logo
Godongwana's path to austerity deepening poverty, inequality

Godongwana's path to austerity deepening poverty, inequality

IOL News25-05-2025

Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana presented the National Budget in Parliament for the third time on May 21, 2025. While it is a welcome relief that the proposed VAT hike was ultimately scrapped, its replacement with deep spending cuts is no cause for celebration, says the writer.
Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers
Reneva Fourie
On 21 May, Parliament finally adopted the national budget after months of contention, heated debates, and public pushback.
The initial two drafts, presented on 19 February and 12 March, did not gain the requisite political backing, resulting in an unprecedented Budget crisis for the country. The most controversial proposal involved increasing the Value Added Tax (VAT) by half a percentage point on 1 May 2025 and another half percentage point on 1 April 2026.
The proposed increase in VAT sparked strong protests from civil society, labour unions, and political parties. In response to this widespread opposition, the government had to rethink its approach and revise the national budget.
When comparing the original budget presented in March to the updated version adopted in May, some significant changes stood out.
The planned VAT increase was cancelled, which many welcomed. However, this decision came with its challenges. Instead of finding new ways to raise money such as taxing the top one per cent of the country's wealthiest, reducing a bloated cabinet, or accelerating efforts to improve state efficiency, the government introduced further austerity measures. The March budget allocation for public spending was significantly reduced, with the most affected sectors being health, education, defence, and social development, four critical areas already under intense pressure.
These reductions occur as the general fuel levy is scheduled to increase by 16c/l for petrol on 4 June, while diesel will rise by 15c/l.
These funding allocation cuts come at a time when the country really can't afford them.
South Africa's public services have been in decline for years. Since 2020, repeated budget cuts have eroded the quality of basic services. Schools are overcrowded, poorly maintained, and lacking in basic teaching resources.
In the health sector, clinics are chronically understaffed and understocked. Nurses and teachers are overwhelmed and demoralised.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
Furthermore, the US government has decreased the money it provides through an initiative called PEPFAR, which supports efforts to fight HIV and AIDS.
This reduction threatens the programmes that have saved many lives over the past twenty years. Many clinics are already experiencing shortages of critical medications and are doing fewer tests to monitor patients' health. When the government tightens its budget for health, the situation is likely to get even worse. This funding gap highlights the growing weaknesses in South Africa's public health system.
In terms of defence, these allocation cuts will likely impact diplomatic initiatives, military-related projects, and participation in collaborative security efforts with allies. The reductions in the budget for this sector have significantly hindered the country's ability to uphold its commitments in the region.
South African peacekeeping troops are in increasingly difficult situations with no air defence support. Without enough resources, their morale and ability to perform their tasks are declining. Additionally, the decreased funding could limit the country's capacity to adequately address and mitigate potential security threats at home.
Perhaps most disturbing are the allocation cuts to social grants.
The Social Relief of Distress Grant has served as a lifeline for millions of poor South Africans, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the continued high levels of unemployment. Reducing allocations to social development in this context is not just shortsighted; it borders on cruelty. It ignores the daily realities of poverty, hunger and economic hardship faced by millions.
The root of this crisis lies not in a lack of funds but in how those funds are prioritised and managed. Instead of ensuring that wealthy individuals contribute their fair share or expand the revenue base by creating jobs, the state keeps leaning on budget cuts.
These strategies to control spending haven't worked. They haven't lowered the level of debt, and they haven't helped the economy grow. What they have done is deepen poverty, worsen hunger and drive unemployment even higher.
While it is a welcome relief that the proposed VAT hike was ultimately scrapped, its replacement with deep spending cuts is no cause for celebration. Indirect taxes like VAT hit poor households the hardest. But slashing social spending to make up for the cancelled increase is just another blow to families who are already struggling.
Almost half of South Africa's working-age population is unemployed or engaged in precarious, low-paying work. At the same time, one in five children goes to bed hungry each night. Yet the government continues to push ineffective fiscal policies disguised as reform favouring deregulation and the growing privatisation of essential services.
The result is the gradual weakening of public institutions while private companies step in to fill the gaps for profit. This shift undermines the public sector and erodes the principle of universal access to essential services such as water, energy, education and healthcare. These services should be public goods, not business opportunities.
These policy interventions represent a systematic and calculated assault on the livelihoods of poor and working-class individuals. By favouring the interests of the wealthy and prioritising corporate profits, these measures undermine essential support systems and resources that vulnerable communities rely on.
As a result, the economic divide widens, exacerbating the struggles those already marginalised face.
Ironically, there is room to manoeuvre even within the current fiscal framework. The South African Revenue Service has recovered about R95 billion in 2024/25. While this is a positive development, it highlights a deeper issue. There are still billions of rands in tax revenue that go uncollected every year. This is due to widespread tax evasion, insufficient enforcement capacity at SARS, and aggressive tax avoidance by large corporations.
SARS estimates that, based on the improved capacity and efforts to tackle illicit financial flows on the back of the investments being made, it could recover at least R120 billion during the current financial year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MK Party's motion to censure Minister Godongwana fails in Parliament
MK Party's motion to censure Minister Godongwana fails in Parliament

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

MK Party's motion to censure Minister Godongwana fails in Parliament

The MK Party's motion to censure Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana over his alleged mishandling of the Budget garnered just 48 votes in favour, while 250 from other parties opposed the motion. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers Parliament on Tuesday rejected the MK Party's motion to censure Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana over his alleged mishandling of the Budget. This was after MPs voted on the matter following a debate in a mini-plenary that took place last Friday after the party's former chief whip, Mzwanele Manyi, tabled a motion last month. In its draft resolution, the MK Party urged the National Assembly to note with grave concern that Godongwana allegedly mishandled the national Budget process. It stated that the mishandling of the Budget process included the unprecedented postponement of the tabling of the national Budget and the Budget and Fiscal Framework, which contained the regressive and unpopular VAT increase. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ According to the party, Godongwana should have been censured for the mishandling of the Budget process as 'these events collectively demonstrate a failure to uphold the constitutional principles of accountability, public participation, and sound financial management'. As the voting commenced on Tuesday, MK Party's new chief whip Colleen Makhubele asked for the division of the House. This prompted DA chief whip George Michalakis to enquire whether the party that moved the motion could ask for a division if it was backing it. House chairperson Werner Horn said the division of the House was allowed in line with the rules. 'If any four or more members demand the division, division is to be given effective,' Werner said. Announcing the voting results, Werner said the MK Party's motion garnered just 48 votes in favour, while 250 from other parties opposed the motion. 'The question is accordingly not agreed to,' Horn said when announcing the voting results. Only the MK Party with its 46 votes and a vote each from the ATM and United African Transformation backed the motion. The ANC, DA, EFF, IFP, Patriotic Alliance, Freedom Front Plus, ActionSA, ACDP, UDM, Rise Mzansi, and the National Coloured Congress voted against. The Good Party, BOSA, PAC, and Al Jama-ah were not present during the vote.

Eskom commits billions to a cleaner Future
Eskom commits billions to a cleaner Future

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Eskom commits billions to a cleaner Future

Power utility Eskom is stepping up its efforts to reduce pollution, with plans to spend R15.6 billion over the next five years Image: Bhekikhaya Mabaso/Independent Newspapers Power utility Eskom is stepping up its efforts to reduce pollution, with plans to spend R15.6 billion over the next five years on projects to cut harmful emissions from its power stations. Earlier this year IOL reported that Minister of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, Dion George, granted the power utility 'limited emissions exemptions' to eight Eskom coal power plants. George has also previously criticised Eskom for "consistently failing to meet minimum emission standards and delaying crucial energy reforms", pointing out that South Africans have endured rolling blackouts, rising costs, and economic stagnation due to Eskom's inefficiencies. "The government cannot grant Eskom a blanket waiver to continue polluting without accountability," George said at the time. According to the power utility it has already invested over R3 billion in emissions reduction projects, with R15.6 billion allocated over the next five years. "To date, Eskom has invested over R3 billion in emissions reduction projects, with R15.6 billion allocated over the next five years," Eskom said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ "However, achieving Minimum Emission Standards (MES) compliance by 2030 will require ~R257 billion in capital investment and ~R6.3 billion in annual operating costs which will have a significant impact on Eskom and add up to ~10% to the electricity tariff," "Given the current trajectory of future non-compliance, 22GW of capacity is at risk of being shut down due to SO₂ non-compliance post-2030". Eskom also noted significant progress in reducing nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions across its fleet. "While Medupi and Kusile are equipped with low-NOx burners. In 2019, Camden Power Station was successfully retrofitted with this technology. Additionally, Eskom has installed flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) technology at Kusile Power Station to reduce sulphur dioxide (SO₂) emissions and is planning to retrofit the same system at Medupi Power Station". Bheki Nxumalo, Eskom's Group Executive for Generation said the the utility was committed to meeting environmental regulations through continuous monitoring, and transparent reporting. 'We are committed to meeting environmental regulations through continuous monitoring, transparent reporting, and proactive plant upgrades,' Nxumalo said. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Business

Parliament to consider the fiscal framework and revenue proposals for the 2025 budget
Parliament to consider the fiscal framework and revenue proposals for the 2025 budget

Eyewitness News

time4 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Parliament to consider the fiscal framework and revenue proposals for the 2025 budget

CAPE TOWN - Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana will be hoping it's second time lucky on Wednesday, when both houses of Parliament meet in separate sittings to consider the fiscal framework and revenue proposals for the 2025 budget. The framework is the blueprint for how the country plans to raise revenue, spend money and manage the country's debt. The last framework had to be abandoned after ActionSA and Build One SA (BOSA) helped the African National Congress (ANC) get through a vote, while the Democratic Alliance (DA) and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) went to court over the Value-added Tax (VAT) increase it proposed to generate revenue. Exactly three weeks since Godongwana tabled the national budget, he will be hoping the vote in the National Assembly is smoother than on the last occasion in March. However, the two biggest opposition parties - the MK Party and the EFF - can be expected to challenge Godongwana's framework with both parties vehemently opposed to an increase in the fuel levy which already took effect/ On Tuesday the MK party's motion to censure Godongwana for what it termed the mishandling of the budget process, failed. Parliamentary Spokesperson Moloto Mothapo explains what will be required to get the fiscal framework approved. "The fiscal framework is being considered within the stipulated time frame of 16 days since the tabling of the budget. And in terms of voting requirements in the National Assembly, the fiscal framework consideration will require one third of MPs to be present, and the majority of those present must vote in favour of it to pass. [In the National Council of Provinces, at least five provinces must vote in favour for the fiscal framework for it to pass.] Only once the framework has been passed by both houses - will committees then set to work on processing the two money bills that apportion money to all spheres of government, and state departments."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store