EPA Approves New Fruit Fungicide
UPL New Zealand Limited applied to import or manufacture Rhapsody, a fungicide containing 218 g/L ipflufenoquin, a chemical new to New Zealand.
UPL says Rhapsody gives growers an alternative to other products that may be becoming less effective due to increasing resistance, gives another option for late season use, and is lower risk to human health.
"This approval means growers will have access to an innovative tool with a new mode of action, helping protect crops vital to New Zealand's primary sector," says Dr Lauren Fleury, EPA Hazardous Substances Applications Manager.
The apple industry contributed almost $2 billion to the New Zealand economy last year, and the wine export value reached approximately $2.4 billion.
The decision to approve Rhapsody was made following a rigorous assessment and consultation process, says Dr Fleury.
"As this product contains an active ingredient that is new to New Zealand, we assessed the scientific data and evidence, as well as economic and local information, to enable access to new chemistry while continuing to protect people's health and our unique environment."
Ipflufenoquin has been approved in other countries, including Australia, Canada, Japan and the USA.
This decision is the latest for the EPA, which has reduced the queue of hazardous substance release applications by almost 21 percent since 1 July 2024. The EPA has set ambitious assessment targets for the coming year, including increasing the number of assessments for substances containing new active ingredients.
"We understand the importance of timely access to new products. Continuing to reduce the queue and assess new active ingredients is a top priority for us."
The substance can only be used by professionals in commercial settings, and users must comply with specific controls.
As an agricultural compound, Rhapsody must also receive approval from the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) before it can be used in New Zealand.
Note:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
23-07-2025
- NZ Herald
Agribusiness and Trade: Drones transform NZ farms from above
'Ag drones have been in the background for a couple of years,' he says. 'But we have recently hit a sweet spot where they are able to carry enough liquid and fly long enough to make them genuinely effective. That's when the market really took off.' Drones fill a practical niche between ground-based equipment and helicopters, and their rise is changing how agricultural contractors operate. They can open up access to land that might previously have been too steep or too wet for traditional agricultural machinery, or that require immediate attention and more precision. Fieldays 2025 Drone Zone. Photo / Danielle Zollickhofer 'If you've got 100 hectares to do, a helicopter is always going to be the best choice,' he says. 'And if you've got lots of ground, it is dry, not steep, and you have got plenty of room to move vehicles, then a tractor or a truck is going to be better. New Zealand's geography makes drones particularly well-suited. 'We farm intensively and make the most out of small holdings,' says Simpson. 'We've got a lot of arable land but not a huge amount of it is flat. Even with beef and sheep, we run stock on quite steep country. A drone is a real nice fit.' This is opening up new possibilities. 'Some farmers never dealt with gorse on steep blocks because the only option was spraying with a backpack. A helicopter wasn't economical. Now a drone contractor can do the job at a reasonable rate.' Urgency has also become a significant factor in the technology's uptake. Simpson points to Wairarapa, which has had to deal with heavy rain this year. 'There is a point at which you can't use a vehicle. In the past you might ring a helicopter provider and be told there is a four-week wait. Meanwhile, the fungus gets a foothold. 'A drone provider might be the same price, but they can be there the next day. You can deal with the problem faster and ultimately use less chemicals.' Safety is another driver of demand. 'Why drive a quad bike or a vehicle across a steep hillside when you can instead fly over it with a drone and keep everyone safe?' says Simpson. Given the compliance requirements, most agricultural drone users aren't farmers themselves, but agricultural contractors. 'Since an ag drone is over 25 kilos, you need a certificate with the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA),' says Simpson. 'You're also required to deal with the Environmental Protection Authority for chemicals, WorkSafe for health and safety, as well as local councils for regulations – that's a lot for one person in a ute with a drone.' The Agricultural Drone Association has grown to around 60 members – even more since Fieldays – and will play a crucial role in advocating for New Zealand's agricultural drone operators and enhancing skills and knowledge within the industry. 'The association is aimed at drone users,' says Simpson. 'They needed a community, and it means that we can speak to regulators with a collective voice.' Fieldays 2025: Craig Simpson, president of the Agricultural Drone Association and founder of Aerolab. Photo / Danielle Zollickhofer He says the CAA has been a constructive partner. Certification wait times have fallen from 18 months to about eight. 'That is a real improvement – but it is still a barrier. If the industry keeps growing, that bottleneck could get worse. 'We'd like to see the regulator continue working closely with industry so we can maintain momentum. This is a great farming technology, and it's important we don't let red tape slow down its potential.' Simpson says that with their speed, precision, and ability to tackle challenging terrain, agricultural drones are on their way to becoming a familiar sight on New Zealand farms – not just a novelty attraction at Fieldays.
NZ Herald
23-07-2025
- NZ Herald
EPA is said to be drafting a plan to end its ability to fight climate change
The transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the US. The EPA intends to argue that imposing climate regulations on car-makers poses the real harm to human health because it would lead to higher prices and reduced consumer choice, according to the two people familiar with the Administration's plan. They asked to remain anonymous because they weren't authorised to discuss the draft proposal. The draft could still undergo changes. But if it is approved by the White House and formally released, the public would have an opportunity to weigh in before it is made final, likely later this year. Molly Vaseliou, a spokesperson for the EPA, did not confirm the details of the plan. In a statement she said the EPA sent the draft proposal to the White House on June 30, and that it 'will be published for public notice and comment once it has completed interagency review and been signed by the administrator'. If the Trump Administration is able to repeal the endangerment finding, it would not only erase all current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants, and other sources. It would prevent future administrations from trying to tackle climate change, with lasting implications. 'The White House is trying to turn back the clock and re-litigate both the science and the law,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel for the Environmental Defence Fund, an environmental group. She called the evidence that climate change is harmful 'overwhelming and incontrovertible'. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has abandoned US efforts to tackle global warming. He also has moved to roll back virtually every federal policy aimed at curbing greenhouse gases from the burning of oil, gas and coal. His Administration has encouraged more production and use of fossil fuels while stifling the growth of clean energy and electric vehicles. In calling to repeal the endangerment finding, the draft EPA rule does not appear to focus on the science or try to make the case that fossil fuels aren't warming the planet. Instead, it argues that the EPA overstepped its legal authority under the Clean Air Act by making a broad finding that greenhouse gas emissions endanger the public welfare. It makes the case that the EPA administrator has limited power that apply only to specific circumstances. Joseph Goffman, who led the air office at the EPA under the Biden Administration, said the rule would all but certainly face legal challenges if it is finalised. He said the Trump Administration's proposed rule conflicts with the 2007 Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts vs EPA, a landmark case that found for the first time that greenhouse gases were a pollutant under the Clean Air Act. That led the EPA to make the finding in 2009 that said that six greenhouse gases were harming public health. In more than 200 pages, the EPA at that time outlined the science and detailed how increasingly severe heatwaves, storms and droughts were expected to contribute to higher rates of death and disease. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Lisa Friedman ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Scoop
23-07-2025
- Scoop
EPA Approves New Fruit Fungicide
The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has approved a fungicide with a new active ingredient that controls blackspot and powdery mildew on apples and pears, and Botrytis on grapes. UPL New Zealand Limited applied to import or manufacture Rhapsody, a fungicide containing 218 g/L ipflufenoquin, a chemical new to New Zealand. UPL says Rhapsody gives growers an alternative to other products that may be becoming less effective due to increasing resistance, gives another option for late season use, and is lower risk to human health. "This approval means growers will have access to an innovative tool with a new mode of action, helping protect crops vital to New Zealand's primary sector," says Dr Lauren Fleury, EPA Hazardous Substances Applications Manager. The apple industry contributed almost $2 billion to the New Zealand economy last year, and the wine export value reached approximately $2.4 billion. The decision to approve Rhapsody was made following a rigorous assessment and consultation process, says Dr Fleury. "As this product contains an active ingredient that is new to New Zealand, we assessed the scientific data and evidence, as well as economic and local information, to enable access to new chemistry while continuing to protect people's health and our unique environment." Ipflufenoquin has been approved in other countries, including Australia, Canada, Japan and the USA. This decision is the latest for the EPA, which has reduced the queue of hazardous substance release applications by almost 21 percent since 1 July 2024. The EPA has set ambitious assessment targets for the coming year, including increasing the number of assessments for substances containing new active ingredients. "We understand the importance of timely access to new products. Continuing to reduce the queue and assess new active ingredients is a top priority for us." The substance can only be used by professionals in commercial settings, and users must comply with specific controls. As an agricultural compound, Rhapsody must also receive approval from the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) before it can be used in New Zealand. Note:
