&w=3840&q=100)
Are Pak military leaders' visits to US signs of resetting ties? Should India be bothered?
The US and Pakistan military ties are seeing a reset. The latest indicator -- Pakistan air force chief's visit to Washington. Representational image/Reuters
In the days after the Pahalgam terror attack, the United States stood firmly by India's side; US President Trump strongly condemned the terror attack and expressed full support to India to bring to justice the perpetrators of the 'heinous attack'. Then, US spy chief Tulsi Gabbard added that her country would back New Delhi as it hunts down the perpetrators, while US House Speaker Mike Johnson said that America would make every effort to help India in its fight against terrorism.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
However, actions speak louder than words, and the US actions are quite telling for India. In the past two weeks, the US leadership has met with the top echelons of the Pakistani military — first Trump met Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir on June 18, and now Pakistan's Chief of the Air Staff Zaheer Ahmed Baber Sidhu met with officials at the Pentagon, State Department and Capitol Hill on Wednesday (July 2).
So, what's brewing? Is the US looking at a reset of its military ties with Islamabad? And what does that mean for New Delhi?'
Pakistan Air Force chief in US
On Wednesday (July 2), Pakistan Air Force Chief Zaheer Ahmed Baber Sidhu visited Washington, holding high-level meetings at the Pentagon, State Department and Capitol Hill to 'further enhance bilateral defence cooperation and mutual interest'.
Sidhu's meetings at the Pentagon included high-level talks with US Air Force Chief of Staff General David W Elon and Secretary of the Air Force for International Affairs Kelly L Seybolt, focusing on joint operational training, technology sharing, and institutional ties and future cooperation.
Similarly, at the State Department, Sidhu met Brown L Stanley of the bureau of political and military affairs and Eric Meyer of the bureau of South and Central Asian affairs. The Pakistan Air Force chief also met some prominent members of the US Congress, including Mike Turner, Rich McCormick, and Bill Heizenga.
Pakistan's Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmad Baber Sidhu has completed a landmark visit to the United States. File image/PTI
A Pakistan Air Force (PAF) statement read, 'This high-level visit is a strategic milestone in the Pak-US defence partnership. The visit will play a significant role in addressing key regional and global security issues as well as building institutional ties.'
Many analysts pointed that Sidhu's visit, which comes nearly two months after India's Operation Sindoor, was with the aim of acquiring American military hardware. Pakistan hopes to acquire the American-built F-16 Block 70 fighter jets, AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missiles, and batteries of the US-made High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This comes as India's missiles and drones bypassed Pakistans China-supplied defence systems to strike military targets deep inside the country. Moreover, it is reported that Chinese-made HQ-9P and HQ-16 missile defence systems were destroyed in Indian counterstrikes.
Pakistan's Munir lunches with Trump
What is most interesting about the Pakistan air force chief's visit to Washington is that it comes just weeks after Pakistan Army chief General Asim Munir travelled to the US for a luncheon with President Donald Trump.
On June 18, Trump hosted Munir at the White House for a closed-door luncheon. It is not clear what transpired in the meeting between Trump and Field Marshal Munir.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly was quoted as saying that the meeting between the two came after the Pakistan army chief pitched Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in preventing a nuclear war between India and Pakistan.
Ever-changing US-Pakistan military ties
The Trump-Munir lunch, the visit of the Pakistan army chief to Washington, and the US army general Michael Kurilla's reference to Islamabad as a 'phenomenal partner in countering terrorism' during an appearance at a hearing of the US House Armed Services Committee last month all signal a change in the US-Pakistan military ties.
And it's quite a dramatic reset; dramatic because seven years ago, Trump accused Pakistan of giving the US 'nothing but lies and deceit' and safe havens to terrorists – and one that his immediate successor Joe Biden called 'one of the most dangerous nations'.
But just how have ties changed between the two countries?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In 1947, soon after Pakistan was formed, US concerns about Soviet expansionism in the region and Islamabad's desire for security assistance against a perceived threat from India prompted a military alliance between the two countries.
Seven years later, Washington and Islamabad signed a mutual defence assistance agreement and soon military aid started flowing into Pakistan. In 1964, Pakistani President Mohammed Ayub Khan even wrote in an article for Foreign Affairs that Islamabad is 'America's most allied ally in Asia'.
Pakistan President Mohammad Ayub Khan with US President John F. Kennedy during the former's 1961 visit to America. The Pakistani president had once said that Islamabad is 'America's most allied ally in Asia. File image/Wikimedia Commons
It is reported that between 1953 and 1961, Pakistan received a whopping $2 billion in aid from Washington, with a huge chunk of it going towards military support. However, following the 1965 India and Pakistan war, the US imposed a ban on the transfer of weapons to both New Delhi and Islamabad.
It was the USSR invasion of Afghanistan that changed America's view towards Pakistan. It became a key partner in the supply of the Afghan mujahideen, which took the fight to the Soviets in Afghanistan, supported by the US and Saudi Arabia, notes the American think tank C_ouncil on Foreign Relation_s. It was around this time that the US also approved the sale of F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But, in 1990, with the end of the Cold War, US President George HW Bush again suspended American military assistance to Pakistan, withholding roughly 28 F-16s that Islamabad purchased in 1989.
US President George W Bush agreed to sell F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan in a major policy shift rewarding a key ally in the war on terrorism in 2004. File image/Reuters
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, shifted relations once again; a Congressional Research Service report reveals that between 2002 and 2020, Pakistan received over $34 billion in aid from the US. Roughly $23 billion of American aid was security related, with $8.2 billion being directly related to military aid, while a further $14.5 billion were 'Coalition Support Fund' reimbursements, for offering key support to US military operations.
It all turned to naught in 2018 amid Trump's first tenure; he suspended security aid to Pakistan, stating that Islamabad had failed to take action against terror groups. Trump even tweeted, 'The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than '$33 billion in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan, with little help. No more!'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But just this year, Trump authorised the release of funds to Pakistan, including $397 for maintaining its F-16 fighter jet fleet.
Experts note that these ebbs and flows in the US-Pakistan military ties is grounded in tactical necessity and overlapping security interests. While Islamabad needs Washington to continue providing aid and military hardware, the US needs Pakistan as a means to counter China as well as the terror groups in Afghanistan.
India should pay heed to US-Pak ties
But should the US tilt to Pakistan, especially in the backdrop of Operation Sindoor, be a concern to India?
The answer is a mixed one. In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, there was a de-hyphenisation between India and Pakistan. However, with the Trump administration interacting with Pakistan's military, there's a chance of a re-hyphenation in ties. Moreover, India can't afford to have Islamabad currying much favour with Washington as well as Beijing. This puts the country in a difficult position on the global stage.
The national flag of India hoisted at Times Square in New York City. Representational image/AFP
But experts also note that India is now America's partner of choice not only in South Asia but the Indo Pacific. As the Hudson Institute notes, it would take much more than a few high-level visits by Pakistani military officials to restore American trust in Pakistan, which remains strategically aligned with America's rival, China.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India's Lt General Syed Ata Hasnain (retired) explains it the best in an Indian Express column, 'Trump's outreach to Pakistan should not be read as a betrayal or a shift away from India. It is better understood as tactical engagement driven by geography, legacy relationships, and evolving regional threats. Pakistan will always offer America access, whether for leverage in Kabul, observation posts against Iran, or to counter Chinese expansion. But such engagement is opportunistic, not strategic.'
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Vandita Mishra writes: As the Monsoon session of Parliament enters its second week
Why did Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar suddenly resign at the end of the first working day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament? The question is riveting. But unfortunately, l'affaire Dhankhar allows us a very limited range of wondering. As Vice President and Rajya Sabha chairman, and as governor of West Bengal before that, Dhankhar spoke the lines scripted by the Narendra Modi government, almost as if they had been written out for him. He took on the elected chief minister, Mamata Banerjee, every day, firming up a template for the disabling politics practised by other BJP-appointed governors in Opposition-ruled states. He loudly confronted the Judiciary and the Opposition at the Centre, and weaponised the Rajya Sabha rule book to stifle debate, not encourage it. There seemed to be little or no daylight between the positions of Dhankhar and the Modi government. Up till now. So, now that a crack is showing, wide enough for Dhankhar to have made his unceremonious exit, or for him to have been eased out abruptly — the health reasons he cited for his resignation are not being taken seriously — there is an opening. Perhaps, hidden in plain sight, Dhankhar had overplayed the hand he had been dealt by the Modi government, and a government that maintains a tight control over MPs/ministers as well as constitutional authorities, could not let that be. All the fevered speculation in the last week about why the former V-P quit boils down to this. The story of the V-P's exit could have been more interesting. It could still be, arguably. It could have been that, to a third-term government with a messianic self-image that loses no opportunity to assert its absolute power absolutely, that gives no quarters to the dissenter and lays all opponents low, Dhankhar has done something that has not been done so far. He has spoken truth — or even better, the Constitution — to power, from within. It could have been that, having subdued the Opposition and its own MPs and Ministers, the government now came up against a pushback from the less bendable constitutional authority. That's a tantalising possibility. But there is a problem here, and it is this: Nothing in Dhankhar's very public record till now supports that particular theory. A level of publicness and transparency — missing from this episode so far — would also have been intrinsic to it. What we are left with, then, is an imagined drama of mincing moves on the chessboard of power and politics that ostensibly led to the V-P's exit. It is set against the broader canvas of a newly reconvened Parliament. Here, large issues, from the recent Operation Sindoor to the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, which has raised genuine fears of disenfranchisement of large numbers of voters, have lined up, and the House has yet to properly let them in. As the Monsoon session enters its second week, then, on one side is the shadow-play of Dhankhar's exit, and on the other side an Opposition clutching at the smaller issue even as, on the larger issue, it does not seem to be getting a grip. Leaders of the Opposition have proposed to host a farewell dinner for Dhankhar, ostensibly to embarrass the government, twist the knife in. But on SIR, the Congress-led Opposition's legitimate criticisms of the Election Commission's impractical timelines in a poll-bound state are in danger of being clouded by its own disunity and Rahul Gandhi's loose and lurching pot shots at the EC. In Gujarat, on Saturday, Gandhi reportedly said the EC was like a 'cheating cricket umpire' and that Congress defeats in the 2017 and 2022 assembly polls in the state had to do with manipulated voter lists. For a leader speaking to party workers — Gandhi was addressing newly appointed Congress district and city unit presidents — there is room for some overblown rhetoric. But this sounded too much like Gandhi blaming the EC in a way that not only lets Congress off the hook, but which could also undermine the case he is making on the conduct of the SIR in Bihar against it. In Gujarat, Congress has failed to stanch the flow of Congressmen crossing over to the BJP camp, to an extent that voters distrust the Congress ability to hold its own in the state quite literally. As in many other states, it has failed to break BJP dominance through new ideas, or even through a new set of leaders. Its messaging has been inconsistent, lacking follow-up on the ground. And it has not been able to live down, or move ahead from, the shortcomings and mistakes of its own past governments. None of these issues can be fixed by turning the focus to voter lists. Of course, the ongoing SIR in Bihar is a different story, where the EC is fumbling visibly. But by setting up the fight so broadly, the party makes it more difficult to ask the sharp and pointed questions that need to be asked of the EC. Both the V-P exit drama about shadowy things, and the loose balls Congress is throwing at the EC, are part of the same story. For an Opposition still flailing to seize the initiative, the best hope is that, in its third term, the government's cracks will start showing. Till next week, Vandita
Deccan Herald
42 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
'Exercise of exclusion': I.N.D.I.A. bloc warns of 'intensified movement' against Bihar SIR
New Delhi: Describing the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar electoral rolls as an 'exercise of exclusion', I.N.D.I.A parties on Sunday warned of an 'intensified movement' next month claiming that the exercise will leave a large number of electors out of voters' list owing to their inability to provide documents of the Supreme Court is set to hear the petitions challenging the exercise, the Opposition bloc is stepping up their attack on the EC with sources saying I.N.D.I.A MPs will hold a protest at Makar Dwar of the Parliament House on Monday at 10:30 am, before the Lok Sabha starts the debate on Operation Sindoor. .With 64 lakh voters weeded out, SIR in Bihar sets an example of 'purifying' electoral a joint press conference of RJD, Congress, CPI(ML)L and CPI(M), the leaders launched an attack on the EC claiming that the whole process was squeezed into one month and because of that, the exercise is flawed. The leaders alleged that the EC was entering into the domain of citizenship verification when it is not its to the allegations, EC sources said the poll body is not able to understand why some are creating a 'big fuss' when there is a one-month window to point out wrongful inclusion or exclusion. Sources also asked why some are trying to give an impression that the draft list is the final one. .CPI(ML)L General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya said, 'What I see is a huge gap in numbers in just six months. Does this mean that in just six months, around 22 lakh people have passed away? So, does this mean the ECI's summary revision was a flop?' .Claiming that a large number of people would be excluded from the rolls after the document verification begins, he said the SIR is 'clearly linked' to the upcoming election when the people of Bihar are ready for a change.'The poor and marginalised sections of Bihar have fought long for their voting rights and now they will also fight against this 'vote-bandi'. In August, Bihar will move into an intensified struggle mode against this exclusionary and disenfranchisement process,' he said. .Senior Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi said all the recent communication of the EC and refusal to accept Aadhaar, EPIC, and Ration Card as valid documents clearly point towards the fact that the entire SIR process is a citizenship verification Manoj K Jha said the EC did not discuss the SIR exercise with parties and built a consensus. "We have not seen such a large attempt of disenfranchisement in the history of independent India. Opacity has become the hallmark of this EC," the senior MP CPI(M) Polit Bureau member Nilotpal Basu asked the EC to provide the details of the independent assessment it said it conducted before deciding on the SIR. The EC had in an affidavit to the SC said that it had conducted an independent assessment, which prompted the exercise.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
INDIA bloc parties trying to harm democracy through foreign infiltrators: BJP
The BJP on Sunday accused the INDIA bloc, a strident critic of the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, of trying to "rob" Indian democracy on the back of foreign infiltrators. BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said the Election Commission's drive is aimed at bringing required changes in electoral rolls through transparency. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category He alleged that the INDIA bloc parties have been winning in places where the presence of infiltrators has brought maximum changes in demography. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox It is an issue of national security and prestige, but Rahul Gandhi "wants to grab power at any cost", Trivedi said on the Congress leader's sharp criticism of the SIR and the Election Commission in general. The BJP leader said India Gandhi believed 50 years back that an election's validity would be subject to her win, and Rahul Gandhi also suffers from the same "Emergency mindset". Live Events "According to Gandhi, the EC did a good job in Telangana, Punjab, West Bengal and Himachal Pradesh because the INDIA bloc parties won there but not so in Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Haryana as the BJP won in these states," he said. Ahead of Parliament taking up a discussion on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, the BJP leader said India's military response was an unprecedented exercise that showed the valour and capability of the armed forces, while the Opposition is trying to insult them. PTI
