logo
Are Authoritarian Regimes Backtracking Women's Rights?

Are Authoritarian Regimes Backtracking Women's Rights?

Politico14-03-2025

Presented by
Happy Friday! New York City is abuzz this week, as women's rights leaders from all over the world gather at the United Nations. I'm thrilled to have chatted with some of the stars of the conference for this week's edition.
Women's rights are declining all over the world — and the global rise of authoritarian regimes may be to blame, according to a new report from the United Nations.
This week, the U.N. kicked off the 69th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women — its second biggest meeting after the opening of the General Assembly.
The aim of the commission: to address the barriers to gender equality that women face around the globe.
This year's CSW marks the 30th anniversary of the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, a policy blueprint for advancing women's rights, such as access to education and health services and protection against violence.
The March 6 report from U.N. Women released ahead of the conference found that progress on women's rights is on a downward trend around the world. In 2024, nearly a quarter of governments worldwide reported a backlash on women's rights.
'We are witnessing the mainstreaming of chauvinism and misogyny,' U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said in a statement. 'As we see in every corner of the world, from pushback to rollback, women's rights are under attack.'
The report tracked data from member countries' five-year national-level reviews of progress and challenges, and 30-year reviews of reports from Africa, Asia and the Pacific, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean and Western Asia. It found that around the world, there was a 'disturbing 50 percent increase in the number of women and girls living in conflict, and women's rights defenders confront daily harassment, personal attacks and even death.'
Laura Turquet, Deputy Chief of the Research and Data section at U.N. Women, tells Women Rule 'we've seen important progress, but it's not going fast enough and it's actually stalling.'
And the rise in authoritarian and populist governments across the world could be what is impeding progress, Turquet says. 'We've seen the rise of very authoritarian governments … a lot of countries are experiencing backsliding when it comes to free and fair elections, to freedom of the press, even the ability of women and civil society organizations to speak out and participate in policy.'
That democratic erosion, she says, 'has gone hand in hand with organized resistance to advances on women's rights.'
As Turquet sees it, increasing inequality, wage disparities and traumatic world events like the Covid-19 pandemic have created an environment enabling authoritarian governments to push for a return to tradition, particularly the idea of a traditional family. Authoritarian leaders often suggest that 'we need to kind of go back to an imagined past where things were simpler and easier, where men and women had more defined roles,' she says, and this push for the traditional family contributes to limiting women's rights.
'When you take a closer look at what the traditional family is … we're talking about a biological male husband who is married with a biological female wife and as many kids as they can possibly have,' Rosalyn Park, director of The Advocates for Human Rights' Women's Human Rights Program, says.
That idea 'really goes to the heart of attacking sexual reproductive rights, family planning, contraception, abortion, all those kinds of things, in the interests of preserving and maintaining the family unit.'
According to Park, this preservation of the family unit has played out in other countries. 'We've seen countries that decriminalized domestic violence, for example, like Russia, because they want to keep the family together at the expense of women's safety.'
'This also lets them push for a revival of stereotypical roles by positioning women first and foremost in the home as homemakers, caretakers … And then men remain as the breadwinners,' Park continues.
One example of the global regression of women's rights: the recent backlash against the Istanbul Convention, a European human rights treaty opposing violence against women and domestic violence. It was initially successful and signed by 34 countries in 2019, but in 2021, Turkey — whose largest city gave the treaty its name and who was the first to ratify it — withdrew from the agreement. Other countries like Poland have also considered withdrawing from it, citing concerns about the agreement promoting harmful gender ideology and threatening the traditional family.
Women's rights have 'become very caught up in this idea of gender ideology, this idea that gender is not about women and men and equality, but that it's … a radical agenda that is almost entirely about LGBT rights,' Turquet explains. As a result, she says, we are seeing 'a backlash on something as basic as protecting women from the violence that they are facing in their everyday lives.'
Similar concerns about gender ideology have popped up in the United States, as exemplified by one of President Donald Trump's first executive orders, 'Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.'
Trump's order argues that gender ideology 'replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa.'
In closed-door meetings at CSW, the U.S. proposed weakening or removing provisions that encourage states and U.N. entities to expand the role of women in peacekeeping and diplomacy, according to a Devex report.
Meanwhile, at the CSW on Friday, Jonathan Shrier, acting U.S. representative to the U.N. Economic and Social Council, reinforced Trump's message.
'The United States government will no longer promote radical ideologies that replace women with men in spaces and opportunities designed for women, nor will it devastate families by indoctrinating our sons and daughters to begin wars with their own bodies or each other,' he said.
'In rejoining the Geneva consensus declaration, we have shown our commitment to women's health, the protection of life at all stages, and the defense of the family as the fundamental unit of society.'
POLITICO Special Report
Top Illinois Democrat Readies a Senate Bid — And Tells People She Has Major Backing by Ally Mutnick and Shia Kapos for POLITICO: 'Juliana Stratton, who first took office in 2019, is quietly positioning herself for a Senate bid if Durbin bows out, calling key Democratic figures to ask for support, according to three people with knowledge of her plans, one of whom spoke with her directly and the other two who spoke with members of her team. And she and her staff have said that she's already secured the support of Gov. JB Pritzker, the three people said.'
Klobuchar Hits Trump on Tariffs: You Can't Be 'Just Declaring Yourself a King' by Jordan Wolman for POLITICO: 'Klobuchar, speaking at POLITICO Playbook's First 100 Days breakfast series, said Trump should be working through trade issues in the context of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, 'not by just declaring yourself a king.' 'The way to negotiate this is in the USMCA,' she said.'
Sen. Tina Smith: DOGE Efforts at USDA Are 'Completely Wrong' by Grace Yarrow and Samuel Benson for POLITICO: 'Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) slammed the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency's efforts to slash spending and cut staff at the Agriculture Department on Thursday. 'I think what they're doing is completely wrong,' Smith said at POLITICO Playbook's First 100 Days breakfast series. 'I think it runs counter to the intentions of Congress and what we have passed,' Smith added. 'Honestly, I don't really believe that Elon Musk or the DOGE guys that are in there really have any idea, what they're doing, or what the impact is of the decisions that they're making.''
Number of the Week
Read more here.
MUST READS
Teenagers Say Girls Are Equal to Boys in School, or Are Ahead by Claire Cain Miller for The New York Times: 'More than half of teenagers say that boys and girls are now mostly equal in school. And significant shares say that girls have advantages over boys — that they get better grades, have more leadership roles and speak up more in class, according to a Pew Research Center survey of teens nationwide published Thursday. Boys are more likely to be disruptive, get into fights or have problems with drugs or alcohol, the teenagers said. And strikingly, boys said they're much less likely to be college-bound: 46 percent of boys said they planned to attend a four-year college, compared with 60 percent of girls.'
Why We Need More Women Leaders in Politics for the Future of Work by Katica Roy for the World Economic Forum: 'When women hold political power, economies grow. A 10 percentage point increase in women's parliamentary representation is associated with a 0.7 percentage point increase in GDP growth. Countries with greater female political representation consistently implement policies that support gender-equal labour markets, such as paid family leave, pay transparency and childcare infrastructure. These policies don't just benefit women; they increase workforce participation, boost productivity and fuel economic expansion.
'Two Transgender Girls, Six Federal Agencies. How Trump Is Trying to Pressure Maine Into Obedience by Callie Ferguson and Erin Rhoda, Bangor Daily News, and Jennifer Smith Richards and Jodi S. Cohen for ProPublica: 'On a Monday last month, after a conservative Maine legislator expressed outrage on Facebook about a transgender girl winning a high school pole vaulting event, the hammer of the federal government began to swing. By Friday of that week, Feb. 21, President Donald Trump singled out Maine's governor during a White House event and threatened to cut off the state's federal funding. 'See you in court,' Gov. Janet Mills shot back. Then came a barrage of investigations and threats: The U.S. Department of Education opened inquiries into the Maine Department of Education and the student's school district, alleging they had violated federal civil rights law.'
Quote of the Week
Read more here.
on the move
Aviva Aron-Dine will join the Brookings economic studies program as a senior fellow and director of the Hamilton Project. She most recently was acting assistant secretary for tax policy at the Treasury Department. (h/t POLITICO Playbook)
Hailey Miller is now director of government relations and public policy for the Digital Power Network, an affiliate of the Chamber of Digital Commerce. She was previously a vice president at 1607 Strategies and is an FTI Consulting and Ted Cruz alum. (h/t POLITICO Influence)
Rachel Millard is now director of corporate reputation and public affairs at EY (Americas). She previously was an SVP at Edelman Smithfield. (h/t POLITICO Playbook)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

$38,000 Fines Waived for Ontario Amish Families Convicted for Not Using ArriveCan App
$38,000 Fines Waived for Ontario Amish Families Convicted for Not Using ArriveCan App

Epoch Times

time3 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

$38,000 Fines Waived for Ontario Amish Families Convicted for Not Using ArriveCan App

Over $38,000 in fines have been waived and convictions set aside for a group of people from an Ontario Amish community who were convicted for not using the ArriveCan app during COVID-19 lockdowns. Lawyers with The Democracy Fund (TDF) won the case after seven months of negotiations and multiple court appearances on behalf of the group known to avoid modern technology due to their faith.

Andrew Giuliani has a new job. It's a high stakes position in a global arena.
Andrew Giuliani has a new job. It's a high stakes position in a global arena.

Politico

time3 hours ago

  • Politico

Andrew Giuliani has a new job. It's a high stakes position in a global arena.

Mounting the world's largest sporting event is never easy. But the task of planning the FIFA World Cup in the United States next summer has grown more complicated by President Donald Trump's border crackdown and contentious relationship with co-hosts Canada and Mexico. The job of coordinating the federal government's role has fallen to Andrew Giuliani, the son of former New York City Mayor and one-time Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani. As a special assistant to the president, Andrew Giuliani served as a sports liaison during the first Trump administration and helped facilitate the reopening of U.S. professional sports leagues following the COVID-19 shutdown. But as head of the White House's FIFA World Cup 2026 Task Force, Andrew Giuliani — who returned to the Trump administration after a failed bid to be New York's governor in 2022 — now has a much larger challenge. Immediately ahead of him is the Club World Cup, another FIFA-run tournament that will kick off next weekend and which soccer's international governing body is using as a test run for the much larger, more logistically complicated World Cup. It will be followed by other high-profile sporting competitions on American soil, including the summer Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028 and the FIFA Women's World Cup in 2031, which Mexico will also co-host. 'If these are safe and secure games,' the 39-year-old former pro golfer said in an interview this week, 'then they're going to be successful games.' But even straightforward logistical questions that Giuliani faces, like how to expedite visa applications for players, fans and media, are fraught with geopolitical complexity: the first non-host country to qualify a team for next summer's tournament is Iran. (The transcript has been edited for length and clarity.) What do you say to those abroad wondering if they can or should travel to the United States given what they see from the administration's border policy? I would simply say: You're welcome here. If you apply early for your visa, if you qualify, then we want to have you here for the World Cup. President Trump has made it very clear that if you're going to come here to celebrate a great event like the World Cup, or America 250, we want you to come. If you're going to come here to cause trouble, then you're not welcome here. What I can tell you is we're going to be working hard on the back end to make sure that you have the opportunity to enjoy these games in person. What does that entail? The State Department has already seen a major reduction in times at some of these countries that were considered problem countries at the end of the Biden presidency. So I think you're going to see a real reduction in visa times. While we're not going to sacrifice our national security, we're going to make sure that the State Department has the resources that they need to process the visas to make the World Cup truly great from an American perspective — an America welcoming-the-world perspective. That language seems hard to reconcile with what this administration is actually doing immigration and trade. In my understanding of it, the President's America First mentality has never been America Only. So what exactly is the role of the FIFA World Cup 2026 Task Force? First and foremost, we're not recreating any federal agency. You look at our task force members, and whether it's the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, Treasury, Commerce, FBI, DOJ, whoever it may be, we're not recreating their department here. What we're doing — to use a different football reference — is we're going to be lead blockers for them to make sure that we end up allowing them to coordinate to the point where we can maximize their strengths and to make sure we're efficient in getting through many of the roadblocks that exist in government. This task force should have been started three years ago, and we're playing catch-up. And that's right, there's a whole lot of work between now and really the Club World Cup, which was written into the executive order as a responsibility, but certainly with the World Cup in 2026, as well. Why do you think you were picked to run it? In 2020 a couple weeks into the shutdown — as we were getting into the great reopening of America — the President wanted to make sure that we could get our sports leagues open. And he tasked me, along with White House counsel and the State Department, to create a system to get our athletes and personnel in. And we were able to get nearly 15,000 athletes and support staff in at a time when it was very difficult. This will be more like 350,000 credentialed personnel — and you have ticket holders, and then we have potential fans here. But I can tell you already, we've set up a working group between FIFA, the State Department and the White House task force that works daily on recent issues for this Club World Cup. Soccer is known for its notoriously rowdy and sometimes violent fans. The last European final, in 2021, was marred by hundreds of ticketless fans storming Wembley Stadium in London. What can you do to prepare for that scenario? I'll give you a more recent example — 2024 in Copa América in Miami. This was a week after [the attempted assassination of Trump in] Butler. It was right at the end of the Republican convention. You had ticketless fans that basically stormed the gates at Hard Rock Stadium, and it took everything to get them off the field. So there have been security breakdowns as recently as last year. That's why for us, the focus is on making these games as safe and secure as humanly possible. That's where we've been focusing our energy. We've put together working groups with DHS, DOD, with our state and local partners. Already, we've done security briefs with nine of the 11 host cities for the Club World Cup games — we're going to be scheduling those other two — to look at their external security posture, their pitch protection, where we're looking at the pyrotechnics, and trying to make sure that the laws are enforced here. Are you prepared for the Club World Cup this year from a security standpoint? There is a different security posture with the Club World Cup versus the World Cup. For the Club World Cup — SEAR (Special Event Assessment Rating) level three and four events — there is no federal coordination team, the responsibility is on the state and locals and on the security of the stadiums for that. With that being said, we still are looking at the security posture, trying to see if there are holes that we can plug, of which we've done a few already and which we're continuing to do. Next year, that is when you will have the SEAR level one and level two events where you'll have federal coordination teams. Perimeters will be pushed out. You'll see some of that being tested already, which FIFA and some of the stadiums have agreed to for the Club World Cup. There will likely be fans crossing the U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada to see matches. Are you coordinating with law enforcement in those countries? We're going to get to that with Canada and Mexico. We had some engagement with them, as well. I think right now my five meter target, if you will, is the Club World Cup, making sure those go off safely and securely. Then I think we start to look kind of more at our engagements with Canada and Mexico after the Club World Cup ends in the middle of July, The 11 American cities that will host matches are counting on federal money to support their security needs around next year's tournament. There's $600 million for that in the reconciliation bill. Are you concerned about whether that money will reach host cities in time? Look, anybody who has a fiscal ask wants their money yesterday, right? I certainly think it works fine. The only other time the United States hosted the men's tournament was in 1994. Do you have any memory of that? I remember going with my father and mother. I think it was my father's first year in office. I remember how hot it was. America is my team, but being part Italian, my second team is Italy, and I got the opportunity to go to an Italy-Ireland game in which Ireland upset Italy. It was a big thing in New York, as you can imagine, with so many Italian and Irish Americans that live in the greater New York area. So that was an incredible moment. And I remember going to the semifinal game where Italy ended up winning and advancing to the final. Obviously the U.S. had an amazing run to get to the knockout stage, which really put U.S. soccer on the map and was the start of the creation of Major League Soccer. And then obviously the women winning in 1999 — the first opportunity here for U.S. soccer to take off. And that's how I kind of look at 2026 and 2031 here — as that next opportunity to launch U.S. soccer even further globally.

Bobby Harrison: MS revenue is anemic even before new tax cut takes effect
Bobby Harrison: MS revenue is anemic even before new tax cut takes effect

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bobby Harrison: MS revenue is anemic even before new tax cut takes effect

It should not be a surprise that what was touted as the largest tax cut in state history might be resulting in less revenue to fund Mississippi's vital services such as education, law enforcement and health care. Perhaps a bit of clarification is needed. In recent years, three separate tax cuts have been touted by leaders as 'the largest tax cut in state history': a $416 million tax cut in 2016 and a $525 million tax cut in 2022. But neither is no longer the state's largest tax cut. That was passed earlier this year during the 2025 legislative session. The 2025 tax cut has not yet gone into effect. So, in other words, three times in less than a decade, legislators have passed 'the largest tax cut in state history.' Mississippi's current anemic revenue collections can be attributed to one of three things: an economic slowdown, those major tax cuts, or a combination of the two. The economic slowdown seems logical. After all, billions of federal dollars flowing into the state as part of COVID-19 pandemic relief are drying up. Then there is the issue of the tax cuts. In the 2016 session, the Legislature approved a tax cut for corporations and on personal income totaling $416 million in 2016 dollars. The portion of that tax cut currently being phased out is for corporations. The 2022 tax cut, though, was all on personal income. Based on the May 2025 revenue report released by the staff of the Legislative Budget Committee, corporate taxes for the current fiscal year are down a staggering $237.5 million or 29% with one month left in the fiscal year. No doubt, there are other factors contributing to such a large decrease, but it is safe to assume the reduction in the corporate tax passed in 2016 is a contributing factor. Despite the income tax cut also being phased in, income tax collections are up slightly this year: $34 million or 1.7%. But do not get too excited. Over the prior two years, income tax collections dropped by $253 million. In fiscal year 2023, the income tax accounted for 35% of general fund revenue compared to 28% for the last fiscal year. The goal of legislative leaders and of Gov. Tate Reeves is to eliminate the income tax, and that most likely will occur by 2040 under the massive tax cut passed earlier this year. Meanwhile, buoyed by the drop in the corporate tax, it is likely that the state will end the fiscal year on June 30 collecting less revenue than it did the previous year for only the sixth time since 1970. Revenue collections normally go up just as in most years there is inflation instead of deflation. Inflation drives higher tax collections. Overall, through 11 months of the fiscal year, revenue collections are down $78.7 million or 1.1%. There is a chance that decrease could be offset in the month of June, but it is not likely. Even if it is offset, it cannot be disputed that revenue is slowing. The last fiscal year and this fiscal year, the collections have been bolstered by interest earnings on the state's deposits. For the current fiscal year, the state is collecting $20 million or 15.8% more in interest earnings than it did the previous year. And that is saying something since in the previous year the state collected $68.7 million or 84.4% more than it did the year before that. Proponents have argued that the tax cuts would spur the economy and result in higher revenue collections in other areas such as on the sales tax. But there is not clear evidence of that occurring. Despite what seems like many flashing warning signs, lawmakers who supported the massive 2025 tax cut would tell you there is nothing to see here, no need to be concerned. Lawmakers and Reeves like to point out that the state has more than $1 billion in reserves. They cite those funds and say, of course, we have the money to eliminate more than one-third of the state revenue stream. But they have consistently discounted the billions in federal funds that have poured into the state because of the pandemic. Those funds, which are no longer available, helped build that surplus they dwell on. Because of that surplus, the state in the short term can absorb any lost revenue from the tax cuts. And, incidentally, Reeves can go on national television and brag about 'eliminating' the income tax. But the question is what will be the impact of the tax cuts in 10 years when Reeves and most of the legislators responsible for the tax cut have retired from public services and are drawing their state retirement benefits? Will they still be bragging about passing the state's largest tax cuts three times? This column was produced by Mississippi Today, a nonprofit news organization that covers state government, public policy, politics and culture. Bobby Harrison is the editor of Mississippi Today Ideas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store