logo
A New Take On Shareholder Primacy

A New Take On Shareholder Primacy

Forbes04-08-2025
Evan Edwards is the CEO of Project Equity, a national nonprofit that helps businesses and communities build wealth through shared ownership.
Much has been written about a shift away from shareholder primacy—the idea that an enterprise's primary duty is to maximize returns for its shareholders—as the top measure of its success. Shareholder primacy traditionally focuses on concentrating power and wealth in the hands of a few. This imbalance leads to many negative business and social outcomes that critics typically highlight—decisions that prioritize quarterly earnings over long-term growth and sustainability, a widening wealth gap between executives and frontline workers and a lack of business resilience in economic downturns.
Critics have pointed out how this approach often leads to short-term decision-making, wealth disparities and even economic instability. In response, many alternative models have been proposed, from stakeholder capitalism to ESG-driven governance. While these conversations are meaningful, they frame shareholder primacy itself as the fundamental problem. But what if we addressed shareholder primacy's potential imbalances by coupling shareholder satisfaction with increasing the overall number of shareholders at the same time? I'm talking about employee ownership (EO).
Beyond Zero-Sum
I spent years working in the tech startup world, where equity ownership was a given. Founders, investors and employees are all expected to have a stake in the company's success. In many ways, tech startups challenge the traditional shareholder model, recognizing that widespread ownership helps attract talent, fosters commitment and drives innovation and productivity. This principle should extend beyond startups.
At Project Equity, we approach these challenges through a different lens. Ownership, management and governance at employee-owned companies are not zero-sum games. Ownership, when broadly shared, can be a tool for alignment, accountability and long-term success. Employee ownership provides a proven way to bring in more shareholders. And by expanding ownership to workers, we can distribute the benefits of economic success more equitably while strengthening the businesses themselves, often in multiple ways.
More Impact In More Ways
One important way employee ownership strengthens businesses is by enhancing their ability to attract and retain talent. For example, Rutgers University found that during the pandemic, employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) helped retain jobs at a rate of four to one compared to non-employee-owned companies. EO businesses are also less likely to face layoffs during economic downturns, adding to the overall stability of the business.
Take Local Ocean Seafoods on Oregon's central coast, for example. Since completing its transition to an employee ownership trust (EOT) with a loan from our Employee Ownership Catalyst Fund in November 2022, the culinary company's turnover rate has steadily decreased to 40% last year, roughly half the industry standard rate of nearly 80%. Even though they were only an EOT for a few months in 2022, they elected to run a simulated profit share at the end of the year, allocating $122,000 to their team.
Employee ownership often drives this kind of culture shift, where new ideas and collective decision-making are prioritized. Na Young Ma, the founder of Proof Bakery, a business we helped transition to EO, shared this insight with researchers from the University of California, Berkeley. She noted that when the bakery transitioned to employee ownership, it experienced rapid growth, tripling its revenue within a few years following the transition. As the co-op grows, it creates new opportunities to nurture its members' unique contributions and provides a workplace where they can actively exercise their ownership.
Transitioning to employee ownership shifts the mindset from "this is where I work" to "this is what I'm building." We often refer to this shift as an ownership culture, where new ideas are generated among highly motivated and informed people, becoming the norm with EO. I've seen how this change can strengthen workforce retention and engagement, while elevating the recruiting process by attracting motivated individuals who want to create a lasting impact and share in the success they help achieve.
Workers As Shareholders: A Good Idea For All
Ultimately, through employee ownership, incentives can be aligned with traditional shareholder models by prioritizing the interests of both workers and shareholders. It's not an either-or situation.
In working with CEOs as they transition to employee ownership, I have observed that employees are motivated to perform for the organization as a whole, rather than just for their own individual benefit. The beauty of EO as a business strategy is that it recognizes that ownership, operations, management and governance are not at odds. This alignment expands the number of shareholders while creating a more just and sustainable economy.
Shareholder primacy, when viewed through the lens of employee ownership, can form a successful loop that benefits everyone within the economic ecosystem.
Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm a Real Estate Agent: It's Getting Harder To Sell Your Home in These 10 Cities
I'm a Real Estate Agent: It's Getting Harder To Sell Your Home in These 10 Cities

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I'm a Real Estate Agent: It's Getting Harder To Sell Your Home in These 10 Cities

Sellers have held the upper hand in the U.S. housing market for so long that buyers might wonder when the dynamic will finally change in their favor. In fact, that might already be happening. The housing market has become more 'buyer-friendly' amid a rise in inventory in many parts of the country, according to a new report from That doesn't mean it's a buyer's market now — at least not yet. High mortgage rates are a headwind for buyers, and list prices remain historically expensive. Meanwhile, some markets continue to see stiff competition, which means available homes tend to go quickly. Be Aware: Learn More: A Clever Real Estate study of 2024 housing data found that nationwide, the median days on market for listed homes was 40 days. But that figure was much higher in some states — including Hawaii (80 days), Montana (78), Louisiana (69), South Carolina (68) and South Dakota (65). At the city level, some once-hot housing markets have started to cool considerably, causing sellers to slash prices to find enough buyers. GOBankingRates spoke with real estate experts about the current state of the housing market and which cities are seeing challenges when it comes to selling homes. Housing Trends Experts Are Seeing Ken Corsini, co-founder of Red Barn Homebuyers in Georgia, said he's seeing homes 'linger much longer' in Florida cities like Miami, Orlando, Jacksonville and West Palm Beach, as well as in Houston, Nashville, Austin (Texas) and Tucson (Arizona). 'These markets are cooling off fast because sellers are clinging to yesterday's prices, but buyers have the upper hand thanks to high rates and growing inventory,' Corsini told GOBankingRates. 'In places like Miami, sellers are even pulling their listings instead of negotiating, which shows how out of sync expectations have become.' This dynamic has spread to smaller towns as well, according to Matt Taschner, CEO of Sota Home Buyers, a Minnesota-based real estate buyer. 'Two markets that are really showing slow selling at the moment and where listed homes are staying on the market longer than they were a year or two ago are Naples, Florida, and Longview, Texas,' Taschner told GOBankingRates. 'The median number of days that homes are sitting on the market in both is well above the national average… All in all, there is greater buyer reluctance and price resistance, even in areas that were previously red hot.' Here's a look at 10 cities where it's getting harder to sell a home. The figures are from Zillow as of Aug. 7, 2025. Austin, Texas Typical home values: $523,769 1-year value change: -6.5% Houston, Texas Typical home values: $269,422 1-year value change: -2.8% Consider This: Jacksonville, Florida Typical home values: $290,108 1-year value change: -3.8% Longview, Texas Typical home values: $232,498 1-year value change: +2.1% Miami, Florida Typical home values: $588,264 1-year value change: -0.7% Naples, Florida Typical home values: $564,809 1-year value change: -7.0% Nashville, Tennessee Typical home values: $445,803 1-year value change: -0.9% Orlando, Florida Typical home values: $381,502 1-year value change: -2.9% Tucson, Arizona Typical home values: $331,789 1-year value change: -2.3% West Palm Beach, Florida Typical home values: $397,047 1-year value change: -4.0% More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on I'm a Real Estate Agent: It's Getting Harder To Sell Your Home in These 10 Cities

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store