Eating half a cup of $3 snack could protect against cancer
Cells are under constant attack from a barrage of stressors, including pollution, UV radiation, processed foods and the body's regular metabolism, all of which generate harmful free radicals that can damage DNA, proteins, and cell membranes over time, contributing to aging and many types of cancer.
Over time, repeated attacks overwhelm the cell's ability to repair itself. If this damage affects genes that control growth and death, mutations accumulate, allowing abnormal cells to multiply unchecked, eventually forming tumors.
Nutrition scientists in Iran and Afghanistan reported that consuming almonds, around two large handfuls, significantly improved oxidative stress markers by reducing DNA and lipid damage while boosting antioxidant defenses.
The benefits were strongest with higher almond intake, likely due to their vitamin E, polyphenols, and healthy fats.
The results varied between studies, though, possibly due to differences in the ways almonds were prepared, such as salting or roasting, or the study subjects' health.
Almonds are widely recognized as a nutritious food, but quantifying their specific health benefits has proven difficult due to inconsistent research findings stemming from key variables across studies, including differences in almond preparation methods (such as roasting versus raw), study durations, and characteristics of the people in the study.
The latest research consolidates previous studies and fragmented findings to better identify how and how much almonds benefit the body.
After reviewing all the research, scientists focused on eight high-quality studies involving 424 people.
The studies tested different groups, including healthy adults, smokers, and people with chronic diseases, using almond doses ranging from a small handful, about five grams, to about six handfuls, or roughly 168g, per day for one to six months.
Almonds' health benefits depend on the serving size. Eating at least two large handfuls daily, about 60g, made a significant impact.
Eating this amount reduced cell membrane damage by a statistically significant 0.46 units, lowered DNA damage by 5.83 units, and boosted the body's natural defenses by 2.02 units.
Researchers have been trying to prove almonds' anti-cancer impacts for years, since the 1997 report of the World Cancer Research Fund, which concluded that, while there are 'theoretical reasons to believe that diets high in nuts and seeds might protect against some cancers, the evidence is currently lacking.'
Over two decades of research has revealed important connections between nut consumption and cancer prevention, with almonds emerging as a particularly promising food in this field.
Large observational studies spanning multiple countries have found that people who regularly eat nuts tend to have lower rates of certain cancers, particularly prostate cancer.
The evidence also suggests a potential protective effect against colon cancer in women, with those consuming just a small handful of nuts daily, about six grams, showing measurable benefits compared to those who did not eat almonds.
The figure, published in Advances in Nutrition, shows how eating different amounts of nuts affects a person's risk of serious health problems. The solid red line shows whether more nuts lower risk (when the line goes down) or do not make much difference (when it is flat). The blue shaded area shows the confidence interval. When it is narrow, researchers are more certain
Population-level findings are supported by laboratory research showing that almonds may actively combat cancer development at the cellular level.
Animal studies have shown that eating an almond-rich diet can reduce the formation of precancerous growths in the digestive tract and may trigger natural anti-tumor defenses in the body.
Almonds pack a powerful nutritional punch, making them a favorite snack among dietitians and nutritionists.
A 2022 study in the journal Advances in Nutrition showed that eating 28 grams of nuts daily, such as almonds, walnuts, cashews, and pistachios, was associated with a 21 percent lower risk of cardiovascular disease, including heart attacks, strokes, and atrial fibrillation, an 11 percent reduced risk of dying from cancer, and a 22 percent lower risk of premature death from any cause.
The benefits likely come from their unique combination of healthy fats, fiber, and antioxidants that improve cholesterol, reduce inflammation, and support blood vessel function.
On top of being rich in vitamins that protect cells from oxidative damage, such as vitamin E, almonds contain monounsaturated fats that lower 'bad' LDL cholesterol.
Research has suggested that eating a handful of almonds with a meal can reduce blood sugar spikes by up to 30 percent, an effect comparable to a diabetes drug.
'These findings support almonds as a functional food for oxidation management,' the researchers said, adding that more rigorously controlled studies are required before implementing broad dietary guidelines to include more almonds.
The researchers did not examine toxicity, but overeating almonds can have drawbacks. To heaping handfuls of almonds contain around seven grams of fiber, around 27 percent of the daily recommended amount. Too much too fast could cause bloating, gas or diarrhea.
In rare cases, overeating almonds can cause vitamin E toxicity if the person is also taking a vitamin E supplement or a multivitamin containing vitamin E.
Vitamin E acts as a blood thinner. Very high doses may increase bruising or bleeding risk, especially if a person is taking blood-thinning medication, such as warfarin or aspirin.
People who are susceptible to kidney stones should also moderate their almond consumption. Almonds contain oxalates. The body converts excess oxalates into crystals that may form stones, especially when combined with low fluid intake or other risk factors
Still, a person would have to eat magnitudes more almonds than what is typical.
A 400mg vitamin E supplement plus 60g almonds, 15mg, is safe, reaching the 1,000mg upper limit would require eating 5.3 lbs (2.4kg) of almonds daily alongside the supplement.
Meanwhile, research shows the oxalate content in typical almond portions poses little risk when consumed as part of a balanced diet with adequate hydration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wildfire smoke far more dangerous to health than thought, say scientists
Choking smoke spewed by wildfires is far more dangerous than previously thought, a new study has found, with death tolls from short-term exposure to fine particulates underestimated by 93%. Researchers found that 535 people in Europe died on average each year between 2004 and 2022 as a result of breathing in the tiny toxic particles known as PM2.5 that are released when wildfires rage. Under standard methods, which assume PM2.5 from wildfires is as deadly as from other sources, such as traffic, they would have expected just 38 deaths a year. The study comes as wildfires ravage southern Europe, and new data from EU fire monitors shows that 895,000 hectares (2.2m acres) have burned so far in 2025, breaking records for this time of year. They have pumped out more than twice the amount of PM2.5 that wildfires have generated on average by this point in the year over the last two decades. 'Previously, people assumed the same toxicity for wildfire particles and all particles,' said Prof Cathryn Tonne, an environmental epidemiologist at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) and co-author of the study. 'Our paper shows evidence that – although it happens less often – the health impact for the same amount of particles is stronger for wildfire particles,' she added. Dirty air is one of the biggest threats to human health, and research suggests wildfires are a significant contributor to the vast death toll. In December, a study attributed 1.53 million deaths around the world each year to short-term and long-term exposure to air pollution from wildfires. The ISGlobal researchers, who looked only at the smoke's short-term effects, for which the evidence base is stronger, combined daily mortality records from 32 European countries with estimates of PM2.5 pollution from 2004 to 2022. Using models that account for an expected lag in deaths, they found exposure to wildfire smoke increased the risk of death in the following week. For every extra microgram of PM2.5 fouling 1 cubic metre of air, they found that all-cause mortality rose by 0.7%, respiratory mortality went up by 1% and cardiovascular mortality rose by 0.9%. 'The results are concerning, considering that wildfires and other extreme events are increasing exponentially with climate change,' said Prof Antonio Gasparrini, an environmental epidemiologist at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, who was not involved in the study. Devastating blazes compounded by relentless heat have killed several people across southern Europe and the Balkans in recent weeks. But deaths from the toxic fumes released by the fires are likely to go unnoticed. 'Smoke can affect populations far away from the fires,' said Tonne. 'So many more people will be exposed to smoke than the immediate physical threat of the flames.' The researchers said the study was limited by the lack of variability in the data on exposure to fire-related particulate matter, which made it harder to estimate how people's health responded based on age and sex. They were also unable to 'completely disentangle' the health burden of fire-related PM2.5 from ozone, another pollutant released by wildfires, though they said estimates were largely consistent when they adjusted the main model for ozone from all sources. Toxic pollution from wildfires creeps into the homes of more than 1 billion people a year, a study found in May. It concluded that air purifiers were an effective but expensive solution to indoor air pollution, which can be nearly three times higher on wildfire days than normal days, even when all windows and doors are closed. The risk of fire weather has risen as greenhouse gas emissions have heated the planet and dried out vegetation in some regions. The Iberian peninsula has been hit particularly hard this year, with Spain and Portugal accounting for the bulk of Europe's burned area. Associate professor Victor Resco de Dios, a forestry engineer at the University of Lleida, said the fire belt would move north in the coming years and decades. 'What we are witnessing now will sooner or later occur also in central and northern Europe, where we have also seen an aggravation of the fire problem,' he said. 'This is not a Mediterranean problem, but a European one.'
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Researchers discovered by accident a possible alternative to LASIK surgery
LASIK eye surgery has been performed successfully in the U.S. since the late 90s, helping nearly 40 million patients to improve their vision through a procedure that cuts into the eye using lasers. Some 600,000 of the Food and Drug Administration-approved surgeries are carried out on American adults each year. Now, researchers say they have come up with an alternative method that wouldn't need invasive incisions and could be cheaper. It uses a process called electromechanical reshaping, which helps to reshape the cornea using electrical current. The cornea is a dome-shaped, clear structure at the front of the eye that helps us to process images. Irregularly shaped corneas are the cause of nearsighted and farsighted vision and astigmatism, and LASIK fixes that by burning away tissue to reshape it. 'The whole effect was discovered by accident,' Brian Wong, a professor and surgeon at the University of California, Irvine, explained in a statement. 'I was looking at living tissues as moldable materials and discovered this whole process of chemical modification.' While the work is in its early stages, it could offer an alternative to LASIK. Although the surgery has been safely performed for nearly 30 years with rare complications, it has some limitations and risks. The surgeons say that cutting the cornea compromises the structural integrity of the eye. This procedure has yet to be performed in humans, but researchers previously used electromechanical reshaping to alter scars and skin in pigs and reshape cartilage-rich rabbit ears. Working with rabbit eyeballs, they constructed platinum 'contact lenses' that served as a template for the corrected shape of the cornea, placing them over a rabbit eyeball in a saline solution meant to mimic natural tears. After about a minute following a small electric charge to the lens, the cornea's curvature conformed to the shape of the lens. That happened in the same amount of time as LASIK, with fewer steps, no incisions, and less expensive equipment. Then, they repeated the step on 12 other rabbit eyeballs. Of those dozen, 10 were treated as if they had nearsighted vision, and the researchers found success. In others, they saw that their technique might be able to reverse some chemical-caused cloudiness to the cornea, which is currently only treatable through a complete transplant of the cornea. In the future, the researchers are planning tests on living rabbits, and looking at far-sightedness and astigmatism. Uncertainties in the team's scientific funding have put those plans on hold, but Michael Hill, a professor of chemistry at Occidental College, will present their findings this week at the fall meeting of the American Chemical Society. 'There's a long road between what we've done and the clinic. But, if we get there, this technique is widely applicable, vastly cheaper and potentially even reversible,' said Hill.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Orange shark with white eyes seen for 'first time ever' by anglers in Costa Rica
A giant shark was reeled in during a sport fishing trip in Costa Rica that is being hailed as a first-of-its-kind catch. The six-and-a-half-foot-long shark exhibited xanthism, a rare pigmentation condition that causes an excess of yellow or golden tones in the skin, scales or fur of animals. While xanthism has been observed in a few fish species, it has never before been documented in cartilaginous fish, a group that includes sharks, rays, and skates, in the Caribbean. Typically, nurse sharks have light to dark brown skin, which helps them blend into reefs and rocky seafloor habitats where they spend most of their time hunting. Based on the shark's size, researchers from the Federal University of Rio Grande concluded that this unusual pigmentation did not appear to affect its survival. The scientists said in a study: 'The discovery of a yellow nurse shark raises important questions about the genetics and adaptability of nurse sharks. 'Is this a one-time occurrence, or could it signal a new genetic trend in the local population?' Because this coloring makes animals more visible, scientists believe xanthism often lowers survival rates in the wild. Albinism, though slightly better known, is also uncommon and can pose serious challenges to animals that develop it. The absence of melanin results in pale skin, scales, or fur, along with white or red eyes. In the wild, this lack of natural camouflage can make albino animals easier targets for predators and less effective hunters. The condition may also increase sensitivity to sunlight and, in some cases, reduce the likelihood of finding a mate. For this reason, the fact that a nurse shark showing both xanthism and albinism survived into adulthood makes the discovery especially significant. The survival of this vividly colored shark into adulthood also offers a rare glimpse into the adaptability of the species and raises new questions for marine biologists about genetic diversity in Caribbean nurse shark populations. Nurse sharks are benthic predators, meaning they spend most of their time on or near the seafloor, often around reefs and rocky areas. Their typical brownish coloring helps them blend in with the surroundings, making them harder to spot. This shark's bright yellow-orange color, however, would have made it stand out, which makes its survival into adulthood particularly remarkable. It is unclear whether this unusual coloring offers any advantages or if the shark simply managed to thrive despite being more visible.
