
US children are much more likely to die than kids in similar countries, study finds
Chronic diseasesFacebookTweetLink
Follow
American children's health has declined profoundly over the past few decades, a new study shows, and the issues are so serious that children in the US are dying at a much higher rate than those in similar high-income countries.
What's particularly frustrating is that the bulk of the health problems are avoidable, said Dr. Chris Forrest, co-author of the study published Monday in the journal JAMA. There isn't a genetic defect unique to American children and it's not about socioeconomics within the United States, he said: The results were applicable to the total pediatric population.
'I think we all should be disturbed by this,' said Forrest, a professor of pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and director of the Applied Clinical Research Center. 'Kids in this country are really suffering.'
From 2007 to 2022, children ages 1 to 19 were 1.8 times more likely to die than children in other high-income countries, the study found. The biggest disparities were in deaths from gun violence and traffic accidents; kids in the US were 15 times more likely than their counterparts in other countries to die by firearms and more than twice as likely to die in motor vehicle crashes.
But US children are also sicker because of chronic conditions, Forrest said, and that's a newer phenomenon. In the '90s, when he started taking care of children, he said, he hardly ever saw one with a chronic condition. Today, nearly half of children are getting medical care for a chronic health problem, the study says.
The researchers, who analyzed hundreds of millions of health records from five nationally representative surveys and electronic health records from 10 pediatric health systems, found that a child in 2023 was 15% to 20% more likely to have a chronic condition than a child in 2011.
Asthma was the one chronic condition for which rates improved in the studied time period, but it was an outlier. Rates of mental health problems such as depression, anxiety and loneliness increased, as did rates of autism, behavioral conduct problems, developmental delays, speech language disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders.
Rates of physical issues also increased significantly, including problems with obesity, difficulties with limitations in activity, problems with sleeping and early menstruation. A period before age 12 is associated with immediate health problems including type 2 diabetes, but in the long term, it may also raise the risk of heart and blood pressure problems, studies show.
Chronic conditions were the focus of a recent federal government report from the Make America Healthy Again Commission that said chronic disease had made children 'the sickest generation in American history.' That report blamed ultraprocessed food, exposure to chemicals in the environment, pervasive technology use and the overprescription of medicine.
The new study doesn't pinpoint what's driving the increase in chronic conditions, but Forrest doesn't believe it's just what's on the MAHA list. Rather, he believes the nation's entire approach toward caring for children needs to change.
'Our kids are being raised in a very toxic environment, and it's not just the chemicals. It's not just the food and the iPhones. It's a much broader. It's much deeper. It's what we call the developmental ecosystem, and it makes it very challenging to change it,' Forrest said. 'That's a hard answer for people who want a pithy message that tells them how to fix the issues. It's about where they're growing up, where they're going to school, they're playing, where their families live, their neighborhoods, and it's not just one population. It's the whole nation that needs help.'
In the 1960s, children in the US were dying at about the same rate as in countries with similar incomes, but that started to change in the 1970s. The US now has about 54 excess child deaths per day compared with 18 other wealthy countries.
'This means the same kid born in this country is much more likely to die than if they were born in Germany or Denmark. Why are we allowing this to happen?' Forrest asked.
In an editorial that published alongside the study, pediatricians from Virginia and Washington wrote that there's reason to worry the health of US children will continue to fall behind, and political winds are shifting in the wrong direction.
'While the administration's Make America Healthy Again movement is drawing welcome attention to chronic diseases and important root causes such as ultra-processed foods, it is pursuing other policies that will work against the health interests of children,' they wrote, noting massive budget cuts at the US Department of Health and Human Services, including injury prevention, cancelled funding for safe sleep programs, Medicaid reductions, shrinking mental health funding and new initiatives that fuel vaccine hesitancy among parents.
The study found that from 2007 to 2022, babies in the US were 1.78 times more likely to die than children in 18 other high-income nations. The biggest disparities in deaths were from prematurity and sudden, unexpected infant death, which is accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed and other deaths from unknown causes.
But it's not just children who are at risk, Forrest said. 'Kids are not getting great start in life because women are also suffering in this country.'
Maternity deserts, where pregnant people don't have easy access to a doctor, have become a growing problem. According to the March of Dimes, about 35% of counties in the US are maternity deserts, a number likely to grow as states pass stricter abortion laws, driving doctors toward states where it's less complicated to provide care. In 2020-22, there were an excess of over 10,000 preterm births among people living in maternity care deserts or limited-access counties, the group says.
Dr. Colleen Kraft, a pediatrician at Children's Hospital Los Angeles who did not work on the research, said the study provides good data on broad problems.
'Nothing here surprises me at all,' said Kraft, former president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, who wasn't involved in the new research.
Over 35 years of practice, she has seen the change in her own patients. At the beginning, she treated mostly infectious disease, but vaccines for conditions like meningococcal disease changed that. Now, she fears that anti-vaccine sentiment could erode much of that progress.
She also treats a lot more children now for chronic conditions that the community can help prevent, she said.
For example, schools could restrict mobile phones so kids interact more, easing problems with loneliness, anxiety and depression. Families can implement a media plan where all devices are plugged into a central location – not a bedroom – so children can get more sleep. Parents can also encourage kids to play outside and engage in more unstructured time to be social and develop their imaginations.
'There are some very common-sense things families can do,' Kraft said.
To see major improvement in childhood health in the US, Forrest believes the country will need to undergo a major transformation. In other countries, for example, day care workers are professionals who get paid a living wage, so kids get quality care. Parents also get more time off when they have a child.
'It's time to rethink how we treat kids and how we're supporting families,' Forrest said. 'Children in our nation our like the proverbial canary in the coal mine. When their health is deteriorating, that means the foundation of our nation is also deteriorating.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Real Housewives' Star Reveals Young Son's 'Very Overwhelming' Health Diagnosis
'Real Housewives' Star Reveals Young Son's 'Very Overwhelming' Health Diagnosis originally appeared on Parade. Real Housewives of Orange County star is opening up about the "very overwhelming" diagnosis her young son, Luke, recently received. In a new interview with People, the reality star revealed that the 10-year-old suffers from ARFID, or Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, which is an eating disorder that causes food restriction, but is not 'caused by a negative self-image or a desire to change your body weight," according to the Cleveland Clinic, like Anorexia or Bulemia. Simpson believed that Luke, like many kids, was simply an incredibly picky eater, until he stopped eating altogether. After seeing a therapist, he was diagnosed with the mental health disorder, which sparks "fear and anxiety about food or the consequences of eating." People with ARFID may avoid eating due to the fear of choking or vomiting, or decline food because of "unwanted color, taste, texture or smell." In Luke's case, "he's very overwhelmed by texture, color, smells." Simpson explained, "He will only eat white rice. And he has to inspect each piece of rice before he eats it. So it's beyond picky eating. A lot of control issues. It's very overwhelming.' The diagnosis will be chronicled in season 19 of RHOC, which Simpson admitted she often "didn't even know if [she] could continue to film" due to the stress and uncertainty. 'There were so many times when he would say he was starving… because he was starving. But he would refuse to eat. And as a mom, that was so frustrating," she explained. "I didn't know what to do because on one hand he's crying and telling me he's starving, and on the other hand, he refuses to eat anything that I offer." 'Every day is challenging,' she added. Today, Luke's therapist and nutritionist help him to improve, and he's added french fries, sliced bananas, potato chips, ice cream and plain turkey that 'doesn't have any lines or blemishes in it' to his diet, and they continue to work on ways to decrease his fears and anxieties surrounding food. While Simpson has some concerns that being so open about Luke's diagnosis may lead kids or parents at school to say something, she's more hopeful that her transparency will help others going through the same thing—something and youngest daughter also aims to do, as she has struggled with the same disorder.'Real Housewives' Star Reveals Young Son's 'Very Overwhelming' Health Diagnosis first appeared on Parade on Jul 12, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 12, 2025, where it first appeared.


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Attorney General Pam Bondi announces dismissal of charges against plastic surgeon accused of faking COVID-19 vaccine cards
Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Saturday that she is dismissing the criminal charges against a Utah plastic surgeon who was currently on trial for allegedly issuing fake Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 vaccination records cards to people who sought fake vaccine cards. Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, whose criminal trial was currently underway in Utah, was indicted by the Justice Department in 2023. Moore, his medical corporation and three co-defendants were accused of allegedly destroying more than $28,000 worth of government-provided COVID-19 vaccines and distributing at least 1,937 falsely marked COVID-19 doses on vaccine cards in exchange for direct cash payments or donations to a charitable organization. Moore pleaded not guilty to the charges, while one of his co-defendants entered into a plea agreement for a misdemeanor charge and another co-defendant entered into a diversion agreement. One co-defendant is currently on trial with Moore. A Justice Department spokesperson did not respond to questions on whether or not the charges against them would be dropped as well. In court filings, attorneys for Moore argued that the CDC vaccine regulations in place were unconstitutional. The Biden Justice Department alleged that Moore was not administering COVID-19 vaccines in exchange for the payment, and was administering saline shots to minors, at the request of their parents, so children would think they were receiving a vaccine dose. Moore and his co-defendants were also charged with conspiracy to convert, sell, convey, and dispose of government property; and the conversion, sale, conveyance, and disposal of government property and aiding and abetting for their efforts to forge the vaccine cards. The fake cards were sold for $50 each, charging documents said, during the scheme they allegedly operated between May 2021 and September 2022. "Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so. He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. It ends today," Bondi wrote on X, thanking Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has a history of casting doubts on the efficacy of COVID vaccines, for raising awareness of his case. "She has been a warrior for Dr. Moore and for ending the weaponization of government," Bondi wrote. In a post on X on Saturday, Greene called Moore a "hero who refused to inject his patients with a government mandated unsafe vaccine!" It was not immediately clear if the charges were being dismissed for Moore's co-defendants. The announcement comes as the department is facing uncertainty after a clash between Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino over a Justice Department review of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, which led to Bongino not showing up for work on Friday, as sources say he is considering leaving his post over the dispute.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
The Doctor was in (and out): Biden's physician invokes Fifth Amendment during deposition
Dr. Kevin O'Connor made a house call this week. Specifically to the House of Representatives. O'Connor served as President Biden's physician. The House Oversight Committee wanted to talk to O'Connor about whether Biden was fit to serve as president. So House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., issued a subpoena for O'Connor. The doctor was in. But not for very long. After 20 minutes behind closed doors with Comer and company, the deposition concluded. Committee attorneys peppered O'Connor with questions about whether he thought former President Biden was up to the job and if he was asked to lie about the commander in chief's health. But Comer got the same response each time. Even when committee lawyers posed a simple question, asking O'Connor if he understood the proceedings. O'Connor deployed his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination each time. The committee even took the rare step of releasing a video from most of the deposition the same evening. "Most people invoke the Fifth when they have criminal liability. And you know, that's what it would appear (to be) on the surface here," said Comer after the deposition concluded. "The American people have a right to know the health condition of the president. Both physical and mental." Comer observed that O'Connor's silence "adds more fuel to the fire that there was a cover-up." Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Tex., was the only Democrat who showed up for the deposition. Crockett just bowed out a few weeks ago from a bid to become the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee after the death of late Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. "It was important to make sure that a Democrat was in the room. Because unfortunately, sometimes people like to cherry pick and make sure that they can give whatever fits their narrative," said Crockett. But the video revealed O'Connor repeatedly citing the Fifth Amendment "on the advice of counsel." That's why Comer hoped to shape one narrative about the health of former President Biden. Comer also suggested the potential lengths that O'Connor was willing to go to in order to protect the former president. And perhaps himself. Crockett was incredulous at Comer's assertions. "It's kind of astounding to hear someone say, if you invoke the Fifth Amendment, that is only because you are guilty," said Crockett. "(Republicans) have been very good at rallying people up and getting them emotional because they don't fully understand some of our processes." Crockett added that patients "have the right to confidentiality when it comes to your health care." The Department of Justice has launched an investigation into the use of the autopen by Biden. O'Connor's lawyers say that led their client to exercise his Fifth Amendment rights. "We want to emphasize that asserting the Fifth Amendment privilege does not imply that Dr. O'Connor has committed any crime," said his legal team. And the statement also indicated there was concern about O'Connor keeping medical information of the First Patient in confidence. "The Committee has indicated that it will demand that Dr. O'Connor reveal, without any limitations, confidential confirmation regarding his medical examinations, treatment and care of President Biden," read the statement. "Revealing confidential patient information would violate the most fundamental ethical duty of a physician." His attorneys went on to say that O'Connor could face "civil liability" and "revocation" of his medical license. Regardless, O'Connor wasn't answering any questions anywhere. Inside the meeting room. Heading to the meeting room. Or heading home. "Will you invoke the Fifth? What about patient doctor confidentiality?" yours truly asked O'Connor as he navigated a third-floor hallway in the Rayburn House Office Building with a small coterie of attorneys. "Do you think (President Biden) was up to the job? Do you think he was up to serve?" No response. O'Connor reprised his reticence on the way out. "Did you take the Fifth because you're trying to cover up what the President's state was?" I asked as he departed down a Rayburn stairwell. Nothing. The statement from the physician's counsel declared that the pact between doctors and patients "require that Dr. O'Connor refuse to testify." This is a question which vexes even doctors who double as lawmakers. Such is the case with Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. He's an OB-GYN. "I can see both sides of it. I can certainly see, as a physician, you take an oath of confidentiality with every patient. If there's a national security issue, does that outweigh that relationship?" pondered Marshall. "I would really have to think about that. I want to get a couple of consults myself and talk to some constitutional lawyers." But aside from the Constitutional, ethical and medical questions, Democrats reverted to defending the former president. I asked Crockett if she ever perceived health problems with the president. "No. None. No. None. I had none. Now, granted, I didn't see Joe Biden every single day. But I did have an opportunity to interact with the president. I never had a concern," said Crockett. "He may get fumbled up by words. But that's not anything new. And it's not anything that (didn't come) with age." There had been discussion about getting O'Connor to cooperate without a subpoena. Comer contends his investigation isn't about plowing some of the same Biden political fields explored a couple of years ago when it was thought the former president might seek a second term. This isn't about business dealings or Burisma or "influence peddling." But Comer is posing a legitimate question here about the fitness of a president. Any president. Regardless of what Crockett says, there are plenty of questions about Mr. Biden's acuity and whether staff made decisions – in lieu of the president. And these questions aren't new when it comes to presidential health. President Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke during his time in office. Historians believe First Lady Edith Wilson made decisions on behalf of the president. Questions lingered about President Ronald Reagan. And the Washington press corps was complicit hiding the infirmaries of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt from the public in an era before television and social media. The committee wheels in other former Biden figures in the coming days. That includes former Biden Chief of Staff Ron Klain and Anthony Bernal, a top aide to former First Lady Jill Biden. Because of patient-doctor confidentiality, we may never know O'Connor's true analysis of former President Biden. It's a problem because the public deserves to know if the commander in chief is up to the job. But there's a special relationship between a patient and their doctor. The question is whether issues of national security and the administration of government outweigh those private rights.