Leo Varadkar accused of reinventing himself after Irish unity comments
Emma Little-Pengelly took a swipe at the former Fine Gael leader after he said that Irish unity would become 'centre stage' if Reform leader Nigel Farage was elected UK prime minister.
Advertisement
Mr Varadkar said if Mr Farage became UK prime minister, it would 'change the pictures in terms of attitudes towards independence in Scotland', and change the views of some people in the middle ground in Northern Ireland.
Former taoiseach Leo Varadkar in conversation with Rev Karen Sethuraman at St Mary's University College, Belfast (Liam McBurney/PA)
Mr Varadkar said he believes planning for a united Ireland should be happening, but that a date should not be fixed as the numbers to win a vote are not in place.
He added: 'I don't think a united Ireland is inevitable, I think it's something that we have to work towards.
'But I think there are a lot of factors that would suggest that we're on that trajectory.
Advertisement
'Demographic factors, polling, even the most recent numbers showing that a very clear majority of younger people in Northern Ireland want there to be a new united Ireland.'
However, speaking in Armagh at the North South Ministerial Council (NSMC) on Friday, Ms Little-Pengelly said that Mr Varadkar is 'entitled to reinvent himself in whatever way that he so chooses'.
'But he is wrong in terms of the trajectory, I think, when you look at people in Northern Ireland voting for nationalist parties, that hasn't moved since 1998, still in and around the 40%, that hasn't increased,' she said.
'And while there's more complexity in terms of the voting beyond that, everyone else is either voting for a proactively Unionist party or parties who explicitly say that they do not want to be focused or agitate for constitutional change.
Advertisement
'There hasn't been any significant shift in that. There's nothing, in my view, to say that the trajectory is such that this inevitability. I don't accept that it is an inevitability, but for my part, I do believe that the focus should be on around uniting the people of Northern Ireland together.
'That very much a focus on reconciliation, but a focus on actually serving their needs.
'While others are preoccupied by these big constitutional debates, for me, it should be about getting on and actually delivering the education system our people want.
'The tackling those big health waiting lists, tackling those big issues that face us here in Northern Ireland, because that's what's impacting on people's lives, day in and day out.'
Advertisement
Taosieach Micheál Martin said his focus is on the 'reconciliation' between all traditions on the island, as well as the United Kingdom and Ireland's relationship.
'I'm very much focused on the hard ground, building relationships. I think what we're doing today is part of that agenda,' he said.
'I'm not going to anticipate what's going to happen in the British election in two or three years time.
'I've often said to Leo, don't always be obsessed with the opinion polls, because they give a different result.
Advertisement
'My own experience bears that out. Point is, I don't know what is going to happen in the British election.'
Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill said the 'prudent' thing to do is to plan for what is 'potentially' happening in years to come (Liam McBurney/PA)
He added: 'Our agenda has to be to try and use the this moment to advance issues of common interest and to get things done.
'We have witnessed a significant change in the relationship between the United Kingdom government and the Irish Government on a number of fronts.'
Tánaiste Simon Harris said that every taoiseach aspires to see 'our country united'.
He added: 'But we do have a huge amount of work to do, and I share the Taoiseach's view in relation to that body of work.
'At the moment, I think relations between the British and Irish governments are at the best they have been in a very long time.
'We have good and honourable interlocutors in London working with, I hope, what they find to be good and honourable interlocutors in Dublin and in Belfast.
'So whilst I certainly don't think Leo's comments are wrong, I think that's where the focus of the Irish Government is at in the here and now.'
Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill said the 'prudent' thing to do is to plan for what is 'potentially' happening in years to come.
She said it is possible to 'chew gum and walk at the same time'.
'I think we can have good relationships, build good relationships. That's always going to be a good thing,' the Sinn Fein MLA said.
'I think we can cooperate on our own mutual interest that we're talking about today here at the North South Ministerial Council.
'Equally, I think we have to plan for constitutional change and set out the argument so people can make mature, rational decisions about what world they see themselves.
'We all have a stake in the future, so let's now plan for it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Netanyahu accuses Starmer of ‘rewarding Hamas' in blistering response to plan to recognise Palestine
Benjamin Netanyahu has issued a furious response after Sir Keir Starmer pledged to recognise Palestine unless Israel takes urgent steps to end the war in Gaza, accusing the prime minister of 'appeasing terrorists'. It came after the prime minister recalled the Cabinet from their summer holidays to discuss steps to end what he called the 'appalling situation in Gaza', where a UN assessment has warned the population is facing a mounting humanitarian crisis. Sir Keir said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. Hamas, the Palestinian militant group, must immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', Sir Keir also said. But responding on social media, the Israeli prime minister said: 'Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims.' He added: 'A jihadist state on Israel's border today will threaten Britain tomorrow. Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen.' US president Donald Trump also accused the UK of 'rewarding Hamas' with the ultimatum, despite previously saying he did not mind the PM 'taking a position' on the issue. It comes amid confusion over whether or not the release of hostages is a condition for the recognition of Palestine, with transport secretary Heidi Alexander on Wednesday morning tying herself in knots on the issue. She said ministers have 'always said right from day one that the hostages need to be released', adding that the UK expects 'Hamas to act in the same way as we expect Israel to act'. 'Hamas need to release the hostages, they need to disarm, and they also need to accept that they will have no future role in the governance of Gaza,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'They are a vile terrorist organisation that has perpetrated heinous crimes and awful atrocities on the Israeli people.' But asked directly if the release of hostages is a condition for recognition, she said: 'We will be making an assessment in September.' She added: 'We're giving Israel eight weeks to act. If they want to be sat at the table to shape that enduring peace in the region, they must act.' Also asked about the issue on Sky News, Ms Alexander added: 'This isn't about Hamas, this is actually about delivering for the Palestinian people and making sure that we can get aid in.' Emily Thornberry, the chair of the House of Commons foreign affairs committee, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that Mr Netanyahu's 'furious' response shows Britain is 'not irrelevant' on the world stage. She said: "If we were completely irrelevant, why has Netanyahu completely lost it overnight? "It's not exactly a considered diplomatic careful statement really. It's a furious statement." Sir Keir said the government's 'primary aim' was getting aid into Gaza and getting hostages released when asked why UK recognition of the state of Palestine was conditional. He added he was 'particularly concerned that the very idea of a two-state solution is reducing and feels further away today than it has for many, many years'. While Sir Keir signalled the UK could back away from recognising a Palestinian state if his conditions are met, No 10 is understood to believe that such a two-state solution would also proceed from negotiations towards a sustained peace. The prime minister said the UK and its allies need to see 'at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day' to deliver aid, and are together 'mounting a major effort to get humanitarian supplies back in' by air and by land. Sir Keir spoke with a series of world leaders throughout Tuesday, including Mr Netanyahu, and King Abdullah II of Jordan, whose nation is leading efforts to airdrop aid into Gaza. About 20 tonnes of aid have been dropped by the UK and Jordan in recent days, according to Foreign Secretary David Lammy. High-level representatives at the UN conference on Tuesday urged Israel to commit to a Palestinian state and gave 'unwavering support' to a two-state solution. The New York Declaration, issued by the conference, sets out a phased plan to end the nearly eight-decade conflict and the ongoing war in Gaza. The plan would culminate with an independent, demilitarised Palestine living side by side peacefully with Israel, and their eventual integration into the wider Middle East region.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Gary Neville hits out at Rachel Reeves over national insurance hike
Gary Neville has hit out at Rachel Reeves for her national insurance hike, saying it has hampered employment and 'could have been held back'. The ex-Manchester United star said the chancellor has significantly increased the burden on businesses and that the national insurance increase was 'a challenge'. Mr Neville was a vocal backer of Labour at the last general election, at one point walking in the fells of the Lake District with Sir Keir Starmer for a video endorsing the party. But he has now joined business leaders and economists in attacking the chancellor's decisions since entering government. Critics say Ms Reeves and Sir Keir's doom and gloom in the wake of the election, as well as the chancellor's tax-hiking October Budget, held back the economy. Speaking to Sky's Business Live, Mr Neville, whose firms employ hundreds of staff, said: 'I honestly don't believe that, to be fair, companies and small businesses should be deterred from employing people. So, I think the national insurance rise was one that I feel probably could have been held back, particularly in terms of the way in which the economy was. 'It's been a tough economy now for a good few years and I did think that once there was a change of government, and once there was some stability, that we would get some settling. "But it's not settling locally in our country, but it is not settling actually, to be fair, in many places in the world either.' Mr Neville supported the chancellor's minimum wage increase, which has also piled pressure on some businesses. 'People, to be fair, should be paid more so I don't think that's something that you can be critical of,' he added. But he said: 'I do think that the national insurance rise, though, was a challenge.' The footballer's comments come months before the chancellor's second Budget, in which she is seeking to find billions of pounds of tax hikes and spending cuts to fill a hole left by Labour's chaotic winter fuel U-turn. Ms Reeves was left with a £5bn gap in her spending plans when Sir Keir abandoned his planned benefit cuts, and could need to find billions more due to the fallout from Donald Trump 's global trade war. The global body's latest World Economic Outlook said the economy would grow by 1.2 per cent this year, up from an earlier prediction of 1.1 per cent.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Minister doubles down on colleague's claim Farage on side of Jimmy Savile
Heidi Alexander has doubled down on her fellow Cabinet minister's claim that Nigel Farage is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile'. The Reform UK leader is 'happy for there to be a free for all on the internet', the Transport Secretary said, as she defended Peter Kyle's comments. The Technology Secretary had accused Mr Farage of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers' over Reform's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act. Asked if she agrees with Mr Kyle's statement, Ms Alexander told Sky News: 'Nigel Farage is, in effect, saying that he is on their side because he's saying he's wanting to repeal the Online Safety Act. 'I think that the position of Reform in saying that they want to repeal the entirety of the Online Safety Act, which is one of the most important pieces of legislation when it comes to the protecting of our children and the safety of young people online, I think that, in effect, what Nigel Farage is saying is that he's totally happy for there to be a free for all on the internet. 'That's not the position of the Labour Government. It's not the position of me. It's not the position of Keir Starmer or Peter Kyle, and that is the point that the Technology Secretary was rightly making yesterday.' Mr Farage has demanded an apology from Mr Kyle, describing the remarks as 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'. Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, the minister had said: 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Following this, Clacton MP Mr Farage urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed. Writing in the Telegraph, Mr Kyle said proposals to overturn the Act 'makes my blood boil', as he argued repealing it would benefit 'disgusting predators who contact children and groom them online'. He added: 'I make no apologies for putting the interests of vulnerable children ahead of the interests of predators and child abusers – and the Reform leader's ego.' Also writing for the newspaper, Mr Farage said 'all of this is of course a deflection from the real problem with the Online Safety Act', as he raised concerns over ID checks. He added: 'In the name of safety, the Act poses the biggest threat to freedom of speech in this country in our lifetimes. 'In the name of protecting children, the law aims to regulate what adults are allowed to say or see – while doing nothing to make our children safer.' Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said making statements about overturning the Bill is 'very lazy' and 'not responsible'. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone. 'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.' The Prime Minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
