
The conservative American talk-show host wiping the floor with liberals
Rival hosts and fellow liberals Jimmy Kimmel and Jon Stewart have defended Stephen Colbert, the host of The Late Show, and accused CBS of a politically motivated decision – Colbert was a leading Trump basher, and CBS is currently the subject of a sale that needs government approval. But a bigger factor is probably the show's woeful ratings, especially when compared with the only successful late-night talk show of the moment, Gutfeld!, which is part of the Right-leaning Fox News schedule.
Hosted by Greg Gutfeld, prank-happy former editor of Maxim in the UK and peripatetic hack-turned-author-turned-TV presenter, Gutfeld! has 3.3 million viewers on cable-only Fox, way ahead of network television's Colbert's 2.42 million, ABC's Jimmy Kimmel with 1.77 million and NBC's Jimmy Fallon with 1.19 million.
It's true that Gutfeld's show is on earlier than the others, starting at 10pm, and it also lacks the traditional late-night talk show's younger audience, attracting just 365,000 viewers under the age of 54, but it's also the one talk show not at war with Donald Trump. Indeed, it's the one late-night talk show to host the president while he was still a candidate back in September 2024.
Trump's talk-show appearance
Trump was in a surprisingly focussed mood and talked about his two assassination attempts, other talk-show hosts, Kamala Harris and how great it is that he had Elon Musk on the team. Gutfeld's ratings soared to 4.9 million.
The show's format isn't quite like its traditional late-night rivals. Gutfeld doesn't sit behind a desk; instead there are five people trading quips as they sit in a semi-circle. He has no band but two co-hosts – Kat Timpf, a bisexual libertarian journalist and comedian, and Tyrus, aka George Murdoch, a mixed-race former wrestler who doesn't vote in elections.
Gutfeld, 60, describes himself as libertarian, saying he became a conservative by hanging around liberals, and a libertarian by hanging around conservatives. 'The worst part of each of them is the moralising,' he explained in 2009.
And Gutfeld's public morality is incredibly flexible. He was in the news this week for urging conservatives to reclaim the n-word. By which he meant Nazi. He was tired of liberals calling Republicans Nazis so 'we need to learn from the blacks', Gutfeld said on his other Fox show The Five. 'The way they were able to remove the power from the n-word by using it. So, from now on, it's 'What up, my Nazi? Hey, what up, my Nazi? Hey, what's hanging, my Nazi?''
The lad mag scene
This doesn't come out of nowhere. In fact, it might come from the UK's lad mag scene of the early 2000s. After graduating with an English degree from Berkley he worked in US fitness magazines Prevention and Men's Health. He was then fired and British publisher Felix Dennis hired him to edit his gadget mag Stuff. Then 38, he made his name when invited to address a seminar of the American Society of Magazine Editors addressing the topic 'what gives a magazine buzz?'
His first thought, he told the New York Times, was that 'if you need to go to that seminar, you're hopeless.'' His second thought, he said, was dwarfs. So he hired three for the day, gave them cellphones and bags of potato chips and sent them in to disrupt the session by munching loudly and taking calls. This began a three-year campaign to annoy, harass, mock and traumatise editors of rival men's magazines with a self-drawn cartoon the Stuff Summary, but also, from time to time, his bosses.
'I could never quite work that out,' one British journalist who knew him in New York muses. 'We hung out a bit while I was out there and I always got on well with him. He just seemed really nice.'
His misbehaviour earned him promotion and he headed for the UK to take over Maxim. 'We needed to develop a point of difference from the rest of the men's market,' said Bruce Sandell, group publishing director at Dennis at the time. 'Greg is a very creative bloke, someone who understand the men's market and is a bit of a maverick.'
And Sandell was proved right. For most British journalists who worked in men's mags at the time, there were two Gutfelds – the 'mild-mannered pleasant enough character, I had a couple of drinks with him and we were all at a dinner once,' one former editor recalls. and then the Maxim Monster who he ran a calendar of 'heroic' women in the December 2004 issue – Margaret Thatcher, Princess Diana, Mother Teresa etc – all substituted by nude models in poses meant to bring their famed counterparts to mind. Diana, for instance, was outfitted with a landmine detector and nothing else. He ran 'Fresh Off the Boat,' a pro-immigration regular showing recently arrived young women in their pants.
He also tried to stoke a feud with Dylan Jones, then-editor of upmarket GQ. Gutfeld ran a contest in which readers who found a tiny picture of male genitalia in the magazine were given a number to call that turned out to be Jones's direct line. He also printed Jones's photo in Maxim's worst dressed column. 'I'm not sure Dylan noticed,' one ex-GQ staffer says. 'Certainly no Maxim readers called, and we didn't see the picture. No one read Maxim.'
'He was doing his best to pick fights,' says another upmarket British men's mag editor recalls, 'but it's not that kind of culture over here, I think. His 'pretend to slag off my rivals' schtick is much more suited to America. I guess he didn't twig that taking the p--- out of each other is, for the British, almost a sign of affection.'
Climbing up the ratings
Whilst working in London he met and married Elena Moussa, the picture editor of the Russian version of Maxim – the couple had daughter Mira in December last year – but despite his best efforts Maxim's circulation fell below 200,000 copies a month and his contract was not renewed.
He spent time writing a column for the Huffington Post until Fox hired him to host Red Eye in 2007 – a sort of proto-Gutfeld but with a broader assault strategy, attacking Right, Left and centre. Whilst there he was forced to apologise to the Canadian army for mocking them days after Canadian troops were killed fighting in Afghanistan.
He was given his own show in 2015, the Greg Gutfeld Show, which moved to the Right and gradually clambered up the ratings, boosted by the coast-to-coast time difference that meant it aired at 8pm on the West Coast. Finally, in 2023, he was given the 10pm slot where his more outré behaviour limits his guests.
'If I had Ryan Reynolds or somebody sitting there and we're doing a segment on trans and sports, do you think he's going to tell me what he thinks? F--- no. He's going to be looking for his publicist: 'You said we were promoting a movie. You didn't tell me they were going to ask me about this,'' he told Variety.
It's also reined in a little by Fox's surprisingly tight rules on things like the use of the word 'a--h---' – he was briefly taken off air for using it. As his star rises, so has his salary – he's earning $9m a year, roughly half of what Fallon, Kimmel and Colbert earn.
But as he delighted in pointing out this week, his job is safe. In fact, it seems likely that Gutfeld may end up being the last late night guy standing while all the competition spins out, blaming Trump. And he seems all too aware of this possibility.
'Firing Stephen Colbert, who was paid $20 million a year while his show lost $50 million, wasn't due to economics, it was fascism,' he gloated in his opening Monday monologue. 'Democrats never get that the free market means exactly that – free to fire someone who's stinking up a market. Hell, his desk cost more than my whole staff. And we still keep beating them in the ratings.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Higher US tariffs part of the price Europe was willing to pay for its security and arms for Ukraine
France's prime minister described it as a 'dark day' for the European Union, a 'submission' to U.S. tariff demands. Commentators said EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen's handshake with President Donald Trump amounted to capitulation. The trouble is, Europe depends mightily on the United States, and not just for trade. Mirroring Trump, Von der Leyen gushed that the arrangement she endorsed over the weekend to set U.S. tariff levels on most European exports to 15%, which is 10% higher than currently, was 'huge.' Her staff texted reporters insisting that the pact, which starts to enter force on Friday, is the 'biggest trade deal ever.' A month after NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte ingratiated himself with Trump by referring to him as 'daddy,' the Europeans had again conceded that swallowing the costs and praising an unpredictable president is more palatable than losing America. 'It's not only about the trade. It's about security. It's about Ukraine. It's about current geopolitical volatility. I cannot go into all the details,' EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič told reporters Monday. 'I can assure you it was not only about the trade,' he insisted, a day after 'the deal' was sealed in an hour-long meeting once Trump finished playing a round of golf with his son at the course he owns in Scotland. The state of Europe's security dependency Indeed, Europe depends on the U.S. for its security and that security is anything but a game, especially since Russia invaded Ukraine. U.S. allies are convinced that, should he win, President Vladimir Putin is likely to take aim at one of them next. So high are these fears that European countries are buying U.S. weapons to help Ukraine to defend itself. Some are prepared to send their own air defense systems and replace them with U.S. equipment, once it can be delivered. 'We're going to be sending now military equipment and other equipment to NATO, and they'll be doing what they want, but I guess it's for the most part working with Ukraine,' Trump said Sunday, sounding ambivalent about America's role in the alliance. The Europeans also are wary about a U.S. troop drawdown, which the Pentagon is expected to announce by October. Around 84,000 U.S. personnel are based in Europe, and they guarantee NATO's deterrent effect against an adversary like Russia. At the same time, Trump is slapping duties on America's own NATO partners, ostensibly due to concerns about U.S. security interests, using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, a logic that seems absurd from across the Atlantic. Weaning Europe off foreign suppliers 'The EU is in a difficult situation because we're very dependent on the U.S. for security,' said Niclas Poitiers at the Bruegel research institution in Brussels. 'Ukraine is a very big part of that, but also generally our defense is underwritten by NATO.' 'I think there was not a big willingness to pick a major fight, which is the one (the EU) might have needed with the U.S.' to better position itself on trade, Poitiers told The Associated Press about key reasons for von der Leyen to accept the tariff demands. Part of the agreement involves a commitment to buy American oil and gas. Over the course of the Russia-Ukraine war, now in its fourth year, most of the EU has slashed its dependence on unreliable energy supplies from Russia, but Hungary and Slovakia still have not. 'Purchases of U.S. energy products will diversify our sources of supply and contribute to Europe's energy security. We will replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of U.S. LNG, oil and nuclear fuels,' von der Leyen said in Scotland on Sunday. In essence, as Europe slowly weans itself off Russian energy it is also struggling to end its reliance on the United States for its security. The Trump administration has warned its priorities now lie elsewhere, in Asia, the Middle East and on its own borders. That was why European allies agreed at NATO's summit last month to spend hundreds of billions of dollars more on defense over the next decade. Primarily for their own security, but also to keep America among their ranks. The diplomacy involved was not always elegant. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' Rutte wrote in a private text message to Trump, which the U.S. leader promptly posted on social media. Rutte brushed off questions about potential embarrassment or concern that Trump had aired it, saying: 'I have absolutely no trouble or problem with that because there's nothing in it which had to stay secret.' A price Europe feels it must pay Von der Leyen did not appear obsequious in her meeting with Trump. She often stared at the floor or smiled politely. She did not rebut Trump when he said that only America is sending aid to Gaza. The EU is world's biggest supplier of aid to the Palestinians. With Trump's threat of 30% tariffs hanging over European exports — whether real or brinksmanship is hard to say — and facing the prospect of a full-blown trade dispute while Europe's biggest war in decades rages, 15% may have been a cheap price to pay. 'In terms of the economic impact on the EU economy itself, it will be negative,' Poitiers said. 'But it's not something that is on a comparable magnitude like the energy crisis after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, or even COVID.' 'This is a negative shock for our economy, but it is something that's very manageable,' he said. It remains an open question as to how long this entente will last. ___


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
CNN fact-checks Trump's Beyoncé $11 million payment claim
A CNN fact check poured cold water on President Donald Trump's claim that Kamala Harris' campaign paid megastar Beyoncé $11 million for an endorsement. The famous singer endorsed Harris at a campaign rally in Houston just weeks before the election last November in a last-minute bid to jolt support for the Democratic nominee. Trump has alleged that Harris's political team illegally paid for the support, and that they should be prosecuted for it. 'I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats, after the presidential e lection , and the fact that they admit to paying, probably illegally, eleven million dollars to singer Beyoncé for an endorsement (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!)' Trump wrote on Saturday. The Truth Social post also alleged that Oprah Winfrey was paid $3 million for 'expenses' and MSNBC's Al Sharpton was given $600,000. 'These ridiculous fees were incorrectly stated in the books and records,' Trump claimed. 'You are not allowed to pay for an endorsement. It is totally illegal to do so. Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them. All hell would break out! Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, broke the law. They should all be prosecuted!' However, an article from CNN's fact checker Daniel Dale asserted that Trump's allegation was baseless. Evidence of the $11 million payment has not been reported. The White House did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for evidence of the multi-million dollar payment. Harris' campaign has denied paying for endorsements and Beyoncé's mother, Tina Knowles, has called the allegations a 'lie.' 'Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris' (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote on her Instagram. According to an Federal Election Commission (FEC) filing , Harris' campaign payed the signer's production company, Parkwood Production Media, $165,000 for 'campaign event production.' Additionally, a spokesperson for Harris' campaign said last year that the political operation did not pay for celebrity endorsements, but they did concede that they had to cover costs associated with the production, like staff and equipment. Another denial came when a spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact last year that the claim the singer was paid millions was 'beyond ridiculous.' Harris' campaign paid a non-profit led by Sharpton a total of $500,000, FEC filings show. The Democrat's political operation also paid Harpo Productions, a company owned by Oprah, $1 million for a live stream event. Trump last spoke about the alleged endorsement payment in February. 'They go out and they pay Beyoncé, as an example. Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million,' the president said at the time. In a May post on Truth Social the president again slammed the alleged payment to Beyoncé while also suggesting that Bruce Springsteen accepted money for his performance at a Harris rally.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Hollywood nepo baby is the spitting image of her heartthrob dad... but do you know who she is?
She's the daughter of one of Hollywood's most famous heartthrobs, and fans can't get over just how much she looks like him. Ella Bleu Travolta, 25, is the only daughter of Grease and Pulp Fiction star John Travolta, and her resemblance to her famous father has only grown more striking with age. From her piercing blue eyes to that signature Travolta smile, Ella is the spitting image of John during his leading man heyday. But Ella isn't just another celebrity nepo child riding on her parents' fame. She's carving out a career of her own in music, film and fashion. Born in April 2000 to John and the late actress Kelly Preston, Ella grew up in the spotlight alongside older brother Jett and younger brother Benjamin. Tragically, Jett passed away in 2009 following a seizure during a family holiday in the Bahamas. Ella started acting when she was just a kid, and she made her big screen debut in 2009's Old Dogs, starring opposite both her parents. She later appeared in The Poison Rose in 2019 and recently wrapped filming Get Lost, a modern-day reimagining of Alice in Wonderland. However, it's music where she seems to have really found her niche. In 2022, she released her debut single Dizzy, followed by tracks No Thank You and Little Bird. The latter song is a moving tribute to her mother, who passed away in 2020 after battling breast cancer. 'Little Bird is about holding onto those pure relationships that you have with people that you lost and really just listening to yourself and staying true to that relationship with that person,' Ella told People. 'It's sort of the viewpoint of a mama bird talking to a baby bird and just not letting any other interference get in between it, because your true instincts were there all along.' She continued: 'It had been a couple years, obviously, since my mom's passing, so I could look at the whole situation and take a step back from it and see what I wanted to communicate on it and what I wanted to communicate to her and what I was feeling in general.' She's also made waves in the fashion world, landing the cover of Hunger Magazine in 2024, wearing a vintage Chanel look previously worn by Taylor Swift at a Kansas City Chiefs game, per Page Six. Since then, Ella has been spotted in front rows at fashion week in Madrid and Milan, appearing alongside European royalty like Princess Diana's niece, Lady Kitty Spencer, and Princess Alexandra of Hanover, per Hola. Ella remains close with her dad as John often shares sweet birthday tributes and throwback videos with her on social media. In a recent birthday post, he called his daughter 'gracious, generous, funny, beautiful, kind, and deeply talented.' The actor also loves to celebrate Ella's accomplishments and often posts about her magazine covers and song releases.