Sen. Chuck Grassley demands probe of ‘bureaucrats' who sidelined CBP whistleblowers — and were promoted
The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman fired off a letter Monday to CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott naming and shaming those 'bureaucrats' who were promoted even after they sidelined whistleblowers Fred Wynn, Mike Taylor and Mark Jones.
'To ensure that retaliation does not happen again at [Department of Homeland Security], CBP, or any of the Department's other component agencies, the bureaucrats that retaliated against Mr. Wynn, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Jones must be held accountable,' Grassley told Scott.
Advertisement
6 Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is demanding an investigation into US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials who allegedly retaliated against whistleblowers pointing out failures to fingerprint criminal migrants in custody.
REUTERS
'Although it's unclear to me whether all retaliators have faced consequences, I've been made aware that some have been promoted,' he added.
The Iowa Republican singled out Ronald Ocker, assistant commissioner of CBP's Office of Intelligence, and Juan Fernandez, the executive director of that office, for having 'improperly removed' the whistleblowers nearly a decade ago from a pilot program to implement the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005.
Advertisement
Jones, Taylor and Wynn worked in the agency's Weapons of Mass Destruction Division between 2016 and 2018 — and found out that federal law enforcement officers weren't enforcing the statute.
6 All three CBP agents worked in the agency's Weapons of Mass Destruction Division between 2016 and 2018 — and uncovered that federal law enforcement officers weren't enforcing the statute.
James Keivom
As a result, DNA from criminal arrestees hadn't been collected since 2009, allowing 'subjects subsequently accused of violent crimes, including homicide and sexual assault, to elude detection even when detained multiple times by CBP or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),' according to an earlier investigation by the US Office of Special Counsel (OSC).
Those 'exceptions to DNA sample collection from criminal arrestees' had been approved by former Attorney General Eric Holder during the Barack Obama administration.
Advertisement
'I believe that if you could get the totality for that period of time [since 2009] … of how many Americans ended up being killed as a result, I think it probably exceeds the number of Americans who died on 9/11,' one source with direct knowledge of the security failure previously told The Post.
6 In his April confirmation hearing, CBP commissioner-designate Rodney Scott had promised Grassley he would 'look into' the case and 'hold people accountable if they've violated policies.'
Paul Martinka
When the whistleblowers drew attention to the issue, they faced professional and financial consequences — including being kicked off of the WMD pilot program by Ocker and Fernandez, according to Grassley's letter.
Jones, who served as acting director of the pilot WMD fingerprint program, was passed over for the director position at a new office called the Operational Field Testing Division, which conducted similar law enforcement work
Advertisement
Taylor lost retirement benefits and had his pension payments stopped. Both he and Jones were also stripped of their guns and badges.
6 But when they drew attention to it, the CBP whistleblowers faced professional and financial consequences — including being kicked off of the WMD pilot program by Ocker and Fernandez, according to Grassley's letter.
Catherine Herridge Reports
OSC's investigation concluded that CBP officials 'retaliated against' the three agents 'for actual or perceived disclosures of wrongdoing,' Grassley noted in his letter.
'OSC also noted that Fernandez did not name Mr. Jones Acting Deputy Director of Operational Field Testing Division (OFTD), despite stating in a March 6, 2018, email that it would happen,' the senator also stated.
'Further, OSC found that both Ocker and Fernandez engaged in retaliation when they passed Mr. Jones over for Director of the OFTD when it stated, 'the agency does not have strong evidence in support of its stated reason or decision not to interview Mr. Jones or fairly consider him for the OFTD Director position.''
6 Grassley had also relayed details of their case to DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari in May 2024.
REUTERS
Jones, Taylor and Wynn were only given new supervisory roles, backpay and their retirement benefits back in May after Grassley highlighted the 'seven-year nightmare these brave whistleblowers endured.'
In his April confirmation hearing, Scott had promised Grassley he would 'look into' the case and 'hold people accountable if they've violated policies.'
Advertisement
'Thank you for always stepping up and supporting the whistleblowers. I think it's a critical part of our government, it pushes transparency,' Scott also told the Republican senator.
6 The trio received new supervisory roles, backpay and retirement benefits in May after Grassley highlighted the 'seven-year nightmare these brave whistleblowers endured.'
AP
'I do know those three, and I know one allegation that's never been levied against them is a challenge of their integrity.'
Grassley had also relayed details of the case to DHS Inspector General Joseph Cuffari in May 2024. That office is still believed to be investigating the matter as well.
Reps for CBP did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOD to offer new medal for personnel deployed to Southern Border
The Pentagon announced a new military decoration that will recognize service members stationed at the U.S.-Mexico border as part of the Trump administration's effort to bolster border security. A U.S. defense official confirmed to Military Times the veracity of a memorandum regarding the medal that began circulating online several days ago. 'Effective immediately, the Mexican Border Defense Medal (MBDM), is hereby established to recognize Service members deployed to the U.S. international border with Mexico for DoD support to United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP),' a memo uploaded to the Navy subreddit reads. Previously, service members collaborating with CBP were awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal, but the Mexican Border Defense Medal will take its place, according to the memo. Military personnel qualify for the medal if they have been 'permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that deployed' in support of a military operation supporting CBP within 100 nautical miles of the U.S.-Mexico border after Jan. 20, 2025, when President Trump assumed office. After chase, US Navy, Coast Guard intercept 1,296 pounds of cocaine Military personnel must have operated within Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California or the adjacent U.S. waters out to 24 nautical miles, the memo said. Service members and veterans can apply to have their Armed Forces Service Medal swapped out with the Mexican Border Defense Medal, but they are not allowed to possess both at once. Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20 to deter the 'unlawful mass migration' of illegal aliens into the United States by deploying supplemental military personnel along the Southern Border, among other strategies. Over the last eight months, the administration has ramped up its border security mission. U.S. Northern Command established Joint Task Force-Southern Border on March 14, 2025, to lead immigration enforcement efforts. As of July 2, approximately 8,500 military personnel were attached to the task force. The administration has also deployed the U.S. Navy to intercept and halt the flow of illicit drugs into the country. On Aug. 11, U.S. Navy Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer Sampson, along with the U.S. Coast Guard, intercepted 1,296 pounds of cocaine from a drug smuggling vessel. Solve the daily Crossword
Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
Colorado lawmakers tap reserve, end tax breaks to fill budget gap
Democratic leaders at the state Capitol outlined plans Tuesday to increase taxes, cut services and tap reserve funds to close a $1 billion budget hole spurred by President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." State of play: The legislation will generate fierce debate about how the state should manage its money when lawmakers return Thursday for a special legislative session. The core of the Democratic plan eliminates a handful of corporate tax breaks worth a combined $300 million to $400 million. The five-bill package will limit the business tax deduction, remove corporate tax breaks on foreign-sold goods and crack down on corporate profit shifting to tax haven countries. The intrigue: The most controversial proposal is lowering the state's 15% financial reserve by $200 million to $300 million, dropping it to 13% at a time when fiscal analysts are warning about a potential recession. Yes, but: Those moves are not enough to close a roughly $750 million gap. Instead, lawmakers will punt $300 million in spending cuts to balance the $44 billion state budget to the governor in consultation with the legislative Joint Budget Committee in the coming weeks. The governor is expected to move quickly to implement cuts by Sept. 1. What they're saying: "We're looking forward to rolling up our sleeves and making sure we can maintain strong fiscal stewardship here in Colorado," Gov. Jared Polis told Axios Denver in a recent interview. Between the lines: More than most states, Colorado is susceptible to changes in federal taxes because they affect state income taxes. The federal tax bill, known as H.R. 1, reduced the state's individual and corporate income taxes by an estimated $1.2 billion, according to the governor's office. The other side: Republican state lawmakers are touting the cuts from Trump's tax bill and pushing back against Democratic efforts to generate new tax revenue, suggesting spending cuts are what is most needed. Sen. Byron Pelton (R-Sterling) plans to introduce legislation requiring voter approval for any bill that changes state tax liability caused by federal tax law. What's next: Beyond the budget, Democratic lawmakers also plan to introduce legislation to stabilize the state's health care marketplaces amid projections that thousands of residents could lose their insurance and enable Planned Parenthood to accept Medicaid payments.
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Rep. Sarah McBride rips Democrats for not knowing how to combat anti-trans attacks: ‘Can't ignore these issues'
Rep. Sarah McBride, D-Del., criticized the Democratic Party's silence on Republican-led attacks on trans issues, arguing on Tuesday that the party needs to learn how to engage on the issue. 'I do think it was a problem that our party didn't explicitly respond to the anti-trans attacks. We can't ignore these issues. We can't just not respond and leave the narrative entirely to the Republicans,' McBride said when pressed by ex-DNC chair Jaime Harrison on his podcast. Discussing how Democrats should respond to Republicans on trans issues, the lawmaker specifically noted President Donald Trump's ad during the 2024 campaign that depicted former Vice President Kamala Harris as being for 'they/them' and the president as being 'for you.' McBride, a transgender lawmaker, said the party broadly should be focused on a 'diverse working class,' and should reject the idea of 'absolute purity politics.' 'I will say one of the reasons why, the sense that I have gotten from some Democrats as I talked to them, that you often see silence from Democrats in response to these attacks is because, to your point, they don't know how to respond, not because they don't know what they believe or how they feel, but because they feel like there is no way to respond in a way that doesn't result in everyone yelling at them,' McBride said during Harrison's podcast, 'At Our Table.' McBride said Democrats didn't need perfect terminology or to embrace the 'maximalist position' on trans issues, but suggested acknowledging concerns about transgender people participating in sports. Rep. Sarah McBride criticized the Democratic Party for staying silent on constant attacks from Republicans on trans issues. At Our Table with Jaime Harrison 'You can grapple with concerns around, for instance, trans people participating in sports, acknowledge that there are very real questions out there. But who is best able to answer those questions about how to balance respect and fairness in women's sports? It's not 435 members of Congress who know nothing about women's sports and even less about trans people. It's the individual athletic associations that understand their sports the best,' McBride said. The Democratic lawmaker said Republicans were trying to misdirect when they talk about trans people, accusing Trump of wanting to 'line the pockets' of corporations and wealthy people. 'And I think we have to be crystal clear about that while also pushing back against these attacks in ways that doesn't dismiss everyone with a question or a concern as a closed-minded bigot,' McBride said. On Jaime Harrison's podcast, McBride said, 'We can't ignore these issues,' and that the Democratic Party has to fight back against anti-trans attacks. Getty Images McBride said in June that the party might have overplayed its hand regarding trans issues. 'I think that's an accurate reflection of the overplaying of the hand in some ways — that we as a coalition went to Trans 201, Trans 301, when people were still at a very much Trans 101 stage,' McBride told The New York Times' Ezra Klein in an interview. The Delaware lawmaker said many of the cultural norms surrounding transgender people were likely premature for a lot of Americans. 'We became absolutist — not just on trans rights but across the progressive movement — and we forgot that in a democracy we have to grapple with where the public authentically is and actually engage with it. Part of this is fostered by social media,' McBride said.
