Instant View: US House sends "Genius Act" stablecoin bill to Trump to sign
The vote marks a watershed moment for the digital asset industry, which has been pushing for federal legislation for years and poured money into last year's elections in order to promote pro-crypto candidates.
Shares of crypto-related companies were mostly higher after passage of the bill, dubbed the Genius Act, that would expand the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's oversight of the industry.
Bitcoin , the largest crypto currency, was down 0.54% at $119,298.87, trading near a record high reached earlier this week. Rival ethereum rose 1.42% to $3,429.47.
STEVE SOSNICK, CHIEF STRATEGIST, INTERACTIVE BROKERS, CONNECTICUT:
"We had already run up over the past week-plus in anticipation of 'crypto week', so a certain level of expectation was already built in. At least we're not seeing a 'sell the news' reaction, perhaps because traders remain hopeful about all the legislation gets passed."
JAKE DOLLARHIDE, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, LONGBOW ASSET MANAGEMENT, TULSA, OKLAHOMA:
"The crypto stocks have been on a run leading up to this hopeful outcome, and they got exactly what they wanted. The Trump administration said they were going to be a champion for the crypto industry, and this is a huge step in that direction. I look for bitcoin to make new highs from here. I look for Ethereum... to make a rebound. Crypto is going to have a moment in the weeks and months ahead as people who have missed out pile in and chase bigger returns."
"Regarding the late trimming of gains in crypto-related shares, he said: "We assumed five days ago it was going to happen. So there's not really a reason to rally. So, it's a relief pause."
BILL STRAZZULLO, CHIEF MARKET STRATEGIST, BELL CURVE TRADING, BOSTON:
'I think [this bill] is positive in the sense that you'd want to have some infrastructure and some regulation. That invites a much broader audience to participate. So, I think it's a positive. But when you look at the correlation of crypto to the S&P 500, it's very high. In order words, people are buying crypto; because I hear this all the time: 'I wanted to diversify my portfolio, it's a hedge against inflation if the bottom falls out on the economy.' No! With crypto, I think the correlation is up around 90% or something and it moves with the S&P 500. I mean when you buy something you need to know what you really own. And with crypto, you are basically just increasing your exposure to the stock market. You need to know that. This notion that it's going to be kind of countertrend or countercyclical or not correlated, that's just not factual. So, I think any regulation and any structure is good because it gives the general public more confidence that it's not a scam and they'd be protected in some way. That's a positive thing for sure. But if you were thinking that buying crypto is some way going to be a magic bullet that hedges you against inflation or geopolitical or market downturn, it's not. That's why the short-term momentum is positive. I don't want to go overboard with crypto either because I still think the [stock] market somewhere around here is going to end up putting a top in. My guess is that as we get closer to the midterms, there's some sort of significant move lower and I don't think crypto will protect you from any of that.'
ANDREW FORSON, PRESIDENT, DEFI TECHNOLOGIES (by email):
'It signals the start of a new era for digital assets and public companies. We're seeing an unprecedented wave of corporations embracing digital assets, diversifying beyond Bitcoin into Ethereum, Solana, and more. But for many institutions, education gaps and regulatory uncertainty have been real barriers.'
'By establishing clear, actionable rules for stablecoins and digital assets, the Genius Act unlocks broader adoption by traditional institutions and brings much-needed trust and transparency to the sector. This paves the way for compliant, bank-backed digital money and new solutions for corporate treasuries, helping to bridge the gap between innovation and investor protection.'
DANTE DISPARTE, CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER, CIRCLE, NEW YORK:
'The House vote to clear the GENIUS Act for the President's signature is a defining moment for the future of money and the internet financial system. It signals strong bipartisan support for responsible innovation and sends a clear message that the U.S. will lead in the regulation of dollar-backed payment stablecoins. We commend Congressional leaders for delivering a regulatory foundation that puts consumer protection, financial integrity, and U.S. competitiveness at the forefront.'
SUMMER MERSINGER, CEO, BLOCKCHAIN ASSOCIATION (press release):
'The bipartisan passage of the GENIUS Act is a watershed moment for digital assets in the United States. For the first time, Congress has moved comprehensive legislation that provides enforceable, tailored rules for stablecoins — a foundational technology for the future of finance. This marks real momentum toward regulatory clarity that protects consumers, supports innovation, and reinforces the strength of the U.S. dollar in the digital economy. We now call on President Trump to swiftly sign the bill into law, ensuring that the United States continues to lead in shaping the global standards for digital assets.'
MICHAEL JAMES, EQUITY SALES TRADER, ROSENBLATT SECURITIES, LOS ANGELES:
"Crypto stocks have been strong the past two days in expectation that the bill, which didn't pass on Tuesday, would eventually get the necessary votes to pass, which it has done this afternoon. That is part of the reason that crypto stocks have been outperformers in the last two days."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now Trump is blamed for $2bn surge in cost of building reservoir in drought-plagued California
California 's most ambitious water infrastructure project in nearly half a century has just become a whole lot more expensive - and President Donald Trump is being blamed for part of the staggering price surge. Planners behind the colossal Sites Reservoir, a sprawling basin that could one day provide drinking water to more than 24 million Californians have confirmed that the cost of construction has ballooned from $4.5 billion to at much as $6.8 billion. And among the reasons cited for the $2 billion spike are the Trump tariffs imposed during the early part of this year which project leaders say are still sending shockwaves through the supply chain. 'The biggest drivers of the increase included factory shutdowns during the Covid-19 pandemic and recent tariffs from President Donald Trump,' Jerry Brown, executive director of the Sites Project Authority (no relation to the former governor), told the Press Democrat. 'Increasing costs are never looked forward to, but they are something that is a fact of life.' He attributed the jump to inflation for steel, concrete, and other building materials since 2021. The revelation has ignited fresh political tensions in the Golden State, where Governor Gavin Newsom 's administration has been pushing hard to shore up water infrastructure amid escalating climate extremes. The Sites project - a reservoir so massive it would stretch 13 miles long and four miles across in Colusa County - is fast becoming a flashpoint in the long-running battle over water, money, and environmental priorities. Nearly 70 residents in Antelope Valley are expected to lose their homes as the basin swallows up swaths of Colusa County. For them, the price tag isn't measured in billions of dollars, but in broken lives and uprooted communities. 'Scores of people are set to see their homes flooded,' read a previous report on the project's local impact, which has been more than 45 years in the making. If completed, the Sites Reservoir would become California's eighth-largest, holding 1.5 million acre-feet of water, or nearly 490 billion gallons - intended primarily for use in Southern and Central California, as well as the Bay Area. Construction is still slated to begin next year with completion by 2033, Brown said. But rising costs may force tough decisions on funding and prioritization. Although the Sites project received backing from both Congress and the Biden administration, with nearly $365 million in federal grants over the past three years, the newly projected cost spike has become a political lightning rod particularly as Trump-era tariffs are now being identified as a contributing factor. On Wednesday, Brown presented the updated cost to the nine-member State Water Commission, which has already set aside $875 million in Proposition 1 bond funds for the project. Commissioner Daniel Curtin said 22 water agencies have committed planning money, with 16 more on a waiting list seeking extra water capacity. 'The rubber hits the road when the money comes,' Curtin said. 'But it sounds like the commitments are pretty strong.' Commissioner Jose Solorio added: 'All of the state would benefit from the construction of this project.' California Republicans have largely avoided commenting on the tariff connection, while environmental groups are using the moment to revive their long-standing opposition to the plan. 'The Sites Reservoir would harm the Sacramento River ecosystem, threaten already imperiled fish species, and release greenhouse gas pollution,' argued a lawsuit filed by conservationists, later dismissed in Yolo County Superior Court. 'The project will cause much environmental harm, which falls on the public, and a small amount of good, which primarily benefits the project investors,' added Stork, senior policy advocate at Friends of the River. 'Among other harms, the reservoir will be a major greenhouse gas emitter. A recent analysis estimated that Sites would emit the equivalent of 80,000 gasoline-powered cars each year.' Opponents lost their appeal last year, but they aren't backing down. 'It's not surprising,' said Ron Stork, policy director at Friends of the River. 'Large mega-projects typically escalate in costs considerably from their initial estimates. There's a reason why these dams haven't been built yet.' Stork added, 'We'll have to see if the wealthy urban water districts in Southern California and the Bay Area want to continue to invest in this project.' He estimated that the Sites Reservoir's odds of being built now stand at 'about 50-50.' The backlash hasn't deterred Governor Newsom, who has thrown his full support behind the project as part of his broader water resilience strategy. 'We are going to need more storage projects with climate change,' said Matt Keller, a spokesperson for the Santa Clara Valley Water District, one of the project's backers. 'Our board is evaluating several different water supply projects from around Northern California and locally, and has been following this one for a while.' 'The longer we wait and the longer it takes to get this done, the more expensive it becomes,' Brown told reporters. 'Even though it is costing more, it is still something we need to do badly.' He compared Sites to a savings account for future droughts: 'People look at all the water running through rivers in wet winters and say why can't we save more of that?' Proponents argue that Sites is uniquely positioned to capture 'excess water from major storms' and store it for drier years, which are increasingly common as global temperatures rise. But for critics, the project epitomizes the high environmental and social cost of mega-infrastructure in an era of climate uncertainty. 'It's very difficult to justify the expense and environmental costs of big surface storage infrastructure projects,' said John Buse, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. 'The Sites Reservoir will cause far more harm than good.' Ironically, the project's price hike comes after a rare string of wet winters that have filled existing reservoirs to capacity. Shasta Lake and Lake Oroville both overflowed for a third consecutive year in 2025. Had the reservoir already existed, Brown noted, Sites could have captured runoff from the past two wet winters. 'It would have filled to the top,' he said, adding that it would have diverted only about 3% of Delta flows during the wettest months. But experts warn that complacency is dangerous. With California's precipitation increasingly concentrated into short, intense bursts followed by prolonged dry spells, the need for storage remains urgent. 'Water scarcity is always just around the corner,' the project's website warns. Brown acknowledged that the project has drawn sharp scrutiny - but said history is on its side. 'Rarely when looked back upon 20, 40 or 60 years later are these projects regretted in terms of the benefits to society,' he said. 'These are hard decisions to make as a society, but we are building this for ourselves and future generations.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry
Labour is to promise families will no longer face the prospect of 'huge shock hikes' in their water bills after a complete overhaul of the sector, it has been reported. Environment Secretary Steve Reed is expected to pledge a 'root and branch' reform of the water industry on Monday, saying that 'regulation has failed customers and the environment'. He will promise that 'hardworking British families will never again face huge shock hikes to their bills like we saw last year', according to a report in The Times. Water bills rose by an average of 26% in April, with the cost of repairing long-neglected infrastructure said to be a significant factor. It is understood that Mr Reed's promised reforms, along with greater investment in the crumbling sewerage network, are expected to make further significant increases unnecessary. Monday's reforms have also been widely reported to include the abolition of water regulator Ofwat. The beleaguered regulator has faced widespread criticism in recent years for failing to curb sewage discharges into rivers while allowing increasingly debt-ridden water companies to continue paying large dividends to their shareholders. On Friday, Downing Street did not deny that it was preparing to abolish Ofwat, and a spokesman said the Government would wait for a report from Sir Jon Cunliffe, who has been conducting a major review of the industry. In his interim report, Sir Jon criticised the division of water regulation between economic regulator Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. The former Bank of England deputy governor is due to publish his final report on Monday, which is likely to recommend replacing Ofwat with a single regulator for the whole water industry. On Friday, a report by the Environment Agency found serious pollution incidents caused by water firms across England rose by 60% in 2024. The watchdog disclosed consistently poor performance from all nine water and sewerage firms in the country, despite its expectations for pollution incidents to decrease. Every year it records the number of times pollution, including untreated sewage, is released into waterways from water company infrastructure such as pumping stations, pipes and treatment works. The figures, released on Friday, show companies recorded a total of 2,801 incidents, a 29% increase on the 2,174 recorded in 2023. But the number of so-called category one and category two incidents, the most serious, rose by 60% from 47 to 75. Three water firms were responsible for 81% of these serious incidents – Thames Water with 33, Southern Water with 15, and Yorkshire Water with 13. Meanwhile, just two companies, Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water, had no serious incidents last year, meeting the Environment Agency's expectations to see a trend to zero serious pollution incidents by 2025. Mr Reed called the figures 'disgraceful' and a 'stark reminder' of how underinvestment and weak regulation have led to sewage polluting England's waterways.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Blackstone drops out of consortium bid for TikTok US, source says
July 18 (Reuters) - Private equity giant Blackstone has withdrawn from a consortium seeking to invest in TikTok's U.S. operations, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday. The latest change came as uncertainty has mounted and there have been several delays in the TikTok deal now at the center of U.S.-China trade talks. Blackstone had planned to take a minority stake in the TikTok U.S. business in a deal orchestrated by President Donald Trump. The consortium is led by Susquehanna International Group and General Atlantic, current investors in TikTok's Chinese owner ByteDance. The group had emerged as the front-runner to secure TikTok's U.S. business in a deal under which U.S. investors would own 80% of TikTok, while ByteDance would retain a minority stake. Blackstone declined to comment. TikTok did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The deadline for ByteDance to divest the popular social media app in the U.S. has been repeatedly postponed, creating uncertainty for investors. Last month, Trump signed a third executive order extending the deadline for ByteDance to sell TikTok or face a ban, moving the cutoff to September 17. In April 2024, Congress passed a law mandating a sale or shutdown of TikTok by January 19, 2025. Extensions to the deadline have drawn criticism from some lawmakers, who argue the Trump administration is 'flouting the law' and ignoring national security concerns related to Chinese control over TikTok. ByteDance is exploring various options to address these concerns, including selling or restructuring its U.S. operations. The Chinese social media giant, which raked in $43 billion in the first three months of this year, recently surpassed Meta in quarterly revenue, sources told Reuters. The U.S. consortium, favored by the administration in any TikTok deal, also includes KKR, as well as new investors such as Andreessen Horowitz, Reuters previously reported. Oracle is also likely to take a stake. It is unclear whether other bidders in the consortium are still involved. A deal had been in the works this spring to spin off TikTok's U.S. operations into a new U.S.-based firm. Talks were put on hold after China indicated it would not approve the transaction, following Trump's announcement of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. If a sale is finalized, the new U.S. app is expected to be owned by a joint venture formed by an American investor consortium and ByteDance, which would maintain a minority stake. TikTok is already working on a U.S.-specific app, sources told Reuters. Blackstone's exit highlights the complexities and uncertainties involved in the deal, as the ongoing talks over TikTok's fate have now become part of Trump's broader trade negotiations with China, and Trump said he would speak to President Xi Jinping about it.
