Turkey fines Adidas $15,000 for pigskin shoes
Turkey has hit German sporting equipment giant Adidas with a fine of more than $15,000 for failing to inform customers that one of its flagship shoe models contained pigskin.
The Muslim-majority country's advertising regulator slammed Adidas for describing its 'Samba OG' sneakers -- sported in recent years by models Kendall Jenner and Bella Hadid -- as made from 'real leather,' without specifying it came from pigs.
In a ruling seen by AFP, it said the use of materials 'contrary to the religious sensibilities of the majority of society must be clearly mentioned' in advertisements and product descriptions.
The regulator imposed a fine of 550,059 lira ($15,200) fine in response.
Adidas did not immediately respond when contacted by AFP for comment.
In 2020, Turkey's Presidency of Religious Affairs ruled that it was 'not permissible to manufacture shoes or garments from pigskin or pigskin hair.'
'It is accepted by nearly all Muslim scholars that pigskin cannot be made pure by tanning or similar processes,' it said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Leaders
3 days ago
- Leaders
Israel's Strike on Iran 'Could Very Well Happen': Trump
The US President, Donald Trump, on Thursday said that Israel's attack on Iran looks very close, although he favors a deal with Tehran if it compromises, reported AFP. Israeli Attack Asked about Israel's potential attack on Iran, Trump replied: 'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen.' The US President also said that the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was considering a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, which he said could spark a 'massive conflict.' He urged Israel not to attack Iran, as Washington and Tehran are edging closer to a new nuclear deal. 'We are fairly close to a pretty good agreement,' he said. 'I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it,' he added. Nuclear Deal Close Trump said he prefers negotiations with Iran to avoid conflict. However, he added that Tehran has to cede more ground in its negotiations with Washington to avoid conflict. 'I'd love to avoid the conflict. Iran's going to have to negotiate a little bit tougher – meaning they're going to have to give us some things that they're not willing to give us right now,' he told reporters. IAEA Resolution Trump's remarks came after the IAEA's Board of Governors announced that Iran is in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. In response, Iran called the resolution 'political' and announced countermeasures, including establishing a third enrichment facility in a 'secure location,' and upgrading its centrifuges for advanced ones at Fordo, which will significantly boost Iran's production of enriched materials. Pulling US Personnel Amid escalating tensions, the US arranged the departure of non-essential personnel from locations around the Middle East, citing heightened security risks in the region. Moreover, the US Embassy in Israel issued a security alert instructing American government employees and their families to remain in the Tel Aviv area over security concerns. Trump said that Washington was pulling American personnel out of the region because 'it could be a dangerous place,' stressing that he would not allow Tehran to develop a nuclear weapon. Short link : Post Views: 1


Saudi Gazette
29-05-2025
- Saudi Gazette
Germany agrees €5bn in aid to Ukraine and joint production of long-range weapons
BERLIN — Chancellor Friedrich Merz has said that Berlin would seek to help Kyiv jointly develop new long-range weapons that can strike deeper inside Russia as Germany agreed on a new €5 billion aid package. Heralding the beginning of a "new form of military industrial cooperation between our two countries," Merz said that Germany and Ukraine would seek to "enable joint production" of weapons. "This will be a cooperation on an industrial level, which can take place both in Ukraine and here in Germany," Merz said. Following Merz's statement, the defense ministers of Ukraine and Germany signed a memorandum which also includes direct German investment in Ukraine's defense industry and a broader agreement between Ukraine and German arms manufacturers. "This is the beginning of a new form of military-industrial cooperation between our countries, which has significant potential," Merz said at a joint press conference with Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin. The German Defense Ministry said a "significant" number of these systems are expected to be manufactured by the end of 2025, with the first batch ready for deployment in the coming also reiterated its commitment to supply Ukraine with more weapons and ammunition, including air defense and declined to say whether Germany will supply its advanced Taurus long-range cruise missile to Ukraine, long a request by Kyiv and a step that Berlin has so far only said that he is not willing to comment on the issue and the sides "want to talk about production and we will not publicly discuss details."Visiting Kyiv at the beginning of May, Merz said that all future arms supply talks with Ukraine would be kept Monday, Merz said that Ukraine's western allies are no longer imposing restrictions on the use of long-range weapons for Kyiv to use against Russian military he sought to temper those comments by elaborating that the decision to lift restrictions had been made "months ago.""In this respect, yesterday in Berlin, I described something that has been happening for months: namely, that Ukraine has the right to use the weapons it receives, even beyond its own borders, against military targets on Russian territory," Merz missiles are similar in range and payload to the Scalp/Storm Shadow missiles which are supplied to Ukraine by France and the the Taurus differs in that it can penetrate reinforced concrete walls and can be programmed to explode after hitting a target, which is why they are used against what the German Air Force refers to as "high-value targets." — Euronews


Saudi Gazette
28-05-2025
- Saudi Gazette
German court rejects Peruvian farmer's landmark climate case
BERLIN — A court in Germany has rejected a lawsuit brought by a Peruvian farmer against German energy giant RWE in a long-awaited decision. Saúl Luciano Lliuya had argued that the firm's global emissions contributed to the melting of glaciers in Peru — threatening his hometown of Huaraz with flooding. He was seeking €17,000 (£14,250) in compensation — money he said he would use to pay for a flood defense project to protect the city. However, the higher regional court in the German city of Hamm on Wednesday blocked the case from proceeding further and ruled out any appeals, putting an end to Lliuya's 10-year legal battle. RWE said it was not active in Peru and questioned why it was singled out. It also pointed to its plans to phase out its coal-fired power plants and become carbon neutral by their ruling on Wednesday, judges deemed that the flood risk to the property of Lliuya was not high enough for the case to in what climate change groups have hailed as a win, they did say that energy companies could be held responsible for the costs caused by their carbon the sum demanded by Lliuya was very low, the case has become a cause celebre for climate change activists, who hope that it will set a precedent for holding powerful firms to 44-year-old mountain guide and farmer said he had brought the case because he had seen first-hand how rising temperatures were causing glaciers near Huaraz to said that as a result, Lake Palcacocha - which is located above the city - now has four times as much water than in 2003 and that residents like him were at risk of flooding, especially if blocks of ice were to break off from Palcacocha glacier and fall into the lake, causing it to alleged that emissions caused by RWE were contributing to the increase in temperature in Peru's mountain region and demanded that the German firm pay toward building a flood also said that he chose the company because a 2013 database tracking historic emissions from major fossil fuel producers listed the German energy giant as one of the biggest polluters in original case was rejected by a lower court in Germany in 2015, with judges arguing that a single firm could not be held responsible for climate in a surprise twist, Lliuya in 2017 won his appeal with judges at the higher regional court, which accepted there was merit to his case and allowed it to lawyers previously argued that RWE was responsible for 0.5% of global CO2 emissions and demanded that the energy firm pay damages amounting to a proportional share of the cost of building a $3.5m-flood defense for an environmental NGO which backed Lliuya's case, celebrated the court's ruling saying it had "made legal history"."Although the court dismissed the specific claim - finding flood risk to Luciano Lliuya's home was not sufficiently high - it confirmed for the first time that major emitters can be held liable under German civil law for risks resulting from climate change," it said in a group said it was hopeful that the decision could positively influence similar cases in other countries. — BBC