
Fee regulation bill triggers outrage from parents, others
The bill proposes a multi-tiered structure comprising school-level committees, district appellate bodies, and a state revision committee to scrutinise, approve or reject school fee proposals. Critics argue that instead of ensuring transparency, the bill creates confusing and overlapping layers of control.
Education activist Ashok Agarwal called the bill "totally confusing and unworkable," suggesting that "one effective fee committee headed by a retired high court judge, a chartered accountant, and a DoE representative would have sufficed."
He warned that the bill, in its present form, will "lead to endless controversies and litigation."
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
A major concern is the requirement that at least 15% of parents must jointly file a complaint for it to be considered. "In a school with 3,000 students, getting signatures from 450 parents is near to impossible," said AAP Delhi state president Saurabh Bharadwaj. "This is a direct conspiracy to ensure no complaint can ever be filed."
Bharadwaj also highlighted that the bill scraps audit provisions and removes prior approval clauses that applied to schools on govt land. "Despite earlier promises, govt has erased all audit mechanisms from the bill. Where are the audit reports that were promised in April?" he asked.
Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva said Bharadwaj had bypassed his own legislative party leader, making premature comments on the education bill for self-promotion.
"It would have been better if Saurabh Bharadwaj had waited until the bill was tabled in the monsoon session before commenting on it," he said.
The composition of school-level committees has drawn particular ire, as five out of ten members will represent the school, and parent representatives will be selected via a lottery conducted by the school itself. Critics allege this system gives school management disproportionate control.
Educationist Mahesh Mishra echoed these concerns, saying the bill "validates parents' fears" and "legalises commercialisation of education under govt protection." He noted the absence of annual CAG audits and said the bill is "not just anti-parent, but a direct attack on the middle class."
Refuting the allegations, Delhi education minister Ashish Sood said the criticism was politically motivated and ignored the policy's intent. "All these days critics were saying the bill hasn't been framed. Now that we have framed it, got it approved by the cabinet, and are introducing it well before the session, they are calling it undemocratic," Sood told TOI. "Those who could not regulate fee hikes for 27 years — under whom so many litigations occurred — are now raising questions about a policy that aims to curb malpractices?"
On the charge of bureaucratic complexity, Sood said: "It is the first time that parents, teachers and non-teaching staff have been included as stakeholders.
When they are part of the system, how will it create bureaucratic hurdles? Having different layers doesn't mean hierarchy. It means participation. We are putting a system in place that will demolish the 'Shiksha Kranti' narrative used to exploit parents."
With widespread fee hikes, up to 82% in some schools, already implemented this April, opposition leaders questioned how the bill plans to roll them back. "This law protects the education mafia, not the parents," Bharadwaj said, demanding answers from the chief minister and education minister.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Friendship Day wishes
,
messages
and
quotes
!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Parents divided over bill, protest planned outside assembly today
New Delhi: On the day Delhi govt introduced the education bill in the assembly, the city witnessed a divide among parents. While a section of them announced plans to protest outside the assembly on Tuesday, calling the bill an attack on their rights, others welcomed it as a long-awaited step towards greater regulation and transparency in school fee structures. According to the protesting parents, the proposed bill dilutes their ability to raise fee-related complaints by mandating that at least 15% of the parents in a school must jointly support a grievance before it can be formally registered. They allege that this requirement will discourage individual voices and limit accountability. The bill, they claim, gives private schools unchecked powers to introduce vague new fee categories that could justify arbitrary hikes. It also seeks to retrospectively legalise previously unauthorised charges—fees earlier deemed illegal—thereby undermining past rulings and weakening trust between parents and school administrations, they allege. The removal of mandatory financial audits, they argue, will further shield schools from scrutiny. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi "What is particularly alarming is a clause that restricts parents from approaching civil courts over fee disputes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top Audiologists Angry About New $160 Device That Makes Hearing Crystal Clear Again Top Trending News Today Learn More Undo This provision, along with the overall weakening of the Delhi School Education Act rules, will leave families vulnerable to exploitation. Instead of safeguarding the interests of students and parents, the bill appears to favour private school lobbies," one parent remarked. Defending the bill, education minister Ashish Sood said, "Within four months of our tenure, we are on track to introduce this bill. I assure people that their concerns will be deliberated in Vidhan Sabha and addressed." Despite the assurances, aggrieved parents plan to gather outside the assembly. "This protest is about protecting our children's future and standing up for an accountable, equitable education system," a parent said. Meanwhile, another group of parents argued that the bill addressed long-standing grievances. A school's parent association described the bill as "a structured and transparent framework" designed to curb arbitrary fee hikes and hidden charges. "It proposes prior approval for fee increases, mandatory public disclosure of school financial records and penalties for violations. These measures are a significant step forward," it stated.


Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Delhi govt forms committees to draft new excise and electric vehicle policies
New Delhi: Delhi govt has constituted two separate ministerial committees to formulate a "transparent and socially secure" excise policy and an "effective and public-centric" electric vehicle policy. These committees will submit their reports to chief minister Rekha Gupta. The committee formed to create the excise policy will be headed by PWD minister Parvesh Verma, while the one on the EV policy will be chaired by home minister Ashish Sood. All other ministers in Gupta's cabinet will be members of both committees. The decision to form the panels was made in the cabinet meeting held last Tuesday, but the information was shared by the govt only this Monday. "Our govt is dedicated to the people of Delhi and is continuously making decisions in the public interest," CM Rekha Gupta said. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Delhi govt is continuing with the old excise policy, which was in place until Nov 2021 when the then AAP govt replaced it with the now-withdrawn Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22. The old policy was re-implemented on Sept 1, 2022, with an important change of handing the retail liquor business completely to the govt corporations, with no role for private players. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Discover the AI-powered language app that's changing how everyone learns Talkpal AI The policy has been extended several times, the latest being on July 1 for nine months until the end of the 2025-26 financial year. Gupta earlier formed a committee under the chairmanship of chief secretary Dharmendra to deliberate upon various aspects of the liquor business in Delhi and even prepared a draft of the new policy. However, the govt decided to deliberate more on the issue and postponed the announcement of a new policy by nine months. Delhi govt also extended the current Electric Vehicle Policy until March 31, 2026, or until a new one is officially notified, whichever comes first, a few days ago. The extension was approved in a cabinet meeting chaired by the chief minister. Officials said the govt wanted more time to conduct public consultations before rolling out a revised, future-ready policy. The draft of the new policy is still under discussion and will involve inputs from citizens, industry players, environmental experts, academic institutions, and private stakeholders.


New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
BJP's cleanliness drive only publicity stunt, lacked sincerity: AAP
NEW DELHI: The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) criticised the BJP-led Delhi government's cleanliness drive, calling it a public spectacle. AAP Delhi State President Saurabh Bharadwaj posted on 'X', 'CM Rekha Gupta is in Greater Kailash today and a mega cleanliness drive is supposedly underway. Just look at the condition between GK-1 gurudwara and mandir - garbage everywhere.' He said the initiative lacked proper planning and adequate sanitation staff. 'Delhi won't become clean with 10 minutes of sweeping or photo-ops. Only sanitation workers can truly clean Delhi,' he added. He highlighted that despite a religious event and prayer gathering underway, garbage bins in the area were overflowing. He further accused the CM of hypocrisy, saying, 'The entire Greater Kailash was plastered with CM's hoardings, the same leader who criticised Delhiites for defacing the city with posters.' 'Initiative lacks sincerity' Saurabh Bharadwaj said the BJP's Swachhata Abhiyan lacked sincerity and was reduced to a publicity stunt, with no real improvement on-ground in sanitation.