
Budget supports for life sciences firms hit by US tariffs a 'priority', says finance minister
While the final shape of a trading agreement between the US and EU remains to be seen, concern has been raised about the impact on the life sciences and medical device industries in even the case of a base rate 15% tariff.
Speaking in Clonmel on Wednesday, Paschal Donohoe said that he would be examining the impact that the agreement between the EU and Ireland will have on the life science sector in Europe, and "what further measures we can take at national level to support a really important pillar of the economy of Ireland".
He said the 15% tariffs that are in place "at least bring certainty regarding where we are, but will still bring cost".
"And what we need to do, and are doing, is working with large employers in life science and elsewhere to look now at how we can support them and the jobs and investment that they have here in Ireland," said the minister.
"We have expertise that we've built up over many, many decades of supporting the life science sector. I will continue to use that expertise to do all we can to protect jobs like we have here in Tipperary."
He said those kinds of investments are replicated all over the length and breadth of Ireland "and it's a really important priority for me as we form the budget".
Mr Donohoe once again reiterated that there will be no cost-of-living package in October's Budget, but said the Government is "very conscious that the cost of living continues to be a challenge for so many".
Ticket prices
Asked if he would be attending this weekend's Oasis concerts in Dublin, the minister said he is "more of a Blur fan", but indicated that he does not want to see the surge in pricing of Oasis tickets to become the norm.
"This is something that the Competition and Consumer Protection Authority has already indicated that it wants to review because these tickets are really expensive.
"They're really expensive because there is a demand for them. Oasis fans are willing to pay a lot of money to go and see them play.
"But I wouldn't like this to be the future of live performances. Live performances are really, really important for fans. Lots of other gigs at the moment continue to be really affordable, and I'd like to see that as being the future."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Mirror
7 minutes ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Defence Forces to increase patrols to combat Russian ships in Irish waters
The Defence Forces are to increase both air and naval patrols to combat Russian ships on illegal manoeuvres in Irish waters. The revelation was made by the Defence Minister Simon Harris as part of a new National Maritime Security Strategy that is currently being finalised. The Government will also speed up the €300 million purchase of a new radar defence system for the State along with sonar capability for its fleet. Four out of our eight naval ships are in operation at the moment but the pressure is now on to hire more recruits to get them all back out to sea. The Irish military has also signed up to the EU's Common Information Sharing Environment system which will help track all vessels coming in and out of our Atlantic Waters up to 200 miles off the west coast. The Government has been coming under increasing pressure from other European states to invest more money in defence and to keep a far closer eye on Russian activities in Irish territorial waters. It follows a year after various Russian ships made secret inclusions into the Exclusive Irish Economic Zone, as it is known, and acted suspiciously around the various international sea cables that come ashore off the west coast. Ireland is the main point linking the internet between Europe and the United States. Mr Harris has assured the public he is taking the Russian threat seriously. He said in a series of replies to parliamentary questions about Russia's activities in Irish water: "The Defence Forces routinely monitor foreign vessels with both Naval Service Assets and Air Corps maritime patrol aircraft as well as remote monitoring on a 24/7 basis from the Naval Operations Command Centre in Haulbowline. Tanaiste Simon Harris "It should be noted that foreign vessels transiting Irish waters must do so in compliance with international law and may be subject to sighting and observation by the Naval Service and Air Corps without their innocent passage being infringed. "In relation to additional measures being introduced to strengthen maritime security and surveillance, My Department is working to deliver Ireland's first ever National Maritime Security Strategy. "The aim of the strategy is, amongst other things, to enhance our maritime domain awareness and to protect our critical infrastructure." Troops marching during Tanaiste Simon Harris's visit to Camp Shamrock. (Image: PA) During the past two years the Air Corps has brought into service two state-of-the-art Airbus C295 Maritime Patrol Aircraft. The Navy has also started using the P70 Class ship to further help and enable more sea operations. The new intelligence deal with the EU will also result in more secure information being shared with Ireland. Mr Harris added: "This EU programme enables structured and secure information sharing among EU maritime authorities both civil and military, allowing for more effective operations at sea amid new and evolving maritime threats." Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.


Irish Independent
21 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Wicklow school awarded €6,000 grant to help promote EU issues
A total of 66 projects across Ireland have been approved for funding as part of the 2025 Communicating Europe Initiative, with a combined allocation of €345,500. The initiative supports voluntary organisations, educational bodies, civil society groups and Local Authorities in raising awareness about the European Union and the role Ireland plays within the bloc. Public engagement with EU issues is also promoted through a wide range of events, educational activities and outreach campaigns. This year, the funding available has been increased, amounting to €250,000 for civil society and voluntary bodies, and €150,000 for local authorities. An independent evaluation committee, comprising officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the European Commission Representation in Ireland, and the European Parliament Liaison Office, met earlier this year to review and assess the applications. A total of 59 projects from civil society and voluntary organisations have been approved, along with 7 projects from Local Authorities. In some cases, funding was approved at a reduced level based on the Committee's assessment. A reserve remains available to support additional initiatives that may arise during the remainder of 2025. Wicklow-Wexford TD Malcom Byrne has welcomed the funding allocation and said Ireland has benefitted from our membership of the European Union. 'From making it easier to travel or to do business across Europe, we have really gained as a country. But many people feel that they don't fully understand the work of the EU. The Communicating Europe initiative is a great opportunity, and I pleased that Gaelscoil Inbhear Mhor is included in the latest round.'


RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What's at stake for Europe at the Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine?
Analysis: The build-up to the summit highlights European doubts and concerns about Russia's sincerity to halt aggression in Ukraine The end of the Cold War was once greeted in Europe as " the end of history". Both Naziism and communism - extreme ideologies that had caused violent turmoil and oppression during the 20th century – had collapsed. Liberal democracy had persevered and was unrivalled by the 1990s. Western governments viewed liberal political and economic reform as vital to nurture peace and security in post-communist Europe. An enlarged security community covering much of the northern hemisphere " from Vancouver to Vladivostok" was an active political aspiration to reduce risks from violent conflict. Institutionalised through the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), this community aimed to enshrine the principles of the Helsinki Final Act agreed in 1975, most notably exclusive adherence to peaceful conflict resolution and no border changes by military force. All has changed. This vision for a pan-European security order defined by enduring peace has been shattered by Russia's military aggression, first in Georgia in 2008 and subsequently in Ukraine after 2014, with Moscow escalating its offensive in 2022. Ukrainians have suffered the most by far, but this war has also caused many reverberations that weaken wider security in Europe. When campaigning for a second US presidential term in 2024, Donald Trump claimed that he would resolve the war in Ukraine " in one day". But after his second term began in January 2025, Trump's administration has instead grappled with many arduous complications inflicted by Russia's aggression. In recent days, Trump has outlined his exploratory expectations for the US-Russia summit with Russia's president Vladimir Putin in Alaska this week. Describing the summit as a " feel-out meeting", Trump claims that he is seeking a measure on Putin's seriousness for peace in Ukraine. His US administration describes the summit as a " listening exercise". Efforts to assist peace in Ukraine must be welcomed once these efforts are sincere. From RTÉ News' Behind the Story podcast, why meeting Trump in Alaska is 'handing Putin victory' But the build-up to the summit highlights many continuing doubts on Putin's sincerity to halt Russian aggression. In Kyiv, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has raised concerns that Putin is "bluffing"about his intent to make peace. In Brussels, EU leaders fear that Putin will gain a diplomatic advantage over Trump to slowly ease Russia closer to the strategic aims it defined when it escalated its war in Ukraine in 2022. These aims included a forceful overthrow of the Ukrainian government; stifling stronger links between Ukraine and the EU and NATO; and consolidating a sphere of influence to insulate Russia's authoritarianism from the West's liberal democratic influences. Putin is considered to have got the better of Trump at the Helsinki Summit between the two presidents in 2018. After this meeting, Trump appeared to publicly support the Russian president's view that Moscow had not interfered in the 2016 US presidential election, despite contrary information communicated to him by America's own security agencies. Seeking to avoid being out-manoeuvred by Putin again, Trump has threatened "very severe consequences", meaning further sanctions will be proposed, should Russia refuse to take US peace efforts seriously. Missing the military power that converts into diplomatic clout, the EU is forced to watch a summit that will likely impact its future security from the sidelines. Trump has discussed " land swapping" as a means to settle the conflict while insisting that such arrangements can only be confirmed by direct negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. De jure border change is unacceptable for Ukraine. However, Kyiv might still painfully accept some de facto compromises understood as temporary until future political circumstances change to allow Ukraine to restore full functional sovereignty within borders benchmarked from its independence in 1991. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland, 26 EU leaders say Ukraine should have freedom to decide its future Should Russia retain de facto military control over territories in eastern Ukraine, a large risk remains that Moscow will use this presence to slowly grind away to coerce and undermine Kyiv in its aims to accelerate Ukraine's democratisation and EU integration. The Trump administration has frustrated Ukrainian attempts to gain a clear pathway towards NATO accession. According to US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, "the United States does not believe that NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement". The Alaska summit also offers Putin an opportunity to propose limitations on Ukraine's future military strength as a condition for Russia's consent to progress settlement talks. Washington is Ukraine's most important military supplier, handing Trump some leverage to pressure Zelenskyy to accept limits on Ukraine's future defence capabilities. This would undercut Ukraine's potential for independent deterrence but with Russia remaining free to replenish its military power to threaten Ukraine again. Observing developments on Ukraine, EU member states at the bloc's frontline with Russia remain concerned that Putin will skilfully manipulate Trump's peace efforts to instead piecemeal towards the aggressive aims he originally revealed in 2022. Should Russia gain such momentum, EU governments in Finland, the Baltic states and Poland anticipate that Moscow's military aggression will only gain further impetus. From RTÉ Radio 1's This Week, Prof Donnacha Ó Beacháin from DCU on whether Russia is ready to end the war in Ukraine or is simply stalling for time Putin's mistakes directed Russia into an unexpectedly long and attritional military campaign where a staggering one million Russian soldiers have died by 2025. However, a negotiated reprieve in Ukraine matched with Trump's ambivalent commitment to NATO will have retrieved Putin's ambitions to eventually challenge the alliance. If a frozen conflict is the most likely compromise to emerge from current negotiations on Ukraine, tensions simmering at the fault line that Russia has created there will endure to undermine European security. Unpredictable and unstable, this order contrasts starkly with optimistic aspirations of peace "from Vancouver to Vladivostok" expressed after the Cold War. In the sentiments of Finnish president Alexander Stubb, Europe's " holiday from history" is now over.