Troubleshooters sent into wildlife charity linked to Carrie Johnson
The Charity Commission has appointed a team of high-powered legal experts to act as interim managers and take over key decision-making at the Aspinall Foundation, run by former casino owner Damian Aspinall.
According to the watchdog's code of conduct, interim managers are imposed on a charity when it believes there has been 'mismanagement and/or misconduct'. It defines misconduct as any 'criminal, unlawful or improper' act.
The Aspinall Foundation is a global conservation group that releases zoo animals back into the wild, working with its sister charity the Howletts Wild Animal Trust, which runs two wildlife parks in Kent.
Both charities have been under the Charity Commission's spotlight for five years, with a statutory inquiry launched in 2021. Its latest decision to send troubleshooters into the Aspinall Foundation over 'fresh issues of concern' marks a major tightening of the screw.
Carrie Johnson was recruited by the Aspinall Foundation in January 2021 in a senior communications role on an estimated 'high five-figure salary' when her partner Mr Johnson, whom she married in May that year, was prime minister.
Mr Johnson has been one of the charity's highest-profile cheerleaders. There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by either of the Johnsons.
The allegations against the Aspinall Foundation include allowing its chair, Mr Aspinall, to rent its headquarters, Howletts House – a neo-Palladian, 30-bedroom mansion in Kent, set in a 90-acre estate – for £2,500 a month, equivalent to the cost of renting a house in nearby Canterbury. The rent was increased to £10,000 a month after a revaluation.
Other allegations include paying £150,000 to Mr Aspinall's wife, Victoria, for 'interior design', as well as making loans to Mr Aspinall. In 2019, he reportedly owed the foundation £113,000.
Allegations against the Howletts Wild Animal Trust include paying Mr Aspinall's step mother Lady Sarah Aspinall a £30,000-a-year pension for 'gardening services'.
In a statement to The Independent, the Charity Commission said: 'Our inquiry into the Aspinall Foundation is ongoing. Towards the end of last year, fresh issues of concern were identified requiring us to embark on a further phase of investigation, and our investigators are working hard to pursue these at pace.
'The commission has now appointed interim managers to the Aspinall Foundation, who will work alongside the existing trustees on specific areas in line with the charity's governing document.'
The Charity Commission only imposes interim managers on a charity 'if it is satisfied that there has been misconduct and/or mismanagement' and it is considered 'necessary to protect the charity's property'.
Misconduct 'includes any act that the person committing it knew – or ought to have known – was criminal, unlawful or improper'.
Mismanagement is defined as 'any act that may result in charitable resources being misused – or the people who benefit from the charity being put at risk'.
The Charity Commission troubleshooters have been tasked with making any decisions that cannot be made by the trustees because of 'a conflict of interest', and with 'reviewing the make-up of the board of trustees'.
Crucially, they have also been ordered to find out whether any of the trustees – or their family members – 'received a direct or indirect benefit from the charity'.
Mr Aspinall's daughter Tansy is a trustee of both the Aspinall Foundation and Howletts Wild Animal Trust.
Multimillionaire and Conservative peer Zac Goldsmith, a former minister and a close friend of Mr Aspinall and both the Johnsons, was an Aspinall trustee until August 2019.
Lord Goldsmith's brother Ben, a Tory donor who was given an advisory post in Mr Johnson's government, was also an Aspinall Foundation trustee. Both left before the Charity Commission launched any inquiries.
A spokesperson for the Aspinall Foundation said: 'We welcome the inquiry by the Charity Commission and will continue to work with them transparently, but until that has concluded we are unable to comment further to press.'
A spokesperson for the Howletts Wild Animal Trust said: 'With the Charity Commission's inquiry ongoing, we are unable to comment further.'
Carrie Johnson could not be contacted. The Aspinall Foundation declined to say whether she is still an employee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Most ethics complaints filed against NM lawmakers resolved quietly
Aug. 4—SANTA FE — The recent internal ethics investigation into top Senate Democrat Mimi Stewart marked the first time in years that a complaint against a New Mexico lawmaker led to a public hearing. But there have been no shortage of filed complaints. With the exception of the complaint against Stewart, all other allegations of misconduct filed against lawmakers in the last five years — there have been a total of 17 — were quietly resolved without any details being publicly released, according to legislative records. Some of the complaints that date back to January 2020 were dismissed following an internal investigation, while others were informally settled or withdrawn. The recent trends have prompted some current and former legislators to say flaws in the system need fixing. Former state Sen. Mark Moores, a Republican who stepped down last year, said New Mexico's current legislative ethics system is tainted by partisan politics. "The system is working as intended, because the system was set up so leadership could still retain control," Moores said . He said the system should be changed to more closely model the congressional ethics system, which features an independent, nonpartisan office that reviews allegations of misconduct against members of Congress and staffers. The public currently lacks confidence in New Mexico's legislative ethics system, Moores added, in large part because leading legislators function as gatekeepers of sorts who determine whether complaints filed against lawmakers should move forward. "You're never going to have a fair hearing against anyone in leadership because they appoint their cronies," he said. Sen. Katy Duhigg, D-Albuquerque, said lawmakers have struggled to find the right balance between transparency and protecting themselves from possible politically-driven complaints. "I think each time we see this process used, we see areas that need improvement," said Duhigg, who chairs the Senate Rules Committee. She said she would support changes to the legislative ethics system such as simplifying the wording of ethics policies and protocols, along with mandatory mediation to try to resolve complaints involving legislators and staffers. "I think we are on the right road, but there is room for improvement," Duhigg said. A recent history of tie votes The complaint against Stewart, the Senate's president pro tem since 2021, was filed by a legislative staffer in February after the veteran lawmaker allegedly shouted at her during a heated moment during this year's 60-day legislative session. After an initial panel of lawmakers found probable cause existed to advance the complaint, a legislative ethics hearing subcommittee recommended last week the complaint against Stewart be dismissed. But the recommendation was made via a party-line 4-3 vote, with retired state Supreme Court Justice Richard Bosson siding with the subcommittee's three Senate Democrats. The three Senate Republicans appointed to the panel voted against dismissing the complaint, while maintaining that sanctions should be imposed in the case. The presence of a retired judge or attorney on the subcommittee was due to a 2022 rule change that was intended to allow for tie votes to be broken, said Randall Cherry, the Legislative Council Service's assistant director for legislative affairs. Before that change was made, several internal ethics probes stalled due to tie votes, according to legislators familiar with the investigations. Transparency issues and concerns One of the reasons the public is left in the dark about most legislative ethics investigations is the existence of confidentiality provisions in both state law and the Legislature's anti-harassment policy. Specifically, the policy stipulates that harassment complaints and documents related to any investigation shall be kept confidential, even under New Mexico's public records law. The confidentiality provision was challenged in a 2022 lawsuit filed by a lobbyist who had accused then-Sen. Daniel Ivey-Soto of sexual harassment. But the lawsuit was dismissed a year later. Amanda Lavin, the legal director of the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government, said citizen complaints are generally required to be made public under a Court of Appeals ruling. She also said the open government group believes any disciplinary action taken by the Legislature against its own members should be public information. But Lavin also pointed out the Legislature is not subject to New Mexico's Open Meetings Act, and state law allows legislators to hold certain types of meetings behind closed doors. "There are a lot of things they can discuss in private and then not even have to disclose what was discussed," Lavin said. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Teenagers who tortured and killed two kittens sentenced
A teenage girl and boy who tortured and killed two kittens have been sentenced after one animal was 'completely ripped open' and found hanging from a tree. The 17-year-olds, who cannot be named for legal reasons, launched the 'sadistic' attack on the animals on 3 May near Ickenham Road, Ruislip, in north-west London. The kittens were found cut open with ropes attached to them, and 'dead pieces of flesh and fur appeared to have been burnt off them', a court heard. The hearing was told the boy had also dreamed of killing a human and 'getting away with murder'. Police analysis of his phone showed he had researched 'sacrificing animals to Satan' and watched a 'significant amount of videos of animals that have been mutilated and people that have been beheaded'. The court heard a note on his device read: 'I have got close to satisfying my urges. I have skinned, strangled and stabbed cats.' The police officer also told the hearing there were 'a few images of kittens that had been quite badly mutilated' on the phone of the girl, who was aged 16 at the time, as well as videos downloaded from a 'gore website' in the months leading up to the incident. The defendants appeared at Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court in May and pleaded guilty to causing unnecessary suffering to the protected animals by 'mutilating and killing' them. They also both admitted to one count of possession of a knife at Ruislip Golf Course. The boy was sentenced to a 12-month detention and training order, and the girl was sentenced to a nine-month detention and training order, both at the same court in London on Monday. District judge Hina Rai described the case as 'deeply shocking and concerning', telling the teenagers: 'Without a doubt, these are the most awful offences against animals that I have seen in this court.' She said their 'clearly premeditated' actions would have caused 'immense suffering' to the 'vulnerable and unable to escape' kittens. Describing the case as 'barbaric and deeply disturbing', DC Rebecca Rickhuss said the cats were both strays, which the defendants had bought from a woman on Gumtree who was attempting to rehome them. The court heard members of the public had seen the pair walking on a footpath in West Ruislip after picking up the kittens. The teenage boy was holding a black bag, which 'was seen to be moving slightly as if something alive was inside it'. The hearing was told members of the public became concerned when they later saw him and the girl running from the scene, which was described as 'horrific' by one member of the public who warned another to avoid it. Prosecutor Valerie Benjamin told the court police were alerted to the two 'dismembered' kittens left in a wooded area. Officers found a 'small black kitten hanging from a branch' by a red rope at the scene, she said. 'Its body was completely ripped open and its eyes were bulging out,' she added. The other animal 'had been cut open and had rope attached to it' when its body was discovered on the ground nearby, she told the hearing. Knives, blowtorches and scissors, with what appeared to have blood on them, were also found at the scene, the hearing was told. The prosecutor described how the animals were killed as 'sadistic'. Ms Benjamin told the court evidence from the boy's phone showed he had spoken about killing cats and dogs, suggesting a degree of planning for the attack, and had even searched how to kill a human. '[He] questioned how easy it would be to get away with murder, killing homeless people,' she said. DC Rickhuss had been involved in reviewing the boy's phone and detailed what she found on the device from the start of April until his arrest in May this year. She read out to the court a note discovered in his phone, which was written in May after the crime was committed. It stated: 'I really wanted to murder someone, and every day I was researching how to get away with murder. I have got close to satisfying my urges. I have skinned, strangled and stabbed cats.' She told reporters outside court after the sentencing hearing: 'Something like this doesn't randomly happen… [It's] very much the case that they got some kind of inspiration from somewhere else.' She cited online groups that are 'encouraging people to go out mutilating kittens and cats'. Ms Benjamin told the court the girl had said she had carried out the attack because she was 'interested in biology and had done a dissection at school'. Both had no previous convictions. The court also imposed a lifetime ban on both defendants from owning or keeping animals. Following sentencing, DC Rickhuss, who led the investigation, described the case as 'deeply distressing'. She added: 'If you suspect cruelty to animals, please report it. In some cases, it can be an early warning sign of something far more dangerous.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Prison service was on verge of collapse over space of nine months
The prison service was on the verge of collapsing on several occasions between autumn 2023 and summer 2024, an independent review has found. The review by Dame Anne Owers was published today, August 5, and shows the potential collapse came as a symptom of a systemic problem which led to recurring prison capacity crises over the last 18 years. The review, commissioned by Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood in February this year, details the damaging impact on prisons, probation, prison escort services and the courts up and down the country. It details how senior officials in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HM Prison and Probations Service (HMPPS) were meeting daily at times to document, monitor and attempt to resolve the capacity problems at the expense of other aspects of prison strategy and policy. At the height of the prison crisis, frontline staff spent most of their time moving prisoners around and implementing ever-changing release schemes. READ MORE: Girl, four, dies after incident at water park READ MORE: State Pension age to rise in 2026 for people with these birthdays During the crisis, the cost of holding prisoners in police cells reached over £70 million, and construction costs for new prisons nearly doubled, to £10.1 billion Successive governments have been forced to implement last-minute emergency release measures as a result of the crisis. The population pressure has also affected prisons' capacity to operate safe environments, Dame Anne, who previously held the role of Chief Inspector of Prisons between 2001 and 2010, has now said there needs to be a move from crisis management to a strategic approach, this is to ensure the entire prison network as well as probation and other community services are able to work efficiently to prevent offending and reoffending. According to the review, at one point there were fewer than 100 places in adult male prisons, with a COBRA meeting being held in May 2025 following the announcement of the general election and concerns the prison system could collapse during the election campaign. On three occasions, the report said, from 2023 onwards, prisons were running very close to capacity, to the point where the use of early release schemes helped to relieve pressure at the last moment. The report said: "Senior officials were so concerned about a potential breakdown in the criminal justice system that an audit was kept of all decision-making and documents, in case there was a public or parliamentary inquiry. "The system in fact limped through the summer of 2024, helped by the knowledge that relief was coming, in the shape of the new government's pledge to reduce the custodial element of most standard determinate sentences from 50% to 40% (SDS40)." Dame Anne Owers said: 'The scale, likelihood, risks and consequences of the prison capacity crisis could not have been signalled more clearly, at every level of government. "The response was last-minute short-term fixes rather than long-term solutions to the underlying problems. This is part of a repeated pattern of prison capacity crises, under successive governments, which have seriously affected prisons' ability to work effectively and safely. 'This report is the backdrop to David Gauke's review of sentencing and Sir Brian Leveson's review of the criminal courts. The Government should now put in place systems that don't just signal approaching problems, but stimulate action to prevent them. "This involves ensuring not only that prisons have the capacity to work effectively, but that there is proper and sustained investment in community provision, to provide effective support to help reduce offending and reoffending.' Dame Anne made the following recommendations: Developing a ten-year strategy for capacity in probation and community services, similar to the prison capacity strategy published by the Government in December. Establishing an independent advisory body to provide advice and external validation of capacity strategies across both prisons and probation, including the impact of any proposed changes to the criminal justice system. A similar body was recommended in the Independent Review of Sentencing. Mandating the HMPPS Board to evaluate the Prison Service, in discussion with the Chief Inspector of Prisons, and to monitor and report on progress on capacity. Involving the Chief Inspector of Probation and the third sector in discussing the design and delivery of community services, including addiction treatment and housing. Reinvigorating the approach to integrated offender management to bring together agencies to deal with repeat and persistent offenders. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: 'This report lays bare the disgraceful way the last Conservative Government ran our prisons. They added less than 500 cells to the prison estate over fourteen years, released over 10,000 prisoners early under a veil of secrecy, and brought our jails close to total collapse on countless occasions. 'This Government is fixing our prisons, for good. Days after taking office, we took the emergency action required to stop our prisons from collapsing. We have already opened 2,400 new cells since coming into office, on track for 14,000 by 2031. And we are reforming sentencing to ensure we can always lock up dangerous offenders and keep the public safe."
