
Americans Have a 'Magic Number' They Need for Retirement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Americans believe they need a "magic number" to retire comfortably, far beyond what many have been able to save.
According to a study from Northwestern Mutual that polled more than 4,600 adults in January, Americans think they need $1.26 million to comfortably retire. For those aiming to retire in 30 years, the financial math to reach this goal is sobering.
To attain the $1.26 million retirement goal based on a 7 percent annual return in investments, a person would need to put away approximately $1,035 each month, which amounts to $12,420 annually. If they're saving 15 percent of their income—a commonly recommended target for retirement savings—this would require an annual salary of around $82,800, more than $20,000 more than the national median salary of $61,984.
However, the study reveals that 25 percent of Americans have saved only one year or less of their current annual income for retirement, and over half fear they will outlive their savings. Gen Xers, who are next in line to retire after baby boomers, are particularly concerned, with 54 percent believing they will not be financially prepared when the time comes.
Why Is Retiring Getting Harder?
While commonly touted as the "golden years" of life, a comfortable retirement is becoming out of reach for plenty of Americans. In an era where the cost of living continues to outpace wages and traditional retirement structures have all but vanished, saving for retirement has transformed from a long-term financial goal into a daily struggle for many Americans.
Bobbi Rebell, CFP and personal finance expert at BadCredit.org, frames the situation starkly.
"The recent market downturn, despite its recovery, was a big reminder that retirement funding is fragile," she told Newsweek. "It has never been easy but it has been something that Americans did not have to think about as directly in the past because many had pensions as well as family support systems in place to help control the variables."
That foundation has steadily eroded. Gone are the days when defined benefit pensions formed a safety net for retirees. Today, most workers rely on self-directed savings plans—if they're lucky enough to have access to them at all, Rebell explained.
"Not only have defined benefit plans like pensions become rare," Rebell notes, "but self-directed defined contribution plans, like 401(k)s, are not available for many people who work in the gig economy. It is no wonder people feel vulnerable and are lowering their expectations when it comes to their retirement nest egg."
Composite image created by Newsweek.
Composite image created by Newsweek.
Newsweek Illustration / Canva
Ashley Morgan, a debt and bankruptcy lawyer and owner at Ashley F Morgan Law, echoes the difficulty facing workers, especially in a volatile housing market.
"Cost of living has been steadily on the rise. Saving for retirement is difficult for many with living costs rising and retirement costs being stagnant," she told Newsweek.
She adds that one of the most common retirement strategies—building home equity over time—is increasingly out of reach.
"Now, since younger generations are not buying properties or house prices are so high that mortgage payments are substantial, saving for retirement is not possible when you have a mortgage."
Renters, in particular, are at a disadvantage, often facing rising housing expenses that eat into any potential savings. "With increasing rent," Morgan explains, "it means increases in income are automatically offset, at least to a certain degree."
Another significant challenge is the shift in employment patterns.
"Many people work for smaller companies or perform contracting jobs like gig work," says Morgan. These jobs typically don't offer retirement benefits, and the lack of employer matching makes it less appealing to contribute independently. Frequently changing your job also makes it difficult to accumulate long-term savings.
Then there are student loans—a burden that can linger well into what should be peak retirement savings years. While some of these borrowers have recently been protected by pandemic-era rules that stopped the collection of unpaid education debts, the Trump administration has now ordered the Department of Education to begin resuming forced collections, which can result in wage and Social Security garnishment.
"I unfortunately see people in their 60s still paying student loans, some for their own educations and some for their children," Morgan said. "These student loans often are paid at the expense of saving for retirement."
These compounding factors, which have made saving more difficult, also mean many are working later in life than previous generations.
A 2023 report from the Pew Research Center revealed that about one in five Americans aged 65 and older were still working, almost double the proportion from 35 years ago.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 8.2 million people over 65 were employed in February 2015. By February 2025, that number had grown to 11.1 million, marking a 35 percent increase. A recent study by Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies found that more than half of current workers—52 percent—plan to work at least part-time in retirement.
While acknowledging these challenges, Rebell does see a silver lining in the growing trend of older workers.
"The growing trend of older workers is not necessarily a bad thing. Working gives purpose and can provide an extra layer of financial security," she said. "As people live healthier for longer lives, staying in the workforce longer makes a lot of sense."
But for millions of Americans, working longer may not be a choice, but a necessity. With financial pressures mounting and support systems weakened, the modern retirement landscape is less a peaceful reward for years of work and more a shifting target that is becoming harder and harder to attain.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
10 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
US Retirement Savings Rates Reach Record High in First Quarter: Fidelity
Americans saved for their golden years at a record pace to kick off 2025, a new In the first quarter, 401(k) savings rates reached an all-time high of 14.3 percent. This was driven by a 9.5 percent employee contribution rate and a 4.8 percent employer contribution rate, falling short of Fidelity's suggested savings rate of 15 percent.


Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
GOP Senator Flummoxed By Trump Adviser's Response To Tariff Question
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Republican senator was stumped on Wednesday when Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said the U.S. would not lift tariffs on another country even if that country agreed to a reciprocal trade deal with the U.S. Why It Matters Lutnick's response appeared to fly in the face of President Donald Trump's claim that the U.S. is seeking trade "reciprocity" with its partners around the world. Trump has repeatedly accused other countries, including some of the U.S.'s closest trading partners, of taking advantage of the U.S. and in April levied steep tariffs against almost every country around the world in an effort to renegotiate more balanced trading relationships. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, left, speaks, as President Donald Trump, right, and Vice President JD Vance, center, listening as a trade deal with United Kingdom in announced in the Oval Office of the White House,... Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, left, speaks, as President Donald Trump, right, and Vice President JD Vance, center, listening as a trade deal with United Kingdom in announced in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, May 8, 2025, in Washington. More Evan Vucci/AP What To Know Lutnick got into a back-and-forth with Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana on Wednesday while testifying on Capitol Hill. Kennedy asked Lutnick if the U.S. would accept a zero-to-zero trade deal with Vietnam, saying, "If Vietnam, for example, came to you tomorrow and said, 'Okay, Mr. Secretary, you win, we're going to remove all tariffs and all trade barriers.' Would the United States please do the same? Would you accept that deal?" "Absolutely not," Lutnick said while smirking. "Absolutely not. That would be the silliest thing we could do." "Why is that?" Kennedy asked. "Vietnam has $125 billion of exports to us and imports from us $12.5 million ... Where do they get it from? They buy 90 billion [dollars worth] from China, then they mark it up and send it to us. It's just a pathway of China to us," Lutnick said. "So you wouldn't accept that deal?" Kennedy pressed. "It's a terrible deal," Lutnick replied. "We're the ones with money, we're the one with the stores. Of course, they want us to take it down." "What's the purpose of reciprocity then?" Kennedy shot back. "Is reciprocity not one of your goals? Are you telling the president that we shouldn't seek reciprocity? If that's what you're telling him, why are you trying to do these trade deals?" Lutnick began to say the U.S. wants to "encourage" Vietnam to produce more, but Kennedy cut him off, saying, "I want to get back to reciprocity." "You just said you don't ... accept reciprocity as a goal. What are you negotiating in these trade deals?" Lutnick pushed back: "Why would we open our bank account—" "But why are you negotiating trade deals?" Kennedy said, speaking over him. "You're trying to get other countries to lower their tariffs and trade barriers in return for us lowering ours. That's called reciprocity." "Of course," Lutnick said. "So are you or are you not seeking reciprocity in these trade deals?" Kennedy pressed. "We are absolutely seeking reciprocity with respect to things that can be reciprocal, but when you're importing from China and sending it to us, they're not—" Lutnick said, before Kennedy again cut him off. "But you just said that if a country came to you and offered you the ultimate reciprocity—no tariffs, no trade barriers, in return for us doing the same—you would reject that?" the Louisiana Republican said. "Of course, because they buy from China and send it to us," Lutnick said. Kennedy asked him how the U.S. would respond if a trade partner pledged that they wouldn't buy products from China and resell them to the U.S., to which Lutnick replied, "Now we're talking." "Would you accept that deal?" Kennedy said. "We would consider it," Lutnick said. This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available. Update 06/04/25 2:40 p.m. ET: This article has been updated with additional information.


Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Bernie Sanders Agrees With Elon Musk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Progressive Senator Bernie Sanders, who has held rallies for months as part of his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour, echoed billionaire Elon Musk on President Donald Trump's spending proposal, saying on social media the so-called "big, beautiful bill" is a "disgusting abomination." Newsweek has reached out to Sanders' press team and X's press team on behalf of Musk via email for comment on Wednesday. Newsweek has also reached out to Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune via email on Wednesday. Why It Matters Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with the Democrats, has been outspoken against billionaires like Musk and their political influence, calling it a "shadow government," thus the convergence between Sanders and Musk is notable. Although Sanders has been actively campaigning against the influence of billionaires in American politics, he has at times sided with Musk on a handful of topics, including reducing Pentagon funding. The Trump-backed reconciliation package passed the House last month following weeks of negotiations in which House Speaker Mike Johnson wrangled votes from the ultraconservative and more centrist factions of the GOP. While Trump praised the measure in its current form, Senate Republicans have made it clear that they plan to make significant changes to it before it passes the upper chamber. What To Know On Tuesday, Sanders shared Musk's X, formerly Twitter, post, adding: "Musk is right: this bill IS a 'disgusting abomination.'" His post continued: "We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1%. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programs to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination." The bill, which is the centerpiece of Trump's domestic agenda, including wide-ranging tax cuts and extra money for the military and border security, has been labeled by Musk as a "massive, outrageous, pork-filled," and a "disgusting abomination." Musk served as one of Trump's top advisors, previously leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cost-cutting task force. On Tuesday, he took to his social media outlet X to denounce the spending bill in a series of posts. (L):Elon Musk attends news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (R): Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is seen during the Senate Health, Education,... (L):Elon Musk attends news conference with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (R): Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is seen during the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing titled "FY2026 Department of Health and Human Services Budget," in Dirksen building on Wednesday, May 14, 2025. More AP Photo/Evan VucciTom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images He said the bill undermines DOGE's efforts to cut federal spending and warned that it leaves "American taxpayers saddled with crushingly unsustainable debt." The bill is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt, according to analysis published by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on Wednesday. Musk previously estimated DOGE would save $2 trillion in federal spending. It has achieved $160 billion in cuts and eliminated 20,000 federal jobs—roughly 1 percent of the workforce. In another post on his social media account, Sanders voiced his agreement with Musk's stance, touching on its social and programmatic implications, saying: "When Mr. Musk, the wealthiest man alive & major campaign contributor, expresses strong distaste for Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, Republicans will listen & obey. That means more cuts to Medicaid, nutrition & education. The oligarchs want it ALL. We're not going to let that happen." Other lawmakers have offered partial support to Musk's stance on the bill, such as Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and staunch supporter of President Trump. She did vote for the bill but said later that had she known about a section that "strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years...I would have voted NO..." What People Are Saying White House Press Secretary Karolina Leavitt said during a Tuesday briefing when asked about Musk's response: "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." Bernie Sanders in a Wednesday X post: "If Musk & his pals are so concerned about increasing the national debt in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, why don't they cut the $664 billion in tax breaks for the 1%; the $420 billion in tax breaks for large profitable corporations; & the $150 billion in increased military spending?" Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene told reporters on Tuesday: "Well, you know, I have to agree with him [Musk] on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it. I think that should've been happening for years now. I mean, we're $36 trillion in debt for a reason." Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters on Tuesday: "We obviously respect everything that Elon did with DOGE. On this particular issue, we have a difference of opinion ... he's entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead." Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, in a tweet this afternoon in reference to Musk's comments: "He's right." What Happens Next Trump recently gave Senate Republicans a July 4 deadline to pass the bill and get it to his desk.