U.S. Interest Rate Cut Bets Push Dollar to Multi-Week Lows - Jordan News
— (Agencies)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
20 hours ago
- Ammon
Jordan, UK talk closer transport ties
Ammon News - Minister of Transport Nidal Qatamin discussed with British Chargé d'Affaires Hazel Mowbray on Saturday prospects of cementing cooperation between Jordan and the UK in the transport field. The minister spoke about the possibility the UK provides support and facilities to advance the vital sector, particularly public transport and logistics. Mowbray pledged her country will offer support through the International Growth Centre (IGC), an economic research center based at the London School of Economics, in coordination with the Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation, for priority projects in the sector. The two sides agreed to continue technical and institutional cooperation to meet transport development goals and enhance the existing partnership between the two countries. Petra
Al Bawaba
2 days ago
- Al Bawaba
Trump vs. Goldman Sachs: Could presidential attacks silence wall street analysts?
ALBAWABA - Investors and professors are worried that Wall Street experts may start lowering their reports because U.S. President Donald Trump publicly criticized Goldman Sachs' economic research on tariff risks. This could mean that markets don't get correct and independent information. Big banks like Goldman Sachs do a lot of research that helps institutional investors like hedge funds and asset managers decide how to put their money to work. But Trump said that Goldman Sachs, its economic team, and CEO David Solomon were giving "false forecasts," which started an argument about what this meant for the ethics of market research. Reuters says that Trump's comments have already led employees at one Wall Street bank to talk about how to handle government data informally. This is especially true since Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and said, without proof, that labor data was being used for political purposes. The bank hasn't changed how it does study yet. Experts in the field say that repeated comments from the Oval Office could make scientists feel like they need to hide their opinions. David Rosenberg of Rosenberg Research said that the effect will rest on how tough economists are and how willing their bosses are to stand up for them. Jack Ablin, chief investment analyst at Cresset Capital, warned that any decrease in independent analysis would hurt small investors the most because they don't have the resources to do their own study. Trump has had a lot of problems with private companies like this in the past. He has attacked companies in the past for passing on price costs to customers and getting involved in business deals, like one with Nvidia to give the government a portion of the money made from selling AI chips. David Mericle, Goldman's chief U.S. economist, supported the bank's research in an interview with CNBC and promised to keep giving what the bank thinks is useful analysis. Self-censorship is starting to show up in other places. J.P. Morgan Asset Management's Michael Cembalest said he has kept some of his public views on tariffs quiet, even though CEO Jamie Dimon told analysts they should speak their minds. Experts say Goldman Sachs could hurt its image if it is seen as unfair. U.S. President Donald Trump's criticism of Goldman Sachs' research on tariff risks could prompt some analysts to water down their research, an outcome that could leave investors with less reliable information. — The Japan Times (@japantimes) August 15, 2025 Mike Mayo of Wells Fargo said that research that isn't biased is what makes investment banks trustworthy. Sources say that research on Wall Street is already carefully checked to make sure it's fair. They say that limiting experts' freedom to speak out could make investments more expensive and risky, lower market liquidity, and discourage involvement from other countries. Concerns have been raised in the past: after the dot-com bubble burst in the late 1990s, a probe showed that analysts had given unwarranted "buy" advice to win bank business. This led to a $1.5 billion settlement and lifetime bans for some analysts. It's still not clear if Trump's latest comments will have long-lasting effects on Wall Street or if they will just fade away, but the debate has brought up important questions about how politics affect financial analysis.
Roya News
3 days ago
- Roya News
Trump, Putin to meet in Alaska; US state once bought from Russia
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are set to meet in the US state of Alaska on Friday, August 15, to discuss the future of the war in Ukraine. Trump announced the meeting on social media, while the Kremlin confirmed the date, noting that Alaska was a 'logical' choice given its relative proximity to Russia. Alaska's connection to Russia runs deeper than geography, the vast state was once Russian territory before being sold to the United States in a historic deal that reshaped the region. From Russian land to US state Russian control over Alaska dates back to the 18th century, when an expedition led by Danish navigator Vitus Bering, commissioned by Russian Tsar Peter the Great, discovered that the new land was not connected to Russia. The discovery of valuable sea otter fur opened the door to a lucrative fur trade, and the first Russian settlement in the region was established in 1784. Decades later, with sea otter populations nearing extinction and political fallout from the Crimean War, Russia became willing to sell Alaska. In 1867, then-US Secretary of State William Seward negotiated the purchase for $7.2 million. On October 18 of that year, the American flag was raised in Sitka, then the capital of Alaska, a day now celebrated annually as Alaska Day. Although the deal was initially mocked as 'Seward's Folly,' the later discovery of gold proved its strategic value. After a long path to statehood, Alaska officially became the 49th US state in 1959. The black gold that transformed Alaska Alaska's economy underwent a dramatic transformation in 1968 with the discovery of a massive oil field in Prudhoe Bay, estimated to hold around 13 billion barrels of reserves. Oil and gas quickly became the state's leading industry. In 1969 alone, Alaska earned $900 million from leasing land to oil companies. A major pipeline was built to transport crude oil across the state, forever changing its economic landscape. A lasting legacy: The Alaska Permanent Fund Recognizing that oil revenues would not last forever, then-Governor Jay Hammond established the Alaska Permanent Fund in 1976, setting aside a quarter of the state's oil royalties for future generations. Today, the fund is valued at over $65 billion. One of its most distinctive features is the Permanent Fund Dividend Program, launched in 1982, which distributes a portion of the fund's earnings annually to every Alaska resident who has lived there for at least a year. This program has helped lift between 15,000 and 25,000 people out of extreme poverty each year and regularly injects money into the local economy. Facts and figures about 'The Great Land'
