logo
Here's how some human rights and LGBTQ+ groups prepared for major foreign aid cuts under Trump

Here's how some human rights and LGBTQ+ groups prepared for major foreign aid cuts under Trump

Independent20-03-2025

In early 2024, Matthew Hart took a hard look at the upcoming elections around the world and worried that the outcomes did not look promising.
'What we knew was that the winds were not in our favor. The winds were not in our sail, and we saw all around the world a kind of moral panic,' said Hart, executive director of the Global Philanthropy Project, a network of funders for LGBTQ+ people internationally.
Rising authoritarianism and religiously motivated political movements were mixing into a 'toxic blend" that regularly targets trans, intersex and gay people, he said in an interview with The Associated Press.
Hart was among the philanthropic leaders who tried to prepare for not just changes under the Trump administration, but growing trends toward autocracy and crackdowns on human rights around the world.
As a result, last year, Global Philanthropy Project quietly launched a campaign called 'Fund Our Futures' to raise money for LGBTQ+ organizations around the world. In November, they announced they had secured more than $100 million and have since raised the bar to try to bring in another $50 million. Donors will award the funds over the next three to five years and GPP will track their commitments.
Funders can be slow to respond to crises
While few anticipated the speed and breadth of the Trump administration's policy changes, Hart had seen funders grapple with fear and paralysis in moments of crisis.
'There's a history in philanthropy that that you sort of wait and see. What's going to happen?' he said. 'We thought, 'Oh, we have got to get ahead of this. Because if we don't secure the commitments now, we're talking two years of internal, philanthropic field work that would need to be done.'
Phil Buchanan, president of The Center for Effective Philanthropy, said the early preparation will allow funders to identify and support organizations aligned with their goals. But he said, no funder can expect to always be accurate in their forecasting.
'Preparation is really important,' he said, 'And then also, so is being responsive when the context looks different than what you prepared for.'
For example, few funders contemplated the wholesale termination of most U.S. foreign aid, which has had vast and cascading effects on organizations across every geography and issue. Trump singled out foundations with large endowments for investigation in one of his executive orders on diversity, equity and inclusion and in a memo in February, he accused many nonprofits who have received federal funding of engaging 'in actions that actively undermine the security, prosperity, and safety of the American people."
Preparation can help funders decide how to act
Funders who support democracy movements in inhospitable environments have some experience adapting to these kinds of threats. Even so, Kellea Miller, executive director of the Human Rights Funders Network, said they were caught off guard.
'There are areas that Trump has very quickly shifted that we knew he would touch, but the scale and rapidity of it is beyond what most of us had imagined,' she said, adding that she had expected more action from Congress.
Starting in 2021, HRFN convened funders to coordinate their responses to crises like the presidential assassination Haiti and the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. Those conversations grew into a framework called Better Preparedness, which encourages foundations to consider in advance of a crisis how they want to react.
'So we're not all funding the same groups and that we're also able to distribute the risk and risk appetite in a way that we can't if we're not honest and and working together,' Miller said.
Miller said now in the U.S., funders of democracy and human rights movements worry the Trump administration will threaten their ability to operate.
'A lot of foundations are very, very cautious right now because they're worried that their assets could be frozen. They're concerned that they will be targeted politically,' she said.
LGBTQ+ communities were still disrupted
The commitments to the Fund Our Futures campaign represent a noticeable portion of the funding for groups that serve gay, transgender and intersex people around the world even as some government funding has been taken away.
In 2021-2022, private philanthropy and donor governments together gave $905 million to these groups, according to the most recent research by GPP.
Of that total, 20 foundations alone gave $522 million, or around 50% of the total, highlighting the importance of these private donations to supporting international LGBTQ+ communities. Sixteen governments and multilateral donors gave $175 million to LGBTQ+ groups, with the largest funder being the Netherlands.
As part of its dramatic reduction in U.S. foreign aid, the Trump administration has also ended its policy of supporting the rights of LGBTQ+ people abroad, which the Biden administration had made a priority. In an exit memo from January, USAID staff under Biden wrote that the agency increased funding for programs for LBGTQ+ communities abroad from $6 million in 2021 to $25 million in 2024.
The Netherlands and another major funder of LGBTQ+ communities, Sweden, both recently announced cuts to their foreign assistance. Canada, which is another major funder, has so far not changed their commitments.
Even with the new resources in the pipeline, the cuts from government funders have significantly disrupted groups that serve LGBTQ+ communities, Hart said. In his view, every philanthropic dollar they can raise will help save the lives of trans, intersex and gay people around the world, who will be under greater attack as support for democracy more broadly falters.
'Gender justice, feminist movements, freedom of movement and LGBTI people are all being attacked at the same time,' Hart said. 'That is a fundamental disruption to some of the core tenets of how modern democracy was proposed to function.'
___
Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Deadly shooting by Israeli forces near Palestinian aid site in Gaza
Deadly shooting by Israeli forces near Palestinian aid site in Gaza

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Deadly shooting by Israeli forces near Palestinian aid site in Gaza

Experts and humanitarian aid workers say Israel's blockade and 20-month military campaign have pushed Gaza to the brink of famine. #Gaza, another day of aid distribution another day of death traps. Day after day, casualties & scores of injured are reported at distribution points manned by Israel & private security companies. This humiliating system continues to force thousands of hungry & desperate people… — Philippe Lazzarini (@UNLazzarini) June 10, 2025 Around 130 people have been killed in a number of shootings near aid sites run by the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which are in military zones that are off-limits to independent media. The Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots on previous occasions at people who it says approached its forces in a suspicious manner. The foundation says there has been no violence in or around the distribution points themselves. But it has warned people to stay on designated access routes and it paused delivery last week while it held talks with the military on improving safety. Thousands of Palestinians ar receiving aid (AP) Two men and a child were killed and at least 130 were wounded on Tuesday, according to Nader Garghoun, a spokesperson for the al-Awda Hospital, which received the casualties. He said most were being treated for gunshot wounds. Witnesses told The Associated Press that Israeli forces opened fire at around 2am local time (midnight BST), several hundred yards from the aid site in central Gaza. Crowds of Palestinians seeking desperately needed food often head to the sites hours before dawn, hoping to beat the crowds. Mohammed Abu Hussein, a resident of the nearby built-up Bureij refugee camp, said Israeli drones and tanks opened fire, and that he saw five people wounded by gunshots. Abed Haniyah, another witness, said Israeli forces opened fire 'indiscriminately' as thousands of people were attempting to reach the food site. 'What happens every day is humiliation,' he said. 'Every day, people are killed just trying to get food for their children.' Activists, lawyers and medical professionals from North Africa are departing from Tunisia to Gaza to break Israel's blockade on the territory (AP) Israel and the United States say they set up the new food distribution system to prevent Hamas from stealing humanitarian aid and using it to finance militant activities. The United Nations, which runs a longstanding system capable of delivering aid to all parts of Gaza, says there is no evidence of any systematic diversion. UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the new system, saying it violates humanitarian principles by allowing Israel to decide who receives aid and by forcing Palestinians to relocate to just three currently operational sites. The other two distribution sites are in the now mostly uninhabited southern city of Rafah, which Israel has transformed into a military zone. Israeli forces maintain an outer perimeter around all three hubs, and Palestinians must pass close to them to reach the distribution points. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has spoken of creating a 'sterile zone' in Rafah free of Hamas and of moving the territory's entire population there. He has also said Israel will facilitate what he refers to as the voluntary emigration of much of Gaza's two million Palestinians to other countries – plans rejected by much of the international community, including the Palestinians, who view it as forcible expulsion. While people in #Gaza have lost everything and need everything, the Israeli authorities have blocked the delivery of safe and dignified aid at scale to the people of Gaza for over three months now. We are not asking for the impossible. Allow us to do our work: assist people in… — UNRWA (@UNRWA) June 9, 2025 Hamas started the war with its attack on southern Israel on October 7 2023, when Palestinian militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took another 251 hostage. They still hold 55 hostages, fewer than half of them alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed nearly 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence. The war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced around 90% of its population, often multiple times.

Deadly shooting by Israeli forces near Palestinian aid site in Gaza
Deadly shooting by Israeli forces near Palestinian aid site in Gaza

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Deadly shooting by Israeli forces near Palestinian aid site in Gaza

The Israeli military said it fired warning shots at people it referred to as suspects who it said had advanced toward its troops hundreds of yards from the aid site prior to its opening hours. Experts and humanitarian aid workers say Israel's blockade and 20-month military campaign have pushed Gaza to the brink of famine. #Gaza, another day of aid distribution another day of death traps. Day after day, casualties & scores of injured are reported at distribution points manned by Israel & private security companies. This humiliating system continues to force thousands of hungry & desperate people… — Philippe Lazzarini (@UNLazzarini) June 10, 2025 Around 130 people have been killed in a number of shootings near aid sites run by the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which are in military zones that are off-limits to independent media. The Israeli military has acknowledged firing warning shots on previous occasions at people who it says approached its forces in a suspicious manner. The foundation says there has been no violence in or around the distribution points themselves. But it has warned people to stay on designated access routes and it paused delivery last week while it held talks with the military on improving safety. Two men and a child were killed and at least 130 were wounded on Tuesday, according to Nader Garghoun, a spokesperson for the al-Awda Hospital, which received the casualties. He said most were being treated for gunshot wounds. Witnesses told The Associated Press that Israeli forces opened fire at around 2am local time (midnight BST), several hundred yards from the aid site in central Gaza. Crowds of Palestinians seeking desperately needed food often head to the sites hours before dawn, hoping to beat the crowds. Mohammed Abu Hussein, a resident of the nearby built-up Bureij refugee camp, said Israeli drones and tanks opened fire, and that he saw five people wounded by gunshots. Abed Haniyah, another witness, said Israeli forces opened fire 'indiscriminately' as thousands of people were attempting to reach the food site. 'What happens every day is humiliation,' he said. 'Every day, people are killed just trying to get food for their children.' Israel and the United States say they set up the new food distribution system to prevent Hamas from stealing humanitarian aid and using it to finance militant activities. The United Nations, which runs a longstanding system capable of delivering aid to all parts of Gaza, says there is no evidence of any systematic diversion. UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the new system, saying it violates humanitarian principles by allowing Israel to decide who receives aid and by forcing Palestinians to relocate to just three currently operational sites. The other two distribution sites are in the now mostly uninhabited southern city of Rafah, which Israel has transformed into a military zone. Israeli forces maintain an outer perimeter around all three hubs, and Palestinians must pass close to them to reach the distribution points. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has spoken of creating a 'sterile zone' in Rafah free of Hamas and of moving the territory's entire population there. He has also said Israel will facilitate what he refers to as the voluntary emigration of much of Gaza's two million Palestinians to other countries – plans rejected by much of the international community, including the Palestinians, who view it as forcible expulsion. While people in #Gaza have lost everything and need everything, the Israeli authorities have blocked the delivery of safe and dignified aid at scale to the people of Gaza for over three months now. We are not asking for the impossible. Allow us to do our work: assist people in… — UNRWA (@UNRWA) June 9, 2025 Hamas started the war with its attack on southern Israel on October 7 2023, when Palestinian militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took another 251 hostage. They still hold 55 hostages, fewer than half of them alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed nearly 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence. The war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced around 90% of its population, often multiple times.

Investment glass seems half full near mid-point of 2025
Investment glass seems half full near mid-point of 2025

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Investment glass seems half full near mid-point of 2025

LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - A consequence of U.S. President Donald Trump's global economic upheaval seems to be greater "home bias" in investing - going some way toward explaining the year's relative performance while seeming chaos sows stimulus around the world. Many of the half-year appraisals of Trump's often erratic trade and economic agenda attempt to cut through policy noise to suggest where the world will ultimately pan out. Larry Fink, boss of BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, opined last week about a "second draft of globalization", one positioned somewhere between the rejected inequities of unfettered global trade and capital and another alternative of stifling economic nationalism and capital curbs. The new middle ground can still enjoy open markets, Fink reckons, but they will likely be steered, prodded and tempted home to ensure household savings first benefit the country of those doing the saving. "People will fuel their country's economic growth and own a piece of it," Fink argued in an op-ed in the Financial Times. For Fink, this "re-globalization" aims "not just to generate prosperity but to aim it towards the people and places left behind the first time." Trump's attempted re-industrialization of America is a version of this idea. Using trade barriers, bilateralism, carrots and sticks, he seeks to kick-start U.S. manufacturing while accepting that lower trade deficits will also see lower overseas investment flows to U.S. markets and smaller government to boot. The political pitch is to create more well-paid factory jobs instead of super-wealthy asset owners. Easier said than done. But whatever one thinks about Trump's "America First" strategy, that formula seems to be working best overseas. Germany's dramatic fiscal reboot this year, which was catalyzed by both Trumpism and far-right populism at home, also speaks to the new globalization theme. Europe at large now appears to be prioritizing investment in its own industrial base, security, digital infrastructure and green technologies - hoping to unleash both under-utilized savings at home and attract capital from Wall Street. Britain is apeing these industrial and defence policy trends, while Japan is attempting to unlock its domestic pension savings too. Meanwhile, Chinese fiscal stimulus has also risen. So while trade war jitters abound, it sets up potentially synched fiscal boosts next year. TS Lombard's Rory Green and Alexandros Xenofontos pointed out on Monday there could be strong fiscal stimuli in Europe, China and possibly the U.S. in 2026 - a trifecta that's only happened twice in 30 years, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the 2007-2008 global financial crisis. That possibility goes some way to explain why, despite all the market volatility and hype surrounding a U.S. cyclical slowdown, global stock markets are once again hitting record highs. It also explains why it's been a bad year for global sovereign bonds and the U.S. dollar - as stimulus requires more borrowing and foreign investors shed overweight U.S. holdings. Even though Wall Street stocks (.SPX), opens new tab are just about positive for the year, they are underperforming the likes of equity indexes in Germany (.GDAXI), opens new tab and Hong Kong (.HIS), opens new tab by 25%-40%. If even some of the estimated $7 trillion of European money that flowed into U.S. equities over the past dozen years were to be repatriated, markets would price such a move very quickly. And despite all the concern about the U.S. economic and political direction, American money is not rushing offshore. Mutual fund data shows net U.S. flows to global equity funds remain negative through this year. In fact, they're at their most negative in more than two years. Cash flowing to U.S. money market funds, meantime, has climbed back above $7 trillion again in the latest week, near the record high set in April. Does that data mean the ultimate outcome of Trump turning the world upside down could actually be positive? In an article for the Council on Foreign Relations' Foreign Affairs magazine titled"Tell Me How This Trade War Ends,", opens new tab Emily Kilcrease and Geoffrey Gertz reckon that despite all the Trump chaos, there is a "kernel of truth" in his insistence that the world trade system needs a re-set. They conclude there is no going back to a world where the U.S. championed ever freer trade. Neither is it inevitable that the world will retreat into outright protectionism, as long as Trump pushes other U.S. allies into a new, less-lopsided trading framework. "Trump's shock to the system may not be pretty. But it could open the way for a much better system," Kilcrease and Gertz wrote. "Trump has turned the United States into a revisionist power seeking to shatter what remains of the economic order. Thus far, his approach has been needlessly chaotic," they said. "But there is still an opportunity to wrest a positive outcome from the current tumult." At nearly the mid-point of the year, investors seem tempted by this "glass half full" view of 2025's disruption. The optimists are trying to see through the inevitable twists and turns ahead to focus on the possibility of a new, more positive equilibrium down the line. In truth, much remains murky and unknowable at this point. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store