposed on Switzerland because of its substantial trade surplus with the US, which is around £28.8bn. This is thanks to exports of watches, chocolate, pharmaceuticals and high-tech machinery. The country is also the world's leading gold exporter. Gold bullion made up more than £45bn of Switzerland's exports to the US in the 12 months to June. Shares in Swiss luxury goods firms, such as Richemont, have taken a hit over the past week after Mr Trump's shock tariff raid was confirmed on Aug 1, a Swiss national holiday. The tariffs on gold bars are a particular surprise, as US customs agents had previously classified the metal as exempt from import levies. Nikolay Markov, an economist at Pictet Asset Management in Geneva, told The Telegraph this week he expected Mr Trump's tariffs to knock 1.8pc of Switzerland's growth. He said: 'It implies no growth for Switzerland in the coming year. It really changes the economic outlook.'
