The Navy may revive this forgotten Alaskan base that sits halfway to Russia
An isolated Navy station known for brutal Alaskan winter storms and thousands of unexploded bombs might soon be reborn as a frontline base to counter Russian and Chinese advances in the Arctic.
Last week, the top commander in the Pacific, Adm. Samuel Paparo, joined other military officials in calling for a revival of a base on Adak Island, a tiny, rocky outpost in Alaska's Aleutian Island chain. The island, which sits halfway between mainland Alaska and Russia, would give the U.S. 'an opportunity to gain time and distance on any force capability that's looking to penetrate,' Paparo said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.
Service members assigned to Adak in the past found it to be a fairly rough tour. With a 'harsh and demanding' climate, the treeless island base earned its reputation as a hardship duty station before it was shuttered in the 1990s, according to an article by Barry Erdman who was one of roughly 150 Marines based at Adak during the Cold War.
For most of the year, wrote Erdman, precipitation was daily and in winter, troops were greeted by storms of horizontal snow mixed driven by wind blasts that the Aleuts referred to as 'Williwaws.' Under the worst of it, Erdman recalled, 'when you held your arm outstretched and you could not see your hand.' But troops got some reprieve with a week's worth of 'all-day sun in the summer,' which led base schools to close 'so the students could enjoy the day,' he wrote.
During World War II, Adak Island in Alaska was used by the U.S. to launch offensives against the Japanese during battles which included the most recent foreign military occupation on American soil. After WWII, the base became Naval Air Station Adak and was used for submarine surveillance during the Cold War.
But with rising tensions in the Pacific, the island is once again viewed by many as a strategic asset.
Alaska Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, who has actively pushed the Pentagon to build up Alaska-based forces, called Adak 'the gateway to the Arctic,' noting that it sits nearly 1,000 miles west of Hawaii.
'It would enable up to ten times the maritime patrol reconnaissance aircraft coverage of that key and increasingly contested space,' Paparo, commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, INDOPACOM, said.
The defunct base remains largely intact, with three piers, two 8,000-ft runways — long enough for any plane in the U.S. arsenal, including B-52s — a hangar, and 22 million gallons of fuel storage, according to Sullivan. Videos from more recent visitors highlight entire neighborhoods of decaying but still-standing base housing.
The potential future of Adak would follow a larger trend as part of the broader U.S. military's pivot to the Pacific. Several WWII bases used during American offensives against the Japanese have been reactivated in recent years including the Marine Corps' airfield on Peleliu in Palau and Air Force fields on both Tinian in the Northern Mariana Islands and at the Northwest Field on Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.
Even without concrete plans to re-open Adak NAS as a formal base, Paparo said at the hearing that Indo Pacific Command's Alaska-based fifth-generation fighter jets would operate out of the base during this summer's Northern Edge exercise. In 2019, nearly 3,000 sailors and Marines were part of an Arctic Expeditionary Capabilities Exercise on Adak to test expeditionary logistics in the Arctic region and train for an Indo-Pacific crisis response.
The location would be important since Russia's Pacific Fleet 'frequently' travels through the Great Circle, a shipping route that goes through the Aleutian Islands, Papro said, adding that the U.S. should also look to 'enhance the ability to operate' out of Eareckson Air Station, formerly Shemya Air Force Station on Shemya Island.
Their comments reflect growing national security concerns over new shipping lanes opening up due to melting ice caps, prompting more economic interests by Russia and China. They are also the latest officials to show an interest in basing troops on Adak Island.
According to Amanda Coyne, a spokesperson for Sullivan, the Navy is 'crafting three different options for redevelopment of Adak' which vary from 'basic infrastructure upgrades to a full-blown naval base.'
When asked about the report, the Navy referred Task & Purpose to Navy Secretary John Phelan's February testimony to Congress where he said he would discuss Adak's future with combatant commanders.
During a discussion prompted by Sullivan around Chinese and Russian bomber incursions into Alaska airspace, Northern Command's Gen. Gregory Guillot said he would support Adak for maritime and air access because U.S. fighter jet responses include 1,000-miles-or-longer flights and require nighttime air refueling stops.
'Also the harsh conditions if a pilot should have to eject,' Guillot said. A base like Adak, Guillot said, 'would allow us to preposition search and rescue aircraft or be able to land there in an emergency which are capabilities that we just don't have right now.
At the hearing, Sullivan said officials from the Navy, state of Alaska, and the Aleut Corporation conducted a site assessment earlier this year.
Kate Gilling, a spokesperson for the Aleut Corporation confirmed to Task & Purpose that they worked with Sullivan's office and the Navy to coordinate an Adak visit to evaluate potentially reestablishing a naval presence on the island again. In March 2004, the Aleut Corporation received more than 47,000 acres of land and many repurposed facilities on Adak Island from a land transfer agreement with the federal government.
'Aleut stands ready to support, collaborate, and provide insight as the Navy continues evaluating the feasibility of returning to Adak,' Gilling said in an email to Task & Purpose. 'This is a continuing conversation with the Senator's office and the Navy.'
Sullivan's office is 'awaiting the results' of the site assessment which would give an estimate on the cost and scope of the project. The Alaska senator is looking to 'push for funds' in the budget reconciliation process or through an amendment through the upcoming national defense authorization bill, Coyne said.
The northern half of Adak Island has been used by the U.S. military going back to the 1940s. During WWII, when nearly 90,000 troops were mobilized to the Aleutian Islands, Adak was used by the Army Air Corps for defensive operations against the Japanese during battles at Attu and Kiska Islands.
Following WWII, the military's presence on the island fluctuated but has 'generally not exceeded 6,000 persons,' according to the city. The base, and the island, was later transferred to the Air Force and renamed Davis Air Force Base. In 1950, the Air Force withdrew and the Navy took over the U.S. military's facilities. Less than a decade later, a public land order withdrew more than 79,000 acres of northern Adak Island from Navy use.
The military's mission at Adak officially ended in 1997. Since then, the Navy's presence has included environmental restoration and cleanup after military landfills and chemical spills contaminated the island's groundwater, surface water, sediments, and soil.
The Environmental Protection Agency described current Navy operations as Superfund site maintenance due to hazardous substances like petroleum, chlorinated solvents, batteries, transformer oils, pesticides and solvents that were disposed of across the island. According to the EPA, the island also has roughly 70,000 unexploded ordinances which has led to restrictions in some areas.
'When Navy use for military purposes is no longer needed, the only legally permissible action Navy may take to dispose of the property is to relinquish it back to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,' according to an Adak city website.
Navy fires commanding officer, command master chief of expeditionary security squadron
The Marine Corps has settled the debate over the size of a rifle squad
Leg day: Army cuts down on number of paid parachutists
Navy commissions its newest submarine, the USS Iowa
Why veterans are the real target audience for 'Helldivers 2'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
When is Flag Day 2025? Is it a federal holiday? What to know
As the country prepares to salute the Army's 250th year with President Donald Trump's grand military parade in downtown Washington, D.C. on June 14, the day will also celebrate America's symbol of freedom: the American flag. A flag resolution was adopted 248 years ago, on June 14, 1777, according to the Smithsonian, that said, "Resolved: that the flag of the United States be made of 13 stripes, alternate red and white; that the union be 13 stars, white in a blue field, representing a new constellation." However, it would be more than 100 years after the Continental Congress approved the flag, that Flag Day would be observed. The event was first observed in the late 1800s by schoolteachers around the U.S., according to the National Constitution Center, and in May 1916, President Woodrow Wilson declared June 14 Flag Day. Since then, the U.S. has honored the adoption of the stars and stripes in a number of ways, including carrying the flag in parades, displaying it outside homes and holding other patriotic events. Before 1916, a number of states and cities had started to observe the day. Flag Day, meanwhile, was declared a national holiday in 1949 by congressional legislation signed into law by President Harry Truman, who in a proclamation directed the U.S. flag to be displayed on all government buildings on that day. Here's what to know about Flag Day and its evolution over the years. Army's 250th birthday parade: How to celebrate Army's 250th year – and (unofficially) Trump's birthday parade Flag Day is on Saturday, June 14, 2025. The June 14 date for Flag Day remains the same, no matter which day of the week it falls. Though it's observed nationally, Flag Day is not a federal holiday. However, the president traditionally proclaims its observance every year. Pennsylvania, meanwhile, recognizes it as a state holiday. June 2025 holiday schedule: Summer solstice, Pride Month, Father's Day, Juneteenth, more The American flag, characterized by 50 stars and 13 stripes, will celebrate its 65th birthday on July 4. After Hawaii became the 50th state in 1959, on July 4, 1960, the flag's new design was officially adopted. Contributing: Janet Loehrke, USA TODAY / Cheryl McCloud, USA TODAY NETWORK - Florida Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at sshafiq@ and follow her on X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Flag Day 2025 date: When is it? Is it a federal holiday?


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Three cheers for the US-China trade war ceasefire
Yay! High-level US-China talks in London this week reached a trade-war ceasefire, offering some stability for nervous markets. Days of talks, following on President Donald Trump's call with China's Xi Jinping last Thursday, settled on a framework that leaves a 55% US tariff on Chinese goods and a 10% Chinese levy on American imports. Plus, Beijing will ease restrictions on rare-earth exports while Washington will back off on its developing ban on Chinese students attending American universities. Plenty of issues remain: China's key role in world fentanyl production, for one thing; its long history of intellectual-property theft, currency manipulation and so on. Not to mention the outright espionage that so many of those students are dragged into. And of course in the longer term the United States needs to be less dependent on China for rare earths, pharmaceutical precursors and many other critical needs. The two sides are supposed to reach a comprehensive deal by Aug. 10, but at least the summer should be calm. The chaos of on-again, off-again tariffs had led to turbulence in US markets and had mom-and-pop shops bracing for 'the end'; now they can plan at least a couple of months ahead, with solid reason to hope the worst is over. US businesses can adapt to 55% tariffs on Chinese goods, as long as they've got some certainty that the rate will remain stable. Kudos to Treasury and Commerce Secretaries Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick, the top US negotiators in London, for mastering 'the art of the framework'; let's hope Trump and Xi can close a final deal.


Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump hails limited trade agreement with China after talks in London
Advertisement Less than two weeks after accusing China of violating a trade-war truce, Trump on Wednesday had nothing but praise for the Chinese leader. 'President Xi and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade. This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!' the president wrote in a second Truth Social post. Under the renewed truce, the United States will impose a 55 percent tariff on Chinese goods, and China will hit American products with a 10 percent import tax, the president said. Those are both higher rates than before Trump took office, but lower than the triple-digit tariff levels that each nation imposed this spring. US and Chinese negotiators agreed late Tuesday to try again to implement the trade-war truce that collapsed amid recriminations on both sides just weeks after it was reached during an earlier round of talks in Geneva. Advertisement Speaking near midnight in London, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced what he called a 'handshake' deal to put into effect the terms of the May 12 US-China agreement that called for both nations to lower their tariffs and take additional steps to facilitate trade. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' Lutnick told reporters, referring to a June 5 telephone conversation between Trump and Xi. 'I think it's really beneficial to the United States of America. It's very beneficial to the Chinese and the China economy.' Negotiators released no text of either the London framework or the earlier Geneva accord to de-escalate the US-China trade war. But Lutnick said both nations would remove new trade barriers they had erected as the truce broke down. That means China is expected to permit an increased flow of critical materials known as 'rare earths' for auto and defense production. As those shipments increase, the United States will lift measures that it imposed recently 'in a balanced way,' Lutnick said. 'We do absolutely expect that the topic of rare-earth minerals and magnets, with respect to the United States of America, will be resolved in this framework implementation,' Lutnick said. He did not specify which US measures would be lifted in response. But his department has implemented a number of restrictions on exports to China of aerospace technology and advanced semiconductor equipment, which Chinese officials urgently want removed. Lutnick described the diplomatic breakthrough as the first step toward expanding US-China trade, which topped $580 billion last year. The United States buys more than three times as much from China as Chinese customers buy from Americans, a trade deficit that the president has inveighed against for years as a measure of industrial decline. Advertisement 'We have an existing, significant trade deficit, and President Trump's fundamental goal is to reduce the trade deficit and increase trade. So this was the first step of the framework by which we will then approach and discuss growing trade . But first we had to sort of get the negativity out," Lutnick said. Briefing reporters outside Lancaster House, the 19th-century mansion in London's West End that hosted two days of talks, Lutnick credited the involvement of both presidents with producing quick results. 'You have to get things done if you're working for President Trump. I'm sure they felt they had to get it done because they were working for President Xi,' he said. The US delegation also included Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Bessent left the talks a few hours early to return to Washington in time to appear before Congress on Wednesday. The Chinese team was led by Vice Premier He Lifeng, a close associate of Xi. In China, Li Chenggang, China's vice commerce minister, said the talks were 'professional, rational, in-depth and candid,' according to Chinese state media, and Beijing hopes the discussions will 'be conducive to increasing trust between China and the United States.' Yao Yang, an economist at Peking University, said the fact that Beijing and Washington engaged in negotiations amid bitter trade tensions is positive. 'The Chinese government's stance has always been, if you want to fight, we are going to take it. But the purpose of fighting is not just for the sake of fighting, it is to prepare for negotiation or to bring the other side to the negotiation table,' he said. Advertisement Yet even as the latest attempt to put US-China relations on a sound footing moved forward, Greer nodded to the long list of issues that divide the two sides. The Trump administration has complained about Chinese policies that fuel what it sees as excess production of manufactured goods, which depress global prices and hurt American factory workers. 'There are some things that the Chinese and US economies, they just don't fit together very well. Other things, maybe they do. And there'll be a time for broader conversations on that,' he said. The 90-day pause on triple-digit tariffs that amounted to a de facto US-China trade embargo expires Aug. 12. In response to a question about prospects for an extension, Greer said that would be up to the president. Further talks are expected, though no date has been agreed to yet. The Trump administration notched a legal win Tuesday when a federal appeals court ruled that many of the tariffs the president imposed on China can remain while the government appeals a lower-court ruling that found they were illegal. The Court of International Trade, a little-known specialized court in New York, ruled last month that Trump exceeded his authority by invoking emergency powers to impose tariffs on imports from China and other nations. The Trump administration quickly appealed and the appeals court temporarily paused the lower court's decision. On Tuesday, it said that pause could stay in place while the appeal was decided. Advertisement 'The court also concludes that these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance,' the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said Tuesday. The appeals court said it would expedite the issue and hear arguments July 31.