A prescription for dismay, disbelief
The costs of butter, milk and cheese, fruit and vegetables, rents, rates and electricity are rising, some of them faster than belief. Annual inflation has lifted to 2.7%, according to the consumer price index.
There can be no doubt New Zealanders are grappling with the escalating cost of living. The government says it is all about cutting costs for Kiwis, something we have seen with its policies and its energetic drive to cut the public service and put thousands of skilled workers out of jobs.
However, despite its much-vaunted approach to trim things, some of which didn't need much pruning, the coalition is still releasing big pots of money for projects which have its favour and tickle its fancy, or the fancies of its cadres.
As a consequence of that favouritism, something else is going up. Advice be blowed, let's have a third medical school in New Zealand at a time when the government has been doing everything it can to minimise the importance of, and squeeze the life out of, Dunedin's desperately needed new hospital.
Until Monday afternoon's announcement that the University of Waikato's persistent and somewhat personal bid for a medical school had been approved, there had been perhaps a hope that surely common sense might prevail and the government wouldn't, after all, go along with the proposal.
Such sanguine thinking, however, was always held in check by the knowledge that this government has already shown several times that logic, facts and evidence to the contrary will not stop it supporting something which it is hell-bent on delivering for its followers.
At the heart of Waikato's proposal was something few could disagree with — that the country urgently needs to do something about the state and delivery of rural healthcare. Access to timely and effective medical services for those communities has been a big concern for many years, one which has only continued to grow.
But does it take a spanking new medical school costing several hundred million dollars, and growing, to ensure rural targets will be met? No.
There is no reason why the medical schools at the University of Otago and the University of Auckland could not have been funded to train more doctors at a significantly lower cost than launching a new school, a point they clearly made to the government.
Even the Treasury advised against the wisdom of proceeding with this pet project, as did the Ministry of Education and the Tertiary Education Commission, warning that the expense, the duplication and the logistical challenges raised red flags for them. In spite of that, the government and Waikato University forged on regardless.
Health Minister Simeon Brown announced a development with costs which have changed significantly from those pledged by the National Party before the last election.
Then, National said it would provide $280 million for the new school and the university would need to find $100m. Now, the government will disburse $82.85m towards it, and Waikato will have to stump up more than $150m. The final cost, of course, is bound to be higher than current expectations.
A lot has been written about links between National and the university and its vice-chancellor Neil Quigley, and also with consultant Steven Joyce, a former National government minister. Without getting too deeply into that, we are concerned that this is little more than an overt example of pork-barrel politics.
We are also troubled and disappointed, yet again, at the lack of transparency around the government's decision-making, particularly over health matters. Whenever it makes pronouncements which it knows are likely to be contentious, the accompanying documents seem to take ages to surface — if they ever do. That in itself probably speaks volumes about the consideration of the evidence.
It's difficult to stay calm and reasoned and attempt to rise above the feeling this government cares not a jot for the South.
When one sees what a charmed life this Waikato proposal has apparently had through the coalition's approval process, and compare that with the absolute shambles it has promulgated with the new Dunedin hospital and its obvious level of disinterest in the project, it is hard to remain philosophical.
Once again, this government has let us down.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
'Call me Mr Cash Man': MP seeks protection for hard currency
Self-proclaimed cash advocate and MP Jamie Arbuckle believes his proposed law protecting hard currency transactions is about more than accessibility — it's also about privacy and preventing "Big Brother" surveillance. The New Zealand First MP's members' legislation, the Cash Transactions Protection Bill, would require vendors to accept cash up to the value of $500, with no limits on the amount of cash that must be accepted for essential items like fuel and food. 'There's a real concern across New Zealand that we're becoming a cashless society, and we've got a lot of people who depend on cash,' the MP told Q+A. He said that particularly applied to people living in rural areas, the elderly who are more comfortable using cash than digital systems, and those on low incomes. A self-professed fan of using cash, Arbuckle said, 'cash is king, and you can call me Mr Cash Man if you like.' ADVERTISEMENT 'I've got to tell you right now, I don't like walking into a shop and not being able to pay cash for a coffee.' Composite image by Vania Chandrawidjaja (Source: iStock/1News) But he said in an increasingly digital world, there was a more serious point to be made about the ability to make anonymous payments. 'People are telling me they want to have the ability to use cash, it's a freedom of choice issue.' 'It's really the only true way of having privacy in a transaction. You don't get that with electronic payments. There's always the concern that Big Brother or someone is able to look at where you've been, what you've purchased, so the majority of people have been very positive about protecting cash use.' A Reserve Bank survey released in June 2025 found that — while electronic and debit card use was by far the most common method of making payments — a significant minority of the country continued to use cash regularly. Around 46% of respondents said they used cash 'to pay for everyday things', down slightly from 48% which an equivalent survey found in June 2023. ADVERTISEMENT The survey also found a majority had used cash at least once in the seven days preceding the survey being taken, with approximately 33% of respondents saying they hadn't used cash in the last week, and a further 3.6% saying they would never use cash. Further research undertaken last year by the Reserve Bank found Kiwis value being able to use physical cash. Director of money and cash Ian Woolford said, '84% of respondents were worried about losing access to banknotes and coins, and want assurance that cash will still be issued by the Reserve Bank and not reduced or replaced by digital cash.' 'We'll keep issuing cash for as long as New Zealanders want to use it," he said in December. "We're doing a lot of work to redesign the cash system, including helping retailers through community cash services trials next year in several rural communities lacking over-the-counter bank or ATM services.' Some businesses have moved to being cash-free, but Arbuckle said in his view, it couldn't be an opt-in and opt-out system. 'The majority of businesses hold cash, so we're only talking about a small amount of businesses that would have to change. ADVERTISEMENT "Cash is legal tender, and you should be able to purchase with cash.' He said if the bill is pulled out of the member's bill biscuit tin, he'd welcome feedback from businesses that might be affected during the select committee process. Q+A with Jack Tame is made with the support of New Zealand On Air
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Building Monopolies Busted: Tradies And Home Buyers To Benefit From Cheaper Materials
ACT is celebrating a major win for tradies and first home buyers alike. From tomorrow, thousands of overseas building products including plasterboard, cladding systems, and joinery will be available for use in New Zealand. This long-overdue reform was a key ACT campaign policy in the 2023 election. 'Builders and tradies are finally free to use materials trusted and approved around the world,' says ACT Building and Construction spokesperson Cameron Luxton, Parliament's only licensed builder. 'For years, outdated red tape has locked our building industry into high-cost, low-choice options. Dumb rules kept out better, cheaper, and more innovative products. This stifled competition, inflated prices, and put the dream of home ownership out of reach for too many Kiwis. "I remember the plasterboard supply crisis back in 2022 and how it crippled the building industry. Only a Government could create the absurd situation where there's a black market for plasterboard. Tomorrow's changes will break up the plasterboard monopoly and have similar effects for products all across the sector. 'Plasterboard in New Zealand costs 67% more than in the US and Canada, and 38% more than in Australia. That's not because ours is better, it's because tradies haven't been allowed to use anything else. 'More competition doesn't just help those who choose the new products, it forces existing suppliers to drop their prices or risk losing out. 'This is how ACT thinks across the board. We're already streamlining medicine approvals, and we're pushing to open the supermarket sector to more overseas players. When there's more choice and more competition, Kiwis get better products at better prices.'
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
More overseas building materials to be let in
The government hopes opening up the ability for building companies to buy more overseas material will cut down the price of construction. On Monday it will release its building product specifications document, which will list international standards for products like plasterboard, cladding, windows and external doors. The aim of the change is to allow more overseas building materials into New Zealand's construction sector. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the products had been given "the green light" to end "costly monopolies". "For example, New Zealand has some of the most expensive plasterboard in the world. "Kiwis pay around 38 percent more than Australia for plasterboard, 47 percent more than the UK, and 67 percent more than the US for the same products. And 97 percent of the plasterboard that we must currently use is made by one established company. "You may recall that in 2022, when that company ran into difficulty, prices for plasterboard soared and some builders were reported to pay six times the normal amount so they could finish the job." He said there were are thousands of high performing products that had been tested against international standards, but faced uptake barriers in New Zealand because they had not been specifically tested against "our own standards". "This is just the beginning of our work to open the door to more building products, lower the cost of homes and turbo charge the construction sector and there will be more to come," he said. ACT building and construction spokesperson Cameron Luxton said builders and tradies were "finally free to use materials trusted and approved around the world". "More competition doesn't just help those who choose the new products, it forces existing suppliers to drop their prices or risk losing out. "This is how ACT thinks across the board." 'Big step forward' Registered Master Builders Association chief executive Ankit Sharma said the announcement marked a timely and practical reform that would help to reduce the construction costs and increase product availability across the sector. "Builders across New Zealand have faced increasing cost pressures, and one of the biggest challenges has been delays or shortages in key building materials. By allowing overseas products that meet standards to be used more readily, we can improve supply chain resilience, reduce delays and ultimately deliver more homes, faster and more affordably," he said. The initiative reflected feedback from association members, who frequently identified access to building products as a constraint, Sharma said. "The building sector has been calling for a more responsive system. Today's announcement is a big step forward and we support the government's commitment to unlocking more affordable housing through better regulation."
