Think Nvidia Stock Is Expensive? These 3 Charts Might Change Your Mind.
Nvidia's valuation looks excessive by some metrics.
The chipmaker's shares are cheaper than they appear.
10 stocks we like better than Nvidia ›
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) remains one of the best artificial intelligence (AI) stocks on the market. But with the chipmaker now trading at a price-to-sales multiple of 26.4, many investors may wonder if shares have gotten too expensive to buy. Don't be fooled: Nvidia stock is still reasonably priced.
Nvidia stock isn't as expensive as it seems
Nvidia designs graphics processing units (GPUs) that provide the processing power required to support modern AI and machine-learning software. The company's gross margins are around 60% -- nearly twice those of competitors like Intel -- a reflection of how superior its cutting-edge chips are compared to the offerings of rivals. Nvidia can simply charge more for its products due largely to their performance superiority, as well as the value of its widely used software platform, which makes it easier for developers to program chips for specific tasks.
Nvidia's hardware is essentially powering the AI revolution: Most analysts believe it has an 85% to 90% market share in AI accelerator chips right now. Because AI infrastructure spending is expected to grow by more than 30% annually through 2033, Nvidia has the potential to grow its sales base aggressively over at least the next decade, and likely beyond.
Due to investors' optimism about all of this, its shares trade at a pricey 26.4 times sales. But when you measure the stock against the company's profits and bottom-line outlook, the valuation picture improves considerably.
Data by YCharts.
Nvidia shares currently trade at roughly 51 times earnings. That's still quite a premium. But because earnings are growing so fast, shares trade at just 36.9 times next year's earnings. If it can maintain its high gross margins, the stock's valuation could continue to improve dramatically year after year due to its rapid sales growth. Compared to a competitor like Intel, which lost money in each of the last three quarters, Nvidia's valuation looks quite reasonable.
To be sure, shares aren't cheap, and the stock just hit the $4 trillion market cap threshold. But for patient investors willing to pay an up-front premium, they could still prove profitable.
Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now?
Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $687,764!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $980,723!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to179%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Military pay raise a big boost for lower ranks, officials say
Social Sharing The federal government's pay increase for members of the Canadian military will provide some much-needed support for the lowest-ranking positions who are struggling in the face of rising costs of living, according to senior military officials. Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a $2 billion-per-year graduated series of salary top-ups and incentives on Friday. "The biggest increases should make a difference for our lower-ranked members and those are the ones that, at this time, seem to be hardest hit by the economy," Royal Canadian Air Force Lt.-Gen. Jamie Speiser-Blanchet told reporters at an event in Halifax on Saturday. The changes will see the lowest ranks of the regular force, like privates, ordinary sailors and aviators, receive a 20 per cent pay increase. Speiser-Blanchet said some members of the military are struggling to make ends meet, just like many Canadians, and this investment will make their lives a lot easier. The increases in pay and benefits will also help with recruitment and retention, said Canadian Royal Navy Vice-Admiral Angus Topshee. A $10,000 bonus is available for recruits in high-demand trades to complete basic training, an additional $20,000 when their training is completed and another $20,000 once they have completed their first term of service. Members and their families sacrifice a lot while serving their country so added incentives to sign up are welcome news, Topshee said. "We ask people to move their families across the country, often multiple times." he said. "There is no overtime in the military. There is no weekend. If we need you to work, you work." Pay raise 'long overdue': Defence minister The last comprehensive overhaul of the military's pay and benefits system happened in 1998, according to senior defence officials. "We're very proud to be able to provide the kind of pay package that our armed forces members deserve," David McGuinty, minister of national defence, said in Halifax on Saturday. "It's long overdue." Many low-ranking military members have struggled due to the cost of living since the pandemic, according to VETS Canada, a Halifax-based charity that supports members. Deb Lowther, the organization's CEO, said she was pleased with Friday's announcement as the organization sees more and more serving members "coming to us in crisis." She said she would like Ottawa to turn its focus to providing more help for members leaving the military and trying to transition back into civilian life. McGuinty told reporters on Saturday that the federal government has heard those concerns and will continue to look at ways to improve support for current and former members. "I think we'll have more to say about this in due course," he said.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
3 Reasons to Buy Carnival Stock Like There's No Tomorrow
Key Points Carnival's revenue continues to reach record levels, with the business benefiting from strong demand for cruise travel. Rising profits have helped the management team reduce the company's debt burden. Even though the stock has rocketed higher, investors will be drawn to the current valuation. 10 stocks we like better than Carnival Corp. › Carnival (NYSE: CCL) continues sailing in the right direction, something its shareholders have become extremely optimistic about. That's not a surprise, given that the cruise line business was decimated by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the company is on much better footing these days as it serves robust demand from consumers. In the past 12 months, shares have soared 104% (as of Aug. 6), showcasing heightened bullishness. Despite this monster performance, here are three reasons why investors should still consider buying this travel stock like there's no tomorrow. Durable demand Carnival's business has benefited from tremendous momentum. During the fiscal 2025 second quarter (ended May 31), the company reported record revenue of $6.3 billion. This figure was up 9.5% year over year and 164% higher than the same period of fiscal 2022. There's clearly strong demand from travelers. Carnival had a whopping $8.5 billion in customer deposits in Q2, a record. Net yields, a measure of a cruise line's pricing power, came in at a record $200.07, after increasing by 7.2% during the second quarter. This was "driven by close-in strength in ticket prices and continued strong onboard spending," CFO David Bernstein said on the Q2 2025 earnings call. The demand for Carnival has been impressive in the years following the pandemic's disruption. Investors might think that the good times will come to an end soon. While the rapid growth the business has registered won't continue indefinitely, there's still reason to remain optimistic over the long term. The cruise industry faces some favorable tailwinds. For instance, younger travelers are more interested in these vacations. There are also more first-time passengers coming aboard. As it pushes to capture the opportunity ahead, Carnival is investing in building new cruise ships. It just opened a new private destination, called the Celebration Key, in July. What's more, Carnival is upgrading its rewards program, which will launch in 2026. This can boost customer loyalty and drive repeat cruise trips. Financial improvements During the pandemic, Carnival was forced to pause its operations. To survive the revenue hit, management had to take on more debt to fund the business. It's understandable if, at the time, investors were worried that Carnival would never get out of its predicament. With each passing quarter these days, the company is making substantial progress when it comes to its financial situation. During Q2, Carnival's operating income increased 66.8% year over year to $934 million. This was another record. To its credit, the business is starting to benefit from being able to better leverage its costs as revenue rises. Cruise and tour operating expenses were up just 2.3% year over year during the second quarter. With profitability showing major improvements, Carnival has been able to clean up its balance sheet as well. It ended Q2 with $27.3 billion of long-term debt, a balance that has been reduced by 20% in the past three years. The company's credit rating was also upgraded by two major agencies, which is a vote of confidence. Carnival's upside Carnival's stock has been a huge winner. However, the valuation is still compelling for new investors, even though the company is operating at a very high level these days. The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 15.8 is no doubt cheap, representing a 36% discount to the overall S&P 500 index. Should the P/E multiple get closer to the benchmark's level, there is sizable upside for patient investors. Carnival's strong demand, improving financials, and attractive valuation are three reasons to buy the stock like there's no tomorrow. Should you invest $1,000 in Carnival Corp. right now? Before you buy stock in Carnival Corp., consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Carnival Corp. wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
A skeptic's take on the housing crisis: 'The developer is the good guy'
Article content 'If you're saying that the problem is, we're not adding enough housing to existing neighbourhoods, and if we would only get rid of zoning regulations, everything would be fine, you need to have proof of that,' Patrick asserts. 'And when you look around for proof,' he says, 'you find that there really isn't any.' Article content The most obvious example, he suggests, is the city of Vancouver, where urban boundaries have not expanded in generations. 'So all the housing that has gone into Vancouver,' he explains, 'has been essentially infill housing that has been accepted through changes and zoning ordinances.' Article content Vancouver has tripled the number of housing units since the 1960s, Patrick reports. What's less well known, he says, this densification hasn't just been achieved by building high-rises in the city's downtown; the rest of the city has accepted over 50 percent of the housing units in lower density formats (basement suites, duplexes, triplexes, four-storey buildings along corridors). Article content Article content 'That housing, advanced by me and others, was based on partly the premise that this would lead to affordable housing,' he says. 'We tried really hard. We tripled the density. We tripled the number of housing units within the same footprint,' he reports, 'and as a reward for our heroic efforts, we have the highest home prices, when measured against average regional incomes of any place in North America, and the third highest home prices in the world.' Article content So he's warning the feds, and anyone else who will listen: 'If you think the solution is just to get rid of the restrictions on zoning and let towers be built basically everywhere, which is what the Vancouver strategy is now, you're gonna be disappointed.' Article content In his 2024 book, 'Broken City,' Patrick explains what's happening. 'It turns out that the issue here is not the building, it's the land under the building,' he argues. When a city allows for additional density, that changes the financial value of the dirt on the proposed building site. Thus, he reports, 'If you go from allowing a one-storey building to allowing a 10-storey building, you get a 1,000-percent increase in the price of the land.' Article content Article content 'So the market is really a market-per-square-foot of the building,' he explains, 'and by adding density, it doesn't change the value of that square foot. What it does change is the value of the land underneath that building.' Article content 'As the authorized use of land is increased,' Patrick elaborates, 'the value of the land is going up and up and up, and it, unfortunately, goes up more or less in measure to what the market is allowing for that built price.' Article content The increase in land values created by up-zoning and densification are not going to the municipality, Patrick suggests. 'That's what's so tragic about it, about the whole thing,' he contends, 'the policy makers are saying (and I think many of them actually believe it), that this will help the community and it's actually harming the community. It's really helping the land speculators.' Article content And Patrick makes clear: The land speculator is different than the developer. 'The developer is the good guy,' he says, chuckling. 'They build a building. The building has social value. What doesn't appear to have social value is the land, and the speculation part of it, which is preventing us from adjudicating land rights to the benefit of the community.' Article content 'The way things are unfolding now,' he continues, 'is that real estate nationally constitutes about 25 per cent of the gross domestic product in Canada, and that's way too high a level. And it's all structured on the idea that real estate values cannot go down … We're seeing it here in Vancouver, where the real estate industry is begging for additional federal local and provincial assistance because of the downturn.' Article content The current collapse of the market for small condo units makes it obvious that the investor community has soured on the profit potential of this product, Patrick explains, stranding these assets in a financial limbo. 'It is very strong proof that the driver for real estate in Canada has for many years been 'housing as investment' vs. 'housing as homes,'' he says. 'This distortion elevated the price of urban land making it impossible for developers to build housing for families at a price they can afford.' Article content Basically, we're doing the wrong thing, Patrick concludes: 'We're going in and giving away land rights, hoping that that will lead to affordability. We shouldn't do that, because it doesn't work. But what we can do is give away land rights, insisting on affordability.' Article content
