logo
Economy will likely slow to near-standstill or recession despite Trump tariff pause: Survey

Economy will likely slow to near-standstill or recession despite Trump tariff pause: Survey

USA Today14-04-2025

Hear this story
Experts predict the economy will nearly stall in 2025, growing 0.8%, down from their projection of 1.7% just last month.
The 46 economists surveyed by Wolters Kluwer Blue Chip Economic Indicators estimate a 47% chance of recession, up from 25% in February.
'We had a very solid economy at the beginning of the year,' Barclays economist Marc Giannoni said. "The tariffs are…weakening activity and weakening demand.'
Forecasters have a bleak outlook on the U.S. economy because of President Donald Trump's escalating trade war even amid his 90-day pause of the highest tariffs on more than 50 countries − and they see the odds of a recession as a tossup.
The experts predict the economy will nearly stall in 2025, growing 0.8%, down from their projection of 1.7% just last month, according to the average estimate of 46 economists surveyed by Wolters Kluwer Blue Chip Economic Indicators on April 4 and April 7.
They reckon there's a 47% chance of recession, up from 25% in February.
'Even higher tariffs'
The economy grew a healthy 2.8% last year.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
The poll was conducted after Trump unveiled his reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries on April 2 but before he announced a 90-day pause on duties as high as 50% on all nations other than China on April 9 and exemptions for many electronics products late Friday.
Yet some of the surveyed economists interviewed in recent days noted that Trump at the same time raised the import fee on Chinese shipments to an outsize 145%, more than offsetting the economic benefits of the concessions.
'That adds up to even higher (total) tariffs,' said Barclays economist Marc Giannoni. The effective, or average, U.S. tariff, on all imports rose to 30%, up from 23% when Trump announced the reciprocal duties. Before the trade war, the average U.S. tariff rate was 2% to 3%.
In yet another twist, late Friday, the Trump administration announced exemptions for smartphones, computers, chips and other electronics products. That, Giannoni said, would lower the effective tariff rate back to 23% and "should reduce the negative effects on activity and inflation," but wouldn't significantly change Barclays' projection for a recession later this year.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told ABC News on April 13 the carevouts for the electronics products is temporary and tariffs for those items would be included in a duty on computer chips that Trump plans to impose in a month or two. That would further mitigate any economic benefit from the exemptions.
Paying for the tariffs: What Trump's 90-day tariff pause means for your wallet
A separate survey of 31 experts this week – 21 of whom responded the day Trump announced the 90-day pause – reveals a similarly dour view, according to the poll by the National Association of Business Economics. They expect the economy to grow just 0.7% this year.
The average tariff rate should gradually fall to about 20% this year and 15% in 2026 as companies import fewer Chinese goods because of the high fees and increasingly source their products from other countries, Giannoni said. Still, he expects overall inflation to rise from 2.4% in March to 3.4% by the end of the year, based on the Consumer Price Index.
Is the US economy declining?
Forecasters say the economy was likely to slow this year after a post-pandemic burst of activity but consumers were in generally good shape, with low debt and wage growth that was still outpacing inflation. The tariffs, however, are expected to drive up prices as manufacturers and retailers pass along much of the fees to consumers.
That's likely to sap their spending power, which makes up about 70% of economic activity.
'We had a very solid economy at the beginning of the year,' Giannoni said. "The tariffs are…weakening activity and weakening demand.'
'It's a massive shock,' said Nationwide Chief Economist Kathy Bostjancic, who expects the economy to grow 1% this year and believes the question of whether the nation tips into recession is a borderline call.
Is a US recession coming?
Giannoni figures the nation will experience a mild recession the second half of the year, with gross domestic product falling 1.5%, net job losses of less than 100,000 and the 4.2% unemployment rate peaking at 4.7%.
Besides the hit to consumer spending broadly, Bostjancic said the turmoil in the stock market has reduced the wealth of high-income Americans who have accounted for the lion's share of consumption, causing those households to spend less. She also expects the Trump administration's substantial layoffs to deliver another blow to the economy.
Consumer sentiment this month fell to the lowest level since June 2022 and Americans' inflation expectations a year from now rose to 6.7%, the highest since 1981, according to a survey by the University if Michigan.
Economists expect consumer spending to increase 0.9% this year, down from 2.8% in 2024, according to the Wolters Kluwer poll.
Is business investment increasing?
And while the 90-day pause on many tariffs grants a reprieve to many countries as well as consumers, 'The disruption we are seeing and the uncertainty we are seeing is already bad for growth,' Giannoni said. 'The 90-day pause is extending the uncertainty.'
Business investment is projected to grow about 1.2% this year, down from 3.6% in 2024, according to the Wolters Kluwer survey.
Which tariffs have gone into effect?
Trump's reciprocal tariffs, theoretically aimed at matching the fees other countries charge for U.S. shipments to their countries, included a minimum 10% fee and additional charges of up to 50% on more than 50 nations. Those took effect Wednesday.
The president already had imposed a 20% fee on China; 25% on imported steel and aluminum; 25% on all imported cars and light trucks; and 25% on some goods from Canada and Mexico not covered by a trade agreement.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. appeals court rules
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. appeals court rules

CNBC

time20 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. appeals court rules

A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of "exceptional importance" warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July 31. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.

Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules
Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules

CNN

time21 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules

President Donald Trump's heftiest tariffs cleared a court hurdle for now, after a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that they could take effect while legal challenges play out. The decision came after the Trump administration appealed the Court of International Trade's ruling finding the president exceeded his authority to impose country-wide tariffs claiming a national emergency. 'Both sides have made substantial arguments on the merits. Having considered the traditional stay factors… the court concludes a stay is warranted under the circumstances,' according to the ruling. The stay is pending the course of the appeal, the court wrote, adding that the case will be heard on a sped-up basis by the full panel of judges at the court. 'The court also concludes that these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance,' the order said. The appeals court ruling, however, has no bearing on the sector-wide tariffs Trump previously enacted, including those on aluminum, steel, cars and car parts. That's because he imposed those levies under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act – a different law than the one Trump cited for his broader trade actions. Section 232 gives a president significant power to levy tariffs on specific sectors if they believe there is a national security threat risk. This is a developing story and will be updated.

Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules
Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules

CNN

time22 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules

President Donald Trump's heftiest tariffs cleared a court hurdle for now, after a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that they could take effect while legal challenges play out. The decision came after the Trump administration appealed the Court of International Trade's ruling finding the president exceeded his authority to impose country-wide tariffs claiming a national emergency. 'Both sides have made substantial arguments on the merits. Having considered the traditional stay factors… the court concludes a stay is warranted under the circumstances,' according to the ruling. The stay is pending the course of the appeal, the court wrote, adding that the case will be heard on a sped-up basis by the full panel of judges at the court. 'The court also concludes that these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance,' the order said. The appeals court ruling, however, has no bearing on the sector-wide tariffs Trump previously enacted, including those on aluminum, steel, cars and car parts. That's because he imposed those levies under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act – a different law than the one Trump cited for his broader trade actions. Section 232 gives a president significant power to levy tariffs on specific sectors if they believe there is a national security threat risk. This is a developing story and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store