logo
Actually, it is the patronising, tone-deaf MPs who need reminding we are human

Actually, it is the patronising, tone-deaf MPs who need reminding we are human

Daily Mirror04-07-2025
Hang on a minute.
Five minutes ago, Chancellor Rachel Reeves was ready and willing to balance the government's books on the back of the poor and the weakest in our society.
The Daily Mirror was among the platforms with a conscience highlighting the ordinary working - and in some cases middle - class people whose tears will never be seen in the public domain.
They continue to include people suffering from stress, anxiety, the people whose children with ADHD can't get an education because they are wrongly characterised as trouble instead of traumatised. Who sees their tears? Who weeps for them outside the campaigners working tirelessly to keep them in the news agenda?
Do the tears and the subsequent puffy eyes of the Chancellor really cancel out the concern for them? Does the justified concern we have for Rachel Reeves really outweigh the mounting worry for millions struggling to access the services they need and the others at the mercy of more welfare cuts?
Yes, a nation we go weak at the knees for a tear or two. Weep in public and you instantly become a national treasure. From Paul Gascoigne at the 1990 World Cup, through Andy Murray in 2012, crying before he finally conquered Wimbledon, to Denise Welch who sobbed announcing her marriage split on Loose Women.
But honestly, spare me the vomit-inducing hypocrisy from disingenuous politicians reminding us that MPs are human when they are more than willing to push through policy they know will leave our lives - and others' - in pieces.
On one side of the Despatch box we have a government whose many positive things they have done since taking office a year ago have been eclipsed by what many perceive as a betrayal of the voters who installed them in office.
On the Opposition benches, the Tories whose lack of humanity is extensively documented going back 14 years. And even they are now having to go some to match Reform.
So actually, it is the politicians who need reminding that we are human. It is the politicians whose word salads when families are burning, starving and being brutalised to death in the Middle East, speak volumes. It is the politicians with form for trying take from the poor to give to the rich.
Even at a basic level, it is hard for the government to send out the 'be kind' message when a PM trumpets the number of women in his government while his Chancellor is crying behind him.
Reeves is the woman who guffawed, slapped her thigh and couldn't stop laughing behind Sir Keir Starmer when the PM, defending himself against criticism of his dog whistle, 'Island of Strangers' speech, humiliated Welsh MP Liz Saville Roberts in the House.
None of that means she deserved her difficult moment on Wednesday. All of it means we all have a duty to be kind, to think of others and to mindful of when it next could be us.
Kemi Badenoch is a vicious, mendacious, nasty piece of work with form for ignoring the sisterhood to kick a colleague when she is down.
Four years ago she tried and failed to embarrass an outstanding young female journalist on a rival newspaper when the writer had quite correctly approached her to clarify issues over a video campaign promoting the coronavirus vaccine programme.
But was the Tory leader really the aggressor in this situation? It was only after Badenoch remarked that Reeves appeared miserable that the Chancellor's tears began to flow.
Handed the chance to go in again, Badenoch would only point out that Starmer hadn't backed his Chancellor, not that her quivering bottom lip was dancing all over the place and that mascara was getting ready to run.
The Tory leader has form for showing herself to be devoid of empathy, sympathy and emotional intelligence.
But she actually declined the chance to in harder, to avail herself of an open goal in what would easily have been even more unedifying scenes.
And here's the thing. What was Reeves doing in the Chamber if she was struggling with 'a private matter' that serious? Nobody would have begrudged her the opportunity to leave to address it.
The theatre of politics would have survived had she attended to the matter instead of engaging in the performative Punch and Judy which so often, actually demeans our political system.
Why did none of her government colleagues on the front bench, seeing her distress, immediately move to support her?
Sadly, her continued presence in the Chamber meant Badenoch had to keep her in the Tory crosshairs - as it was the Chancellor's work on the line.
Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions had been the highest profile of the politicians raising the alarm. Millions of words had been written and spoken voicing fear at what had already been characterised as a betrayal of the very people that had voted for this Labour government.
A week ago the Treasury had been briefing there would be no u-turn.
The issue was so serious that, yes, Reeves's colleagues were openly briefing against her.
Now this. There is a view that the Chancellor was feeling the emotional effects of an earlier exchange with the Speaker, caught on camera.
But then, in the next breath, we are told by those who have known her since her student days that she is a tough political operator.
Anyone who has operated in business - and the £3billion hit taken by the markets provided a stark reminder that this was very much business - will know that you simply cannot show what could be perceived as weakness in the field.
As someone who has fought my own battles in the workplace, my mantra has always been to keep a lid on vulnerability. Breathe out in private.
Many of the people who will defend your right to show it in our supposed enlightened era will be the same ones jumping onto their private WhatsApp groups to give you both barrels there.
The reality too, is that whatever the truth, political images act as a brutal metaphor for the bigger political picture.
Ask Ed Miliband who never recovered from his bacon sandwich face. Ask Rishi Sunak, soaked outside no.10 during his General Election announcement or another former PM, Theresa May who wept as she prepared to exit stage left.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is the issue of violence against women being used as as a political tool?
Is the issue of violence against women being used as as a political tool?

Metro

time6 hours ago

  • Metro

Is the issue of violence against women being used as as a political tool?

Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Jon (MetroTalk, Thu) discusses the protests in Epping against the use of a hotel to house asylum seekers. He says they are based on concerns for the safety of women and girls and criticises government minister Jess Phillips for not voicing the same concerns. However, many of those claiming to protest in the name of women's safety – or supporting those who do – have defended Andrew Tate, who has been criticised for his misogynistic views. This raises serious doubts about their true motives. It appears that the issue of violence against women and girls (VAWG) is being co-opted as a political tool — a convenient cover for broader protests targeting asylum seekers and refugees. This tactic mirrors strategies seen in other parts of Europe. It's likely that the next step will be claiming to protect LGBTQ people from asylum seekers, despite the fact that many of these same individuals support policies that harm the LGBTQ community in the UK. Ultimately, it seems they are willing to exploit any marginalised group to advance their political agenda against asylum seekers and refugees. Alfiaz, London Some people seem to be seeing asylum seekers everywhere. No wonder they keep screaming, 'We're being invaded.' First, former Reform MP Rupert Lowe mistook charity rowers off Great Yarmouth for 'illegal immigrants'. Then residents in a Welsh village thought Scouts from Scotland must be migrants because of their accents. You can access completely fee-free mortgage advice with London & Country (L&C) Mortgages, a partner of Metro. Customers benefit from: – Award winning service from the UK's leading mortgage broker – Expert advisors on hand 7 days a week – Access to 1000s of mortgage deals from across the market Unlike many mortgage brokers, L&C won't charge you a fee for their advice. Find out how much you could borrow online Mortgage service provided by London & Country Mortgages (L&C), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number: 143002). The FCA does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages. Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. Now caravan park operator Haven has had to issue a statement saying its facilities aren't being used to house asylum seekers. Apparently, it was sparked by social media posts claiming that 'coaches of men' had been turning up to some caravan parks. The UK is more than 94,000 square miles. At the end of March, there were nearly 110,000 asylum seekers – so barely one per square mile. The overall 68million UK population means there are more than 700 of us per square mile. It's unlikely you are going to see an asylum seeker today. Even if you do, please be nice – not racist. Peter Packham, Chair, Leeds for Europe How dare James Murray-Smith (MetroTalk, Thu) describe a tax on selling your home being considered by chancellor Rachel Reeves as a tax on 'unearned' wealth. Maybe he inherited his property unearned but the rest of us worked hard, often forgoing things, in order to get on the so-called property ladder. So no, it is not 'unearned', which implies undeserving. As to it being 'unavailable to those who do not own their own homes', so what? Is it the seller or home-owners' fault others don't own their homes? It's thinking like this that makes me despair! So much for getting to own your own home as so many of our young are struggling to do. Agatha, Surrey Some estate agents have warned that house-sellers will simply pass the cost of this tax on to buyers. They're wrong. The price of a house isn't controlled by what the owner wants – it is controlled by what the market is willing to pay. Otherwise, owners would sell for however much money they fancied. This tax – which is only being considered for homes above £500,000 – would mean people selling their houses will just end up with less money. Which is fine – they'll still have at least £450,000, which is enough for a deposit and plenty to spare. JWA Caley, St Pancras Rupert Fast's letter (MetroTalk, Thu) should be read by Labour chancellor Rachel Reeves. Britain is indeed, as he says, 'living beyond its means'. This fact has lead to UK gilt yields – the price the market demands for government loans – hitting the highs last seen during Liz Truss's tenure. More Trending This, therefore, supports Mr Fast and means that Britain has to pay more to service growing debt. That of course means Jo and Joe Public paying through taxes. Fares, food, broadband and council taxes have all risen more than inflation. The government must reduce spending and reduce debt. Fast. Graham Reid, Stockport MORE: How to win £3,000,000 house in West Sussex MORE: 'Ozempic vagina' is here and women are paying £2,000 to reverse it MORE: Inside the rise of 'Reta' – the controversial new weight loss jab 3 times stronger than Ozempic

Billy Bragg: 'I love my country's flag - but I won't have it used to intimidate my neighbours'
Billy Bragg: 'I love my country's flag - but I won't have it used to intimidate my neighbours'

Daily Mirror

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Billy Bragg: 'I love my country's flag - but I won't have it used to intimidate my neighbours'

When you pick up a flag, you can't expect to just have your meaning of it accepted by everybody, says musician Billy Bragg When the Lionesses came home victorious after winning in Europe, delighted fans waved St George's and Union flags in celebration of their win. ‌ This week has seen flags being raised again in communities across the country, in a campaign which claims to be promoting patriotism. ‌ The Wythall Flaggers group are asking for every street in their Worcestershire village to be covered in flags. They've crowdfunded around £3,500 towards costs through GoFundMe, where they describe themselves, saying: 'This is NOT racist, never has been, never will be. We have members of the community of all ethnicities and religions stopping by and praising what we are doing.' ‌ But, in an interview on LBC radio, musician and anti-racism campaigner Billy Bragg, asked presenter Nick Abbott: 'What is the Flaggers' motivation?' Billy says 'In the case of the Wythall Flaggers, the question is, 'what is the motivation behind this?' ‌ I love our flag, I'm a patriot myself. But I don't want my flag being used to intimidate my neighbours. I really object to that. Say they (the Wythall Flaggers) put up a community Facebook page and said, 'we want to do a St George's Day event. Everybody's welcome, come on down. You know, we're going to celebrate the fact that St George was born in Lebanon. He came here. Now it's part of our story,' that kind of thing. You can see the context with that. ‌ But when it's just suddenly a load of flags appear, you do have to think to yourself, what's the meaning of this? I think, unfortunately, in the current context, where there's so much hostility towards people who have come to this country without any papers, I think it's a bit of a tinderbox around that issue. We've seen that with people outside the asylum hostels. Clearly the people are demonstrating. They are very angry about the situation and it only takes a small thing to set this off into a spiral of violence. ‌ If you see the flag of St. George flying from the church tower when you're in the countryside somewhere, you know what the context is. Or you might see it when there's a World cup on or something like that. And, you know, the context is support for sport. But in the case of the Wythall Flaggers, the question is, what is their motivation behind this? Flags have meaning. It's true of the trans rights flag, the Palestinian flag, and it's true of the flag of England as well. ‌ It's all about context, really. And in this context, I think there's an ambiguity. And from what's been written on their GoFundMe, they clearly know there's a provocative aspect to what they're doing. And unfortunately, you know, these things can quickly get out of hand. For instance, I'll show you what I mean. ‌ Next month, on 20 September, I'm doing a benefit for Palestinian aid at the Shepherd's Bush Empire, and there will be a lot of Palestinian flags there. I'll probably have one on stage. There will be some people who say, 'well, by flying that flag, you're supporting terrorism.' Whereas we know our intentions are purely with regard to humanitarian aid for people in Gaza. So, when you pick up a flag, you can't expect to just have your meaning of it accepted by everybody. ‌ With patriotism, I think a person's identity is their own sense of who they are. Sometimes you feel a bit patriotic. Perhaps when the football's on you feel patriotic or it might be when the coronation was on, you feel patriotic or trooping the colour. ‌ I would say your, your flag waving patriot is someone who believes passionately in the symbolism of patriotism and they like the symbols because symbols are immutable, they never change - they mean the same thing all the time to them. Whereas my patriotism is based on values, the values we have as a society, values of tolerance and empathy, values of accountability. These are the issues that I feel very strongly about. My patriotism comes out when I see our country, particularly our government, not living up to those values. ‌ So I think there are different types of patriotism and what we're seeing, I think, with the Wythall flaggers is they're trying to enforce their particular type of patriotism on everybody. I don't want it (our flag) to symbolise a narrow definition of Englishness, where everybody has to conform to a particular historical narrative that is exclusive, rather than being inclusive. England is an amazing place. It's one of the most multicultural places in Europe, and I'm proud of it whenever I look. You know, if you want to see a reflection of what it's like, look at any of our sporting teams and national sporting teams. We're a multicultural nation. I'm very proud of that. And it's what makes me feel patriotic. And that's what I want our flag to symbolise.

Rupert Lowe gets his guns back from police
Rupert Lowe gets his guns back from police

Telegraph

time8 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Rupert Lowe gets his guns back from police

Former Reform MP Rupert Lowe has had his guns returned to him by police. The weapons were seized in March after Mr Lowe was accused by Zia Yusuf, the then party chairman, of making two threats of physical violence. Mr Lowe denied the claims. 'I have a large collection, so it took some time – a wheelbarrow was required,' Mr Lowe said at the time. The guns were returned after the Crown Prosecution Service said no action would be brought. 'After having my guns confiscated in an armed police raid late on a Friday night in mid-March thanks to false allegations from Reform's Lee Anderson and Zia Yusuf, I have finally had my guns returned,' he said on X. 'I am pleased they're back, but furious they were ever taken.' The MP for Great Yarmouth has previously published footage of police arriving at his home and inspecting his guns in March during the investigation into alleged threats against Mr Yusuf. He posted the videos and images on X showing police arriving at night before inspecting guns in the kitchen before leaving at 11.38pm. Mr Lowe said at the time: 'As a result of the false allegations that I made threats against the Reform chairman, on the 14th March at 21.30, armed police arrived at my home unannounced – three vehicles, with four armed officers. 'The previous day, I had arranged with the police to voluntarily give up my guns. So as you can imagine, to have armed police suddenly arrive on my doorstep late at night was a deeply stressful situation. 'I am a farmer. Farmers have guns, all entirely legally. There is nothing unusual about it.' The police report came amid Mr Lowe's suspension from Reform and led to an extraordinary war of words between the MP and his now former party. Days before details of the accusations emerged, Mr Lowe had given an interview in which he accused party leader Nigel Farage of acting like a messiah and said he was not sure he could continue to back him. In a series of WhatsApp messages leaked to the BBC earlier this year, Mr Farage told an activist Mr Lowe was suspended because he had tried to 'damage' the party before the local elections. Mr Lowe is still facing a parliamentary investigation into allegations that he and members of his team bullied two former members of his staff, claims that he has categorically denied.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store