logo
Kenny MacAskill: SNP losing by-election was unforgiveable

Kenny MacAskill: SNP losing by-election was unforgiveable

The National2 days ago

The town's name is seared in Scotland's soul from Winnie Ewing's victory there in the UK Parliament by-election in 1967. I was a child then but was aware of its seismic effect on not just Scottish politics but Scottish society.
Many stalwarts told me how a movement viewed as marginal and romantic came alive with that triumph. Scottish politics was changed irrevocably, with independence becoming a possibility, not just a dream.
More recently, when I was justice secretary, I worked with Christina McKelvie, an assiduous and popular MSP, as she sought to address knife crime in her community.
READ MORE: SNP candidate calls out Tory rival for being in 'lockstep with failed ideology'
The seat's loss a bitter blow to the efforts of those stalwarts and countless others.
Alba stood aside, calling on supporters to 'max the Yes vote'. Just what the Scottish Greens think they achieved by standing is for them to explain, with their total of votes barely greater than the very small Labour majority.
Unionists are now crowing and the impact will be felt by the wider independence movement. It's a tragedy which will require work and change to come back from.
It wasn't the fault of the SNP candidate any more than success can be attributed to her spectacularly poor Labour opponent. The polish of New Labour was forsaken, with Davy Russell a throwback to Labour candidates from days of yore when the party reigned across huge swathes of Scotland, its dead hand lying across the land.
Under Alex Salmond's leadership, that Tammany Hall power was broken and Scotland was transformed for the better. We cannot allow those dark days to return.
Remember that this was also a defeat for what little remains of the Labour left and those who still think Scotland can be transformed within the Union.
Last week's result will be taken as an endorsement of Starmerism, legitimation of the austerity agenda and Labour's attacks on the poor and vulnerable. Those who have bravely spoken out will be hounded and party loyalists empowered.
Responsibility for the defeat rests with the SNP leadership for both its lamentable by-election strategy, and its actions and failings over recent years. Circumstances had changed from last year and were favourable for SNP.
The tidal clamour for change last July, which saw myself and my Alba colleague swept out of the UK Parliament along with numerous SNP MPs, had well and truly ebbed. Starmer's Labour were and are deeply unpopular. At the same
time independence was polling well above 50% and even higher when the spectre of Farage and Reform was posed. All good, you'd think, for pushing the case for independence.
READ MORE: SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action', says Swinney
That was what, after all, was done by Winnie Ewing all those years ago and decades before we even had our Parliament restored. She gave a vision of the land Scotland could be, contrasting it with the country it was, as pits and shipyards started to close and emigration continued.
But independence wasn't mentioned by the SNP. It was the policy notable only for its absence in literature, on the doorsteps and in debate.
Yet it was the unique selling point for the SNP.
It was the one thing that carved them out from their principal opponents, Labour and Reform, and, even more than that, was backed by well over half of voters. That failure's not just inexplicable but unforgiveable.
Instead, a strategy of 'stop Reform' was pushed. Just what was that meant to express other than avoiding having to answer for failings in their Scottish Government administration is hard to fathom.
In politics, saying what you're for is always better than arguing what you're against. It motivates those who share your beliefs and can even earn respect or at least legitimation from opponents.
Besides, Reform are not going to take power in Scotland – but only independence can ensure they are not foisted on us by being in the Union. The SNP leadership treated independence supporters in Hamilton with the same arrogance and disdain that they've treated the wider movement over recent years.
A simple assumption that they'd have to vote for them and the backing of others could safely be pursued.
Do what 'yer telt' and 'wheesht for indy'. But, as in 2017, where there's neither motivation nor articulation of independence, many simply stayed at home. The SNP did not lose support to Reform in Hamilton, instead they saw independence supporters say: 'What's the point of voting?'
That compounded growing contempt for their failings in office and their lack of vision for the country. An obsession with gender and identity when what is wanted is an improvement in public services, whether health or housing, jobs or justice. Focusing on individual rights rather than the collective good at a time when communities are struggling.
There has to be a coming together of the independence movement but that requires a recognition by SNP that they are only a part, albeit a major part, of it.
The growing gap between support for independence and support for SNP tells a story and a bit of humility would go a long way. It also means that Holyrood 2026 has to be a plebiscite election and that to 'Max the Yes', it has to be vote Alba on the list.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scottish Government rules out reopening national park process
Scottish Government rules out reopening national park process

The National

time23 minutes ago

  • The National

Scottish Government rules out reopening national park process

With ministers having decided not to proceed with plans to establish a national park in Galloway, Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said she would not be 'reopening' the process. That was despite Galloway having been selected for consideration from a shortlist of five areas. As Gougeon appeared before Holyrood's Rural Affairs Committee, she was pressed on whether one of the other areas could now be considered for national park status. READ MORE: Secondary pupils to receive free school meals in eligibility expansion Noting that the plans for Galloway had been abandoned because of a lack of public support in the area, Green MSP Mark Ruskell said in one of the other shortlisted areas, Tay Forest, a consultation had found a 'large majority support for a national park in that area'. He told the Rural Affairs Secretary: 'You have one area which does have public support, does meet the criteria, what would be the future for a national park in Tay Forest at this point?' Gougeon told him: 'We set out a process to establish or to designate a new national park in Scotland, as far as I am concerned we have completed that process and we have come to a decision not to proceed with that designation. 'So, I wouldn't want you to now think we are going to reopen that or go back to consider other bids, because we have been through that process and that has been completed. 'So, I won't be going back to review those bids or to consider proceeding on that basis.' Gougeon added that ministers are 'open to considering establishing a national park, potentially in the future' but with the next Holyrood elections taking place in May 2026 she stressed that this would be for a future government to consider. Ruskell said: 'That sounds like no more national parks for the foreseeable future, at a time when there are lots of national park proposals being developed in England and elsewhere.' Scotland currently has two national parks, with one in the Cairngorms and one in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs. The Scottish Government's commitment to creating a new one came out of the powersharing agreement between the SNP and the Scottish Greens at Holyrood – a deal which came to an end last year when then first minister Humza Yousaf ejected the smaller party from his government. Gougeon appeared before Holyrood's Rural Affairs Committee some two weeks after she confirmed that the Government would not be proceeding with the proposed national park in Galloway. She told MSPs than that a consultation had found 54% of people were opposed to a national park in the area, with 42% in favour. Among local people, 57% were against the national park bid while 40% were supportive of it, Ms Gougeon added.

Ex-Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross sparks fury by chairing 'farcical' Holyrood committee remotely from 4,000 miles away in the CARIBBEAN
Ex-Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross sparks fury by chairing 'farcical' Holyrood committee remotely from 4,000 miles away in the CARIBBEAN

Daily Mail​

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Ex-Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross sparks fury by chairing 'farcical' Holyrood committee remotely from 4,000 miles away in the CARIBBEAN

The former leader of the Scottish Tories sparked fury today after chairing a Holyrood committee while 4,000 miles away in the Caribbean. Douglas Ross acted as convener of the education committee via video-link from an official visit to the Turks and Caicos Islands. The meeting room in Edinbugh was packed with MSPs ready to question SNP education secretary Jenny Gilruth, children's minister Natalie Don-Innes, and higher and further education minister Graeme Dey. He got up at 4am local time to chair the 9am BST meeting, but refused to hand over control to deputy convener Jackie Dunbar - who was in the committee room - because there was nothing in the rules to say he could not chair from abroad. But it comes months after the Scottish Tories criticised SNP MSP Evelyn Tweed for voting at a committee via videolink from the Cayman Islands. Former Scottish Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie told the meeting: 'It is wholly inappropriate and unprofessional for Douglas Ross to even attempt to chair the Education Committee 4,000 miles away in the Caribbean. 'This is especially the case when questioning the three ministers for education on issues such as temporary contracts for teachers, school violence, the University of Dundee, the future of colleges, The Promise, additional support needs and so much more. 'These issues deserve a convener who is in the room rather than attempting to conduct affairs in the middle of the night in the Turks and Caicos islands.' The former Scottish Conservative leader is in the Caribbean as part of a Commonwealth Parliamentary Association seminar following a nomination by Scottish Parliament members of the association. Mr Ross, who arrived in the archipelago on Monday and will return on Thursday, had said beforehand he would still attend the committee. During the session, Mr Rennie said his appearance from the Caribbean 'doesn't make you look good and it doesn't make this committee look good'. He had asked Mr Ross to hand over his duties on Wednesday to the vice-convener. Mr Ross said he was happy to hear concerns and allow deputy convener Ms Dunbar to convene the committee. Following a brief suspension, Ms Dunbar said the rules for conveners did not distinguish between a virtual or physical appearance at the committee, and Mr Ross convened the rest of the meeting. SNP MSP George Adam also lashed out at Mr Ross for 'convening this from a tropical island on the other side of the world'. 'I am, for the record, not happy. I find this meeting farcical, the fact that you could even think you could do that online from the other side of the world,' he said. 'To be fair, it's the best behaved you've been in the past couple of weeks so perhaps being online suits you and not actually meeting people in person is maybe not your best way forward. 'The aggressive manner and the lack of respect you've shown to people who have come to the committee in the past have actually made this Parliament look bad. 'I want to put that on the record because we have tried on numerous occasions to talk to you, take you aside and ask you to do the right thing, but you continue with your continued behaviour and quite frankly I think it makes you look small and pathetic.'

Rachel Reeves' £445m is a major victory for Wales, but there is more to do
Rachel Reeves' £445m is a major victory for Wales, but there is more to do

Wales Online

timean hour ago

  • Wales Online

Rachel Reeves' £445m is a major victory for Wales, but there is more to do

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info As of yesterday lunchtimes, Wales' First Minister and her cabinet were still in the dark, waiting to hear whether their letters, their lobbying, their pleas, had been heard by Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer. They knew that if Wales didn't get a big sum, it would be disastrous. Not just politically, as it would provide untold hours of capital for opponents to be able to accuse them of not even having influence with their party colleagues in power in Westminster, but with voters. Voters who have been telling any Labour party member knocking on their door that they were fed up. Fed up of the cuts to welfare payments, fed up of the changes to winter fuel payments, and fed up with services that just aren't good enough. Then in the early evening on Tuesday night, the figure of £445m was starting to circulate, and there was a collective exhale of breath. That is clearly a big sum of money that Rachel Reeves is all but certain to confirm will be spent in Wales when she stands up in the Commons today, and it is specifically to improve rail in Wales. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here It will be spent by both governments - because rail is complicated and bits of the network here are controlled by the Welsh Government and other parts of it by the UK government But the bit of the announcement that actually brought particular joy was that the figure before the pound sign was prefaced with two words "at least". There has been a concerted lobbying effort behind the scenes. Labour figures are talking up Jo Stevens' role as Welsh secretary and it is certainly a big win for her. Labour MPs too have been at pains to explain they have been involved, slowly and cautiously bending the ear of chief secretary to the Treasury, Darren Jones, about why it made sense to invest in rail in Wales. WalesOnline has been campaigning since the start of the year. We've given a platform to different voices arguing what should be done to rectify decades of underfunding of the rail network here - and put pressure on politicians to act in a critical year in which the Labour administration at Westminster has two significant opportunities to act. (Image: Marc White / WalesOnline) For politicians, it has been a long game, a careful plan of sending formal letters, of getting public acknowledgement rail had been historically underfunded in Wales. MPs from Wales met with Mr Jones privately to explain why they need this, the benefits it will bring on both an individual constituency level, but to Wales as a nation, and those dire polling numbers won't be far from anyone's minds. This spending review has committed money to improving rail in Wales in the short term, over the next few years. That was one of the asks of our campaign. The other is for the UK Government to put in place a mechanism to ensure fair funding over the long term as well. Keir Starmer's government has an opportunity through its Railways Bill to put in place a system to ensure that the Welsh rail network is never denied fair funding again. This is more complicated than it has ever been before because the Welsh Government has control of the Core Valleys Lines. But the UK government can put in place a system to ensure that both the Welsh Government gets fair funding to maintain and enhance those rail lines and also that a fair share of investment goes into the lines like the main lines in south and north Wales that are still owned and run by Westminster. This is vital because the way the Treasury has historically allocated investment through the Green Book formula - which focuses with tunnel vision on return on investment - has meant that cash has been ploughed into the most populous areas in the south east for decades and decades. WalesOnline's campaign for fair funding Keir Starmer has a historic chance this year to end decades of second-class treatment of the Welsh rail network. Far less money is spent per person on rail in Wales compared to England and that has left us with far less electrified track and without the capacity to build a transport network fit for the nation's needs. This spring Mr Starmer's government is conducting a multi-year spending review which gives him the opportunity to reset the amount of funding allocated to the rail network in Wales. Later on in the year, he's planning a major bit of rail legislation that will be a once-in-a-generation chance to put in place a mechanism to guarantee fairness in perpetuity. Read more about this here. You can help put pressure on him to do use this historic opportunity by signing WalesOnline's petition on the UK government website calling for fair rail funding for Wales. Very simply, we want people in England and Wales to be treated the same when it comes to rail. There are arguments about how this should be done but widespread agreement that things must change. One academic told WalesOnline the Wales always comes at the bottom of the pile and will continue to unless there is full devolution. Another told us there was no appetite in either Cardiff Bay or Westminster for devolution and this lack of ambition was repeating the biggest mistake the Welsh Government had ever made. There are fears that unless there is full devolution, Wales will suffer every time the UK government cuts spending but protects major projects in England, as is happening right now. However the Welsh Government believes fair funding can be delivered without full devolution, which is does not want. And the head of a passenger body told us he didn't care who got the money as long as they did a good job with it, adding more cash could make a huge difference. The result has been that London and the surrounding counties have an extensive, electrified rail network encompassing underground trains, light rail lines, commuter services, dedicated airport lines and express services all serving the UK's most densely populated region. But Wales? We've been left with old stock, reliability issues and overcrowded services we all know too well. In recent years, the Welsh Government has been ploughing in its own money to address some of these problems. But that money has effectively been redirected from the share of public spending on other areas that the Welsh Government gets from Westminster. Today's announcement ensures that there will be a significant sum of funding for rail in Wales that should allow investment in both maintenance and also improvements, such as work on the Burns stations in south Wales and progress towards electrification in the north. Yet we will again be left depending on academics reviewing spending in the years to come to work out just how fair this has been - and whether these millions being spent in Wales are truly a fair share of the millions that will be spent in the same period on the flagship projects in England like HS2, East West rail. The UK government has an opportunity later this year to end the baffling, endless, arguments about how projects are classified, which has left the public utterly befuddled. It has an opportunity to guarantee fairness for posterity. There is a very simple truth that over the coming decades billions and billions are going to be spent in England on massive schemes like HS2, East West rail and the huge plans for trams and trains in the north of England. Although we've been talking about it for years, HS2 is not a historic injustice. It's still largely a future one as most of the money has not been spent yet. There are still 16 more years of spending to come. The widely-misunderstood fact is that the £4bn figure everyone cites is not something Wales has already missed out on - it's the amount Wales will miss out on if nothing is done. That's why it will be slightly misleading if you hear politicians today compare the £445m being announced in today's spending review with that much larger HS2 consequential figure. A fair share of those HS2 billions still can and should come to Wales. Not all of it should go to the Welsh Government, at least not while much of the rail network in Wales is controlled from Westminster. But this argument can be ended by putting in place a formula to guarantee a population-based share of rail funding for Wales for posterity. The lobbying campaign that delivered today's funding announcement should celebrate. But it will have to go again because major bits of rail legislation are few and far between. It is 20 years since the last one and the importance of this opportunity must be hammered home to politicians and civil servants in Westminster. There is a chance for Wales to put baffling arguments about rail classification, like the £6bn East West rail row we wrote about here, behind us. It is accepted by both governments that Wales has missed out in terms of rail. Today is a welcome step in the right direction but Keir Starmer must now take the chance he has later this year to make sure it doesn't happen again.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store