Plan to cut free IVF to one-cycle across Greater Manchester
The number of NHS-funded IVF cycles available in parts of Greater Manchester could drop to one under new plans for a "consistent approach" across the region.Three cycles are currently available for women in Tameside, while two are on offer in Salford, Wigan and Stockport.The remaining six boroughs - including Oldham where the first "test tube baby" Louise Brown was born due to in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1978 - already only offer one cycle for free.The region's residents are being urged to take part in a six-week public consultation on the proposed changes, which the NHS said would make it "fair for everyone" and "affordable" for the health service.
NHS Greater Manchester is proposing one full IVF cycle to eligible women aged 39 and under - plus an additional attempt if the first cycle is cancelled or abandoned.It said the "inconsistency stems from historic commissioning arrangements" and it was reviewing the policies to "ensure a consistent and fair approach for everyone, regardless of where they live".The planned measure was "affordable for the NHS now and in the future", it added.
'Deeply personal'
There are no changes planned to the eligibility criteria or the current offer of one cycle for women aged 40-42.Katherine Sheerin, chief commissioning officer at NHS Greater Manchester, said "fertility is a deeply personal and often emotional topic, which is why this consultation is so important"."Whether you've had experience with IVF, are considering fertility treatment, or simply want to share your perspective, please take part and share your views."The consultation is available online and sessions will be held locally until the consultation ends on 29 July.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Moment of truth for the assisted dying bill: all you need to know
Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP who came top in the private members' bill ballot last year, and was therefore given a chance of getting her own law onto the statute book, is 'confident' that her Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will complete its Commons stages on Friday. The bill has been through an arduous and often bad-tempered journey since MPs voted to give it the go-ahead in principle in November by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55. It was debated by a committee of MPs in 29 sittings between January and March. The committee considered 500 amendments and about one-third were agreed. The bill came back to the Commons last Friday, when further amendments were debated. Tomorrow will be its last day in the Commons, when more amendments will be debated and a final vote held. If it passes, it will then go to the House of Lords. How has the bill been amended? The main change is that, instead of a court having to approve a request, supported by two doctors, for an assisted death, it will be decided by a panel consisting of a lawyer, a consultant psychiatrist and a social worker. Other amendments include: • requiring the doctors assessing assisted dying requests to have undertaken detailed training on domestic abuse, including coercive control and financial abuse; • making independent advocates available for those who 'may experience substantial difficulty in understanding the processes or information relevant' to the assisted dying process; and • increasing the commencement period from two years to four years in England, meaning that the majority of the bill's provisions must be implemented within four years of the bill becoming law. Is the bill going to pass? Almost certainly. The majority of 55 in November was larger than expected, and although some MPs have changed their minds since then, it seems unlikely that there are 28 of them – the number required to change the outcome. Indeed, some of those changing their minds have gone from abstaining last time to supporting the bill, saying that they are now satisfied with the safeguards in the bill. However, it is MPs switching from support or a neutral position to opposition who tend to attract the most attention. Four Labour MPs who supported the bill in November but who will vote against it tomorrow have written to their colleagues urging them to do the same. 'This is not a normal bill,' they write. 'It fundamentally alters the relationship between doctor and patient. It strips power away from parliament and concentrates it in the hands of future health secretaries.' They conclude: 'The bill before us simply does not do enough to safeguard people who may want to choose to live.' The opposition from outside parliament has been forceful. Some MPs are particularly disconcerted by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, which continues to oppose the bill. Although it says it is not opposed to the principle of assisted dying, it is worried about the implications for mental health and says that there are not enough consultant psychiatrists to sit on the expert panels. Even so, Leadbeater's confidence appears to be justified. Where do cabinet ministers stand? Assisted dying is an issue of conscience, and so by convention, the government has allowed a free vote. The government does not have a view on the issue, and collective ministerial responsibility does not apply. That means that some ministers will vote in favour and some against. Seven ministers who attend cabinet are opposed to the bill: Darren Jones, David Lammy, Shabana Mahmood, Bridget Phillipson, Angela Rayner, Jonathan Reynolds and Wes Streeting. Streeting has changed his mind: he said last year that the poor state of NHS palliative care meant that he could not support the bill. All the rest support the bill, including the prime minister, who reaffirmed his support this week – apart from Ian Murray, the Scottish secretary, who will not vote on the grounds that the issue is devolved. The Scottish parliament voted for a similar bill at its first stage last month.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
UK ‘behind curve' on assisted dying among progressive nations, says Kim Leadbeater
The UK is 'behind the curve' on assisted dying among progressive nations, the bill's sponsor Kim Leadbeater has said on the eve of one of the most consequential votes for social change in England and Wales. The Labour MP told the Guardian that the circumstances may never be right again to pass such a bill, which would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales for those terminally ill with less than six months to live, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel of experts. Her intervention came amid more warnings about the safeguards in the bill, including from the Royal College of Psychiatrists and disability activists – who will protest outside parliament on Friday at the final vote in the Commons. Opponents believe the bill will not sufficiently protect those with mental illness or disability or from coercion by abusers. On Thursday, another leading Labour MP, Dan Carden, told the Guardian he would vote against the bill and the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, urged her MPs to oppose it. Keir Starmer has reiterated his own support for the bill – but on Thursday night there was no firm commitment from No 10 that the prime minister would be present to vote. 'We are behind the curve,' Leadbeater told the Guardian. 'We've got the law going through the Isle of Man. We've got Jersey. We've got France. We've got various American states, Colorado recently. 'Other countries are looking at us and saying, goodness me, why are you not doing what is essentially the right thing to do? And if we don't do it now, we could be looking at another 10 years. We cannot put families through another 10 years of that.' The MP for Spen Valley said circumstances may never allow such a change for another generation – given the numbers of progressive MPs in the parliament. 'This is surely everything modern parliamentarians should believe in: big societal change for the people that need it,' she said. 'Now is the time.' Should the bill pass, Leadbeater said it would be accessible to those with a terminal illness by the end of the parliament – with a four-year implementation period. 'I will certainly be putting pressure on to commence sooner than that if it can be done safely and effectively,' she said 'But ultimately it's about it being safe rather than rushing it through.' At least 19 MPs have publicly said they will switch sides from either abstaining or backing the bill to voting against. Since the bill was last voted on, there has been a major change to the legislation – the removal of a high court judge to sign off each case, replaced by a panel of experts including a psychiatrist, a social worker and senior lawyer. Proponents of the bill claimed they were confident it will pass again on Friday, having previously passed with a majority of 55. But further high-profile switchers or even significant interventions in the chamber on Friday could be critical and those who oppose the bill said they believe there was still significant traffic in their direction. Campaigners on both sides said that MPs would be going to extraordinary lengths to make the vote – returning from hospital bedsides and long-haul trips. Carden, who leads the Blue Labour group of MPs, told the Guardian he would vote against, having previously abstained. 'Legalising assisted suicide will normalise the choice of death over life, care, respect and love,' the MP for Liverpool Walton said. 'I draw on my own family experience, caring for my dad who died from lung cancer three years ago. 'I genuinely fear the legislation will take us in the wrong direction. The values of family, social bonds, responsibilities, time and community will be diminished, with isolation, atomisation and individualism winning again.' Those who have switched from previously supporting the bill to voting against include the Conservative former minister George Freeman, the Lib Dem work and pensions spokesperson, Steve Darling, and Labour MPs Karl Turner, Kanishka Narayan and Jonathan Hinder. But there have been some who have moved to vote in favour, including the Ipswich Labour MP Jack Abbott, who voted against in November but switched to support having been on the bill's scrutiny committee, saying he was now convinced the safeguards were robust. A YouGov poll on the eve of the vote found support for assisted dying has robust support among the UK public – 75% believe that assisted dying should in principle be legal in some form in the UK, compared to 14% opposed. But there are significant divisions across different sections of society. In polling for the Muslim Council of Britain, British Muslims were overwhelmingly likely to oppose the bill. The poll found 70% of respondents said that if their local MP were to vote for the assisted suicide bill, it would make them less likely to vote for them at the next election. Badenoch urged Conservative MPs to vote against the bill, though it remains a free vote. 'I'm somebody who has been previously supportive of assisted suicide,' she said. 'This bill is a bad bill. It is not going to deliver. It has not been done properly. 'This is not how we should put through legislation like this. I don't believe that the NHS and other services are ready to carry out assisted suicide, so I'll be voting no, and I hope as many Conservative MPs as possible will be supporting me in that.' The Royal College of Psychiatrists issued another warning ahead of the vote, saying there were 'too many unanswered questions about the safeguarding of people with mental illness'. Should the bill pass on Friday, it will then go to the House of Lords. However, it is not expected peers will block its progress once the Commons has passed the bill, though it may be amended. The Labour peer Luciana Berger urged MPs to vote against the bill if they were unsure about safeguards, rather than assume further changes would be made in the Lords. 'Elected MPs should be clear that as it is a [private members bill], amendments are likely to be limited,' she posted on X. 'MPs must be satisfied that the Bill in front of them on Friday is fit for purpose.' The Labour peer Charlie Falconer is likely to take charge of the bill in the House of Lords. Falconer had submitted his own bill to the Lords prior to Leadbeater's – though he withdrew it when her bill was put to the Commons. Proponents of the bill hope it would receive royal assent by October, but there will be a four-year implementation period to allow the NHS, Department of Health and Social Care and the Ministry of Justice to develop procedures and guidance. It is – as yet – unclear if the procedure would be available on the NHS or free at the point of use.
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Public Health Wales issues update on infection outbreak linked to Welsh attraction
Public Health Wales issues update on infection outbreak linked to Welsh attraction A total of 89 confirmed cases were linked to the outbreak at a farm in the Vale of Glamorgan The farm in the Vale (Image: Marlborough Grange Farm ) An infection outbreak associated with a farm shop, which saw a total of 89 confirmed cases in Vale of Glamorgan, has been officially declared over. Public Health Wales confirmed that the cryptosporidium outbreak associated with Cowbridge Farm Shop at Marlborough Grange Farm in Crossways near Cowbridge has now come to an end. The NHS body said a total of 89 confirmed cases were linked to the outbreak, but there had been no new cases identified since the last outbreak control team (OCT) meeting, which was was held on Wednesday, May 28. Following their final meeting on Wednesday, June 18, the outbreak was considered closed. Stay informed on the latest health news by signing up to our newsletter here . According to NHS Wales, cryptosporidium is a parasite that causes an infection called cryptosporidiosis. It can affect people and farm animals. Cryptosporidium is found in lakes, streams and rivers, untreated drinking water and sometimes in swimming pools. Public Health Wales said that although the outbreak has ended they are still encouraging people to practice good hygiene, such as thorough handwashing with soap and water, especially after contact with animals or the natural environment. Article continues below The main symptoms of cryptosporidium infection include: Watery diarrhoea Stomach pains or cramps Nausea or vomiting Mild fever Loss of appetite Weight loss According to Public Health Wales, the symptoms usually start between two and 10 days after exposure and can last for up to two weeks. To help reduce the risk of infection, people visiting farms are reminded to follow the NHS' body's hygiene precautions, which are: Avoid close contact with animals – including holding, cuddling or kissing animals – this significantly increases the risk of illness. Always wash your hands thoroughly with soap and warm water after touching animals, footwear, clothing, bikes, scooters, prams etc. before eating or drinking. Alcohol based hand gels do not provide sufficient cleaning. The physical action of washing with soap and water is the most reliable way to remove the parasite from the skin. Supervise children closely to ensure they wash their hands properly and to avoid close contact, especially cuddling or kissing the animals. Do not eat or drink while touching animals or walking around the farm. Remove and clean footwear and wash hands after leaving the farm. Pregnant women should take particular care to avoid contact with newborn lambs during lambing season. Susan Mably, consultant in health protection at Public Health Wales, said: "We would like to thank everyone affected by this outbreak for their understanding and cooperation. Article continues below "We are particularly grateful to our colleagues from Shared Regulatory Services, Vale of Glamorgan Council, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and the Animal and Plant Health Agency for their expertise and partnership throughout this investigation."
