Elation as Whanganui gets voice in fast-track seabed mining decision
Whanganui councillor Charlotte Melser, who opposes Taranaki seabed mining, said the council now had the opportunity to influence the decision.
'It means our foot is in the door to have our say about how this proposal would negatively impact our district. I was elated,' she told Local Democracy Reporting.
It was critical for the council to have a voice in the fast-track process because the legislation provided limited opportunities for public input, she said.
Under the act, only relevant local authorities, identified iwi authorities and selected others can make written comments on applications.
'It cuts out the voices of community, scientists, environmentalists, divers – some of the people that know that marine area better than anyone,' Melser said.
Whanganui councillor Charlotte Melser says it is crucial for the council to have its say about how a South Taranaki seabed mining proposal would negatively impact Whanganui. Photo / Tuakana Te Tana (single use only)
'We've had to fight tooth and nail just to get this far because Whanganui is not directly in the project zone.'
TTR wants to extract up to 50 million tonnes of seabed material a year. It would recover an estimated 5 million tonnes of vanadium-rich titanomagnetite concentrate and then dump unwanted sediment back into the sea.
Its application says the project would bring regional benefits, including 305 jobs with the miner and port upgrades at New Plymouth and Whanganui.
TTR withdrew from an environmental hearing to apply for marine consents via the new fast-track approvals regime.
The councils named as relevant local authorities can nominate a representative to the decision-making panel, provide written comments on the application and speak about those comments if a hearing is held.
They met iwi, TTR and the expert panel's convenor, Jennifer Caldwell, on July 7 to discuss the expertise needed on the panel and the timing of its decision-making.
Whanganui council chief executive David Langford summarised his council's position in a letter to Caldwell before the meeting.
The key concerns were environmental, particularly the negative impact of the sediment plume, which would affect the Whanganui district; cultural, particularly the conflict of the proposal with Treaty obligations and settlements; and economic, specifically the adverse impact of the proposal on the district.
'Our council would like to emphasise the need for expertise to consider the potential economic disbenefit of the proposal with regards to its conflict with offshore wind farming in the Taranaki Bight.'
Whanganui District had been identified as one of the best locations in the world for wind energy, and the council was pursuing opportunities for renewable energy investment, including offshore wind farming, Langford said.
'Our view is that this one project could stand in the way of other projects which would not only provide significant economic benefits for our district (and beyond), but also better align with the Government's strategic objectives around climate, energy and industrial transformation goals (for example, to double New Zealand's renewable electricity production by 2050).'
The scale and nature of the proposed extraction, along with the resuspension of seabed sediments, could affect ecological and cultural features that each had a potential economic impact, he said.
The complex and contentious nature of the application would mean a considerable amount of time would be required to reach a decision.
'Not only is the fast-track process and its underpinning legislation new, but the proposed mining activity is also a world first.'
It would be important to include the council throughout the process.
'We do not believe we should be precluded from any step of this process on the basis that our council has filed a motion opposing the project – our relevance remains, regardless of our position.'
In December last year, Melser's motion opposing the project won the unanimous support of fellow councillors.
A public-excluded meeting of Taranaki Regional Council was expected to decide this week on a collective council nomination to the panel.
Caldwell is expected to appoint a panel by late July.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Elation as Whanganui gets voice in fast-track seabed mining decision
A decision on the application will be made by a panel created for the purpose. Whanganui councillor Charlotte Melser, who opposes Taranaki seabed mining, said the council now had the opportunity to influence the decision. 'It means our foot is in the door to have our say about how this proposal would negatively impact our district. I was elated,' she told Local Democracy Reporting. It was critical for the council to have a voice in the fast-track process because the legislation provided limited opportunities for public input, she said. Under the act, only relevant local authorities, identified iwi authorities and selected others can make written comments on applications. 'It cuts out the voices of community, scientists, environmentalists, divers – some of the people that know that marine area better than anyone,' Melser said. Whanganui councillor Charlotte Melser says it is crucial for the council to have its say about how a South Taranaki seabed mining proposal would negatively impact Whanganui. Photo / Tuakana Te Tana (single use only) 'We've had to fight tooth and nail just to get this far because Whanganui is not directly in the project zone.' TTR wants to extract up to 50 million tonnes of seabed material a year. It would recover an estimated 5 million tonnes of vanadium-rich titanomagnetite concentrate and then dump unwanted sediment back into the sea. Its application says the project would bring regional benefits, including 305 jobs with the miner and port upgrades at New Plymouth and Whanganui. TTR withdrew from an environmental hearing to apply for marine consents via the new fast-track approvals regime. The councils named as relevant local authorities can nominate a representative to the decision-making panel, provide written comments on the application and speak about those comments if a hearing is held. They met iwi, TTR and the expert panel's convenor, Jennifer Caldwell, on July 7 to discuss the expertise needed on the panel and the timing of its decision-making. Whanganui council chief executive David Langford summarised his council's position in a letter to Caldwell before the meeting. The key concerns were environmental, particularly the negative impact of the sediment plume, which would affect the Whanganui district; cultural, particularly the conflict of the proposal with Treaty obligations and settlements; and economic, specifically the adverse impact of the proposal on the district. 'Our council would like to emphasise the need for expertise to consider the potential economic disbenefit of the proposal with regards to its conflict with offshore wind farming in the Taranaki Bight.' Whanganui District had been identified as one of the best locations in the world for wind energy, and the council was pursuing opportunities for renewable energy investment, including offshore wind farming, Langford said. 'Our view is that this one project could stand in the way of other projects which would not only provide significant economic benefits for our district (and beyond), but also better align with the Government's strategic objectives around climate, energy and industrial transformation goals (for example, to double New Zealand's renewable electricity production by 2050).' The scale and nature of the proposed extraction, along with the resuspension of seabed sediments, could affect ecological and cultural features that each had a potential economic impact, he said. The complex and contentious nature of the application would mean a considerable amount of time would be required to reach a decision. 'Not only is the fast-track process and its underpinning legislation new, but the proposed mining activity is also a world first.' It would be important to include the council throughout the process. 'We do not believe we should be precluded from any step of this process on the basis that our council has filed a motion opposing the project – our relevance remains, regardless of our position.' In December last year, Melser's motion opposing the project won the unanimous support of fellow councillors. A public-excluded meeting of Taranaki Regional Council was expected to decide this week on a collective council nomination to the panel. Caldwell is expected to appoint a panel by late July. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
1News
3 days ago
- 1News
'Torches' and 'pitchforks': Rotorua council's turbulent water debate
Rotorua Lakes Council has thrashed out two proposals that will shape the city's future approach to water and treated wastewater services. But it was not straightforward in the meeting on Wednesday, with councillor Robert Lee's suggestion to dump treated wastewater into a stream rebuked by fellow councillors, and debates over mana whenua and te ao Māori principles. Rotorua's current wastewater system uses spray irrigation in the Whakarewarewa Forest under a temporary agreement until 2026. The council was voting on whether to establish a Recovered Water Working Group to assess alternatives and recommend a new permanent discharge method by early 2027. The vote was divided into two sections, with the criteria and values of a working group to consider as well as the weighting of those values. ADVERTISEMENT Lee labelled the process "overly complex and complicated" and any working group a "recipe for disaster". Councillor Robert Lee of Rotorua Lakes Council. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) He suggested a simple solution existed, which was to drain treated wastewater into Puarenga Stream. He said this would be the "cheapest solution" for ratepayers. Councillor Gregg Brown said that would be a "pretty quick" way to end up in the Environment Court. Councillor Don Paterson then suggested the people of Ngapuna would be "lighting torches and coming with pitchforks" should that be the plan. Councillor Conan O'Brien insisted a complete consensus on the issue was unlikely, before Mayor Tania Tapsell emphasised a need to go "above and beyond" to ensure all wastewater decision-making was made in the public eye. Rotorua Lakes Council Mayor Tania Tapsell. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) ADVERTISEMENT Councillor Lani Kereopa also expressed her concerns about the plan putting costs ahead of mana whenua engagement. She and Lee both voted against the criteria and values. Councillors were asked to vote on how to prioritise the outcomes the working group should focus on. One option gave more weight to financial and practical concerns, assigning 35% each to total lifecycle cost and implementation risk, while giving just 10% each to relationships with mana whenua, community acceptance and environmental outcomes. The alternative was to treat all five areas equally at 20% each. Most councillors supported the first option with the heavier weighting on cost and risk. However, Kereopa, Paterson and Trevor Maxwell voted against it, raising concerns that mana whenua engagement was being undervalued. Lee abstained. There was more heated debate as councillors confirmed the Water Services Delivery Plan. The plan, required by the Government's Local Water Done Well legislation, stated Rotorua would continue managing water services in-house until at least 2028. ADVERTISEMENT Meanwhile, the council would explore forming a joint water services organisation with neighbouring councils, then make a final service delivery model decision in 2027. Lee signalled an intention to abstain from voting, saying he was sceptical of the ability of a council-controlled organisation to deliver and of some wording around te ao Māori and mana whenua. He highlighted a recent agreement with Ngāti Kearoa-Ngāti Tuara over Karamū Tākina Springs, which supply 60% of the city's drinking water, saying it meant rates rises for constituents. Despite their concerns about changes being forced upon them by central government, Lee's abstention was rebuked by Brown and O'Brien. Councillor Gregg Brown. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) "For a mayoral candidate to sit on the fence is not great fella," said Brown. "Abstain? Come on. You've got all the information make a decision." "I won't be abstaining despite my concerns," said O'Brien. "Because I am here to make decisions. I believe that is why people put me here. Not just to blab, continue on and sit on the fence and not make a decision or follow principles." ADVERTISEMENT Lee suggested abstaining was one of three voting options, along with yes and no. 'Continuing bashing of Māori and iwi' Tapsell said his voting options were yes or no and that abstaining was considered a non-vote. The mayor praised council staff for putting together a "strategic document', which gave the council time and opportunity to decrease costs and ensure they make the right long-term decision. She then called out Lee for what she described as his "continuing bashing of Māori and iwi". Tapsell suggested the Karamū Tākina Springs agreement potentially saved a sum approaching $100 million. Lee's attempt to raise a point of order in response was shot down by Tapsell, who gave him one more chance to "please be quiet" to allow the meeting to continue. ADVERTISEMENT The motion then carried, with Lee abstaining and Paterson voting against – believing it was unfair Rotorua be treated the same as other areas with poorer performing water systems. Tapsell and Lee previously confirmed to Local Democracy Reporting they would run for mayor in the October election. By Matthew Nash, Local Democracy Reporter LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Melser Announces Re-Election Bid With Focus On Youth And Climate
Singer, activist and Whanganui councillor Charlotte Melser has announced she will stand for a second term in October's local body elections. Melser will campaign on four pillars: enabling the youth sector, climate and environment, community cohesion, and business and innovation. The former restaurant owner – at 37 one of the council's youngest elected members – launched her first term in local government in 2022. 'The reason I initially stood hasn't changed – the importance of broader representation. For people to want to engage in democracy they need to see people they feel represent them and their values.' It had been a challenging three years and big issues lay ahead. 'It's been an absolute baptism by fire. The complexities of local government are growing and we've been through pretty tough economic times. 'I've worked hard to learn the mechanisms and different parts of council, to understand how our town works, and the levers we can pull to connect people and make it better. 'There are pieces of work I've spent a lot of time and energy on, which I would love to see through, particularly in the youth space.' During long-term plan deliberations, the council decided to dissolve its youth council. Responding to a 'huge' outcry of public support for youth representation, Melser asked for a $10,000 youth initiatives budget, which councillors not only backed but increased to $40,000. 'We're now looking at something pretty cool that could elevate and enable the sector. 'Across the board, the challenges are marketing, networking and reaching the youth that organisations are specifically trying to target. We are looking at ways to fill those gaps and connect the sector.' A key focus in the new triennium would be change within local government, including potential amalgamation. 'The writing is on the wall – things are changing. A lot of conversations need to be had to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of local government. 'Water reform is part of it, the first tranche of change. We're walking down another road of pretty big reform beyond water services. 'A lot of councils, including our own, are working together to find efficiencies like shared service arrangements, which makes sense.' An advocate for environment, biodiversity and climate strategies, Melser gained her qualification as a Resource Management Act (RMA) hearings commissioner during the term and sees RMA reform as another big council workstream. She is concerned about lack of clarity and guidance from Government on climate resilience and adaptation. 'RMA reform is surely the opportunity to start seriously talking about climate change adaptation. 'We're getting major weather event after major weather event. We have MPs talking about where the liability lands in terms of home ownership and buy-outs, and in the meantime we're having insurance payouts fixing these homes up and selling them on, so where's the liability? 'Where is the conversation about managed retreat? We need continuity around the country in terms of what that looks like, and that needs to come from the top.' Whanganui could not on its own fund the managed retreat of vulnerable areas such as Anzac Parade, Pūtiki and along parts of the Whanganui River. 'Our communities deserve to have certainty and clarity, and we as a district deserve to have direction on what that looks like.' Melser has been an active opponent of proposed seabed mining off South Taranaki. 'I've been working very hard on that in my own time. It's at a crucial point as the fast-track approvals process is stood up. 'Opposition is massive and growing. You've got the fishing industry, farmers, environmentalists, scientists, politicians, businesses, iwi. Never have I seen such unity among communities on a single issue.' Melser's promise to advance community cohesion rests on her experience in Castlecliff, where she lives and once owned The Citadel restaurant. She cites the Castlecliff Rejuvenation Project partnership with the council as an important insight into the growth and activation that could be achieved through the power of community. Whanganui could develop as a thriving hub of business and innovation, logistics and manufacturing, Melser said. 'It's about looking outward regionally, where the opportunities are. Our airport and port developments put us in a really strong position to be innovative and connected in logistics, and we have incredible manufacturers here in all sorts of industries.' The mother of young twins has also worked to support the introduction of Whanganui's first Māori seats this year. 'My sense of justice and fairness kicked in and I just got to work. I think it's going to be a game-changer.' Melser will confirm her second-term campaign on Friday with a fundraising event at Amdram Theatre, supported by Castlecliff Lights. A singer-songwriter herself, Melser will also perform. Her second single Down To Me will be released on 16 August.
