Cross River signs Plaid as first customer for new Requests-for-Payments feature
0
The capability will streamline inbound money movement and enhance funding agility across the Real-Time Payments (RTP)® network. Plaid will be the first to implement the feature, unlocking instant purchases through its bank payments platform, Plaid Transfer.
A leader in instant payments and an early adopter of the RTP® network, Cross River moves over $1 billion monthly in real-time disbursements across RTP® and FedNow combined. However, while outbound payments have become instant, inbound funding has lagged — dependent on ACH and wire transfers that operate on batch processing and limited banking hours. Now, Cross River will be one of the first financial institutions to support RfP on the RTP® network, paving the way for faster and more reliable pay-in options.
'The current reality of money movement is imbalanced — payments go out in seconds, but pay-ins often take a day or more,' said Adam Goller, EVP and Head of Fintech Banking at Cross River. 'RfP is a smarter, more flexible way to receive incoming funds. It gives our partners greater control over timing, real-time visibility into each transaction, and reduces the need for overfunding or constant balance monitoring — all while delivering a better experience for the end user.'
RfP allows businesses to send a secure, digital request for payment — enabling payers to authorize and send funds instantly with greater control, a significant step forward in streamlining the payment experience and reducing friction in how money moves. With RfP, businesses will be able to instantly fund digital wallets and accounts, reduce operational friction from delayed deposits, and improve customer experience with smooth, real-time pay-in options.
Plaid, the first to implement RfP functionality with Cross River, will enable real-time pay-ins for Carvana customers. This integration allows car buyers to complete purchases instantly and seamlessly — eliminating the friction typically caused by traditional bank transfers.
'Instant payment rails unlock huge value for businesses and end customers by reducing friction, accelerating funding, and boosting conversion,' said Brian Dammeir, Global Head of Payments and Financial Management at Plaid. 'Through our partnership with Cross River, Plaid Transfer now offers instant pay-ins, instant payouts and Same Day ACH, as part of a full solution with best-in-class account linking and optimized conversion, so customers can tailor bank payments across their business.'
Built on Cross River's proprietary API-based banking core infrastructure, COS, the RfP solution was developed with security, transparency, and compliance at its core. Each RfP is presented to the recipient by the receiving financial institution for explicit authorization, ensuring full control over every transaction. This adds a critical layer of security and trust, while improving the user experience on both ends of the exchange.
Cross River is continuing its mission to modernize financial services and provide real-time tools that reflect the pace of today's economy. This new capability reflects Cross River's commitment to building a more inclusive and modern financial system — where speed and safety go hand in hand.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Newsmax and Dominion settle for $67m in defamation suit over US election lies
The conservative outlet Newsmax has agreed to pay $67m to Dominion Voting Systems to settle a defamation lawsuit over lies about voting in the 2020 election. The settlement came as the case was headed to trial. Earlier this year, Delaware superior court judge Eric Davis ruled that Newsmax had defamed the voting technology company by broadcasting false claims about its equipment after the 2020 election. A jury would have considered whether Newsmax was liable for damages. Dominion had sued the outlet for $1.6bn. After the 2020 election, lies about the security of Dominion voting machines, which are widely used in the US, became central to Donald Trump's false claim that the election was stolen from him. Allies and other rightwing personalities made baseless claims that votes had been flipped and that the equipment was not secure. 'We are pleased to have settled this matter,' Dominion said in a statement to CNN. In a lengthy statement of its own, Newsmax was defiant, saying it chose to settle not because it was admitting wrongdoing, but because it believed Davis wouldn't give the company a fair trial. 'Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020,' the company said. 'We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism.' Newsmax will be paying the settlement in three instalments until January 2027. Dominion obtained a $787.5m defamation settlement from Fox in 2023 on the eve of a defamation trial in Delaware. Ahead of the settlement, Dominion lawyers obtained internal communications from Fox hosts and personalities that showed they knew many of the outlandish claims the outlets hosts and guests were broadcasting about the election were not true. Newsmax agreed to pay $40m to settle a defamation case against Smartmatic, another voting equipment company, last year. One America News, another far-right outlet, also settled a defamation case with Smartmatic last year. Fox is now defending itself in a pending defamation suit against Smartmatic.
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted. The ongoing legal fight is being watched by other states that are considering taxes for online ads. Maryland estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure. Maryland's law says the companies must not only pay the tax, but avoid telling customers how it affects pricing, with no line items, surcharges or fees, said the appeals court Friday in siding with trade associations fighting the tax. Judge Julius Richardson cited the Colonial-era Stamp Act, which helped spark the Revolutionary War, and wrote that 'criticizing the government — for taxes or anything else — is important discourse in a democratic society.' The plaintiffs contended Maryland lawmakers were trying to insulate themselves from criticism and political accountability by forbidding companies from explaining the tax to their customers. 'A state cannot duck criticism by silencing those affected by its tax,' the judge wrote. The unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a decision by U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby and sends the case back to her with instructions to consider an appropriate remedy in light of the panel's decision. Trade groups praised the decision. 'Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship,' said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement. The law imposes a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Under the law, the tax rate is 2.5% for businesses making more than $100 million in global gross annual revenue; 5% for companies making $1 billion or more; 7.5% for companies making $5 billion or more and 10% for companies making $15 billion or more. The law has been challenged in multiple legal venues, including Maryland Tax Court, where the case is ongoing. The Maryland General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats, overrode a veto of the legislation in 2021 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican.
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
US FTC sues ticket reseller for evading Taylor Swift's Eras tour ticket limits
Aug 18 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued ticket reseller Key Investment Group for evading purchasing limits to buy up thousands of tickets to live events including Taylor Swift's Eras tour and resell them at a markup, according to a complaint filed in Maryland federal court on Monday. The Baltimore, Maryland-based company, which operates ticket resale sites including used thousands of Ticketmaster accounts, including fake or purchased accounts, the FTC said. Ticketmaster faced intense criticism after its botched 2022 sale of tickets to Swift's much-hyped New Eras Tour, when billions of requests from Swift fans, bots and ticket resellers overwhelmed its website and the company canceled a planned ticket sale to the general public. For one Swift concert, Key Investment Group used 49 different accounts to purchase 273 tickets and evade a 6-ticket purchase limit, the FTC said on Monday. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson said in a statement that the lawsuit puts ticket sellers on notice that the agency will go after those who circumvent ticketing platforms' limits on ticket sales. The lawsuit is part of a crackdown President Donald Trump announced in March focused on curbing exploitative ticket reselling practices that raise costs for fans. Key Investment Group sued the FTC in July to block its investigation, saying that its ticket purchases did not use automated software, or bots, and did not violate the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act. The FTC has made it clear that "they intend to use the BOTS Act to shut down the entire secondary-ticket market," the company said in its lawsuit. The agency on Monday accused Key Investment Group and three of its executives of violating the BOTS Act as well as the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices. Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment (LYV.N), opens new tab, are facing a lawsuit brought by U.S. antitrust enforcers accusing the company of monopolizing markets across the live concert industry.
