Dáil votes by 86 to 64 to abolish juries in defamation cases
Juries in High Court defamation actions are set to be abolished after the Dáil voted by 86 to 64 for their removal.
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan had opposed the move as a Government backbencher, when the Defamation (Amendment) Bill was introduced last year.
At the time he described the measure as 'short-sighted' and 'not fully thought out'. But the Minister told TDs that being in a political party 'requires compromise'.
He said there has been a general election since he made those remarks, the legislation is part of the programme for government and he is bound by that as a member of Cabinet.
READ MORE
The Dáil was debating the legislation, which aims to reform the State's defamation laws, including relating to online trolling, and to reduce legal costs for parties involved.
The Bill also introduces protection against Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (Slapps), which are seen as a threat to press freedom and are usually taken against individual journalists.
Independent TD Catherine Connolly had called on the Minister to show 'moral courage and leadership' by opposing the abolition of juries.
'I wouldn't like to be sitting in your position and having to eat my words. I don't think you should eat your words. I think you should be proud of them,' she said.
There has been a belief among media defendants that without juries, monetary award values will reduce and defamation cases would not last as long. Previously, Mr O'Callaghan's assessment was that this would not be the case, she said.
She quoted his remarks: 'If we abolish juries, I can guarantee [to] the House that we will develop a whole body of jurisprudence that will result in cases being repeatedly appealed to the Court of Appeal and probably the Supreme Court.' It is seldom the case that jury decisions are appealed, he had added.
Ms Connolly said to abolish juries 'is nothing less than a bowing to vested interests'.
Sinn Féin justice spokesman Matt Carthy said his party opposes the abolition of juries as a matter of principle and would oppose the entire Bill on this basis. He added that 'it would leave Ireland as a complete outlier in common law jurisdictions globally'.
The Law Society and Bar Council have pointed to the importance of members of the public determining issues relating to damage to reputation and freedom of expression, and he sees this as 'eminently sensible'.
Social Democrats justice spokesman Gary Gannon said juries play an important role to ensure fairness, particularly when 'powerful entities' are involved. He added that there is no evidence jury actions are more costly.
Labour TD Marie Sherlock said the legislation is now out of date. She said legal fees in defamation cases are higher than in any other civil action and the legislation should change that practice.
She proposed an amendment that would mean juries have a role in determining questions of fact but no role in the assessment of damages.
Mr O'Callaghan said it would be inappropriate and would divide functions between the jury and the judge. The amendment was rejected by 86 to 64 votes.
The Minister said one of the consequences of being in a political party 'is the need and necessity for compromise'.
There had been a general election, and Fianna Fáil put forward a manifesto that he supported, which included the passage of the Defamation Bill.
Mr O'Callaghan added it was 'not a question of morality but a recognition of the compromise that is required if one becomes a minister in government and if one signs up to a programme for government that contains a principle that was in conflict with what I had said previously'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
35 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Fresh homeless fears as new Gov plan ‘incentivises landlords to evict tenants' & Martin accused of ‘gaslighting renters'
HARD-pressed renters face the risk of homelessness under new Government plans, it has been warned. Under the proposals, rents in newly built 2 New plans will see the rental rates of newly built properties tied to inflation Credit: Getty Images - Getty 2 Housing Minister James Browne will bring the new proposal to the Cabinet tomorrow Credit: 2025 PA Media, All Rights Reserved The plans to restructure Rent Pressure Zones will go to Cabinet tomorrow but they have led to fears tenants will face significant hikes and have increased concerns that renters may end up on the streets. Under the plans, The proposal, which Housing Minister James Browne will bring to the Cabinet, will likely state that there will be no changes for existing renters if they stay in their current tenancy. However if they move, a landlord can reset the rent for the new tenant at the market rate. READ MORE ON HOUSING CRISIS Taoiseach But He said: 'When the Taoiseach said that this was a balanced package to protect renters and encourage investment, he is deliberately misleading the public. 'He is gaslighting renters, and I'm not even sure he fully understands the extent which they're putting huge numbers of people, young people, people approaching pension age, at enormous risk with even greater financial hardship, and in many cases, at risk of Most read in Irish News Mike Allen, the Director of Advocacy at Focus Ireland, also told how the proposals could place further Allen said: 'They seem to be creating a system which creates incentives for landlords to evict tenants so they can bring in something at higher market rates. Sinn Fein housing spokesman Eoin O Broin reacts to record number of homeless people 'And secondly, they're increasing rents right across the board. What are they doing for low income people on HAP to make sure subsidies there don't force people into deeper debt and eventually into homelessness?' The Irish Property Owners Association said they were concerned that the And they stressed that the proposed six-year minimum security of tenure will have a serious negative impact on private, non-institutional landlords, and on the rental 'CHANGES ARE UNFAIR' Chairperson Mary Conway said: 'The proposed changes are unfair on the individual who – for good reason – wishes to, and needs to, rent out their home for a short period and points to a flaw on the part of the Government thinking which – by going after institutional landlords – has ignored the implications for individual, private landlords. 'We believe that in seeking to address political concerns about the role of institutional landlords (who are predominantly active in the
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Tough decisions to tackle housing crisis are under way – but will they work?
The expected move to ease rent caps is part of a Government response to the worsening housing crisis which will see further policy changes announced in the coming weeks, before a revised plan for housing is finalised in July. Government insiders hope that the departures will show them finally getting to grips with the housing crisis. But it would be an exaggeration to say there is confidence that all this will work quickly to increase housing supply. Meanwhile, opposition to the rent cap changes is growing and will be heard both in the Dáil tomorrow and on the streets next week when Raise the Roof, an umbrella group co-ordinated by the trade unions and including NGOs and Opposition parties, holds a major protest outside Leinster House. The housing measures include some already announced and some yet to come. There will be changes in planning regulations to allow small residences in back gardens, extensions and attic conversion s without planning permission; potentially also changes in regulations on apartment construction; the role of the Land Development Agency will be expanded to include mixed-use developments with private sector partners; the appointment of a 'housing tsar' ( just don't call it that ) is also coming; commencing the changes in last year's mammoth planning Act will make it harder to block planning permissions; and money will be provided for new planners in local authorities and An Bord Pleanála to speed up the planning process. READ MORE [ Explainer: Garden rooms and attics – What are the proposed changes to regulations? Opens in new window ] Divisions remain in Government over the possibility of tax incentives for builders and developers of certain types of housing, and they are unlikely to be settled until the budget. But at the top level of Government, there is a growing sense that urgent action is needed on housing, with one insider insisting that the series of decisions now under way will place housing at the very centre of the Government's priorities from now until the summer recess in mid-July. However, there is also an awareness that some measures to increase supply will leave the Coalition open to political attack and public unpopularity. [ Proposed changes to rent rules will incentivise evictions, housing charity warns Opens in new window ] And the problem for the Government is that the unpopularity and the political attacks will be immediate – but any potential payback from the measures in the shape of increased supply is at best years away, and may not even be felt until after the next general election. Even without the planning delays and legal actions that they have to factor into their considerations, builders and developers say it can still take three to four years to deliver a block of apartments. There is no doubt the measures will be welcomed by developers and landlords. But that is not necessarily the same thing as prompting them to move quickly to increase supply. Many will want to see if tax incentives are introduced in the budget; others will want to see if the Government has the political will to resist the pressure already building on the rent pressure zone changes. 'Look, the reality is there is no silver bullet,' says one senior Government source. But, the source says, we need apartments, and the people who build apartments are not building them right now because of the rent caps. [ Rules for renters: What are the planned reforms and will they work? Opens in new window ] All very well, but the simple and logical outcome of changing the rent cap rules is that rents will go up – that's why the landlords and the developers are in favour of it. The Government says that its package will protect renters – but among groups working at the coalface of homelessness, there is little confidence in that. An uptick in evictions and rising rents – both predicted by Opposition parties – would pile enormous pressure on the Government. Within Government, there is an undoubted willingness to take difficult decisions, and an awareness that the time to take them is in the first year of its term of office. But that is not matched by any great confidence that the measures will work. [ Ireland's housing crisis: Why is there such a shortage of homes to buy and rent here? Opens in new window ]
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Government to withhold support for motion to end Central Bank facilitation of Israeli war bonds
The Government will not be supporting a cross-party motion demanding the Central Bank end the facilitation of Israeli war bonds and will instead table its own counter motion. Four opposition parties have come together to back the motion and have called on Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael to provide the Government TDs with a free vote when it comes before the Dáil on Wednesday. The Social Democrats, Sinn Féin, Labour and People Before Profit-Solidarity have united behind the motion that demands that the Government enact emergency legislation to explicitly force the Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli bonds. It also calls on the coalition to advise the bank that "by acting as the enabling cog in Israel's fundraising machine in the European Union it is putting the state at risk of a charge of complicity in genocide". The motion stresses that since October 2023 the bonds have been advertised as war bonds with the slogan 'stand with Israel – Israel is at war'. The website marketing the bonds contains a video by Israeli President Isaac Herzog who lauds 'the crucial role of Israel bonds during this time of conflict and war". Last month, a similar Sinn Féin bill which sought to stop the Central Bank facilitating the sale of Israeli war bonds was defeated after the Government voted against the draft legislation. Sinn Féin TD Seán Crowe said the gap between the vote on the Sinn Féin Bill and this motion has given TDs 'time to reflect'. Mr Crowe asked: Is there anyone in Ireland comfortable with the fact that we're facilitating this blood money coming into our country and being spent on weapons that are killing men, women and children? Calling on the Government leaders to allow backbench TDs a vote of conscience, Social Democrats TD Sinéad Gibney said: 'We have failed as an international community to prevent a genocide from happening so now we have to do everything in our power to make sure that we stop it.' She added: 'We are urging the Government to allow a free vote, a vote of conscience, because we believe that this is something that many TDs will support if given the opportunity. 'And we absolutely urge the Government to support this motion.' Labour TD Duncan Smith said adopting the motion would send a "clear signal" that Ireland is "morally and ethically" against Israel's bombardment of Gaza and that "Irish people do not stand for the selling of Israeli war bonds". Humanitarian aid blockade Meanwhile, Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris has made an urgent call to end the blockade and allow humanitarian aid into Gaza. "Ireland has consistently called on Israel to lift its blockade and allow unimpeded access of humanitarian aid at scale into Gaza, in accordance with international law and humanitarian principles," Mr Harris said in a statement. "The UN and humanitarian organisations must be allowed to work independently and do their job. It is a shame on the world and international community that people are starving in Gaza." Praising activists aboard the Madleen, which was blocked by Israeli forces on route to Gaza, Mr Harris said: "The question we should be asking today is not a debate about the merits or not of the flotilla but how it has come to this; that the world is turning a blind eye to starving children in Gaza." Read More Watch: Surveillance footage shows crew on Gaza aid boat putting hands up as Israeli forces seize vessel
