Biggest polluters need ‘breathing space' to reform, DBS says
Live Events
Major polluters need support to develop credible plans to curb emissions instead of being held to unrealistic demands for reforms, according to DBS Group Holdings Ltd., Southeast Asia's largest lender.Coal still accounts for almost half of total energy supply in the Asia-Pacific region, and sectors including shipping and steel-making continue to face challenges in decarbonizing quickly.'We need to give everyone a bit of breathing space to develop transition plans,' Helge Muenkel, the bank's chief sustainability officer, said in an interview on the sidelines of the Ecosperity Week conference in Singapore.DBS has previously warned that emissions tied to its customers could rise in the short-term. The trajectory will be impacted by its efforts to direct more funding to support the early retirement of coal power plants, and development of supply chains for critical minerals and other products required for green technology like electric vehicles.Banks in Europe are coming under new pressure to stand by strict climate commitments, and both Barclays Plc and Standard Chartered Plc will face calls from investors this week to accelerate lending to clean energy.DBS, which lifted sustainable financing commitments to S$89 billion ($69 billion) at the end of 2024 from S$70 billion the previous year, will aim to hold customers to account over their transition efforts, Muenkel said in the Tuesday interview.'If customers after engagement don't give us a sense that they really want to move, then ultimately that's actually a concern,' Muenkel said. 'Then we need to discuss cutting lines, disbanding relationships.'The bank has chosen to remain a member of the Net-Zero Banking Alliance , the finance sector climate group that's been abandoned by Wall Street and a series of lenders across Asia.'We like collective action, we like platforms that foster collaboration,' he said. 'It has proven to be actually very helpful.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
6 days ago
- Mint
DBS Is Said to Shelve Plans for Asia Insurance Deal on Valuation
(Bloomberg) -- DBS Group Holdings Ltd. has shelved plans to form an insurance partnership in India and Taiwan after initial offers from prospective bidders didn't match value expectations, according to people familiar with the matter. The Singapore-based lender and its advisers have paused work on the transaction, the people said, asking not to be identified because the information is private. A bancassurance agreement for the two Asian markets, as well as certain products in Singapore, had attracted interest from other insurers and financial services firms, the people said. DBS could opt to revive considerations for potential deal in the future, the people said. A representative for DBS declined to comment. In September, Bloomberg News reported DBS was working with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. as it weighed forming insurance partnerships in India and Taiwan, and some products in Singapore, in a transaction that could have been valued at a few hundred million dollars. DBS already has a bancassurance partnership with Toronto-based Manulife Financial Corp. for markets including China, Hong Kong, Indonesia and Singapore. DBS has had a presence in India for about three decades, having opened its first office in Mumbai in 1994. In 2020, DBS Bank India Ltd. merged with Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd., and it now has about 500 branches in 19 states, according to a recent press release. It entered Taiwan even earlier, in 1983, and has more than 70 branches across the island, expanding organically and via acquisitions including Citigroup Inc.'s consumer banking assets in the country in 2023. More stories like this are available on
Mint
26-05-2025
- Mint
Ring-Fencing Was a Good Idea That UK Banking No Longer Needs
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- UK banks want the government to abolish a key piece of post-financial crisis regulation that forces them to keep ordinary depositors' money legally separate from their trading and investment-banking business. This uniquely British setup, known as ring-fencing, limits the kind of lending banks can do and raises their costs. Well, most lenders don't like it. Barclays Plc alone is happy with the rules, which may be because it is uniquely placed to benefit from any protections they afford. I was always a big supporter of the idea behind this separation, but I'm no longer convinced the setup achieves much at all — for depositors or for Barclays. Ring-fencing is back in the news as the UK government looks desperately for anything that might stimulate investment and growth. The Bank of England is looking at ways to further relax their impact after having already made some changes in February. Big banks wrote to Britain's finance minister, Rachel Reeves, last month saying the rules should be scrapped, and a string of executives from large and small banks gave more views in front of a parliamentary committee last week. Vim Maru, chief executive officer of Barclays UK, reiterated the bank's case that the cordon around retail deposits has boosted financial stability and trust in lenders. Other countries have seen banks stumble and fall in the past couple of years, he said, while the UK has been immune. 'I think that is because we have ring-fencing,' Maru said. Other big banks, like HSBC Holdings Plc and NatWest Group Plc, complained about the additional costs for IT services, reporting and governance (a ring-fenced subsidiary needs its own independent board of directors). Executives also claim it leaves them stuck with redundant cash. 'I really think that a review now, to try to recalibrate that so that you are putting more oxygen into the economy, would be timely,' Ian Stuart, CEO of HSBC UK, told the committee. He also pointed out that US investment banks with small retail brands are free to raise UK deposits and use them wherever in their investment banks they wish. Ring-fencing doesn't apply until deposits exceed £35 billion ($47 billion), which rose from £25 billion in February. So, Chase UK — the British digital brand of JPMorgan Chase & Co. — or Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s Marcus can use ordinary people's cash for 'casino banking,' but Barclays, HSBC or NatWest can't. In the context of JPMorgan's massive balance sheet, UK deposits aren't much, but they're still a nice source of a little cheap money, and US lenders don't need any more competitive help. The ring-fencing threshold was raised to give small, local challenger banks and fintechs room to grow, but for them this isn't the hurdle that hurts. Starling Bank Ltd. and peers such as Monzo Bank Ltd. are less hemmed in by lending restrictions and more by capital requirements that kick in sooner. The so-called MREL rules govern how much equity and loss-absorbing debt a bank must issue and start to apply when total assets reach £15 billion to £25 billion. Raman Bhatia, Starling CEO, told Parliament on Thursday that small lenders' capital requirements can jump by up to two times at that point. This is a much lower boundary than in Europe, where MREL rules start applying to banks with assets of €60 billion ($68 billion) to €100 billion, according to industry executives. If the ring fence isn't a competition for challenger banks, it might be for JPMorgan's Chase UK brand, which would need lending restrictions, an independent board and so on if it wanted to compete harder with Britain's four big incumbents on their own turf. Maybe that's a benefit to Barclays. Its UK business is good but produces a lower return on risk-weighted assets than HSBC's UK business, while also deploying more of its deposits into lending than HSBC. Still, if JPMorgan really saw value in taking on UK lenders, it could afford to go after market share with or without the ring fence. The real value for Barclays might instead lie in the size of its investment bank, which is a much bigger proportion of the group than for peers. Trading and capital markets account for 56% of Barclays risk-weighted assets, although it has a target to get that down to 50%. At HSBC, the whole corporate and institutional unit, which is a broader business than straight investment banking, accounts for 46% of the balance sheet. At other UK lenders, the proportion is lower still. So perhaps Barclays is more worried than rivals about testing depositor trust if they realized they were relatively more exposed to global financial markets. It's possible, but I'm dubious it makes any difference. Inside the ring fence, retail deposits are mostly insured up to £85,000 — which could soon rise to £110,000. And that insurance is paid for by industry levies, not the taxpayer. If ordinary people are aware of ring-fencing at all, they'll be more aware of deposit insurance and the protection that gives them. If government or regulators really believe removing the ring fence increases the likelihood of bank runs, a sensible countermeasure could be to increase the scale of the deposit insurance fund to reassure people about the speed of recoveries if a big bank fails. The final part of ring-fencing that really matters is the assurance it gives that a UK retail bank's core services will continue to function if the larger group it's part of gets into real trouble. But even that is also covered by the detailed resolution planning regime that banks must meet. Ring-fencing was a good idea that has become redundant. Scrapping it won't boost UK growth suddenly — it'll take several years to pass and then implement the legislation, while banks will face another round of costs to restructure their businesses again. But it does just seem like a friction that no longer serves a purpose. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Paul J. Davies is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering banking and finance. Previously, he was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. More stories like this are available on
Time of India
22-05-2025
- Time of India
Adani Ports gets about $150 million loan from DBS for capex
Adani Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd. raised about $150 million through a bilateral loan agreement with DBS Group Holdings Ltd., according to people familiar with the matter, as the Indian conglomerate continues to restore lender confidence. The proceeds of the four-year dollar loan will be used for capital expenditure , the people said, asking not be identified because the information is private. The facility has been priced at about 200 basis points above the benchmark Secured Overnight Financing Rate, they said. The all-in-price, including the hedging cost, is about 5.5%, one of the person said. DBS declined to comment. An Adani Group representative did not offer any immediate comments on the transaction. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Has Honda Done It Again? The New Honda CR-V is Finally Here. TheFactualist Undo Billionaire Gautam Adani-owned conglomerate, with interests stretching from ports to green energy, is steadily regaining creditor confidence following a US Department of Justice indicted Adani over an alleged bribery plot in November. The bilateral loan is the group's first from a global bank since the indictment, one of the person said. Last month, the group raised about $750 million through an offshore private placement bond to fund an acquisition of a construction firm. BlackRock Inc. subscribed to about a third of the issuance. Separately, the conglomerate is in talks with foreign banks including Barclays Plc, First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC and Standard Chartered Bank Plc for a $750 million loan for its airport unit. Live Events Representatives for Adani and his companies recently met US administration officials to discuss potentially dismissing criminal charges levied against him in the bribery probe, Bloomberg reported earlier this month.
